Floyd Reifer September 2, 2009

Reifer revels in his opportunity

Stand-in though he is, West Indies' new captain is determined to play a big role in the future of West Indies cricket

"Make sure you get this in," said Floyd Reifer, as the interview drew to a close. "I want the people in the Caribbean to know that this is a West Indies team that is dedicated to West Indies cricket. This is not a second-string team. We will do the six million people of the Caribbean proud at the ICC [Champions Trophy] tournament."

Ordinarily a captain rallying his team would create not so much as a ripple in international cricket. From Durban to Dhaka, such expressions of confidence - whether heartfelt or contrived - are considered de rigeur. Another tick for the sports psychologists; another soundbite for the media.

But when the call to arms is sounded in the midst of intense industrial action and directed towards a hastily cobbled-together collection of wizened veterans and raw rookies, the comments assume far greater importance. Around the time mediation talks between WIPA and the WICB broke down on Tuesday, Reifer, the West Indies' 37-year-old stand-in captain, risked the ire of the union and its striking players by insisting the show must go on and expressing pride in his new-look squad.

"The fans have a right to feel bad about some of the things that are going on, but there must be cricket," Reifer told Cricinfo. "The game cannot stop because of other issues. I do not listen to the negative talk, I don't read negative things. What I know is that we have a group of players here right now who are happy to be here and are happy to play for the many people in the Caribbean who have cricket at heart."

Many a modern West Indies captain has supped from a poisoned chalice, but perhaps none so toxic as that inherited by Reifer. In shades of Bob Simpson circa 1977, Reifer was called upon to lead an "establishment XI", after a decade on the outer, while senior players stood against the board. The initial results were underwhelming to say the least - a 0-2 Test series defeat to Bangladesh, followed by a 0-3 whitewash in the ODIs; and with the likes of Chris Gayle, Ramnaresh Sarwan and Shivnarine Chanderpaul unavailable for this month's Champions Trophy, few are expecting a prompt reversal in fortunes.

The Reifer story redefines unusual. Called into a West Indies team battling a myriad of transitional issues, Reifer played four unspectacular Tests and two one-day internationals between 1997 and 1999 against Sri Lanka and South Africa. Over the ensuring decade, the Bajan batsman established a solid domestic record in the Caribbean and Scotland before gravitating towards coaching. He had assumed the role of player-coach with the University of the West Indies in recent seasons.

Then came the call. On the evening of July 7 Reifer was asked to board a flight to St Vincent. On the morning of July 9 he lead an almost unrecognisable West Indies side onto Arnos Vale for the first Test against Bangladesh. At a time when most cricketers are penning epilogues to their careers, Reifer was reeling off new chapters. But whether they will receive positive reviews remains to be seen.

Inevitably, some will view Reifer as a regional pariah for accepting work at a time when many of his contemporaries were feuding with their employer. That said, the game in the Caribbean might have faced financial ruin under the weight of ICC fines and legal challenges from broadcast rights-holders had the board been unable to fulfill its hosting commitments. Still, right or wrong, Reifer intends to continue at the helm of the West Indies team indefinitely, and spark a revival that many have attempted but few have achieved.

"I see my role as trying to help rebuild West Indies cricket," he said. "We have a group of young players here who are trying to take West Indies cricket forward. They have shown commitment and dedication. Before we went out to play on the first day against Bangladesh I told them that they were the West Indian team, not a second-string team, and to go out there and fight for the people of the Caribbean.

"I don't feel there is any pressure on me. I was very grateful to receive the opportunity to captain the West Indies. If you go through history, there are probably only 25 or 30 people who have had that honour. It is what every young cricketer in the region dreams of doing. I give thanks to God for the opportunity. If [the WIPA-WICB dispute] ends and they don't see a role for me anymore, I will graciously move on. But if they think that I have performed well and led the team well, then I can't see any reason why I could not play on for the next couple of years."

"You think of all the great West Indian players like Sobers, Walsh, Ambrose, Lara, Weekes and where they took West Indies cricket, and you desperately want to do well"

Reifer is not prepared to discuss the recent termination of John Dyson's coaching contract, and insists he is "not fully aware" of the intricacies of the dispute between the players' union and the West Indies board. He is adamant he has received no negative feedback from the striking players, and is hopeful of holding his place in the West Indian side if or when the matter is resolved, even if his batting averages of 9.25 and 16.20 in Tests and ODIs suggest he will have a difficult time doing so.

He has sought leadership advice from the great Sir Garfield Sobers, and notes with no small amount of satisfaction the recent performances of Omar Phillips, Kemar Roach, David Bernard and Chadwick Walton, three of whom made their Test debuts at Arnos Vale. But it might well be that Reifer is remembered as the man who allowed Bangladesh to triple their number of Test victories over three forgettable weeks in St Vincent and Grenada this July. Only once in their previous 59 Tests had Bangladesh tasted success in the five-day format, and that to a struggling Zimbabwean side more than four years ago.

