Australia v Sri Lanka, 2nd Test, Melbourne December 23, 2012

'Never doubted there was a role for me'

Mitchell Johnson's impressive comeback after a year in Perth showed his value hasn't been lost to Australia

This time last year, Mitchell Johnson's family and friends were in Melbourne for the Boxing Day Test on a trip that had been planned for some time. The only problem was that Johnson wasn't. This year his family is at home - his wife Jessica and their baby girl Rubika, born less than three weeks ago, are home in Perth - but Johnson is back at the MCG preparing for his fifth Boxing Day Test. And awaiting Johnson is a milestone that few Australians have achieved.

If Johnson can pick up four more wickets, he will join Ray Lindwall, Richie Benaud, Merv Hughes, Shane Warne, Jason Gillespie and Brett Lee as the only Australians to have accumulated 1000 runs and 200 wickets in Tests. It might not be the achievement it once was, given the greater number of matches these days, but it still gives an indication of what Johnson has provided for Australia over the past five years.

The fact that the milestone is within his grasp is a credit to Johnson, for this time last year he could have been finished as a Test cricketer. The foot injury that an out-of-form Johnson suffered during the Johannesburg Test last November saved the selectors a decision over his future, for Pat Cummins, James Pattinson and Mitchell Starc were all emerging, while the more experienced trio of Peter Siddle, Ben Hilfenhaus and Ryan Harris remained solid.

But Johnson, 31, has followed the example of his mentor Dennis Lillee, who returned from back injuries later in his career as a smarter bowler, thinking more about his approach and using his quicker bouncers sparingly as a shock weapon. It worked for him in state cricket earlier this summer, and during his comeback Test at the WACA against South Africa, there were few of the terrible deliveries that had given batsmen respite during the previous couple of years.

"I've still got to have that aggressive streak as a fast bowler," Johnson said. "That intimidation does work for me. It's just using it at the right time. I felt like I used it pretty well in Perth. Using that bouncer at the right time has really worked for me, and getting that right length and getting a bit of swing has been key for me this year.

"I was pretty nervous [in Perth]. I probably didn't show it. The first over or so was a little bit nerve-wracking. Playing state cricket you don't get the crowds, you don't get the media, so the pressure is very different. It was quite different out there when I started bowling. You just realise that all these people are watching you again and the media is there and so on."

That Johnson emerged with match figures of 6 for 164 was creditable, and the way he bowled suggested that he can play an ongoing role for the Test team. It won't be as the spearhead, and it won't be in every Test, but if Australia continued rotating the fast men through the side, they will have some confidence that Johnson can be part of that group - and will bring with him the experience of five years of Test cricket.

"I never doubted there was a role there for me, it was just whether I would be getting the opportunity again," he said. "We've got a lot of young, talented players and you're going to have to work your way back, you don't just come back in. I've been working really hard and I've got to keep working hard."

Johnson is expected to play on Boxing Day, though it appears unlikely it will be in concert with his fellow left-armer Mitchell Starc, who might be rested. Johnson and Starc played together at the WACA, and he believes there is no reason a pair of left-armers should be treated any differently at the selection table to a couple of right-arm bowlers.

"I don't see why there's so much talk about it," Johnson said. "The only thing I can think of is it doesn't generally happen in Australian cricket. If you look back at the history there haven't been too many left-arm combinations. But myself and Dougie [Bollinger] have done well and myself and Mitch Starc have done well so far. I don't see any difference in why we can't have two left-armers."

Brydon Coverdale is an assistant editor at ESPNcricinfo. He tweets here

Comments have now been closed for this article

  • Kevin on December 25, 2012, 22:32 GMT

    Johnson's problem is not that he bowls too many loose deliveries, its that he bowls them too fast. If he looses 20 kph and gains 20kg, and continues to bowl short and wide, he could be a world beater. It worked for Ian Botham didn't it?

