Ramachandra Guha
Cricket writer and historian

Why Tendulkar must retire now

Like the other great Bombay batsmen of the past, he should time his exit right. It can't get better than ending with a series against Australia

Ramachandra Guha

March 24, 2013

Comments: 332 | Text size: A | A

Sachin Tendulkar and Virat Kohli chat during their 91-run stand, India v Australia, 1st Test, Chennai, 3rd day, February 24, 2013
Tendulkar has groomed and inspired India's talented young batsmen, so he'll know he leaves the team in good hands © BCCI
Related Links
Ed Smith : Tendulkar and the pull of love
Series/Tournaments: Australia tour of India
Teams: India

In December 1951, after a Test match against England in New Delhi, the founder of the Bombay School of Batsmanship retired from international cricket. Vijay Merchant had scored a flawless hundred, and yet he chose to hang up his boots (and his bat). When a friend asked why, he said he didn't want to wait for the time when people would ask: why not?

Merchant was the greatest Indian batsman until the arrival of Sunil Gavaskar. Gavaskar grew up hearing stories about Merchant at the crease. Merchant had played for India with Gavaskar's uncle, Madhav Mantri, and it was Merchant who selected Gavaskar to play for India. When the time came for Gavaskar to leave the game, he chose the method laid out by his mentor. In the winter of 1986-87, Gavaskar played what he, and many others, regarded as his best-ever Test innings, against Pakistan in Bangalore. Later that year he retired, after batting well (and surprisingly briskly) through most of the 1987 World Cup.

The Bombay School of Batsmanship features many high hills and three mighty mountains: Merchant, Gavaskar, and Sachin Tendulkar. In choosing his moment of departure, will Sachin be as wise or as lucky as his predecessors? There was, in fact, a moment, in the fairly recent past, when he could have gone, to universal acclaim and the highest of honours. To be more specific, if Sachin had retired after the 2011 World Cup, which India won in part because of his 85 against Pakistan in the semi-final, he would surely have been honoured with the Bharat Ratna.

But he played on, a decision no one begrudged him, for he was batting well. In the two years since, though, his game has slipped. While touring England and Australia he batted well only in patches. Against New Zealand and England at home he was bowled far too often for a player of his genius. He went back to the Ranji Trophy, rediscovered some of his form, and has batted moderately well in the series against Australia currently underway. This prompts the question: should he retire at the end of this, the fourth and last Test of the series?

Every Indian cricket fan claims a special kinship with Sachin. Mine is this: he made his Test debut in 1989, and we acquired a colour television in the same year. Ever since, I have had my life enriched by the magic of Sachin Tendulkar at the crease. I have watched him bat many times live, and many other times on the box. I have marvelled at the range of his strokeplay, at his commanding control of both the Test and the one-day game, at his extraordinary ability to master different wickets, grounds and bowling attacks, and above all at the cool authority and understated calm with which he has borne, for this past quarter of a century, the absurdly inflated and sometimes maniacal expectations of millions of his countrymen.

Although I have followed him closely since 1989, I have never spoken to Sachin. We have not even ever been in the same room. Those who have think that he might yet be tempted to go to South Africa so that he plays 200 Tests (he is currently two short). Others speak of the ecosystem of sponsors, supporters and plain old-fashioned chamchas (hangers-on) who will not let him go. To this we must add the tendency of most sportsmen, indeed most men, to think that they alone are ageless, that the attritional forces of biology and history do not operate on them with the same intensity as they would on other mortals.

Even if Sachin does badly in South Africa, his standing among the fans will remain intact. Even so, I think that now is the time for him to go

The British writer Enoch Powell, himself a long-serving Member of Parliament, once remarked that all political lives end in failure. This is mostly true. Politicians tend to stay on far too long for the good of their reputation (and the good of their country). Winston Churchill should have retired as soon as the Second World War ended. Instead, he contested and lost the elections of 1945, coming back a few years later in his dotage, to serve a disastrous last term as prime minister.

Closer home, had Manmohan Singh left public life in 2009, at the completion of his first term as prime minister, history - and the people of India - would have remembered him very differently.

In this respect, sportsmen are somewhat luckier than politicians. Their fans tend to remember their best days, not their decline. The fact that John McEnroe won no major tournaments in his last few years as a player has not stopped us from remembering him as the most gifted shotmaker of his generation. That Rahul Dravid and VVS Laxman batted so poorly on their last tour will not stop us from being grateful for all they did for and in front of us.

By this token, even if Sachin does badly in South Africa, his standing among the fans shall remain intact. Even so, I think that once this Delhi Test ends it will be the time for him to go.

Throughout his career it has been the rivalry with Australia that has been definitive, for him and for the cricketing history of the world. From those two brilliant hundreds on his first tour Down Under, to the superlative 155 in Chennai that demolished Warne and won a series six years later, to those magnificent one-day innings he has played against Australia in various countries, the image one carries - and will carry to one's grave - is of a little man with a flashing bat taking on a pack of tall, fearsome Aussie fast bowlers and their even more deadly wristspinning companion as well.

When Sachin went in to bat for the first time in the present series, the game hung in the balance. Australia had posted an impressive first-innings score (350-plus), while India had just lost two quick wickets. Sachin hit the dangerous James Pattinson for three boundaries, forcing Michael Clarke to take the bowler off. Those strokes reassured Sachin's partner, Virat Kohli, and together they steadied the innings, preparing the way for MS Dhoni's savage onslaught the next day.

Had Sachin fallen early in that first Test, however, the series may well have turned out differently.

