Indian Cricket League June 2, 2009

BCCI amnesty for 79 players

Cricinfo staff

Hemang Badani is one of 79 Indian players back in the official fold after severing ties with the ICL © Cricinfo Ltd

The BCCI has granted amnesty to 79 ICL players, 11 former players and 11 officials, dealing a potentially crippling blow to the unofficial league. The players include Hemang Badani, Dinesh Mongia and Deep Dasgupta while the former players include Sandeep Patil, EAS Prasanna, Madan Lal and Ajit Wadekar.

The players (click here for the full list) have been declared eligible for domestic cricket in India, which will be good news for the teams that suffered most from the ban - Bengal, Punjab and Hyderabad - but their participation in the IPL has not yet been formalised.

The ICL is now left with five Indian players from its original pool of 84 but there has been no official confirmation on the status of the league's 53 remaining foreign signings. ICL officials said "some of the foreign players" have left, and there have been individual confirmations from players such as Pakistan's Mohammad Yousuf and Abdul Razzaq and, on Tuesday, South Africa's Justin Kemp.

However, India's former captain Kapil Dev, who is the chariman of the ICL's Executive Board, has not terminated his contract, nor has former wicketkeeper Kiran More.

Himanshu Mody, the ICL's business head, dismissed suggestions that the league was winding up. "The world has been saying this about the ICL time and again, and every time we come out stronger," he told Cricinfo.

ICL officials maintain that the league will survive and will soon conduct camps in India to create a talent pool. They also say they are "on track" with their international tournament planned for October; the March edition of the league had been called off due to the deepening recession and non-availability of Pakistan players given the cross-border tensions in the wake of the Mumbai attacks last November.

Daryll Cullinan, coach of the Royal Bengal Tigers, appeared less optimistic. "This is a big blow because it is the bulk of the Indian players continuing their careers outside of the ICL," he said. "My guess [on whether the league would wind up] is as good as anyone else's. I don't really know what the long-term plans or intentions are of the ICL."

Top Curve
Countdown to amnesty
  • Dec 23, 2008 - ICC officials meet with ICL in Delhi but there's no solution
  • Feb 2, 2009 - ICC gives member countries power to decide on competitions on home soil.
  • Feb 2, 2009 - Pakistan court allows Pak ICL players to play in domestic tournaments.
  • Feb 2, 2009 - The ICC says it will push for a settlement and organises a meeting between the BCCI and the ICL in Johannesburg
  • Feb 23 - Johannesburg talks between ICC, ICL and the BCCI fail
  • April 18, 2009 - ICC rejects official ICL recognition request
  • April 29, 2009 - BCCI offers amnesty to ICL players if they end their contracts
  • April 29, 2009 - New Zealand Cricket considers waiving the 'cool off' period for its players
  • April 29, 2009 - PCB says it will consider amnesty on case-wise basis
  • May 9, 2009 - Bangladesh board offers amnesty to its players involved with the ICL, pending the termination of their contracts
  • May 15, 2009 - Sri Lanka Cricket offers a three-month 'cooling period' to its players if they end their ties with the ICL
  • May 20, 2009 - ICL releases 50 players before amnesty deadline
  • May 22, 2009 - Cricket South Africa announces amnesty for its players if they end their contracts
Bottom Curve

However, the players who have quit are looking at the benefits of life with the BCCI. "It's heartening to be back in the main fold," Hemang Badani, the former India batsman, told Cricinfo. "I am looking forward to playing again for my state [Tamil Nadu] and also for Chennai Super Kings in the next IPL. I would like to use my experience to make Tamil Nadu win a Ranji Trophy."

The decision to quit the league did, however, leave him with mixed emotions. "It was obviously tough because we had left the BCCI, joined ICL and have come back again now. There were worries whether they [BCCI] would treat us right or victimise us but so far things have gone on well. Look, there was not enough cricket being played in the ICL now. Not even practice. We were all hoping that the so-called war between the ICL and the BCCI would end but it hasn't. We couldn't enter grounds or play for our companies. There was also a cash crunch at the ICL. But, I would like to thank the ICL for the opportunity given in the last two years and I wish them luck for the future."

A major attraction for the returning players will be the opportunity to play in the big-money IPL but the BCCI said it was yet to decide on the issue, although the IPL has been classified as an Indian domestic event.

