Essays, reflections and more

Bradman versus Warne

What if the greatest batsman of them all had faced the finest legspinner ever?

Ashley Mallett

January 8, 2012

Comments: 91 | Text size: A | A

Don Bradman plays and misses during his innings of 138, England v Australia, 1st Test, Trent Bridge, 2nd day, June 11, 1948
Bradman: "Let me see the ball coming and then I'll decide the best place to hit it" © Getty Images
Enlarge
Related Links
Players/Officials: Sir Donald Bradman | Shane Warne
Teams: Australia

Having watched epic contests between Shane Warne and Sachin Tendulkar - the master bowler of the age versus the champion batsman - I have always wondered how Don Bradman would have dealt with the sublime spin of Warne. How I wish Albert Einstein realised that things could go faster than light, and a time machine was potential reality. Perhaps not in our time.

However, in the absence of technology, we can use our imaginations. We can look at old footage of Bradman and film of Warne; we can research and analyse and use part of the large portion of the human mind science tells us we usually don't utilise, to visualise such a contest. Sometimes the unreal melds with the real, but fantasy is fantasy. Or is it?

As the clock struck the hour, fans in their thousands poured into the Sydney Cricket Ground to witness first-hand the greatest cricket battle of them all - Bradman versus Warne.

Sid Barnes, stalwart of the 1948 Invincibles, and Arthur Morris' opening partner, fell to Warne's second ball, a hard-spun legbreak that left the bowler's hand and curved down the pitch in a lovely arc, fit to send Banjo Paterson into poetic song.

As Barnes probed forward, the hissing Warne legbreak ducked swiftly, like a diving Spitfire, and the batsman's failure to cover the length and breadth of spin presented Mark Taylor with a dolly at first slip. Already 50,000 people had packed the SCG, and they rose as one to give the greatest batsman of all time the most magnificent reception.

Barnes tried in vain to mention to Bradman that the ball was dipping wickedly and that the legspin magician had it on a string, but The Don was in no mood to talk to anyone about the merits of a bowler for whom he had great respect but dearly wanted to thrash unmercifully.

On the 1930 Australia tour of England, the brash 20-year-old batting phenomenon told his team-mates: "Plenty of batsmen watch the bowler's fingers, hoping to detect what sort of ball he's going to deliver, but that's no good to me. Let me see the ball coming and then I'll decide the best place to hit it." Never would he stop on his way to the wicket to hear the out-going batsman describe the amazing swing, cut or spin the bowler had achieved to cause his downfall.

Maybe Clarrie Grimmett, the greatest legspinner between the wars, had told Bradman of the Test trial at the SCG in 1925, when Grimmett spun one a good deal to trap Tommy Andrews and then watched the departing batsman and saw how he stopped to chat to the man next in, Alan Kippax. There was Andrews demonstrating with arms outstretched how the ball that got him "spun a mile". Kippax lasted one ball: a fizzing Grimmett topspinner ripped between bat and pad to hit middle stump as Kippax played with his bat away from the pad to counter the excessive turn he expected.

The stage was set. Taylor remembered how Sachin Tendulkar attacked Warne in India and succeeded with big hundreds in three innings. Would Bradman go at Warne in similar vein?

Bradman took guard, looked about the field, and took up his stance. Warne had a slip, backward point, short cover, extra cover and mid-off. To the on side was a man behind square leg, a very straight midwicket, mid-on, and a man in the deep just in front of square. The crowd fell silent. They knew this contest would provide something special, for both players were at the pinnacle of their powers.

While the likes of Victor Trumper came from an era where a batsman, after hitting a century, looked for a worthy opponent to "present" his wicket to, Bradman simply marked guard afresh and went for the next hundred. He was totally ruthless and was said to have targeted bowlers, setting out to destroy them on the field. Once, in a grade match in Adelaide, he went to the wicket late on a Saturday afternoon. The big fast bowler standing at mid-on looked like he might possibly ruffle the champion's feathers if he bowled fast the next over on the green track in bad light. So the Don hit all eight deliveries of his first over just out of reach of mid-on. By the time the over ended and he was expected to bowl to Bradman, the poor man was so exhausted he couldn't scratch himself.

Now Bradman was up against Warne, the man he had said in the late 1990s, was "the best thing to happen to Australian cricket in 30 years". Around that time Bradman invited Sachin Tendulkar and Shane Warne to his Kensington Park home in Adelaide. It was a pleasant change from having busloads of people - even Japanese tourists - turn up unannounced to snap their cameras in a frenzy of celebrity worship.