In the event, India won that Test easily, and the next two as well. As I write this, on the second afternoon of the final Test, the match lies slightly in India's favour. But whatever happens over the next three days, we know for sure that in this series the mighty Australians have been vanquished. A group of fine young batsmen - Pujara, Kohli, Vijay, Dhawan - groomed and inspired by Sachin himself, are scoring runs regularly and with assurance. Therefore, at the end of this Delhi Test, Sachin Tendulkar should do a Vijay Merchant and retire from international cricket.

Historian and cricket writer Ramachandra Guha is the author of A Corner of A Foreign Field and Wickets in the East among other books

RSS Feeds: Ramachandra Guha

© ESPN Sports Media Ltd.

Posted by Nampally on (March 27, 2013, 18:38 GMT)

Mr. Guha, The Fans & the Journalists may have their own opinion on Sachin's retirement. But Sachin himself must decide when he is ready to retire. In my opinion, he should have retired after India returned from Australian with 4-0 white wash. SRT is a legend like Wayne Gretzky was in the Ice Hockey. But sadly, age catches up with all of us. It is especially important for the Legends to quit so that people remember you for what you were at your peak. By staying on past your best years, you leave memories of a washed out batsman. SRT's Test average has dipped at least 4 points over the past 2 years & is still dipping! India has lot of talent in guys like Pujara, Kohli & Tiwary to take the spots vacated by Dravid, SRT & Laxman. There is also a new generation of younger guys like U.Chand (20) + others like R.Sharma, Raina, Rahane, in the middle order. SRT has achieved all the records & there is nothing more to be gained. Our life itself is a Game of Cricket - SRT, so lets play the Game!

Posted by bailey8210 on (March 27, 2013, 8:55 GMT)

hi its going to be sad to see sachin retire but his outstanding record wont be beaten for a long time we will miss him. one thing i would like to see is if anyone was to replace sachin it would have to be rohit sharma the young man needs the opportunity and this would be the only indian cricket could move on and win games over seas that would be with rohit sharma.

Posted by   on (March 27, 2013, 3:51 GMT)

Perhaps the 2 tests spanning the same dates showed why. While in one his reputation influenced the umpire, apparently the reason why his camp (read he) objects to DRS, the other witnessed some drastic reviews, but for which the big chase for draw would have ended in a result, yet a dull one (most such chases end midway as they put umpires under extra pressure). It's another matter Oz's inability to capitalize on such breakthroughs may still have left them in trouble. He of course had once had his share of bad luck with umpiring , but that's no excuse for leaving Hugheses, Cowans, Pujaras or Kohlis at the mercy of instinctive umpiring when technology is available. It's horrible feeling when you see a drastic decision was just a howler.

Posted by Smithie on (March 26, 2013, 18:04 GMT)

There is one most compelling reason why he must retire now. So that all of the cricket world can have consistency and use DRS in all ICC Test Nation matches. His reluctance to support DRS has been a blot on his impressive career. Hopefully his retirement will allow Srinivasan to save face and support DRS fully.

Posted by   on (March 26, 2013, 17:59 GMT)

Dear Sir, i am agree with you but i think indian batsmen have proved themsleves in indian conditions. In SA and NZ they have to face the seaming and bouncing conditions, in such case they require the experience of Sachin I believe for their motivation Sachin must retain in team, and irrespective of any result their he should retire from cricket after that. But any way master has made us proud so, Cheers for Sachin

Posted by henchart on (March 26, 2013, 15:05 GMT)

SRT is his own worst enemy or at least is becoming so.Where are those booming extracover drives,use of feet to smother spin ,ferocious pulls,deft cuts?Probably in old videos ,repeatedly aired on Channels.SRT has to overhaul his approach to give one last fillip to his career.I guess he wont play another test in India.SRT is going the Kapil not Gavaskar way into retirement.People were asking when would Kapil break Hadlee's record and pave way for Srinath whereas masses were left yearning for more of Gavaskar after his superb 96 on a crumbling pitch at Bangalore.

Comments have now been closed for this article

Email Feedback Print
Ramachandra GuhaClose

    'I have what it takes to be a great Test batsman'

Couch Talk: West Indies batsman Kraigg Brathwaite on his mental approach, and his captaincy ambitions

What to expect from this World Cup

Jarrod Kimber: A random list of things that you may or may not see at the 2015 mega-event

Forever young

The Cricket Monthly: Famous players at the age of 25, in pictures
Download the app: for iPads | for Android tablets

    Ronchi's blitz, and remarkable ODI recoveries

Ask Steven: Also, the fastest ODI 150s, and the highest Test totals without a half-century

When will we see the first truly freelance cricketer?

Jon Hotten: Will the likes of Pietersen become guns for hire in the full sense of the term?

News | Features Last 7 days

Off-stump blues leave Dhawan flailing

The out-of-form Shikhar Dhawan still has the backing of his captain, but there's no denying his slump has arrived at an inconvenient time for India and his technical issues have to be sorted out before they attempt to defend the World Cup

Kohli at No. 4 - defensive or practical?

It seems Virat Kohli is to not bat before the 12th or 13th over to strengthen the middle and the lower middle order. It suggests a lack of confidence in what was supposed to be India's strength in their title defence: their batting

Open with Rohit and Binny, with Kohli at No. 3

India's batting is going the way of their bowling in Australia, and they need get their order sorted before the World Cup

On TV it looks uglier than it actually is

Often reasonable arguments on the field look nasty beyond the boundary and on camera

Ten things that are different at this World Cup

And one that will be the same. A look at what has changed since 2011

News | Features Last 7 days