South Africa v India, 2nd Test, Durban, 4th day

Test of character awaits after testing day

The work on the India quicks' legs finally began to show, but their fate in this series now depends on how their batsmen fare on a challenging final day

Sidharth Monga in Durban

December 29, 2013

Comments: 46 | Text size: A | A
Persisted with old ball for reverse swing - Trevor Penney

India can't have gone into the fourth day thinking of a win. Their plan would have been to delay South Africa's attainment of a sizeable lead as much as possible. The Ravindra Jadeja threat in South Africa's minds would have helped India. It had showed in how the hosts didn't push for quick runs towards the end of the third day. However, there were two ways of going about it.

The first was to actively try to take wickets. The second was to bowl with an old and soft ball for as long as they could because it would be hard to score off on a slow and slightly two-paced pitch. There was no right or wrong decision; it was a matter of having a feel of the conditions, the fitness and the intensity of the quicker bowlers, who would have to bowl with the new ball, and how much threat the possibility quick runs posed.

As it turned out, India bowled with the old ball until they were literally not allowed to use it anymore. It was an extreme step, but MS Dhoni must have felt that was the way to go. For 146 overs, India went on with a scuffed-up ball that did almost nothing for the bowlers, except not travelling off the bat.

You wonder if India thought they should have done otherwise when they saw Dale Steyn and Vernon Philander do things with the new ball, but you also wonder how much the workload of the fast bowlers at the Wanderers played in this decision. They came into this Test having had only three days' recovery, saw India bat first and weather delay their turn a bit, but the intensity - especially from Zaheer Khan, from whom you could not snatch the ball at Wanderers - was visibly lower.

When Graeme Smith was asked before the second Test whether South Africa would look to bat first to put the India bowlers back on the field as soon as possible, he didn't sound too desperate to do that because he expected the tired legs to show up at some point in the Test. "I think that workload will be in their legs somewhere in the Test match," Smith said. "I think especially if we can get a good partnership somewhere in our top order."


Ravindra Jadeja celebrates taking five wickets, South Africa v India, 2nd Test, Durban, 4th day, December 29, 2013
With the fast bowlers fatigued, Ravindra Jadeja did most of the bowling for India © Associated Press
Enlarge

The three India quicks bowled 86 overs at Kingsmead for 315 runs and three wickets, two of which were lower-order batsmen who had already done the damage. It wasn't easy. Durban has been hot and humid when it isn't raining, and the wicket is not as helpful as the one at Wanderers, but it still has something in it, especially as it deteriorates.

Most of India's work was done by the unwavering Jadeja. He bowled 58.2 overs, a rarity for a spinner in South Africa. No spinner has bowled more than 50 in an innings here in the last seven years. Jadeja was difficult to get away even when South Africa showed more intent on the fourth day. As the ball grew older, though, Jadeja got less and less bite from the pitch. The big debate around the new ball was whether India should have taken it as soon as a wicket fell, to not allow the new batsman time to settle in.

Robin Peterson, who teed off for 61 off 52, said the old ball was much more difficult to get away, and that all the new ball did was give the quicks some extra bounce, but not much in terms of sideways movement. It probably didn't make too much of a difference to India. Had they taken the new ball as soon as Faf du Plessis came in, they might have taken a wicket or two and slowed South Africa down. The new ball might also have flown to all parts, and they might have been looking at a deficit of 200 as opposed to the eventual 166.

The difference, though, was in how the South Africa quicks bowled with the new ball. They were clearly fitter and more intense. The two wickets taken before stumps would have buoyed South Africa, and India now need a good third innings, after their hard work on both their previous tours was undone by ordinary third innings' efforts. They would hate to lose the series after having done so well in Johannesburg and having got a pitch in Durban that arguably suited them more than the hosts.

It will be a tough examination on the final day should rain not intervene. It is not just about batting time, even runs will come into the picture if they come close to wiping off the deficit. Their two best batsmen are at the wicket. It won't be a bad call to promote Ajinkya Rahane, who can bat time, ahead of Rohit Sharma, who must be low on confidence and has shown previously his ability to bat with the tail. The tail, though, is almost non-existent on the evidence of the first innings. It will be a test of character for this young team should there be a full day's play on Monday.

Sidharth Monga is an assistant editor at ESPNcricinfo

RSS Feeds: Sidharth Monga

© ESPN Sports Media Ltd.