 
 
Ball three arrives, again dipping menacingly in a lovely curve. Bradman pounces with feline reflexes, his feet moving swiftly, yet with silky smoothness, to reach the ball the instant it strikes the turf
 

At the age of 16, Len Hutton faced 62-year-old SF Barnes in the nets, and years later he declared that Barnes "was the best bowler I've faced". Bradman considered Bill O'Reilly to be the greatest bowler he had played with or against. He wrote to me in 1989:

"Of all the bowlers I played with and against, I rate Bill O'Reilly No. 1. In my opinion the hardest ball to play is the one which turns from leg to off, and this was Bill's stock delivery. He persistently bowled at a right-hander's leg stump, and when perfectly pitched that ball would take the off bail. There is precious little answer to such a delivery - the batsman actually gets an outside edge or the ball clips the off stump. Bill also bowled a magnificent Bosey, which was hard to pick and which he aimed at middle and leg stumps. It was fractionally slower than his legbreak and usually dropped a little in flight and "sat up" to entice a catch to one of his two short-leg fieldsmen. These two deliveries, combined with great accuracy and unrelenting hostility, were enough to test the greatest of batsmen, particularly as his legbreak was bowled at medium pace - quicker than the normal run of slow bowlers - thereby making it extremely difficult for a batsman to use his feet as a counter measure. Bill will always remain in my book, the greatest of all."

And how did Bradman rate Grimmett, O'Reilly's great spinning partner? He revealed in a letter to me in 1991:

"I always classified Clarrie as the best of the genuine slow legspinners (I exclude O'Reilly because, as you say, he was not really a slow leggie), and what made him the best was his accuracy. His control was remarkable. I saw Clarrie in one match take the ball after some light rain, when the ball was greasy and hard to hold, yet he reeled off five maidens without a loose ball. That is the problem with young legbreak bowlers - it takes years to develop such control, and in the meantime they are too expensive and get discarded."

As far as I know, Sir Donald never aired in public any comparison of Grimmett with Warne. Perhaps Warne's emergence was too late in Bradman's life to make such comparisons, for invariably it would have led to his being hounded by the press. Who'd want that as you entered your 90s?

Bradman again looks about the field. Warne has Taylor at slip, Matthew Hayden at backward point, Ricky Ponting at short cover, Mark Waugh at extra cover, and Steve Waugh at mid-off. As the keeper, Ian Healy, settles down with a "Carn Shane," Merv Hughes moves in at backward square leg; so too do David Boon at short, straight midwicket and Jason Gillespie at mid-on. At deep square leg Glenn McGrath ambles in a few yards. There is a hush in the crowd.

Warne stands at the top of his mark. His spinning fingers move a little up and down as he caresses the ball, ensuring the grip is neither too loose or too tight, but firm. Bradman's eyes are set on the blond legspinner.

Warne starts on his methodical way to the wicket. When he gets within a yard of the crease his wrist cocks and he drives up and over his front leg with amazing energy and strength. The ball spins so hard it hums, dipping away in a lovely curve. Bradman can't hit this one for six, four, three, two or one, so he goes well forward and meets the ball with a dead bat. No run.

Warne stands at the end of his follow-through and rubs his chin. Bradman avoids his stare, looking about the field. He sees gaps on the on side but knows all too well that hitting those gaps will be risky against hard-spun legbreaks, which if Warne is on song, will arrive in a fizzing, dipping arc.


Shane Warne ended the year with 96 Test wickets, Australia v South Africa, 2nd Test, Melbourne, 4th day, December 30, 2005
Warne was, Bradman said, "the best thing to happen to Australian cricket in 30 years" © Getty Images
Enlarge

Warne again. A legbreak. It curves in towards leg stump, and upon pitching it fairly buzzes, spinning past Bradman's forward-defensive stroke. The ball misses off by a whisker, and as the crowd roars in appreciation of the bowler's skill, Healy takes it, throwing his head back.

Almost.

Ball three arrives, again dipping menacingly in a lovely curve. Bradman pounces with feline reflexes, his feet moving swiftly, yet with silky smoothness, to reach the ball the instant it strikes the turf. There can be no error, for to misjudge the length would be fatal. The cover drive scorches past Ponting at short cover, beats Mark Waugh at extra, and scuttles like a startled rabbit to the boundary.

The battle goes on for an hour. Bradman has scored freely up the other end, and has taken about a dozen runs off Warne. Two boundaries and four singles. In the meanwhile Morris, who was Grimmett's last first-class wicket, falls to McGrath, and Lindsay Hassett, one of the few batsmen to repeatedly play well against O'Reilly, proves a good ally for Bradman. A big partnership looms.

