| Series | Countries | Live Scores | Fixtures | Results | News |
Features
|
Photos | Video & Audio | Blogs | Statistics | Archive | Games | Mobile | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
To let ruthless commerce direct the fate of cricket's future is to sign a death warrant for a way of life
March 7, 2013
![]()
|
|||
|
Related Links
Sites:
Cricinfo ICC Site
|
|||
"I woke up this morning
I could barely breathe
Just an empty impression
In the bed where you used to be
Empty sky, empty sky."
- Bruce Springsteen
No crowd to speak of in Dunedin, or in Pretoria a week or so ago. Nobody in Tasmania for Sri Lanka's visit just before Christmas, and not many in Nagpur when England were carving up Dhoni's disciples. We must face it, Test cricket has become a television spectacle in most parts of the world. Empty grounds are the symptom of a game that may be terminally ill. The generations that fell in love with it are going or gone.
For a reason lost on those who care, the ruling bodies of the game cannot see this, or they choose to ignore it. During the past five years there has been more international cricket played than ever before. And there is the IPL too, along with other franchise-styled T20 tournaments that have encouraged the mercenary globetrotter to an unprecedented level. To pick one talented cricketer as an example, Kieron Pollard has played just two first-class matches for Trinidad and Tobago in four years. He is the franchise owner's dream but knows little of the application and concentration required to play the longer format with any substance.
Maybe this doesn't matter. Maybe the market of the future is satisfied by instant gratification. But I doubt it. Cricket is not a game that can thrive within the canvas of the lowest common denominator. The skills that are necessary to play over four and five days are the foundation of the enterprise that makes the short form so appealing. Of course there is innovation and progress but not without a framework, and a reference to the fund of knowledge and virtues that have made Test cricket an important part of our civilisation. True lovers understand the depth and the rhythm. They take pleasure in patience and quiet. They rejoice in periods so compelling that runs - the currency of the short form - are sometimes irrelevant. They study history and they read word upon word of prose that has a language and spirit of its own.
There is more than a sport at stake here. To let ruthless commerce direct the fate of cricket's future is to sign a death warrant for a way of life. Guardians listen up. It is in your power to take action before it is too late.
First, play Test matches exclusively in major centres, where access is straightforward and the most people are at hand. Drop ticket prices for adults to the price of a movie in the poorer countries and of the theatre in the more prosperous. Invite everyone still at school age for free. Nobody under the age of 18 should be paying to watch a game that is in our gift to give. Promote, promote, promote, and thus educate, across all media platforms. The message is that Test cricket is a long slow burn but that it washes over you, consuming the senses. There is glamour in the certainty of seeing the best players and desirability in nationalism. Divide the countries into two leagues of six, adding any of Holland, Ireland, Afghanistan, UAE to the echelon and, if required, allowing them a quota of two foreign players for ballast. Promotion and relegation is a thrill in itself. Play day-night matches in the hot, dry countries, where the balance between bat and ball in not unfairly tilted by the dew. Sell tickets for "the night session" separately.
Do something about the painfully slow over rates, which have become a turn-off, with penalties of runs, and then aim at 100 overs per day. This might lead to 400-over matches over four days instead of 450 over five, which leads to wastage. Get rid of those endless drinks breaks by leaving water or "ade" at the boundary edge.
| Of course there is innovation and progress but not without a framework, and a reference to the fund of knowledge and virtues that have made Test cricket an important part of our civilisation. True lovers understand the depth and the rhythm. They take pleasure in patience and quiet | |||
Put Test cricket back on free-to-air television. The culture for it is diminished by a lack of awareness. Appointment to view works for the converted but not for those unaware of the preacher man. Ensure that government-funded schools play the game, whatever it costs. It is here, in the heartlands, that the messages must be heard. In Britain, the Chance to Shine programme does wonderful work to keep the game afloat amongst the young, but try telling those kids that Test cricket is the real deal. Hardly. The only way to get to them is through the world they inhabit. Television, telephones, social-media pages and the internet at large. Yes, the Test match grounds of England often sell out but look at the demographic and the numbers. The grounds are small, the population is big. Only three grounds in Britain seat more than 20,000 people and none more than 30,000. Then count the kids among those numbers on one hand.
Finally, rethink 50-over cricket, either by ditching it or using it smarter. Until you play one-day cricket, or T20, you can have no idea what it takes out of you. This is the format that is sucking the oxygen from the lungs of the overworked elite. Worse still, it cramps the schedule. T20 is a winner and set to stay, though overkill is already a concern and needs addressing.
