New Zealand v Pakistan, 5th ODI, Hamilton February 3, 2011

Taylor blames batsmen's poor conversion rates for loss

18

Ross Taylor, the New Zealand batsman, has said the failure of New Zealand's batsmen to convert starts is what has hurt them in their ODI series loss to Pakistan. Another poor batting effort in Hamilton, on Thursday, saw the hosts go down by 41 runs to give Pakistan an unassailable 3-1 lead in the series. New Zealand lost wickets at regular intervals, as the run chase faltered repeatedly just as a decent partnership appeared to be building.

"Once again we put ourselves in a good position to push ahead in the dying overs but we kept losing wickets at crucial times," Taylor, who captained the side on Thursday in the absence of Daniel Vettori, said. "Obviously the confidence is lower because of that."

New Zealand's batting has failed all too frequently during the series, with the top five often unable to make an impact on the game. Even when the top order have got starts - as they did on Thursday with Taylor and Martin Guptill both hitting half-centuries - none of the New Zealand batsmen have been able to play a definitive innings to swing games in their favour. In five one-dayers, the hosts' highest individual score has been 69, and Taylor identified that as the chief reason behind their losses.

"At the moment we are getting ourselves into a good position and not capitalising. The batters can take a good look at the way the Pakistanis have played. Today, [Ahmed] Shehzad went on to score three figures, Misbah got ninety-odd in Napier and Hafeez got a hundred in Christchurch. Scores of sixty from Guptill and myself are alright sometimes, but when the team needs you, you've got to step up and score a ninety or a hundred like they have.

"The confidence is not quite there and when the confidence isn't there results don't seem to go your way. I don't think we are very far away to be honest. We just need to convert a couple of sixties to big scores and make sure we don't keep losing wickets."

Taylor said his 69 was of little consequence because he was unable to see New Zealand level the series with a win. "I was happy to get a score but it doesn't really mean much when you lose. I got myself into a position when I should have pushed on and I didn't go on."

Taylor did reserve praise for his bowlers, however, who reined Pakistan in during the last ten overs after they had threatened to score in excess of 300. Pakistan were 243 for 5 after 45 overs, with three batting Powerplay overs yet to come, and Shahid Afridi and Umar Akmal at the crease. Canny variations and a slower short ball used to great effect prevented Pakistan from getting away at the death and restricted their total to 268 for nine in 50 overs. Pakistan managed only 25 runs for the loss of four wickets in their final five overs, and Taylor said his bowlers' performance in the end overs boded well for the World Cup.

"I was very happy [with the death bowling]. In Christchurch, we were a little predictable, but the way we changed the pace and manipulated the field today [Thursday] kept the batsmen guessing. New Zealand grounds in general are very small and you need to do that. The way they mixed up their pace was a positive we can take out of this, not only for the next match but for the World Cup as well. Some of the grounds in India are small too."

Jacob Oram and Kyle Mills were particularly impressive, and showed their experience during the batting Powerplay. The pair picked up two wickets apiece. "I've got to give it to Millsy and Jake and even Hamish [Bennett] for the way he bowled his last over. They were looking like scoring well over 300. It was probably a 280, 300 wicket; we were happy to chase that down and we should have got there."

New Zealand will play one more ODI against Pakistan, in Auckland on Saturday, and Taylor said they were eager to salvage what little momentum there is to be taken from the final encounter ahead of the World Cup, which begins on February 19. "There is some urgency to get some momentum with a win [on Saturday]. But I don't think we are far away [from a winning performance]."

Andrew Fernando writes for The Pigeon and blogs here

Comments have now been closed for this article

  • on February 4, 2011, 15:31 GMT

    NEWZEALAND MUST MEET INDIA IN QF.PAKISTAN IN SF AND WESTINDIES IN FINAL LOL

  • EddyEhmed on February 4, 2011, 6:59 GMT

    *"At the moment we are getting ourselves into a good position and not capitalizing"*

    Those good moments were due to 13 players which NZ was playing in the series, yes you all are correct *The Two Umpires* but still Pakistan WON ..

  • on February 4, 2011, 4:32 GMT

    If you look at Pakistan batting line up you would see most of the bastmen are aggressive in nature:

    Mohammad Hafeez Aggressive Ahmed Shehzad Aggressive Kamran Akmal† Aggressive Younis Khan Defensive Misbah-ul-Haq Defensive Umar Akmal Aggressive Shahid Afridi* Aggressive Abdul Razzaq Aggressive Wahab Riaz N/A Umar Gul N/A Shoaib Akhtar N/A

    This can easily backfire in World Cup on any given day.