But Warne has other ideas. He has used his full repertoire: the legbreak, fizzing topspinner, back-spinner, zooter, wrong'un and flipper. Just one wrong'un to Bradman, which he latched on to, as he so often did when Grimmett bowled that ball. Bradman always said Grimmett's wrong'un was easy to pick, and he found it the same with Warne.

The flipper too made little impact. Bradman was alert to the delivery, which Grimmett invented and Warne bowled so well to many, especially South Africa's Daryll Cullinan, who once told me he always "picked" Warne's flipper but, alas, kept getting bowled by it.

Some 75 minutes into the match, the Invincibles' score stood at 94 for 2: Bradman 49 and Hassett 17. Warne decided to go back to relying on his stock ball. He would concentrate on bowling hard-spun legbreaks and varying, ever so slightly, the pace of those deliveries.

Bradman had batted with assurance and skill but found Warne's bowling to be an extraordinary mix of O'Reilly and Grimmett wrapped up in one amazing bowler. Warne had the spin and the guile of Grimmett; in fact, he spun it harder and the ball dropped more dramatically than when Grimmett bowled it, and Warne also possessed O'Reilly's "unrelenting hostility".

Warne moves in again. He bowls a hard-spun legbreak, but with a slight, almost imperceptible change of pace. Fifty thousand people watching at the ground, plus millions on television, are fooled, so too is Bradman. Although his footwork is swift and sure, the balls dips suddenly and wickedly, and lands well short of where the Don expects it to. Too far into his stroke to check it, his lofted drive goes straight into the hands of Ponting at short cover.

Bradman c Ponting b Warne 49.

Ashley Mallett took 132 Tests wickets in 38 Tests for Australia. An author of over 25 books, he has written biographies of Clarrie Grimmett, Doug Walters, Jeff Thomson and Ian Chappell

RSS Feeds: Ashley Mallett

© ESPN Sports Media Ltd.

Posted by endofageofaquarius on (January 11, 2012, 17:05 GMT)

Can someone who cannot bowl a googly be considered to be a true leg spinner? (Shane Warne holds the ball in a manner, with the finger next to his small finger being the spinning finger, so that while maxmimum spin is imparted onto the ball this completely removes the possibility of delivering the ball from the back of the hand for the googly)

If so, then I question whether Shane Warne is really worthy of the title of the greatest leg spinner in history?? A bit of a western spin I think to crown him thus !!

In terms of pure ability and skill and guile I would rate Mushtaq Muhammed as the greatest legspinner in history.

Posted by   on (January 11, 2012, 12:21 GMT)

what a boring article.. tell me the bottom line in one line..

Posted by BillyCC on (January 11, 2012, 11:22 GMT)

@Raymond Oliver, flash forward to 2200, evolution will bring along faster, stronger and smarter cricketers. Technology will bring along advancements in batting that will make batting in 2000 look amateurish and make those future cricketers think their mums could have gotten Tendulkar out. Don't bring the evolutionary and anthropological side of it into the equation. Trust your imagination. Cricket will always move forward in leaps and bounds. The determination of greatness will always be the same, and one major factor is how well you stack up against your peers.

Posted by   on (January 11, 2012, 5:20 GMT)

To the author : Why warnie? Why not wasim akram or andy roberts, michael holding? Surely you wanna test the man against people that could trouble him. Bradman could not deal with sheer pace. He was out of his comfort zone against the bouncer. Why on earth would you like to see warnie bowl to him? He isnt even a great leg spinner,or spinner for that matter. If you cant flumex the indians on turning tracks ,or any subcontinental team,or pretty darn useless if u ask me. Shane warne doesnt cut it. Im sure most his wickets are against england and daryll cullinan anyway,who need i remind you,were pretty pathetic against most spin,especially in the 90's when he played.

Posted by   on (January 11, 2012, 5:07 GMT)

Bradman. Great batsman in his era. The only thing is,he is most certainly not the greatest ever. No ways. He played almost all his tests in his beloved Australia,and mainly against England,scoring about 5000 runs out of 6996 against them. He played west indies and india once,and that was in australia. So for only playing england im taking away 15 off hia average and a further 15 for not playing anywhere else(except england).Also,he played in timeless tests and 6 day tests,dokess another 4 off his average. Lack of fielding ability,and technology means he got away with a lot of tight run out calls. Dock another 3 from his average.That leaves him on an average of 62. Not too mention they were a lot of time between series(upto a year) unlike these days. Dock another 2. That leaves him on 60. Doesnt seem too great now does he?