Fifty-over cricket should become a first course, an entree, an antipasto. It should be the first thing on everyone's lips after a layoff and should be taken to the small towns, the country, to the outposts where the game does not usually go. It should be stripped back to a purer form - limitless overs for bowlers perhaps, as there are for batsmen, and fewer fielding restrictions and Powerplays. And never should there be more than three matches in a series. Give the game that brought cricket into the 20th century a last chance to seduce us by making it important again through place and structure. Presently it is compromised by the T20 phenomenon and often featured as an add-on to a series, whereupon it dies, along with the months of summer.
Empty seats are not a distant or trifling concern, they are the zeitgeist. We live in an age of public conscience about the environment and constant reminders of the sort of footprint we should leave for those who follow. The ICC - and by that we mean the boards of all the member nations of the global cricket community - have the power to do something about their cricket footprint. We implore them to divert from financial ambition and to pay attention to a legacy. And we urge them not to delay.
Mark Nicholas, the former Hampshire captain, presents the cricket on Channel 9 in Australia and Channel 5 in the UK
© ESPN EMEA Ltd.
| ||||||
| Comments have now been closed for this article |
||||||
A prolific and stylish middle-order batsman for Hampshire, Mark Nicholas was unlucky never to have played for England, but after captaining his county to four major trophies he made his reputation as a presenter, commentator and columnist. Named the UK Sports Presenter of the Year in 2001 and 2005 by the Royal Television Society, he has commentated all over the world, from the World Cup in the West Indies to the Indian Premier League. He now hosts the cricket coverage for Channel 9 in Australia and Channel 5 in England.

Fixing? It's people like us doing it
Ed Hawkins: It's convenient to blame the underworld for every instance of fixing, but it's ordinary punters behind many of them
The perils of scoffing at failure
Rob Steen: Excessive success can destroy inhibition, and hence the capacity for shame
New Zealand shaken and stirred
Andrew Alderson: The second-innings collapse at Lord's has revived concerns about New Zealand's top order
'The most complete fast bowler I've seen'
Allan Donald on one of the bowlers he found intimidating: the relentless Wasim Akram
The divine madness of Kevin Pietersen
Jon Hotten: Players like him, when absent, stir a yearning in the spectator that has nothing to do with team loyalty
A talent that didn't know its own worth
Sreesanth wasn't the most likeable team-mate or opponent, but he had skill beyond doubt, which we might have seen the last of
Even at the height of his success with the national side, Sreesanth was a lonely cricketer who felt hard done by
Pollard sledges Watson, Dravid is angry
Plays of the day from the IPL match between Mumbai Indians and Rajasthan Royals in Mumbai
A time for anger, a time for action
Out of the shattered lives of three young men caught up in allegations of fraud, newer and stronger players must emerge
Another season in the bottom half
With some of their big names stumbling this season, Kings XI Punjab were rarely serious contenders for a playoff place
Even at the height of his success with the national side, Sreesanth was a lonely cricketer who felt hard done by
Mumbai Indians still have a better head-to-head record against Chennai Super Kings, but once again on the big occasion, they came second
Anderson's magic not to be missed (50)
None of the other three England bowlers with 300 Test wickets - or many other of the game's finest swing merchants - could have bowled better than James Anderson at Lord's
"Minimise sixes" - Two words sum up farcical contest (40)
The eight-over dash between Bangalore and Chennai was as close as cricket played on the field can get to cricket played on smartphone apps
A case of peaking too early (39)
Royal Challengers began the season in full steam, but failed to replicate their consistency away from home
ICICI Bank M2I. Register Now and Get A Gift Offer.
Safe & simple online money transfer. Apply Now!
Buy Wisden 2013 & get a FREE Playfair
Available now at Cricshop
The problem is that people dont have enough time to spare these days to watch a 5 day match.Encourage people to go on cricketing holidays by providing facilites and packages ..Play tests over the weekend.Start a match on a Thursday as they do in England.Educate fans on how to watch a test match by keeping track of the field placements about the crikcet ball and the way it behaves including reverse swing,by providing insight into the nature of the wickett by providing small pamphlets at venues
The 5-10 year olds of today are not charmed by test match cricket. And we as the 5-10 year olds knew only one form of cricket - test cricket! Its kind of sad because test match cricket teaches you so much about life in general. All principles which allow a player to succeed in test match cricket can be easily replicated to succeed in any sphere of life. But times are changing. And we need to change and adapt. It is no good to live in the past and yearn for it because that does not reflect the reality of today. Perhaps the face of cricket has already changed. Trying to reinforce the supremeness of test cricket may be a futile exercise (although in my personal opinion, its a very worthy exercise). Bless people like Mark who have come up with some brilliant suggestions, but who would educate the Srinivasans and Pawars of this world?!