    The other two weakness in Pakistan team are:

    1. Ability to drop catches 2. Running between wickets

    They really need to work on these things to give themselves better chances. Wish them good luck

  • Zahidsaltin on February 4, 2011, 3:10 GMT

    CRICKET NZ you need to bring Vettori at 4 and open with McCullum and Guptil. Keep Ryder down the order. Don't lose him to new ball. I,ll say McCullum, Guptil, How, Vettori, Tylor, Ryder, Styris, Franklin, N.McClum, Mills and Bennet. Ryder is the key here and he is not so good playing new ball. I dont like How coming at 3 as I do not rate him as a world class batsman but then who else.

  • Zahidsaltin on February 4, 2011, 3:00 GMT

    Taylor, Guptal, Ryder and MacCullum are 4 very good players who can score fast. Then they have Styris, How, Vettori too. What I dont understand is Orams batting. He used to do some good hitting in end overs. On papirs NZ isn't a bad team at all. They just need to fire and specially Ryder got to get in to form befor the WC

  • on February 4, 2011, 0:37 GMT

    New Zealand is not a bad side, they lost because Pakisan played good cricket.

  • on February 3, 2011, 23:57 GMT

    Personally I think ryder needs to assess himself as a batsmen - he is too flippant an impetuos. Taylor and Guptil cant do everything themselves, and Jamie How needs to perform or he wont be coming back after the world cup.

    It is good to see the likes the Nathan and Franklin becoming good all rounders with the likes of styris- but this article is correct, every game atleast 3/5 of our better batsmen are getting dismall scores and those that do get a good score just can not convert it too a high totla.

  • pk_cric_rox on February 3, 2011, 23:44 GMT

    kane williamson at num 3 or 4 might solve their problem,kiwis r trying to fit hitters on top order n thats always riskky. u need atleast one wise head among top 4

  • SixFourOut on February 3, 2011, 23:06 GMT

    AndyZaltzmannsHair is right, NZ need a glue player. Williamson needs to be groomed as this at no 5...........................................................

    NZ need to bat low, they are NOT going to turn this top order woe around any time soon.......................................................................................

    They need the following team in the following order:.................................

    1. McCullum, 2. Ryder, 3. Guptil, 4. Taylor, 5. Williamson, 6. Styris, 7. Franklin, 8. Oram, 9. Vettori, 10. N McCullum, 11. Mills

    That's a solid batting order that bats all the way down in case of the omnipresent, frequent collapses.........................................................................

    It also gives you 2 spinners plus Guptil, Williamson on a real turner, plus Mills, Oram, Franklin, Styris and Ryder...........................

    Why play Southee and Bennett who are too young, too inexperienced and frankly not up to the task on the subcontinent?..

  • on February 3, 2011, 22:19 GMT

    New Zealand need to make brendon mccullum open with guptill, with ryder coming at no 3 , taylor at 4, styris at 5, franklin 6 and vettori 7,nathan mucullum , oram , southee and hamish bennett. they are not as bad as the result suggests. if they take this squad in to the world cup. i can see them progressing atleast to the semi final. don't forget new zealand have made the top four in world cup most of the time while other big teams have flopped out in the group stages. They need somebody to hold down one end, probably styris or taylor or even promoting franklin to do the job up top.

  • on February 4, 2011, 15:31 GMT

    NEWZEALAND MUST MEET INDIA IN QF.PAKISTAN IN SF AND WESTINDIES IN FINAL LOL

  • EddyEhmed on February 4, 2011, 6:59 GMT

    *"At the moment we are getting ourselves into a good position and not capitalizing"*

    Those good moments were due to 13 players which NZ was playing in the series, yes you all are correct *The Two Umpires* but still Pakistan WON ..

  • on February 4, 2011, 4:32 GMT

    If you look at Pakistan batting line up you would see most of the bastmen are aggressive in nature:

    Mohammad Hafeez Aggressive Ahmed Shehzad Aggressive Kamran Akmal† Aggressive Younis Khan Defensive Misbah-ul-Haq Defensive Umar Akmal Aggressive Shahid Afridi* Aggressive Abdul Razzaq Aggressive Wahab Riaz N/A Umar Gul N/A Shoaib Akhtar N/A

    This can easily backfire in World Cup on any given day.