Posted by sachin_vvsfan on (December 30, 2013, 9:41 GMT)

I did not like the way both Dhoni and Smith used their tactics. But Smith at least does something with the bat. Dhoni's position as batsman should be questioned.

Posted by   on (December 30, 2013, 8:16 GMT)

Innings defeat by 20 runs cannot be ruled out.

Posted by premendrasinghal on (December 30, 2013, 7:12 GMT)

Smith has been so negative in his approach in the series. In the first match he didn't go to win the match even in last three balls where he had three wickets in hand they just blocked the balls. In second match on day one he didn't show faith in his spin attack which is far better than the last match he refused to bowl spin in last session and lost 30 overs' match. And on day four he delayed the declaration just because he doesn't want to bowl spin to India but fortunately got Dhawan on Duminy's spin. His captaincy is totally dependent on Dale and Morkel. In past he was dependent on Pollock and Ntini nothing good in his captaincy. He is an ordinary captain of Great Team on other way Dhoni is great captain of an ordinary team.

Posted by   on (December 30, 2013, 7:09 GMT)

Don't get me wrong because I like MS Dhoni and Indian cricket but I think that this game has shown up a few cracks in Dhoni's captaincy. It also shows that when push comes to shove most teams will play for the draw. Dhoni started playing for the draw on day 3 already.

Posted by philvic on (December 30, 2013, 7:06 GMT)

Althought this wicket is more subcontinental then typical South African, the Indian's can be proud of how their batsmen have acquitted themselves against the best pace attack in the world. Even if they lose today, at least they have fought hard and not just rolled over like the English in Oz.

Posted by T20Fun on (December 30, 2013, 7:03 GMT)

It was unfortunate to see Dhoni be behind the game for quite a while in this test. He took Jadeja off for way too long on Day 3 when the fourth wicket partnership was flourishing. On Day 4 India would have found it easier to save the game by restricting the lead instead by not using seaming conditions with a new ball SA were allowed to progress slowly but steadily at an imposing lead. The old ball strategy also back-fired because Petersen and Faf added 110 at run-a-ball. I think too much is being expected of the batsmen now.

Posted by   on (December 30, 2013, 6:47 GMT)

Technically,Dhoni's recent record overseas is only 0-7 & not 0-8 as many people believe.It was Sehwag who captained India in the Adelaide test match.

Posted by   on (December 30, 2013, 6:34 GMT)

Dhoni is doing his best with the team he has got. If bowlers cant get 20 wickets in the previous Test match. what option has he got. Smith is being so defensive in his approach too. Smith is a ordinary caption who has great team. Dhoni is by far a better caption than most. Better than Cook and Smith. People talk about replacing him, replace him with whom? Any candidates?

Posted by fairfan70 on (December 30, 2013, 6:05 GMT)

@bKrish282, completely agree with you with everything you said!!

Posted by fairfan70 on (December 30, 2013, 5:55 GMT)

That Dhoni is a conservative captain is proved time and again. Even with a batting line up as good as he has, he still goes into tests with 4 bowlers, none of them world-class. Given the traditional fitness levels of Indians (due to diet and various other factors), it is only a matter of time once the match gets underway that the opposition begins to cash on the weak Indian bowling. One additional specialist batsman is not going to save the game, if 6 others can't do it. For this team to even aim to be #1, either Dhoni needs to shed his safety first approach and go with 5 bowlers (one of which can be an allrounder) or it is time for the team to have a new leader who shows that boldness of approach. SA is loaded with all-rounders and that helps their fast bowlers to stay fit and fresh and go hard at opponents. That is why they are #1.

Comments have now been closed for this article

TopTop
Email Feedback Print
Share
E-mail
Feedback
Print
Sidharth MongaClose
Tour Results
South Africa v India at Durban - Dec 26-30, 2013
South Africa won by 10 wickets
South Africa v India at Johannesburg - Dec 18-22, 2013
Match drawn
SAf Invit XI v Indians at Benoni - Dec 13-14, 2013
Match abandoned without a ball bowled
South Africa v India at Centurion - Dec 11, 2013
No result
South Africa v India at Durban - Dec 8, 2013
South Africa won by 134 runs
More results »
News | Features Last 3 days
News | Features Last 3 days
Sponsored Links

Why not you? Read and learn how!