Cricket, in all its brands, is business. For the moment t20 can generate income, esp. when it's marketed & packaged like the IPL. You can be sure that the BCCI wouldn't prioritise their baby - now nearly six years old! - over the adult & estranged parent, Test cricket, unless it did. Yet anyone who has an enduring (as opposed to a passing) interest in cricket appreciates the depth & subtlety offered by TC & whilst nat. cricket remains the concern & responsibility of nat. boards, then they collectively (within the ICC) & separately have an absolute obligation to safeguard its future. Much energy & commitment are needed for this, &, as ever, the bigger picture needs to be acknowledged. To sports fans in cricketing countries how their Test side is doing is a matter of some national importance & it's down to the boards to use their marketing skills (esp. by reducing the cost of tickets) + income from t20 to ensure that TC thrives for years to come. ODIs have no place to go now. Bury them.
Money is king when sport becomes an industry rather than a pastime. Sad but true.
Shorter, allegedly more public and TV friendly, forms of the game will dominate unless the ICC and the Test Nations do something about it. Test series need to be at least 4 matched long - I remember when Ashes series were routinely six matches - the ICC must rule to end the trend towards series made up of ten or more short format games and only one or two tests. Unfortunately there does not seem to be a will to do anything about the inexorable rise of the short format games.
What to do about involvement? Reducing ticket prices is unrealistic, it just won't happen. Hooking kids early and keeping them is essential - get them playing. Not in the pressured and elitist League Clubs where they are welcome until they are 15 and then kicked out unless they are ready to go straight into the 1st XI. The majority of the audience for cricket are duffers like me. We watch and pay for the elite, but are ignored.
Here in New Zealand test cricket crowds have never really been anything like the boxing day test match in melbourne. Generally days one, two and three fall on weekdays. A lot of people are working and can't get to the match. Day four is on a saturday once again true cricket fans are either playing cricket themselves and can't get to the game. Plus why would you go to the cricket and pay for overpriced drinks and food when watching it at home on tv you can enjoy a beverage or two without it hitting you hard in the back pocket. I agree dropping the ticket prices for both tests and odi's, you will get the public down. I don't think test cricket is dying. It is still the pinnacle and the true test of how good you are.
Posted by Atul on (March 9, 2013, 18:31 GMT)While I agree with all of Mark's points as usual, I would like to point out that the Hyderabad test had far better attendance than is being portrayed here. The second day was almost full. The first and the third were not bad either - about 60-70% full.
Posted byMark you have a point!! Evey-body across all cricketing diaspora(those who understand the game and its intricacies) share the similar sentiment! And it's not the first time I have come across concerns like this! But then it is not well received!! It fall to deaf years and like you rightly pointed out in your article"ruthless commerce is directing the fate of its future" Let us hope good sense prevails and something is done before it's too late!
Posted by GoCric on (March 9, 2013, 2:28 GMT)Its getting a little old with people constantly placing the perceived ills of Cricket at the doorstep of the BCCI. Test cricket is the ultimate test but the world changes and cricket has to change with it. The BCCI did not invent 20/20 in fact they were always against playing 20/20 when it was first conceived of by the ECB and CA. Now that the BCCI has found a way to commercialize it with the IPL everyone is up in arms against them. Although I also think that test cricket is the ultimate test of a cricketer, the sport however will not survive in this era without 20/20 and certainly will not expand to other countries without it. However one way to bring crowds back is to cut back on the number of matches being played. There is way too much cricket played today by all countries and I would certainly blame all the boards including the BCCI for that.
Posted by __PK on (March 8, 2013, 22:29 GMT)Test cricket is like opera, museums, art galleries. It's important to have them, but almost noone goes to them. Perhaps the art gallery parallel is where the author got the inspiriation for 2013's most confused and, frankly, patronising metaphor - "thrive within the canvas of the lowest common denominator". How many times do you hear people rejoicing over the place cricket in the hearts of hundreds of millions of ordinary Indians? How can that not be the lowest common denominator? Sorry, this whole article smacks of a man trying to appeal to the 15 other people world-wide who agree with him to defend something he's invested his whole life in. The last line "We urge them not to delay." Sorry, is he writing this with the help of a vast legion of assistants? If not, then try a little humility and say "I urge them."
Posted by bjg62 on (March 8, 2013, 13:41 GMT)One point I definitely agree with is that the T20 and 50 over ODI should be played prior to a Test series (as they were a long time ago). I recall the massive anticipation that used to precede an Ashes series in England when the one-day games were being played. It only seemed to whet the appetite for the Test series. These days, with the ODI & T20 played at the completion of the Test series, it almost always seems to be anticlimactic for the players involved.