County news February 12, 2013

Warwickshire could lose Clarke

  shares 8

Warwickshire may have secured the services of William Porterfield but Rikki Clarke's future at the club remains uncertain.

Ireland captain Porterfield has signed a two-year contract extension that will keep him at Edgbaston until at least the end of 2015, but Clarke is out of contract at the end of the 2013 season and has so far declined a new deal.

While 28-year-old Porterfield, who moved to Warwickshire ahead of the 2011 season, endured a modest season with the bat in the Championship and FLt20 - he averaged 24.10 strike rate of 95.18. Appointed captain of Ireland in 2008 and a veteran of 90 international matches, he is also an outstanding catcher at gully and seen as a highly positive, experienced and calm influence in the dressing room.

Warwickshire are also keen to retain the services of Clarke. A key member of the side in all three formats - he averaged 44.70 with the bat and 27.70 with the ball to help Warwickshire to the Championship title - his recent form has won him a return to the England set-up when he was added to the Lions squad for the Australia tour and he was offered a new deal shortly after the end of the season. Despite renewed talks over Christmas, however, he has so far declined to commit himself.

It is understood that Clarke was disappointed by the club's reluctance to release him for the Bangladesh Premier League over the last couple of years. It is also understood that he favoured Warwickshire's bowling coach Graeme Welch as successor to Ashley Giles as Warwickshire's director of cricket. Instead Dougie Brown was appointed to the job with Welch promoted to a role as his assistant.

Clarke is also coming to the age - he was 31 in September - where his next deal could be his last in the county game. Clarke developed through the Surrey system, but left the club for an ill-fated stay at Derbyshire in 2008 and then moved on to Warwickshire later in the same season. Fitter than ever before, he has produced the most consistent cricket of his career over the last few years and, if he does decide to move, is unlikely to have any shortage of suitors. He came close to joining Sussex at the end of 2011.

"Rikki is a crucial member of the squad and we would be delighted if he signed a contract extension," Brown, Warwickshire's new director of cricket, said. "While he is in Australia with the England Lions, he will be concentrating on that. But it is something we will be looking to get on to straight after he gets back."

Brown was keen to celebrate retaining the services of Porterfield. While Porterfield has yet to register a Championship century for the club, Brown felt the player would benefit from increased preparation time ahead of the season.

"Because of a reduced international calendar this is the first winter where we've seen a lot of William here at Edgbaston," Brown said. "His attitude and commitment towards pre-season training has made a great impact on other members of the squad. He's made great strides in the last few months and we had no hesitation in offering him a chance to commit himself to Warwickshire for the foreseeable future.

"His opening stand with Varun Chopra - 67 runs out of a partnership of 126 - in the CB40 semi-final at Old Trafford demonstrated his maturity and ability to perform on the biggest stage. His challenge is to do this consistently across all formats of the game and prove himself to be one of the leading batsmen in the domestic game."

George Dobell is a senior correspondent at ESPNcricinfo

Comments have now been closed for this article

  • on February 13, 2013, 1:38 GMT

    Rikki was a player who was very much down on his luck when he came to Warwickshire, and we helped him re-find his game. If he leaves it will be a real shame, because he has been a big part of two trophy-winning seasons!!

  • countjimmoriarty on February 13, 2013, 13:13 GMT

    Never understood why Clarke has been so highly rated. A thoroughly mediocre cricketer in every way - a nothing batsman and just an average trundler. How he ever played for England is beyond comprehension.

  • nb733 on February 13, 2013, 10:53 GMT

    Being a sportsman is a short career and at his age, he has to do what is best for him financially. He left previous clubs for cricketing reasons, no-one should begrudge him making sure his future is secure by getting the best deal he can.

  • on February 13, 2013, 8:57 GMT

    Why should any county want to sign a player who's main priority is to be released to play in another league? Hopefully no county will want to touch him with a barge pole unless he is willing to show proper commitment on a full-time basis. What effect will replacing an existing player with a "hired hand" who wants to come and go whenever he pleases, just to make money elsewhere, have on that county's team spirit? Counties like Hampshire already have this trouble with the likes of Mascarenhas coming and going to the IPL instead of concentrating on a building a side around players who are always available apart from international call-ups which are distracting enough without this added problem. Clarke needs to confirm or deny these BPL rumours so it's known where he stands on the issue.

  • on February 12, 2013, 22:48 GMT

    Clarke is 31, his priority would have to be what serves him best. Counties dont show any sentiment when dumping players, why should players be any different?

  • on February 12, 2013, 22:45 GMT

    For an average cricketer like Rikki Clarke stints in 20/20 leagues, will help him secure his finances long after hes retired from cricket just remember that! It's a Job at the end of the day, look at the modern person. A lot of people change companies everyday, just because hes a cricketer is no different. Rant over

  • bumsonseats on February 12, 2013, 21:40 GMT

    maybe its back to his old side as they seem to want most guys who become available and as they have lost a few players expect him back south of the river

  • TripleCenturian on February 12, 2013, 18:15 GMT

    It's good to see a player show some loyalty to the county that has helped him get back in the England selectors minds and given him a chance to win some trophies. But then for a player with his third county, loyalty is perhaps a word that Clarke may nor be overly familiar with. It's obvious what his priorities are. Some quick bucks from a T20 sub standard league, an improved county contract from a team he expects to be able to leave in the lurch if he has the chance to earn more money elsewhere and a fourth county to add to his CV.