The BCCI statement announcing the amnesty was ambiguous on the point: "Guidelines with respect to participation in Indian Premier League will be intimated in due course," it said. However Rajiv Shukla, a BCCI vice-president and member of the IPL governing council, said the board might apply the one-year cooling period prescribed by the ICC.

Shukla also said the return of ICL players would be beneficial for Indian cricket. "This issue has been going on for some time and that's why the BCCI decided that players who are playing for other leagues should be given an opportunity to return," Shukla said.

The Indian board announced on April 29 an amnesty for all Indian players associated with the ICL, with a May 31 deadline to cut their ties with the league. Players who did so would be eligible to play international cricket after a one-year 'cooling period' and domestic cricket from June 1, when the ICC's new rules on official and unofficial cricket came into force.

Following the decision, other cricket governing bodies, including the Bangladesh Cricket Board (BCB) and Cricket South Africa (CSA) offered amnesty to their players involved with the league.

Comments have now been closed for this article

  • Pete on June 4, 2009, 22:00 GMT

    Yeah tezzAUS, 2 cents sums up your comment. Test cricket will always survive, but 20 20 will bring cricket to an entirely new audience. Do not be afraid to embrace change

  • Terry on June 4, 2009, 8:08 GMT

    pffft. To me the IPL is as tacky as a bollywood film. True cricket purists know that that Twenty20 is more pot luck hit and giggle then anything else. Bring on test cricket, i'd rather watch a good doco then Twenty20.

    my 2cents

  • subramanyam on June 3, 2009, 15:53 GMT

    It is just wonderful that BCCI has given amensty to 79 players thereby the officials of BCCI happy of the status of Supremcy in the game. I am a follower of the game of CRICKET for the past 55years only and my name to ICL is International Cricket League and IPL is Indian Power League. ICL promotes the game from the retired cricketers to the new enterants and IPL isgives more avenue for Business Cricket, encourages artists celebrities, belly dancers, business executives, thereby making cricket as secondary which diminsh the interest of the game to some another aspect. With the POWER lobbying BCCI able to see that ICC reject IPL demand for recongition and made IPL players dialemma to their benefit, I srongly feel that BUSINESS won against THE GAME OF CRICKET.

  • Pankaj on June 3, 2009, 14:57 GMT

    Amnesty!! The word suggests that these players did something horribly wrong, some crime, and BCCI again displayed its magnanimity by forgiving them.

  • Ejaz on June 3, 2009, 4:45 GMT

    Thats the case of "might is right".

  • Sean on June 2, 2009, 22:09 GMT

    I still don't know why they persist in mentioning the ICC - everyone knows the BCCI controls world cricket now....and they're destroying it with their greed for fast money. They care not for Test cricket and they do not care at all for player welfare.

    Jason Gillespie has always been a class act and i'd rather send him a cheque for any money i'll ever spend at the cricket again rather than waste it going to see India play anything anywhere. And if Cricket Australia continues to kowtow to the BCCI i'll just stop going altogether.

    The game isn't what it used to be any more, but it doesn't have to be what it is now....a money making venture controlled at the whim of a group of greedy, restrictive, bloated, overbearing and bleating 'administrators' who see the Indian way of doing things (over-marketed over-hyped meaningless tournaments, the results of which are very dubious at best) as being best for the game. WRONG! you're all WRONG!

  • Rahul on June 2, 2009, 19:43 GMT

    I'm very happy with the present situation. I never backed ICL, as it was profit oriented. When BCCI makes huge profits, the money goes to the development of Cricket in India, which is great.

  • Sidhanta on June 2, 2009, 16:32 GMT

    There was an attempt made by ICL to change the trend that only BCCI controls the game in the country

    But unfortunately the fact still remains intact

  • Maulik on June 2, 2009, 15:23 GMT

    This is a clear case of monopoly. I don't like either BCCI or ICL, but BCCI has clearly been unfair to ICL by not giving them a chance to survive. In the feud, the players who wanted to play got a raw deal. Anyways, I think this is a fatal blow to ICL. I think going forward, ICL may keep fighting this battle in court and eventually may get some monetary reward to back off. But at that point BCCI will be so rich with IPL money, that sum of money wont matter much to them.

  • Mohammed on June 2, 2009, 14:27 GMT

    For the moment we ICL-lovers are saddened but ICL will come vigorously insha-Allah. It is not BCCI who have been able to give any blow to ICL. It is the Mumbai attack which has caused this stagger for the ICL. Our love is for ICL. Our prayer is with ICL. No can harm ICL except God.

  • No featured comments at the moment.