Wanted: A compliant figurehead
The ICC board's refusal to back John Howard as its next vice-president is a disgrace and an insult to Australia and New Zealand, the former ICC chief executive Malcolm Speed writes in the Age .
Under previous rotation systems, Australia and New Zealand have accepted nominations when they clearly had strong reservations about the candidates. They expected the same respect for their choice, instead they and Howard were insulted.
Australia's central aim for nominating Howard was to bring good governance to the ICC and give cricket a broader standing on the world stage. The ICC is not interested in good governance, as it showed by sacking its previous chief executive, Malcolm Speed, for attempting to bring Zimbabwe to account.
Howard's nomination should have been a rubber-stamp exercise. That it was not points to deep unease among the non-white member nations - India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Sri Lanka and the West Indies, along with Zimbabwe's neighbour, South Africa - about whether Howard was a good fit for the job, and a person they could happily work with. Cricket Australia deserved no better.
Brydon Coverdale is an assistant editor at ESPNcricinfo. He tweets here