  • on February 13, 2013, 1:38 GMT

    Rikki was a player who was very much down on his luck when he came to Warwickshire, and we helped him re-find his game. If he leaves it will be a real shame, because he has been a big part of two trophy-winning seasons!!

  • countjimmoriarty on February 13, 2013, 13:13 GMT

    Never understood why Clarke has been so highly rated. A thoroughly mediocre cricketer in every way - a nothing batsman and just an average trundler. How he ever played for England is beyond comprehension.

  • nb733 on February 13, 2013, 10:53 GMT

    Being a sportsman is a short career and at his age, he has to do what is best for him financially. He left previous clubs for cricketing reasons, no-one should begrudge him making sure his future is secure by getting the best deal he can.

  • on February 13, 2013, 8:57 GMT

    Why should any county want to sign a player who's main priority is to be released to play in another league? Hopefully no county will want to touch him with a barge pole unless he is willing to show proper commitment on a full-time basis. What effect will replacing an existing player with a "hired hand" who wants to come and go whenever he pleases, just to make money elsewhere, have on that county's team spirit? Counties like Hampshire already have this trouble with the likes of Mascarenhas coming and going to the IPL instead of concentrating on a building a side around players who are always available apart from international call-ups which are distracting enough without this added problem. Clarke needs to confirm or deny these BPL rumours so it's known where he stands on the issue.

  • on February 12, 2013, 22:48 GMT

    Clarke is 31, his priority would have to be what serves him best. Counties dont show any sentiment when dumping players, why should players be any different?

  • on February 12, 2013, 22:45 GMT

    For an average cricketer like Rikki Clarke stints in 20/20 leagues, will help him secure his finances long after hes retired from cricket just remember that! It's a Job at the end of the day, look at the modern person. A lot of people change companies everyday, just because hes a cricketer is no different. Rant over

  • bumsonseats on February 12, 2013, 21:40 GMT

    maybe its back to his old side as they seem to want most guys who become available and as they have lost a few players expect him back south of the river

  • TripleCenturian on February 12, 2013, 18:15 GMT

    It's good to see a player show some loyalty to the county that has helped him get back in the England selectors minds and given him a chance to win some trophies. But then for a player with his third county, loyalty is perhaps a word that Clarke may nor be overly familiar with. It's obvious what his priorities are. Some quick bucks from a T20 sub standard league, an improved county contract from a team he expects to be able to leave in the lurch if he has the chance to earn more money elsewhere and a fourth county to add to his CV.

  • TripleCenturian on February 12, 2013, 18:15 GMT

    It's good to see a player show some loyalty to the county that has helped him get back in the England selectors minds and given him a chance to win some trophies. But then for a player with his third county, loyalty is perhaps a word that Clarke may nor be overly familiar with. It's obvious what his priorities are. Some quick bucks from a T20 sub standard league, an improved county contract from a team he expects to be able to leave in the lurch if he has the chance to earn more money elsewhere and a fourth county to add to his CV.

  • bumsonseats on February 12, 2013, 21:40 GMT

    maybe its back to his old side as they seem to want most guys who become available and as they have lost a few players expect him back south of the river

  • on February 12, 2013, 22:45 GMT

    For an average cricketer like Rikki Clarke stints in 20/20 leagues, will help him secure his finances long after hes retired from cricket just remember that! It's a Job at the end of the day, look at the modern person. A lot of people change companies everyday, just because hes a cricketer is no different. Rant over

  • on February 12, 2013, 22:48 GMT

    Clarke is 31, his priority would have to be what serves him best. Counties dont show any sentiment when dumping players, why should players be any different?

  • on February 13, 2013, 8:57 GMT

    Why should any county want to sign a player who's main priority is to be released to play in another league? Hopefully no county will want to touch him with a barge pole unless he is willing to show proper commitment on a full-time basis. What effect will replacing an existing player with a "hired hand" who wants to come and go whenever he pleases, just to make money elsewhere, have on that county's team spirit? Counties like Hampshire already have this trouble with the likes of Mascarenhas coming and going to the IPL instead of concentrating on a building a side around players who are always available apart from international call-ups which are distracting enough without this added problem. Clarke needs to confirm or deny these BPL rumours so it's known where he stands on the issue.

  • nb733 on February 13, 2013, 10:53 GMT

    Being a sportsman is a short career and at his age, he has to do what is best for him financially. He left previous clubs for cricketing reasons, no-one should begrudge him making sure his future is secure by getting the best deal he can.

  • countjimmoriarty on February 13, 2013, 13:13 GMT

    Never understood why Clarke has been so highly rated. A thoroughly mediocre cricketer in every way - a nothing batsman and just an average trundler. How he ever played for England is beyond comprehension.

  • on February 13, 2013, 1:38 GMT

    Rikki was a player who was very much down on his luck when he came to Warwickshire, and we helped him re-find his game. If he leaves it will be a real shame, because he has been a big part of two trophy-winning seasons!!