|Photos||Video & Audio||Blogs||Statistics||Archive||Games||Mobile|
Reverse swing is playing a huge role in the current Ashes series and experts are analysing every aspect of the art. What's all the fuss about
August 21, 2005
If only Channel 4, with its wondrous assortment of armchair techno-analysing and lowbrow jargon busting was broadcasting cricket in 1992:
"So you see Richie, on the left screen, the little dark gentleman is busy introducing the ball to a bottle top and on the right we see that very ball swinging very late at high speed straight into the base of leg stump. This is swing but unconventional, swing but reverse to what you would expect. And that is what the Pakistanis and Wasim Akram and Waqar Younis in particular, have been doing right throughout this series."
See, that was the last time a battered old ball swinging when it shouldn't, created such fuss. Then, it was a fantastical, other-worldly creation of a malevolent, wild-eyed, wild-haired, moustachioed medium-pacer from the subcontinent. Moreover, it was an invention cloaked in a maelstrom of fingernails, bottle tops and knives. Now, the inventor is a wily, ingenious even, resistor of conditions: "Yes, yes, Sarfraz Nawaz discovered the art. He was a clever one, he was, a little askew but intelligent." And the bottle tops?
Thirteen summers on, reverse swing has become, apparently and belatedly, legit. Articles are telling us that the skill stands on the brink of becoming the soul of this Ashes series. In 1992, despite being the mind, body and soul of Pakistan's 2-1 series win, it was the tarnishing of a series.
And don't you know, there is now a science to it too? One article on a website in Australia reveals to us the secrets of reverse swing and there's not a single freakishly long nail, knife or jar of Vaseline in sight. What is it? Who invented it? For what purpose? Why is it so deadly? What is its impact on the game? The trick, it is said, is to keep one side of the ball completely dry and even scuffed and the other as polished as possible and wet. Vitally, the whole team must work very hard on getting the ball into that condition. This is reverse swing for dummies, taught as Newtonian laws of motion might be in Physics refresher courses; rationalized and legitimized.
And if you're still not sure, then of course, you can always call up the true father of English reverse swing, Mickey Stewart. He, after all knew, back in 1992 as manager of England for the last time, exactly what reverse swing was and how it was done. Except he would never tell anyone then and the Pakistani version of working really hard on the ball as a team and getting one side dry and rough and the other wet and polished just didn't cut any ice.
Now, opponents must plan assiduously to combat it, and planning doesn't come any more assiduous than with the Australians. Use lower back lifts, Mark Taylor tells us, for that was what Allan Border did to nullify Wasim and Waqar, although Justin Langer thinks it is detrimental to fluency, and he should know. Others move extravagantly outside off-stump to open up the leg-side as well as reduce the likelihood of a leg-before. And if all else fails, then just accuse them of picking the seam. No wait.
Shed of its oriental mystique and illicit implications, reverse swing, appropriately perhaps, has risen to grace rather than fallen from it. Dark art to legit science, villain to hero, vilified to lionised, Flintoff 2000 to Flintoff 2005, Bosie to googly.
Of course, 1992 and 2005 are not one and the same. There are still differences in what Wasim and Waqar did and what Flintoff and Jones do. For one, the Pakistani duo usually had the decency to wait at least 40-50 overs, and sometimes even 65-70, before they started. Young Jones starts reversing as early as the 15th over, which says something not only about his ability but also how hard the England team must work on the ball. (Exactly what it says, however, nobody except Mickey Stewart is certain.)
And back then, the two Ws conjured only the most frenzied disintegrations from situations of relative idyll: 197 for 3 finished 255 all out at Lord's; 292 for 2 at Headingley became 320 all out; 182 for 3 at The Oval swiftly ended 207 all out. In the current series, the havoc realised by an old ball is a little more prosaic; Australia "collapsed" from 194 for 3 to 308 at Edgbaston or 119 for 3 to 302 all out, sustained yes but lacking the sheer statistical madness of 1992. And tellingly, as Edgbaston and Old Trafford proved, tailenders are not as prone to this reverse swing as they were once.
Now, in a few months' time, what Gideon Haigh referred to as one of the headline trends of the 1990s, will complete an astounding rehabilitation. With England arriving in Pakistan, the spiritual and necessary home of the skill, with two of the best practitioners now on their side, reverse swing completes as admirable a tale of redemption as any, an apt closure from a disreputable past. And if it turns out that Wasim at Lancashire and Waqar at Glamorgan had anything to do with Flintoff and Jones's mastery of this skill, then well, isn't that just the cutest thing?
Historian Ramachandra Guha on the special relationship India and South Africa have forged
Bowl at Boycs: Geoff Boycott on England conceding the Ashes, and India's challenge in South Africa
Veteran Kenya allrounder Steve Tikolo made an age-defying comeback recently to help his side reclaim some past glory. By Firdose Moonda
Sanjay Manjrekar: England's troubles in the Ashes have shown why an initial back-foot trigger movement may not be a great idea
Russell Jackson: Cricket nearly reached an impasse in the mid '90s and the game might have split into two factions
ESPNcricinfo looks at five reasons for Australia's dominance in winning back the Ashes
ESPNcricinfo looks at five reasons for England's failure to compete in Australia