November 22, 2006

Ashes

Head to head: The key Ashes battles

George Binoy

by Andrew Miller

As both captains have said, it's time for the talking to stop. Tomorrow's eagerly anticipated first Test contains a number of head-to-heads that could prove pivotal in the destination of the Ashes. Here, Cricinfo takes a look at seven of the most important match-ups

Ricky Ponting and Andrew Flintoff share a lighter moment on the eve of the first Ashes Test, Brisbane, November 22, 2006
 © Getty Images
Enlarge

RELATED LINKS

Ricky Ponting v Andrew Flintoff
The most successful England captain in Australia in recent years was rugby's Martin Johnson, which is why Flintoff's door-frame-filling captaincy could yet prove to be a masterstroke. He has the skill and popularity to lead from the front, and a sturdy brains trust to guide him in the big decisions, but he will only be truly tested if and when England fall behind. That's when Ponting, older and wiser after his mauling at the hands of Michael Vaughan in 2005, could come into his own. He has proved himself as a batsman annually but, ultimately, he's going to be judged on his captaincy.

Shane Warne v Kevin Pietersen
In any other circumstances, Pietersen's move to No. 5 in the order would be seen as retrogressive, as Warne himself was suggesting only this week. But then again, who better to appear at three-down in the mid-afternoon session, with the ball going soft and the spinners beginning to take hold? Only Pietersen has the eye and the chutzpah to beat Warne at his own ultra-attacking game and, as the Australians themselves have pointed out in the past, he can be a notoriously slow starter against the quicks.

Adam Gilchrist v Geraint Jones
Warne's none too impressed with Jones's reinstatement either. Nevertheless, he did what he had to do in 2005, clinging on to the catches that really mattered, and combining with Flintoff superbly in the pivotal partnership at Trent Bridge. Moreover, the pacy pitches will suit his cross-batted game. As for Gilchrist, it's a question of hunger as much as anything. By his own admission, his struggles from round the wicket were mental as much as technical. If he atones for 2005 with one of his typical Ashes performances, the battle will be more than half won.

Matthew Hayden v Matthew Hoggard
Here's an interesting decider. Round one, in 2002-03, went emphatically in favour of Hayden, who bullied a young and insecure Hoggard into utter submission, cashing in on his undisciplined inswinging line to deposit him over midwicket at every opportunity. Last summer, however, it was an entirely different scenario. Aided by some cunning field placings, Hoggard swung rings around his nemesis, reducing him to a leaden-footed shell of a batsman. Hayden has since reinvented his game, stripping it of much of its former bombast. But the scars could still be there to be picked at.

Justin Langer is felled by Steve Harmison, England v Australia, The Oval, London, September 10, 2005
 © Getty Images
Enlarge
Justin Langer v Steve Harmison
On the last opening morning of the Ashes, a vicious rising delivery from Harmison clanged into Langer's elbow, and thus ignited a never-to-be-forgotten contest. And once again, this battle of the openers promises to be a microcosm of the summer's action, for each man embodies the strange fragility that lies beneath the surface of each camp. If Harmison is off-colour, England could be hung out to dry. But Langer was 36 yesterday and is arguably one serious blow from retirement. Something similar could be said for most of his team-mates.

Glenn McGrath v Ian Bell
There was a moment in Jaipur during the Champions Trophy that summed up Bell's new improved attitude to the game. Peeved at his lack of success, McGrath picked up in his follow-through and winged the ball at the batsman. Instead of flinching, Bell stood tall and looked his opponent up and down with wry amusement. How different the scene had been at The Oval last summer, when McGrath dismissed him first-ball on that fretful final morning to deliver a miserable pair. The youth has gained experience, but Mr Experience can't regain his youth.

Brett Lee v Andrew Strauss
Is this the match-up that could decide the Ashes? Quite conceivably. None of England's top seven has played an Ashes Test in Australia before, but Strauss excelled on the bouncy wickets of South Africa two winters ago, and in the absence of Marcus Trescothick, it is up to him to blunt Australia's sharpest tool. Lee is now 30 and knows that this is his time. Expect a plethora of cuts and pulls and high-octane action, because as England know from experience, attack is the best means of defence against the Aussies.

George Binoy is an assistant editor at ESPNcricinfo

RSS Feeds: George Binoy

© ESPN Sports Media Ltd.

Posted by Dan on (November 22, 2006, 12:10 GMT)

Hayden and Gilchrist both had lean trots in England last time around. They are the type of guys who have long memories and will relish the chance to make amends. I expect Gilly to be man of the match, Hayden to make a ton and those people who paid big money for fourth day tickets to be a little nervous by Sat arvo.

Posted by Dan on (November 22, 2006, 11:24 GMT)

What a load of biased tripe - reading this, I'd expect England to win 5-0. Australia's players are too old, lack leadership, intestinal fortitude, and/or are too defensive. The English players are young, swashbuckling go-getters, highly skilled with steely resolve.

Strauss is the key - if he fires, so will England, and it'll be a close run thing. If he fails this series, there's no serious batsman to fall back on. Pietersen might have one or two quick fire knocks, but a series winner he isn't. Cook could go alright in the conditions, but I don't like Bell's chances on bouncy pitches. I like Collingwood - he's like a second rate Steve Waugh.

Harmisson's the most over-rated bowler in the world, and Hoggard is not suited to Australian conditions. If Flintoff gets injured, it'll be close to a whitewash. How England will miss Simon Jones, the most important bowler by far in the last Ashes series.

Posted by Ant on (November 22, 2006, 10:02 GMT)

Good article. I think you've covered all the angles. Interestingly enough,you haven't mentioned Ashley v someone or Monty V someone else. Perhaps this spin thing is being blown out of all proportion by the media.

Comments have now been closed for this article

ABOUT THE AUTHOR

George Binoy
Assistant Editor After a major in Economics and nine months in a financial research firm, George realised that equity, capital and the like were not for him. He decided that he wanted to be one of those lucky few who did what they love at work. Alas, his prodigious talent was never spotted and he had to reconcile himself to the fact that he would never earn his money playing cricket for his country, state or even district. He jumped at the opportunity to work for ESPNcricinfo and is now confident of mastering the art of office cricket

All articles by this writer