    The other two weakness in Pakistan team are:

    1. Ability to drop catches 2. Running between wickets

    They really need to work on these things to give themselves better chances. Wish them good luck

  • Zahidsaltin on February 4, 2011, 3:10 GMT

    CRICKET NZ you need to bring Vettori at 4 and open with McCullum and Guptil. Keep Ryder down the order. Don't lose him to new ball. I,ll say McCullum, Guptil, How, Vettori, Tylor, Ryder, Styris, Franklin, N.McClum, Mills and Bennet. Ryder is the key here and he is not so good playing new ball. I dont like How coming at 3 as I do not rate him as a world class batsman but then who else.

  • Zahidsaltin on February 4, 2011, 3:00 GMT

    Taylor, Guptal, Ryder and MacCullum are 4 very good players who can score fast. Then they have Styris, How, Vettori too. What I dont understand is Orams batting. He used to do some good hitting in end overs. On papirs NZ isn't a bad team at all. They just need to fire and specially Ryder got to get in to form befor the WC

  • on February 4, 2011, 0:37 GMT

    New Zealand is not a bad side, they lost because Pakisan played good cricket.

  • on February 3, 2011, 23:57 GMT

    Personally I think ryder needs to assess himself as a batsmen - he is too flippant an impetuos. Taylor and Guptil cant do everything themselves, and Jamie How needs to perform or he wont be coming back after the world cup.

    It is good to see the likes the Nathan and Franklin becoming good all rounders with the likes of styris- but this article is correct, every game atleast 3/5 of our better batsmen are getting dismall scores and those that do get a good score just can not convert it too a high totla.

  • pk_cric_rox on February 3, 2011, 23:44 GMT

    kane williamson at num 3 or 4 might solve their problem,kiwis r trying to fit hitters on top order n thats always riskky. u need atleast one wise head among top 4

  • SixFourOut on February 3, 2011, 23:06 GMT

    AndyZaltzmannsHair is right, NZ need a glue player. Williamson needs to be groomed as this at no 5...........................................................

    NZ need to bat low, they are NOT going to turn this top order woe around any time soon.......................................................................................

    They need the following team in the following order:.................................

    1. McCullum, 2. Ryder, 3. Guptil, 4. Taylor, 5. Williamson, 6. Styris, 7. Franklin, 8. Oram, 9. Vettori, 10. N McCullum, 11. Mills

    That's a solid batting order that bats all the way down in case of the omnipresent, frequent collapses.........................................................................

    It also gives you 2 spinners plus Guptil, Williamson on a real turner, plus Mills, Oram, Franklin, Styris and Ryder...........................

    Why play Southee and Bennett who are too young, too inexperienced and frankly not up to the task on the subcontinent?..

  • on February 3, 2011, 22:19 GMT

    New Zealand need to make brendon mccullum open with guptill, with ryder coming at no 3 , taylor at 4, styris at 5, franklin 6 and vettori 7,nathan mucullum , oram , southee and hamish bennett. they are not as bad as the result suggests. if they take this squad in to the world cup. i can see them progressing atleast to the semi final. don't forget new zealand have made the top four in world cup most of the time while other big teams have flopped out in the group stages. They need somebody to hold down one end, probably styris or taylor or even promoting franklin to do the job up top.

  • sirvivfan on February 3, 2011, 20:06 GMT

    NEW ZEALAND ARE NOT FAR OFF WINNING. THEY NEED COUPLE OF BATS TO PERSERVE THEIR WICKETS AND PERHAPS BAT BIT MORE CAREFULLY IN TH MIDDLE. THE MARGING BETWEEN WINNING AND LOOSING IS SMALLIN LIMITED OVER GAMES.

  • on February 3, 2011, 16:47 GMT

    Umpires' performance was not near to satisfactory anyhow!

  • on February 3, 2011, 16:14 GMT

    Taylor should be talking about his strike rate..lol

  • rizzz86 on February 3, 2011, 16:13 GMT

    Excellent show by Pakistan today. Really a confidence booster before world cup

  • AndyZaltzmannsHair on February 3, 2011, 15:29 GMT

    All this NZ team lacks is a middle order 'glue' player to gel them all together. They're asking Guptill to do that role but he's playing as an opener who has to keep the score ticking over which is asking too much of him. Taylor is never gonna be a nudger and nurdler of the ball so that's out of the question. One player in the middle who's job it is to just preserve their wicket whilst others hit out is imperative. Until then the batting is gonna struggle.

