Australia news June 10, 2011

Katich shakes Australian cricket


Simon Katich has given Australian cricket a mighty shake. In the most extraordinary public repudiation of Cricket Australia and its selectors, Katich laid bare the discontent among players around the country about the ways of the national selection panel and the part-time nature of its work.

Both Katich and his former Australian team-mate Stuart Clark were adamant about the need to implement a system whereby the selectors were employed full-time and made to be as accountable for their decisions as the players are for their performances.

In just one of many memorable lines, Katich summed up the incongruity of $2 million-earning players being judged by part-time selectors on $40,000 a year by saying "when you talk about money you get the best in the business for paying. If you pay peanuts you get monkeys".

"There's been talk about that (full-time selectors) for a while now but nothing's been done about it," Katich said. "It's a business, there's no doubt about that, that's just the way sport has gone. Being realistic it's got to go that way, because you're dealing with guys' careers. This is not just me, there's plenty of other guys out there as well who've gone through this. So maybe something good will come out of this situation.

"Technically I'm still contracted until the end of June 30. So no doubt the phone will ring and I'll probably have to answer for this. But at the same time, I'm not going to stand up here and lie about it all, because that's not going to help anyone moving forward. Hopefully the review, something good will come out of that review, because this might just be the straw that breaks the camel's back."

Having been removed from the list of CA-contracted players on Tuesday, Katich bided his time to compose himself and decide whether or not to keep playing. His announcement that he would continue for New South Wales was followed by what can only be described as a blitz of angry yet focused and carefully-chosen words about the selectors.

"I'm extremely disappointed and frustrated with the decision I found out about on Tuesday but I also want to make it clear that I know I'm not the only player who has gone through this in the last couple of years due to inconsistent policies," Katich said. "I just hope that something good comes out of this situation because I actually think the decision that came on Tuesday was absolutely ridiculous.

"It certainly didn't come as a total shock on Tuesday, only because I know how they operate. I've been through this situation before. From my point of view, to hear the news was very disappointing, particularly because of the reason that was given. To be given the reason that it's because the opening partnership needs to bed down for 2013, when I know for a fact that Watto [Shane Watson] and I have thoroughly enjoyed opening together, and it's been one of the bright spots of our team in the last two years, I find it very hard to believe that [a new partnership needs to come in].

"This is not just about me but a number of players that have felt aggrieved at how they've been treated by the selectors in particular. Not just the selectors, by CA. There's people above the selectors that make the decisions on their futures and also our players' futures because they ratify the decisions that are made.

"I'm one of a number of players that will be in this situation. Having spoken to Paul Marsh, the ACA boss, there's actually no course of appeal against this happening. As a player we've got absolutely no way apart from legal proceedings to answer back."

Katich said he and his manager Robert Joske had seriously considered legal action, via unfair dismissal laws, before reasoning that it would be better to air his grievances rather than drag them through the courts. His venom was directed as much at CA's management apparatus as the selectors themselves, who were placed in an unenviable position of having to name an early squad for the first Ashes Test due to marketing and publicity demands.

"There needs to be more consistency," Katich said. "The facts are a week or two before the Ashes a squad of 17 was named. In my opinion if you can't know what your best 11 is a week or so before our biggest Test series that we play in the Ashes, that to me reeks of indecision.

"The fact that we've had 10 or 11 spinners in the last two or three years whatever it's been, obviously some have been through retirements and injury and stuff like that, (but) that to me is another indicator of the inconsistency in selections. There's been rules for some and rules for others.

"I'd be lying if I said I didn't (consider retirement), every thought goes through your mind, and this isn't just something I've thought about since Tuesday because I know how they operate and I could see it coming. I've only had a four minute conversation with Andrew Hilditch on Tuesday, and I haven't heard from anyone else at CA since, and I've been involved in the organisation since 1999."
Simon Katich believes he deserved better

"I've got no doubt that it (the 17-man squad) did (unsettle the team) and I'm sure there'll be other players in the team saying the same thing because you've got so many guys looking over their shoulder about whether they would play or not. If you were to compare it to how England prepared, they were settled, they played the same team in all their warm-up games and no surprise that they had a very good campaign."

As for the chairman of selectors Andrew Hilditch and his phone call to deliver the bad news, which took place just before a fitness test for NSW players, Katich felt he deserved better.

"As soon as he told me the reason, which was what was being trotted out in the press about wanting the opening partnership to bed down for the 2013 Ashes, that got me steaming obviously," said Katich. "Because to hear that when our opening partnership is something that's been one of the strong points of the team, and something that Watto and I actually really enjoy doing. I've received a really nice message from him, of support, and expressing his disappointment that we won't get to open again.

"I'd be lying if I said I didn't (consider retirement). Every thought goes through your mind, and this isn't just something I've thought about since Tuesday because I know how they operate and I could see it coming. I've only had a four-minute conversation with Andrew Hilditch on Tuesday, and I haven't heard from anyone else at CA since, and I've been involved in the organisation since 1999."

After Katich's 20 minutes of fury had concluded, Clark said it was "a joke" that the selectors were not all full-time. At present the chairman Andrew Hilditch, plus Jamie Cox and the outgoing David Boon, are employed on a part-time basis, while Greg Chappell is installed as a full-time national talent manager and selector.

"I think it's a joke that they're part-time. You're dealing with $2 million salaries and a guy that works part-time getting $40,000 a year, it's laughable," Clark said. "(Full-time) would make them more accountable. At the moment they have got some sort of accountability, but when was the last time you saw a selector sacked for a poor selection? I can't seem to remember one.