  • Colin on December 25, 2012, 22:26 GMT

    The fact this guy is anywhere near the Aussie team, shows how very poor this Aussie team have become. How can he get a game after spraying it around for test after test is beyond me. I really hope he gets an Ashes place. He will cop a lot of banter and he has already shown how weak and soft he is when the chips are down. Another Aussie with no heart.

  • joel on December 24, 2012, 15:09 GMT

    Jono Makim , Broad was injured for the last 2 test matches in India . He hasnt been dropped by England , hes on the plane to New Zealand for the ODIs .

  • joel on December 24, 2012, 14:57 GMT

    I hope he gets selected for next years Ashes , that way Alastair Cook will be able to pass Goochies record ! .

  • Dummy4 on December 24, 2012, 12:32 GMT

    @LillianThomson, I think England looked most dangerous with Finn and Anderson in their attack, their two best quicks. Picking a bowler for their batting doesn't work in my view. I think Bresnan got a duck in the last test. I think if Australia is going to pick a bowling allrounder then it should be O'Keefe. At the moment i'd be picking Siddle, Starc, Lyon, O'Keefe and Watson in my starting xi. Starc's ability to swing the new ball and he's ability to bowl full and straight with the old ball will trouble the Indian batsmen in my view. Johnsons tactic of banging in half trackers to unsettle the batsmen and then hope they play a poor shot to a full delivery, in my opinion, will not work.

  • Graham on December 24, 2012, 12:26 GMT

    Johnson at his best was a very good bowler, Wisden cricketer of the year. He has the ability and pace to really hurry batsman. He showed that ability in Perth and I believe he can again show that in Melbourne. At his best I would have him, Siddle and Pattinson as our three best bowlers

  • j on December 24, 2012, 9:48 GMT

    Johnson - He bowls to the left, he bowls to the rriighht...(Please continue Aussie fans - that's if you remember the last Ashes).

  • David on December 24, 2012, 9:10 GMT

    @Jono Makim To be fair, Broad was injured and bowling at half-pace.

    India went into the last couple of Tests with 1 fast bowler and 3 spinners, while England had 1 fast bowler, 1 medium-paced all-rounder and 2 spinners.

    I think that Siddle is an obvious starter for reverse swinging reasons, but after that we have to understand that any second quick bowler in India has to be worth his place with the bat. And to me that means Mitch Johnson ahead of Mitch Starc.

    I would point out the roles of Junaid Khan and Aizaz Cheema as Pakistan's second quick bowler early in 2012 when England toured the UAE. They were lucky to get a bowl at all in some completed innings.

    Lastly, many of Mitch's past problems mirrored problems beyond his control in his family life. He doesn't seem to always handle that well. But all seems settled currently, and he looked better than Starc at the WACA.

  • Dummy4 on December 24, 2012, 8:13 GMT

    @Meety, really? That is not good! I hope the J Bird has been for a trim up and looking sharp for Boxing Day.... @Busie, the greatest talent Johnson has is that of natural athleticism, unfortunately he has never developed the bowling skills to go with it. Its not just about the mental aspect, it is also about skill. He will suffer more quickly, mentally, than others because he doesn't have the skill set to fall back on. If the ball or pitch aren't doing anything than he is canon fodder. He knows it and quickly falls apart when things are not going well.... @LillianThomson, Johnson, in India? That isn't going to end well, and your man Broad whom you hold up as a model case was just dropped from the England team.

  • David on December 24, 2012, 7:53 GMT

    @Tintaman Not being in the top six fast bowlers might matter if Johnson was a right-armer who bats at number eleven.

    But he isn't: he is an out-and-out fast left-armer who averages 20+ with the bat.

    That variety is important. Doubly important in India, where Pattinson, Hilfenhaus and other right-arm quicks are going to be irrelevant, apart from Siddle who can reverse the ball on rough surfaces.

    Siddle + Johnson + Watson is already probably one quick bowler too many for Indian conditions.

    A large part of the value of Stuart Broad is that ability to score runs as well as take wickets, but Johnson has the added value of being both faster and having the different angle a left-armer brings.

  • No featured comments at the moment.