  • on February 3, 2011, 15:24 GMT

    GLORIOUS UNCERTIANTIES IS NAME OF THIS GAME FOR ITS UP AND DOWN CHARACTER - FOR LONG IT HAS BEEN WITH PAKISTAN AND OF LATE FOR NEWZEALAND - BUT DOWN ENOUGH, THEY WILL NOW SEE THE WAY UP - FOR NOW THEY NEED TO WIN THE LAST MATCH - GOOD LUCK.......

  • on February 3, 2011, 15:08 GMT

    Inspite of the fact, that Umpires had tried their best not to give lbw of any kind

  • AndyZaltzmannsHair on February 3, 2011, 13:51 GMT

    Fire safety code for batting. 'Get in and stay in, do not look to hit out, do not look to throw your wicket away. If a collapse is underway, immediately call up Daniel Vettori and stay away from the vicinity of the collapse.'

  • No featured comments at the moment.

  • AndyZaltzmannsHair on February 3, 2011, 13:51 GMT

    Fire safety code for batting. 'Get in and stay in, do not look to hit out, do not look to throw your wicket away. If a collapse is underway, immediately call up Daniel Vettori and stay away from the vicinity of the collapse.'

  • on February 3, 2011, 15:08 GMT

    Inspite of the fact, that Umpires had tried their best not to give lbw of any kind

  • on February 3, 2011, 15:24 GMT

    GLORIOUS UNCERTIANTIES IS NAME OF THIS GAME FOR ITS UP AND DOWN CHARACTER - FOR LONG IT HAS BEEN WITH PAKISTAN AND OF LATE FOR NEWZEALAND - BUT DOWN ENOUGH, THEY WILL NOW SEE THE WAY UP - FOR NOW THEY NEED TO WIN THE LAST MATCH - GOOD LUCK.......

  • AndyZaltzmannsHair on February 3, 2011, 15:29 GMT

    All this NZ team lacks is a middle order 'glue' player to gel them all together. They're asking Guptill to do that role but he's playing as an opener who has to keep the score ticking over which is asking too much of him. Taylor is never gonna be a nudger and nurdler of the ball so that's out of the question. One player in the middle who's job it is to just preserve their wicket whilst others hit out is imperative. Until then the batting is gonna struggle.

  • rizzz86 on February 3, 2011, 16:13 GMT

    Excellent show by Pakistan today. Really a confidence booster before world cup

  • on February 3, 2011, 16:14 GMT

    Taylor should be talking about his strike rate..lol

  • on February 3, 2011, 16:47 GMT

    Umpires' performance was not near to satisfactory anyhow!

  • sirvivfan on February 3, 2011, 20:06 GMT

    NEW ZEALAND ARE NOT FAR OFF WINNING. THEY NEED COUPLE OF BATS TO PERSERVE THEIR WICKETS AND PERHAPS BAT BIT MORE CAREFULLY IN TH MIDDLE. THE MARGING BETWEEN WINNING AND LOOSING IS SMALLIN LIMITED OVER GAMES.

  • on February 3, 2011, 22:19 GMT

    New Zealand need to make brendon mccullum open with guptill, with ryder coming at no 3 , taylor at 4, styris at 5, franklin 6 and vettori 7,nathan mucullum , oram , southee and hamish bennett. they are not as bad as the result suggests. if they take this squad in to the world cup. i can see them progressing atleast to the semi final. don't forget new zealand have made the top four in world cup most of the time while other big teams have flopped out in the group stages. They need somebody to hold down one end, probably styris or taylor or even promoting franklin to do the job up top.

  • SixFourOut on February 3, 2011, 23:06 GMT

    AndyZaltzmannsHair is right, NZ need a glue player. Williamson needs to be groomed as this at no 5...........................................................

    NZ need to bat low, they are NOT going to turn this top order woe around any time soon.......................................................................................

    They need the following team in the following order:.................................

    1. McCullum, 2. Ryder, 3. Guptil, 4. Taylor, 5. Williamson, 6. Styris, 7. Franklin, 8. Oram, 9. Vettori, 10. N McCullum, 11. Mills

    That's a solid batting order that bats all the way down in case of the omnipresent, frequent collapses.........................................................................

    It also gives you 2 spinners plus Guptil, Williamson on a real turner, plus Mills, Oram, Franklin, Styris and Ryder...........................

    Why play Southee and Bennett who are too young, too inexperienced and frankly not up to the task on the subcontinent?..