The hunt for a proper opening pair continues
Barely had they recovered from the wounds inflicted upon them in Australia when the Indians were asked to wave the magic wand to ward off their cricketing blues in the Test series against South Africa
Natarajan Sriram
09-Mar-2000
Barely had they recovered from the wounds inflicted upon them in
Australia when the Indians were asked to wave the magic wand to ward
off their cricketing blues in the Test series against South
Africa. But not unexpectedly, they surrendered meekly when pitted
against plainly superior opposition. Of the number of reasons given
for the debacle, one which seems to get top priority is the lack of a
suitable opening pair.
Only the genuine opener possesses the twin qualities of technique and
temperament to face the new ball successfully and counter the initial
movement off the seam and the pitch. A good opening partnership really
sets the platform for the later order batsmen to open the floodgates
to a good total.
So it does come as a shocker when we see that the last time that India
had a genuine opening pair in the team was when Arun lal and Srikkanth
last appeared togather in the third and final Test against New Zealand
at Hyderabad in 1988.
Since the time Sunil Gavaskar retired after the India-Pakistan series
in 1987, India have played 28 pairs of openers so far in 86 Tests. Out
of this line up, Arun lal, Vikram Rathour, Devang Gandhi, Sadagopan
Ramesh and Wasim Jaffer were the only players who have been considered
for the Indian team on their merit of being an opener. The rest of the
lot includes make shift openers such as Ravi Shastri, Navjot Sidhu,
Manoj Prabakar, Ajay Jadeja, Nayan Mongia, Sanjay Manjrekar, Rahul
Dravid, WV Raman and VVS Laxman to name a few.
A glance at the records will show that the selectors inexplicably seem
to have placed more faith on players pushed up the order rather than
genuine openers. Between 1987 and 1989, Arun lal opened the innings
for India in only 11 Tests along with Srikkanth and later on with
Sidhu.
After the exit of both Srikkanth and Arun lal, the next real opener to
come in was Rathour in the first India-England Test at Birmingham in
1996. But he was not very successful, scoring only 131 runs at an
average of 13.10 in six Tests before being dropped. In this short
tenure, his partners were Jadeja, Mongia and Raman. For a brief period
in the late 90s, Ramesh seemed to be the answer to the selectors'
prayers. But he came a cropper on the faster and bouncier tracks in
Australia. The next to catch the selectors fancy was Devang Gandhi
during the New Zealand tour of India last year but he has since been
dropped after playing only four Tests and not a very impressive
record.
Moreover, from 1987 to 2000, the contributions of the make shift
openers have been nothing to write home about. There have been eight
100 plus parnerships in the post Gavaskar period. On the contrary
there have been 11 occasions on which the batsmen have failed to even
open their account and 35 times the pairing has realised below ten for
the first wicket. In these failures, the Indian openers have seven of
the 11 duck partnerships on foreign soil, whereas, of the eight
hundred run partnerships, only three have been made outside India.
It is clearly seen that the inherent failures of the irregular openers
has by far been our chief drawback. It has led to the dismal show of
the team on foreign tours. So it has become imperative that
specialists are to be nurtured. They should be given enough confidence
and encouragement at the international level primarily in games at
home before they are sent on foreign tours.