Australia news February 5, 2013

Watson's Test recall not guaranteed


Michael Clarke has warned his vice-captain Shane Watson that he faces much stiffer competition for a place in Australia's Test team by choosing to play as a batsman rather than an allrounder.

Watson will return to international cricket in Wednesday's ODI against West Indies in Canberra, ahead of the four-Test tour of India, having spent a month out of the game due to a calf injury that he aggravated during the Boxing Day Test.

For the time being Watson has decided not to bowl, as it has typically been bowling that has caused his many injury problems over the years. He is desperate to enjoy a sustained run in the national team instead of constantly battling niggles. Although he hopes to be in a position to start bowling again ahead of this year's Ashes tour, Watson will for the time being need to justify his place as a batsman only.

"I don't think anybody walks into the Australian cricket team. It's about performance, and the strength of Shane is that he's performed over a period of time, in all three forms of the game," Clarke said. "He's vice-captain of the team and it will be great to have Watto back.

"As I've said to Watto, while he's not bowling he goes into a much bigger pool of players ... the pool of batsmen is much bigger than the pool of allrounders in Australian cricket at the moment. But Shane knows if he's at his best, he's as good as any player in the world, let alone in the Australian team. Our goal as a team is to help Watto get back to his best."

On Monday night in Melbourne, Watson was named the Twenty20 International Player of the Year at the Allan Border Medal ceremony, no surprise given his dominance with bat and ball at the World T20 in Sri Lanka last year. But it has also been an injury-plagued pair of summers for Watson, who missed all of the 2011-12 home Tests with calf and hamstring problems and managed only three of the six played this season.

His position in the batting order has also been variable: in November 2011 he was opening on the tour of South Africa, then he filled the No.3 spot for most of his appearances last year before slipping down into the No.4 space vacated by Ricky Ponting in December. Watson has spoken of his desire to return to the opening position in Test cricket at some point but he is aware that he needs to be happy with any spot available for him as a batsman only.

"At this point in time it is purely as a batsman and wherever I fit in," Watson said of his role in the Test side. "It's been something that I've been thinking about for a long period of time, especially over the last 12 months, when things haven't gone exactly to plan with my body. Hopefully I can just get some continuity with my batting over the next few months and then slowly build into getting some bowling under my belt.

"The perfect world for me would be making sure I'm able to bowl and contribute with the ball during the Ashes. I know that's looking a long way forward, but even just physically to be able to give myself a chance to get to that is a dream for me at the moment."

Over the course of Watson's career, he has played 38 Tests of a possible 89, the majority having been missed through injury, and his main goal now is to allow himself to pursue a period of stability. That begins with the remaining three ODIs against West Indies, his first matches back at the elite level after returning via grade cricket and a Ryobi Cup match for New South Wales last week.

"One of the hardest things about being injured is coming back and trying to find form as quick as you possibly can," Watson said. "Hopefully I can do that over the next couple of weeks leading into the Indian Test series. Then we'll see how things evolve from there. But I'm certainly not getting in front of myself because I know how quickly it can change.

"The times when I've had the most success playing for Australia has been when I've been able to play games back to back. That's been one of the most frustrating things about the past 12 months, it seems like a lot of the times when I've been playing I've been coming back from injury, which makes it difficult to be able to build some momentum and find some form and hold some form, which I've been able to do in the past."

Brydon Coverdale is an assistant editor at ESPNcricinfo. He tweets here

Comments have now been closed for this article

  • John on February 7, 2013, 5:27 GMT

    Maybe Michael Clarke is right and at his best Watson is as good as any player in the world, but with two centuries from 69 test innings, he isn't at his best in tests very often. The problem with selecting him as an opener is that Australia then has a gap at #6. Mad Max doesn't look like a top 6 batsman yet, Wade would be better left at #7 and Henriques is a bowling allrounder and even #7 is a stretch. Steve Smith (whom I have defended in these forums) might be up to it, but he hasn't been consistent yet.

