Rewind to Rewind toRSS FeedFeeds

1912

'You've been asking for a punch all night'

Some selection meetings involve heated exchanges of opinion, but few end up in a 20-minute brawl

Martin Williamson

August 26, 2005

Text size: A | A



Clem Hill: dangerous with the bat ... and not bad with his fists © The Cricketer
Enlarge
Criticism from the public and the media is all part and parcel of being a selector, and rarely do their decisions meet with universal acclaim or acclaim. But generally, the brickbats are verbal - and not from fellow selectors. But on February 2, 1912, the meeting to pick the Australian team to play England in the fourth Test ended in an unseemly brawl between two of the selectors.

The fight involved Clem Hill, Australia's captain and legendary batsman, and Peter McAlister, a former Victorian batsman who had played eight Tests without distinction, and who had for some time been allied to the Australian Board of Control (BOC). McAlister was not well-liked, and had attracted controversy when, as chairman of selectors, he had immediately picked himself as vice-captain on the 1909 England tour. His offhand treatment by many of that squad - including Hill - further soured his attitude towards the players. But McAlister had persuaded the board to send him as he was prepared effectively to act as its spy, so the players' shunning of him was not all that surprising.

The animosity between the fledgling board and the players dated back almost a decade. The board regarded the cricketers with a level of disdain more associated with the MCC in London. Meanwhile, many of the players viewed the board with deep distrust verging on loathing, seeing them as profiting off their abilities while being unwilling to share the spoils.

The real confrontation which was looming was about the appointment of the manager for the 1912 tour of England. The players had until then chosen their own man, but the board wanted their choice. The role was crucial in that the manager materially affected how much the players earned from the trip, and there was a suspicion, which was proved right, was that a board appointee would leave them out of pocket. Almost all the players were amateurs in name only.

Hill and McAlister's dislike of each other was even more deep-rooted. For some time, McAlister had been making disrespectful and, occasionally, obnoxious comments about Hill, as both player and captain, privately and to the media. Shortly before the meeting at the New South Wales Cricket Association offices in Sydney, McAlister sent Hill an inflammatory telegram suggesting that he drop himself from the Australian side.

Once the meeting started, McAlister continued in the same vein, sniping at Hill's captaincy during the last two Tests. Hill, in no mood to bite his lip, told him that "he was no judge of cricket," turning the tables with a barbed challenge to McAlister regarding his own - limited - abilities.

The schoolboy slanging match continued, before McAlister sent Hill's blood pressure soaring by claiming that he himself had been as "good a captain as [Warwick] Armstrong, [Victor] Trumper or you." Hill snarled that perhaps McAlister should captain the side himself, adding that in his opinion McAlister knew nothing about cricket.



Peter McAlister: almost thrown out the window © The Cricketer
Enlarge
McAlister fired back that Hill was "the worst captain in living memory". That was an insult too far. Hill stood up. "You've been asking for a punch all night," he warned, "and I'll give you one."

Thereafter accounts vary, but the best summary can be found in Gideon Haigh's excellent biography of Armstrong, The Big Ship. Some witnesses said that Hill delivered a slap to the face, others that the blow was much harder. Whatever the truth, a full-blown brawl ensured, lasting almost 20 minutes, and at one point Hill had to be restrained from hurling McAlister out of the third-storey window. Most accounts agreed that Hill won the bout, and as he exited the room, the bloodied and prostrate McAlister yelled after him: "Come back and fight, you coward."

With the scrap over, Hill returned to his hotel and, amazingly, the selection meeting continued. Equally surprising was that Hill was retained as both player and captain.

News of the melee was all over the newspapers as early as the next morning, as supporters of both camps engaged in some early attempts at spin. The public generally sided with Hill, who was enthusiastically applauded when he went out to bat in the fourth Test at Melbourne. The pressure took its toll on Hill, and Australia lost the last two Tests and his own form fell away.

But, as is so often the case, the board was to have its way. It voted to force through its right to appoint the manager, and as a result six leading players - Hill, Armstrong, Trumper, Tibby Cotter, Hanson Carter and Vernon Ransford - refused to tour. A weakened Australian side were well beaten in the first - and only - triangular tournament.

Hill and Trumper did not play for Australia again, but Armstrong continued to be a thorn in the side of the Australian board for another decade. McAlister faded from the scene, and his association with the game dwindled. But his role in one of the game's liveliest selection meetings will never be forgotten.

Is there an incident from the past you would like to know more about? E-mail rewind@cricinfo.com with your comments and suggestions.

RSS Feeds: Martin Williamson

© ESPN Sports Media Ltd.

FeedbackTop
Email Feedback Print
Share
E-mail
Feedback
Print
Martin WilliamsonClose
Martin Williamson Executive editor Martin Williamson joined the Wisden website in its planning stages in 2001 after failing to make his millions in the internet boom when managing editor of Sportal. Before that he was in charge of Sky Sports Online and helped launch and run Sky News Online. With a preference for all things old (except his wife and children), he has recently confounded colleagues by displaying an uncharacteristic fondness for Twenty20 cricket. His enthusiasm for the game is sadly not matched by his ability, but he remains convinced that he might be a late developer and perseveres in the hope of an England call-up with his middle-order batting and non-spinning offbreaks. He is now managing editor of ESPN EMEA Digital Group as well as his Cricinfo responsibilities.

    Trading places

All Out Cricket: In a world where £50m can be staked on a single IPL game, armies of professional cricket traders work the betting markets. But who are these people?

The set-up

The Cricket Monthly: When Tony Greig was outwitted by Ashley Mallett
Download the app: for iPad | for Android tablet

    Automaton, man, inspiration

Twenty years on, Shivnarine Chanderpaul continues to be understated. And that doesn't bother him. What's not to like? By Brydon Coverdale

    85 Tests, 70 defeats

Numbers Game: Bangladesh's stats are easily the worst among all teams when they'd played as many Tests

The case against revoking ODI status

Tim Wigmore: The ICC's decision to restrict the number of ODI teams deprives Associates of the ability to generate enough funds to survive, and to gain new fans

News | Features Last 7 days

Champions League T20 still battling for meaning

The thrills are rather low-octane, the skills are a bit lightweight, and the tournament overly India-centric

From Constantine to Chanderpaul

As West Indies play their 500th Test, here's an interactive journey through their Test history

Busy keepers, and Waqar's bowleds

Also, high scores and low averages, most ducks in international cricket, and the 12-year-old Test player

'My kind of bowling style is gone now'

Former New Zealand seamer Gavin Larsen talks about wobbly seam-up bowling, the 1992 World Cup, and his role in the next tournament

Automaton, man, inspiration

Twenty years on, Shivnarine Chanderpaul continues to be understated, underestimated. And that doesn't bother him. What's not to like?

News | Features Last 7 days