Sri Lanka Premier League 2013

Sri Lanka Premier League 2013 called off

Andrew Fidel Fernando

July 17, 2013

Comments: 44 | Text size: A | A

Jacob Oram celebrates a wicket with his team-mates, Uva v Nagenahira, SLPL, final, Colombo, August 31, 2012
The Uva Next franchise, which won the tournament last year, left several operational expenses unpaid © Ron Gaunt/SPORTZPICS/SLPL
Enlarge

Sri Lanka Cricket has cancelled the Sri Lanka Premier League for 2013, after all eight franchises failed to pay the tournament fee and the bank guarantees for player payments, an official release confirmed. The franchises had breached two payment deadlines and forced the postponement of the player draft, and will now have their contracts terminated by SLC. The tournament was due to take place between August 10 and September 7. 


"We want to maintain the integrity of the board and the integrity of the tournament, so we had to take a stand," SLPL director Ajit Jayasekara said. "We can't have a situation where the franchises say, 'We will pay if the other franchises pay'.

"Player payments are a major factor in this. We are the only league in the world not to have defaulted on our player payments, and the franchises failed to provide those bank guarantees. We have given them enough chances and we can't stand this nonsense."

Jayasekara said the franchises had not made it clear to SLC that they did not wish to be a part of the tournament, and instead continued to promise to make the payments, before ultimately failing to deliver. In March, the franchises had successfully sought to increase the lease period for the teams from seven years to 15, amid fears seven years would not be sufficient to recoup their costs, but they have now seemingly opted to cut their losses after one season. 


All eight franchises and SLC's marketing partner Somerset Entertainment Ventures are understood to have made a loss from the inaugural tournament, but SLC had a profit of 289 million rupees (approx. USD $2.3 million). The franchises were due to pay USD $4.3 million a year on average, in order to participate in the tournament, but would have had to sustain operational costs in addition to that.

Jayasekara said SLC "haven't invested a cent" in this year's tournament as they were simply making preparations, and had relatively little to lose from cancelling the tournament. The board will, however, consider playing the tournament in 2014, but not before arriving at a new business approach.


"SLPL is suspended for this year, so now we have to sit with our partners, Somerset, and decide on a new model," Jayasekara said. "We have to decide on how and if and when we are going to call for bids for the franchises and get committed organisations."

The tournament had been scheduled to begin in 2011, but was cancelled that year, after the BCCI refused to allow its players to participate in the tournament. The inaugural season, the following year, was then largely plagued by poor crowds and a lack of interest at home. There were also allegations of spot-fixing in the tournament, though the tape which was provided as evidence was later found to be a fraud, according to Jayasekara. In addition, the Uva Next franchise that won the tournament, left several operational expenses unpaid, including refusing to foot costs to send the team to the Champions League. 



The three Tests, from South Africa's ongoing tour of Sri Lanka were also postponed, partly in order to allow the SLPL to be played. The Future Tours Programme had set aside most parts of the months of July and August for the tour, and despite SLC's official reason that it was the recently completed tri-series in West Indies that made the Tests against South Africa impossible, the dates originally allocated for the tour almost certainly clash with the SLPL schedule.

SLC has not yet sought a reinstatement of those Tests, in light of Sri Lanka's now clear schedule, but it is unlikely that if such a request is made, that CSA will agree to a Test series at such short notice.


The board has also announced an inter-provincial Twenty20 tournament will be played in place of the SLPL in August, the winner of which will represent Sri Lanka at the Champions League in India the following month.

Andrew Fidel Fernando is ESPNcricinfo's Sri Lanka correspondent. He tweets here

RSS Feeds: Andrew Fidel Fernando

© ESPN Sports Media Ltd.

Posted by SLMaster on (July 19, 2013, 14:22 GMT)

If, SLC has little to lose, then why there are higher fees? This is what money does. SLC wants money, but do not care about improving youngsters and SL cricket. If Franchises lost money last year, SLC could have addressed this last year. There wanted a new model because no money this year. No one wants to part of the loosing game. SLC has to think of win-win situation. If franchises gain SLC gains, and players gain as well as cricket in SL.

BTW these 20-20 leagues are useless.

Posted by warneneverchuck on (July 18, 2013, 15:01 GMT)

As I predicted last year no league wil survive for more than few years except IPL

Posted by KingOwl on (July 18, 2013, 13:33 GMT)

Great news. Now, hopefully they will reinstate the tests with SA.

Posted by   on (July 18, 2013, 13:11 GMT)

good news! It should be cancelled forever...

Posted by   on (July 18, 2013, 12:37 GMT)

Disappointment by my side, as I will miss the chance now to see the young talented untried Lankans play with the big's. They are one of the few teams I enjoy watching simply because of their love for the game and immense talent. I really hope we get to see the SLPL14!! Comparing it to other leagues is not a fair draw, simply because you cannot match the amount of money and fan base of IPL. However, talent wise I would rate SLPL to better than the other Asian leagues as of now. We are yet to see the Pakistani version of this, but I am sure if it were to exist it would be the most exciting one to watch. For now good luck to SLPL and SLC:)

Posted by   on (July 18, 2013, 12:35 GMT)

It is sad to see the SLPL cancelled. These tournaments give great opportunites to youngsters who never had a platform like this before. No T20 leagues should compete with each other, each country should try and have a tournament as big as they are capable of handling it. IPL for me is too long a format and should go on for a max of 2 weeks. Although I love test cricket too no one in this day and age has the time to watch a game for one whole day let alone 5 days (maybe one in a while yes). The most succesfull sports in the world today are played for 3-4 max that the attention span of a sports fan.

Posted by mark2011 on (July 18, 2013, 11:28 GMT)

hope this would long last forever... SL do not need the PL carnival... instead better bilateral series will atract more crowd and good for the future of the game....

Posted by   on (July 18, 2013, 11:26 GMT)

@anupkeni no they wont cancel IPL 2014 they will simply move it to south africa like last time

Posted by   on (July 18, 2013, 10:58 GMT)

Another nail in the coffin for 20/20. Even the IPL will wither and die at some point like all the other 20/20 leagues around the world. You can't artificially manufacture excitement and enjoyment and hope it will last.

Posted by ms2000 on (July 18, 2013, 10:35 GMT)

This is the best thing that could happen to Sri Lankan Cricket. It must be cancelled forever not just this time. Congratulations for cancelling same!

Comments have now been closed for this article

TopTop
Email Feedback Print
Share
E-mail
Feedback
Print
Andrew Fidel FernandoClose
Tournament Fixtures Tournament Results
No fixtures scheduled
News | Features Last 3 days
News | Features Last 3 days