    If Watson is going to play as an opener, why is Cowan there at all? Cowan's strength is taking the shine off the new ball. Playing him in the middle order in India, where the ball will be turning by the time he gets in, would be wildly optimistic rather than sensible. I suspect the order will be Cowan, Warner, Hughes, Watson, Clarke, Khawaja, Wade- for the first test, at least. After that, evaluation will be based on results.

  • Varun on February 6, 2013, 21:48 GMT

    My Test XIs' for Australia's tour of India: AUS: David Warner, Shane Watson, Phillip Hughes, Michael Clarke (C), Usman Khawaja, Matthew Wade (wk), George Bailey (who would bat above No. 6) / Glenn Maxwell / Moises Henriques, Mitchell Johnson, Peter Siddle, Mitchell Starc / Xavier Doherty (based on which all rounder is selected at No. 7), Nathan Lyon. IND: Gautam Gambhir / Ajinkya Rahane, Virender Sehwag, Cheteshwar Pujara, Sachin Tendulkar, Virat Kohli, Rohit Sharma (maybe Manoj Tiwary), MS Dhoni (C&wk), Harbhajan Singh, R Ashwin, Zaheer Khan, Umesh Yadav.

  • Baundule on February 6, 2013, 19:53 GMT

    Watson should play as an opener. Full stop. Do not reinvent the wheel. Questioning about his inclusion in the playing XI is ridiculous. He is special and he must be treated in that way.

  • david on February 6, 2013, 14:35 GMT

    im not sure why not, maybe not in the top 3 but how people can still write that hes not cemented a place in the team is nonsense.

  • Peter on February 6, 2013, 12:07 GMT

    @Meety. At full strength, he is behind 7 guys at Western Australia alone! One dayers he is in the mix, but tests? He needs to get a bucketload of runs in the shield & I mean an absolute bucketload, something he has failed to do for over 10 seasons already. What is it with his supporters?

  • Andrew on February 6, 2013, 9:02 GMT

    @Chris_P on (February 6, 2013, 8:21 GMT) - I am happy S Marsh got some runs v QLD, but gee whiz it doesn't take many runs from him & his legion of fans come out of the woodwork! I couldn't justify S Marsh in any Test side for a year (after strong Shield form), a maybe for the ODI side, but personally think he is behind 6 or 7 others in that format!

  • Peter on February 6, 2013, 8:21 GMT

    @Lewis_Edwards. You mean the same Shaun Marsh who has scored 152 runs this season @19? What we need to do is select batsman who are in form thank you very much, Shaun Marsh isn't even scoring runs in Perth grade. Steve Smith, fyi, has scored 363 @ 40 this season & you still think Marsh deserves a gig before him? And let's bot forget Smith is way ahead of him in his career average. Khawaia is one person who is in form & selected, but why not Doolan, easily yhe most in form batsman in the Shield? Try looking up current stats, we all have our favourites, but let's llok at this with an unbiased view.

  • Mark on February 6, 2013, 7:09 GMT

    @Lewis_Edwards - Marsh has a hell of a lot of talent, but no form to speak of. He wont get anywhere near the test team until he can start putting runs on the board. I personally would have Ferguson in the squad. He is a proven performer at international level (outstanding form in ODI's before his injury) and is one of the leading batsmen in shield cricket this year.

  • Eddie on February 6, 2013, 6:23 GMT

    i would never pick cowan again, hes had his chance more than 10 tests is enough to prove what u can do. Plus ed cant play spin, i dont like clarke undermining his deputy, maybe theres some jealousy or nervousness there with all the attention watson gets. my team for india would be warner, watson, hughes, clarke, khawaja, bailey, wade, starc, siddle, bird, lyon

  • Andrew on February 6, 2013, 5:05 GMT

    Ahh gotta love cricket! I more or less said "what sort of form will Watto gain out of playing in an ODI v a Shield match?" - the answer appears to be FORM!!!! Can't buy a run domestically, but now he is slaying them atm! Always said he was a great batsmen (cough/choke)! LOL!