Matches (15)
IPL (2)
PAK v WI [W] (2)
Bangladesh vs Zimbabwe (1)
WT20 Qualifier (4)
County DIV1 (2)
County DIV2 (3)
BAN v IND [W] (1)
News

Confusion surrounds captaincy and security advice

The West Indies Cricket Board is reportedly attempting to salvage the A-team tour to Zimbabwe despite being faced with players refusing to tour and confusion over the safety advice given regarding the wisdom of the trip even happening

Cricinfo staff
22-Jun-2007


Sylvester Joseph: said no to captaincy for the A-team tour of Zimbabwe © Getty Images
The West Indies Cricket Board is reportedly attempting to salvage the A-team tour to Zimbabwe despite being faced with players refusing to tour and confusion over the safety advice given regarding the wisdom of the trip even happening.
Cricinfo has learned that Sylvester Joseph, who was originally named as captain last week, has declined the invitation to lead the side or take part. It now emerges that Daren Ganga was offered the role on Thursday and also turned it down. The latest name in the frame is Rawl Lewis.
There is also increasing speculation that the West Indies Cricket Board is struggling to find enough players of a decent standard to fill the squad without it losing credibility. They are due to leave in a week and yet nobody has been named, despite daily assurances that an announcement is imminent.
What is certain is that if the tour does happen, once again, as happened with the senior side before their tour of England, a West Indies team will set out with little preparation.
Meanwhile, assurances from the West Indies board that CARICOM had given its blessing on player safety have been denied by Eddie Green, CARICOM's assistant secretary general. He said that Tony Deyal, the WICB's corporate services manager, had been told that "the Bureau of Heads the opinions were split and we need to send out a formal request to all Heads which we did two weeks ago. I have not spoken to him since and the official decison will be made on June 30."
Yesterday, Deyal told reporters that the WICB had "received a no-objection letter from ... Greene". That now seems to be incorrect, even though Bruce Aanensen, the WICB's chief executive officer, said last weekend that a response from CARICOM had been delivered on June 13.
The other documentation relied on by the WICB is from Zimbabwe Cricket and the Zimbabwe Republic Police. A source inside Zimbabwe told Cricinfo that any assurance from the police "was not only worthless but was a sick joke". He added: "The police are the people to be afraid of, and the Zimbabwe board might not be the most objective party."
Deyal told Cricinfo that player safety was of paramount importance to the WICB and that nothing would ever be done to threaten that. He earlier said that unless WIPA passed over their documentary evidence that it would be unsafe to travel to Zimbabwe, then the tour would go ahead.
"We want WIPA to send us what they have so we can make the best decision in the circumstances and that both parties can agree to it," he said. "WIPA never sent us anything. We are anxious to get information. We have sought information from a variety of sources."
However, WIPA officials have told Cricinfo that much of the evidence they have has come from sources who do not wish to be identified as many of them fear for their own safety. In view of that, it will not be passed to the WICB for fear that it will find its way into the hands of the Zimbabwe authorities.
"We are not in agreement with the tour as stated before because of concerns over players' safety and the volatile situation in Zimbabwe," Dinanath Ramnarine told The Nation. "That's still our position. As far as we are concerned, the players' safety is of paramount importance to us. We are a responsible organisation and we want to look after the interest of our members. We don't see the benefits of the tour."
"We are left to interpret the actions of WIPA to be nothing more than a play for power," Deyal countered. That the two sides are again at loggerheads less than 24 hours after an arbitration panel, which yet again found in WIPA's favour in a dispute with the board, stressed the need for the two parties to work together, does not bode well.