Posted by   on (January 10, 2012, 22:20 GMT)

BillyCC - just trust your own eyes and watch the footage from that era. Test cricketers in their late 30's and 40's; batsmen playing defense shots with straight elbows, spin bowlers with their opposing arms by their sides - it's like watching my mum bowl when we were kids. Most of all, don't bring Steve Waugh into this discussion - he doesn't even rate in the top 100!

Posted by Dravid_Pujara_Gravitas on (January 10, 2012, 14:32 GMT)

I finished reading the article now. I beg to differ with the author. Please watch Warne's helplessness with players who are not even the best among their contemporaries - Siddhu, KP, Sachin, Lara, Dravid, VVS etc...Sachin, who is not even the best among his contemporaries, who doesn't have an average that is double that of his contemporaries, gave Warne nightmares - why would the scenario be any different with The Greatest Sir? It simply is not possible that a batsman who has nearly double the average of his contemporaries would not take Warne to the cleaners. It's a no contest. I also doubt if Warne is the best ever legspinner to start with. Subhash Gupte it is or Bhagawat.

Posted by BillyCC on (January 9, 2012, 20:56 GMT)

@RaymondOliver, it is definitely possible for a mere mortal to average close to 100 for an extended period. Bradman did it for 52 tests and 234 first class matches for a period over 20 years. And yes, it may not have been at the "highest" level under your definition when comparing eras. However, plenty of other batsmen played with Bradman under these so called comical conditions and no one came close. So we can conclude that he had freakish talent and genius. What does that translate to in modern times? A combination of the best facets of Lara, Tendulkar and Steve Waugh? Then yes, I think someone could well average close to 100 against the current English team.

Posted by   on (January 9, 2012, 17:19 GMT)

BillyCC 7 co:- The comparison with Ramprakash was used only to highlight that it is possible for a mere mortal to average near 100 for an extended period. With respect to him, my point is that he has been able to do this because he was not playing at the very highest level. Yes the wickets are probably better now in Test cricket than say the 70's, but the athletes hurtling the ball down are better, stronger and more accurate. Just look at the footage that is available from past eras - some of it is almost comical. You failed to mention that the ball was changed less often and spinners bowled for long periods. Tests against India over the years prove what can happen when the ball doesn't turn. Yes there are some 'easy' runs around Test cricket, but not against England, SA and (currently) Australia. I'm sorry, but no batsman born of this earth would average 100 over 50-odd tests against this current England outfit…not even on the subcontinent.

Posted by Thisara.N on (January 9, 2012, 6:23 GMT)

Most of the people outside of asia when they talk about great spinners always call Warne "THE GREATEST LEG SPINNER EVER".But they don't like to mention even a word about Murali.Because they know statistics implies that Murali is greater than Warne.So those forces them not to call Warne "Greatest SPINNER " but call him as the "GREATEST LEG SPINNER".But the everyone knows Murali is the "GREATEST SPINNER" of all time.

Comments have now been closed for this article

FeedbackTop
Email Feedback Print
Share
E-mail
Feedback
Print
Ashley MallettClose

'Effectiveness, runs and consistency'

Modern Masters: Rahul Dravid and Sanjay Manjrekar discuss Steve Waugh's impact

    James Taylor wants to suit England's needs

Batsman talks about his long wait for a full England tour, where he gets his power from, and his days on a horse. By Alan Gardner

    That's my boy

ESPNcricinfo XI: Father and son pairs to have scored Test hundreds

    'Everyone stares at you when you're 6ft 8in'

Boyd Rankin talks about giants, playing for the enemy, and being mentored by Allan Donald

How much can you love a franchise?

Jonathan Wilson: Money and the quality of the contest are important, but there's something to be said for soul

News | Features Last 7 days

Pakistan should not welcome Amir back

The serene team culture cultivated by Misbah and his men shouldn't be allowed to be disrupted by a player with a tainted past

'I don't blame Arjuna for my early retirement'

Former Sri Lanka batsman Asanka Gurusinha talks about playing and coaching in Australia, and tactics during the 1996 World Cup

'I'm a bit disappointed not to get that Test average up to 50'

Mahela Jayawardene reflects on his Test career, and the need to bridge the gap between international and club cricket in Sri Lanka

Dhoni's absence a guide to India's future

He's past his use-by date as a Test captain and keeper. India now have a chance to test Kohli's leadership skills

Rohit's record, and captains' equal scores

Also, scoring a hundred and opening the bowling, the youngest Australian player, and scoreless in three Tests

News | Features Last 7 days