"Selection's a tough ask, you've got to balance a lot of different issues and a lot of different perspectives. Whether this is right I'm not sure, but let's just hope the selection process gets better because of this.

"He's arguably Australia's best batsman over the past three years, so for him not to be selected can only mean that they've just said 'you're too old and we want to go down a youth path' and any other job in the country that'd probably end up in court somewhere.

"A four-minute conversation is probably not enough for someone that's been part of the organisation for 12 years. How long is right I don't know, but surely Simon deserves something more than that."

Listen to the full press conference here

Daniel Brettig is an assistant editor at ESPNcricinfo

Comments have now been closed for this article

  • Andrew on June 13, 2011, 23:55 GMT

    @Anil Kupar - the answer is no they won't, but there is nothing stopping them from handing him a ticket for the plane to SL in August. @TheOnlyEmperor - often disagree with you, but on this occasion I do agree. I am not a fan of the selectors of late.

  • al on June 13, 2011, 20:42 GMT

    @Ram Jegendran: Thank god you ifnished your post with the word "cricketers".

  • Kannan on June 13, 2011, 11:20 GMT

    I completely support the selectors. Their job is to select from available talent keeping in mind the present and the future. Maybe they thought that Axing Ponting and Hussey would ripple a lot of waters and they would have to take more flak especially if the replacements flopped and Clarke was held accountable for performance with a bunch of newbies. Of course, when there is a talent pool with good bench strength somebody would have to be left out even if they feel bad. Would Katich have felt better if he had been contracted to be in the 30 and not selected... after all why should a highly paid modern day cricket crib about not being in the squad? If it is not this year, it could have been the next. Alternately he could have performed well in the domestic / IPLs and have got the selectors to perk up. Nobody says he is a spent force. It's just that he isn't in the 30. All this "travesty of justice" is humbug. Team building doesn't come easy. So let the selectors do their job! :P

  • Dummy4 on June 13, 2011, 6:58 GMT

    There is definitely bias and partial-ism in CA. They seem to be in a mess. They should sack Ponting instead of Katich. Its a Joke. They are thinking Ponting can do a Tendulkar. But the fact is Tendulkar is the Greatest batsman ever and probably the Greatest Sportsman ever along with Pele with both playing under the pressure of Cricket and Football crazy nations respectively. Not everyone is a Tendulkar. Tendulkar was never in Bad form by the way only that he was not getting the Hundreds!

  • John on June 12, 2011, 17:29 GMT

    Their problem is that they are thinking 10 years from now and not 2 years form now. Ponting, Hussey, Katich could have all played til 2013 together.

  • Ajay on June 12, 2011, 14:10 GMT

    Whether people like it or not, I can see Michael Clarke's input in this decision. In a world a Tendulkar at 38 is still top choice (since he is performing), it is difficult to say Katich does not feature in the plans for the future. I can understand placing an understudy, but denying a contract outright is just not cricket. The only positive I can think of in this whole thing is, finally the Australian Selectors can now qualify for an exchange program with Pakistan. They still have some stuff to learn, but they are rapidly getting there.

  • Dummy4 on June 12, 2011, 14:00 GMT

    Excluding Katich from the nations team and giving his age as an excuse is clearly an discrimination and it needs to be protested and I strongly recommend him to pursue legal route for loss of income because of age profiling. In the meantime,he should look for other options for this summer. He should continue playing cricket in all possible form of cricket and also plan to return to ODI and T20 team ( I am saying this because Sachin & Jayasuryia plays all form of cricket, then why Katich is restricted to Test cricket). There are many England and Indian Club who will like to hire him and with a salary higher than Aussie. Also he should play county cricket in England. Aussie is in a very bad hand ( Greg ) and I think this team will hit rock bottom soon and then realize how valuable Katich is. I'am sure they will have no options but to give him a deserved recall.

  • Shreenaguesh on June 12, 2011, 13:28 GMT

    It is indeed creditable that Katich opened his mouth. Probably, he has nothing to lose. Cricketers across the world, have been critical of their selectors. But their voices have been stifled by their Boards. If the Aussie selection committee is somehow guided by the likes of Greg Chappell, there could be trouble ahead. Greg Chappell might have been a great cricketer, but I don't believe that he is that great an administrator/manager, as was evident during his stint with India. Hilditch himself, was never that great a Test cricketer. The selection committee must also be under added scrutiny, due to the Ashes loss and a bad performance at the World Cup. Years ago, Mohinder Amarnath termed the Indian selectors, "a bunch of jokers"! Dilip Vengskarkar had refused to serve on India's selection panel, which had selectors with zero Test experience. Dedicated cricketers have made the game great and they definitely need to be heard and treated with respect!

  • Bernard on June 12, 2011, 12:12 GMT

    I agree with the Australian selectors that the side needs to get younger but at who's expense. Firstly, it is quite obvious that the selectors felt Simon Katich would go away quietly and he didn't. Bravo to Katich!!. Secondly, Simon Katich is much younger than Ricky Ponting and Michael Hussey. Lastly, the selectors should show some guts and replace Mr. Ponting and Mr. Hussey with younger players.

  • Dummy4 on June 12, 2011, 11:45 GMT

    I am a avid Indian cricket supporter but felt I had to write a comment here. Katich has been unfairly treated by the Australian selectors. I wonder if the Australian selectors will do a U-turn and maybe change their minds if enough powerful people argue for Katich's return?

  • No featured comments at the moment.