"The Bangladesh series was difficult," Reifer said. "I received the call on the Tuesday night and the Test started on the Thursday. We hadn't really played together and we didn't really have time to prepare. We played tough cricket, and most of the games were quite close, but in the end you have to give credit to Bangladesh. It hurt all the guys really badly. You think of all the great West Indian players like Sobers, Walsh, Ambrose, Lara, Weekes and where they took West Indies cricket, and you desperately want to do well.

"There wasn't really any strategy at first, but we learned as we went on. The team played some tough cricket, but made crucial mistakes at crucial times. They will learn from those and become stronger for the experience."

Only Reifer truly knows whether his insistence that West Indies can "go deep" in the Champions Trophy is a genuine appraisal of an improving side or an attempted pick-me-up for a downtrodden squad. History appears to be on their side - West Indies have made the past two Champions Trophy finals, and won the tournament in 2004. However, with a patchwork team and India, Pakistan and Australia in their pool, bookmakers have echoed the sentiments of most observers by installing them as 20-1 outsiders.

"Like anybody, we will go into the ICC tournament thinking we can win," he said. "I am not saying we will go out and beat everybody, but I think we have a young and talented team that can advance. The world will be watching us, and it is an opportunity for us to show that we can go out there and play tough cricket."

Alex Brown is deputy editor of Cricinfo

Comments have now been closed for this article

  • O on September 5, 2009, 21:52 GMT

    Mr Reifer,its a second string team you are leading.You should not even been on that team because of your continous poor form.I would not pay a penny to watch that team play.I wish all the fans would follow me and boycott all the games

  • giovaughn on September 5, 2009, 17:53 GMT

    Obviously west indies cricket is in dire straights. However this contract dispute/impasse could be a blessing in disguise. if we can resolve this conflict quickly then we may be in a better position to improve our cricketing results as a region. who knows a few fresh talents may emerge from this tournament. if they are nutured and have the right atitude then in a few years they may be performing well for a full strength west indies team. we just have to be patient and give them all our support. however we need a full strength team to be touring australia by november. if we pick a second string squad for that tour then it is quite likely the australian cricket board will cancel the series or the series will be a disaster both to our reputation and the finances of both cricket boards due to the loss of spectator support & television / radio broadcasting rights. i dont think the ACB can afford this much more the money strapped WICB.

  • Clynie on September 4, 2009, 10:22 GMT

    Sorry Mr. Reifer as a batsman and captain with an average of 9, you pronouncements here would not help you gain confidence. Please step aside and let the process of proper governance in WI cricket take shape.

  • Len on September 4, 2009, 9:37 GMT

    The problems with Reife's article is that he has not acknowledged his own form and he has not said if the players are concentrating on their fielding, bowling or batting and above all DISCIPLINE. His sound bites are like all of the recent WIndian players and Coaches of the last ten years, have spoken generally without saying ANYTHING CONSTRUCTIVE and this way of speaking alone, indicates there will be no development within the team. It would have been better if Reifer admitted that his team are second stringers, but will go to the champions trophy with the intention of developing their cricket and DISCIPLINE, even if they do not fare well in the tourmament. As it is, they will get pummelled because they have not admitted that they have a lot to learn, so will go on in the same ill disciplined way.

  • Ben on September 3, 2009, 22:34 GMT

    Statistically Reifer must be one of the worst batsman to play test cricket. For him to even imply that a spot may, even potentially, be open to him once the contract issues subside is an outright joke. I don't even think he should be in a second string WI test side - let alone the First XI. For a man who has batted 12 times in test cricket, an average of 9.25 is embarrassing.

    His attempted spirited words are meaningless when WI have been flogged by Bangladesh. He doesn't mean it and no one believes it. How can you be proud of a side that got panned by a nation that has won one test match (pre-series) since its introduction?

  • Kevin on September 3, 2009, 20:17 GMT

    The ICC needs to implement systems of standards for the management of cricket to which all Cricket boards need to adhere to before they are allowed to continue to play cricket.

    Rules for payments of players and staff as well as benefits and bonuses should be set by the ICC. This will ensure that all teams ands players will be treated equally and fairly and the cricket boards do not take advantage of the players and conversely the boards will not be at the mercy of cricketers demanding more than is due to them.

    The ICC mission states: As the international governing body for cricket, the International Cricket Council will lead by: Promoting and protecting the game, and its unique spirit Delivering outstanding, memorable events Providing excellent service to Members and stakeholders Optimising its commercial rights and properties for the benefit of its Members

    The question to be asked is where is the International Cricket Council amidst this conflict?

  • AARON HUSSEIN on September 3, 2009, 19:06 GMT

    Of course, a combined West Indies side stronger than any of the its separate islands, but the separate island's team is much stronger by themselves than today's so-called 2nd grade combined West Indies team, which should be disqualified immediately by ICC. @ redneck, India is an independent country, whether West Indies is a group of independent Caribbean countries, and Karnataka or Mumbai is an integral part of India. Before 1947, the territories of today's Pakistan and Bangladesh were in India, and India's national cricket team has granted Test cricket status by ICC (Imperial CC) in 1932. Pakistan as a separate independent country has granted test status in 1952, when Bangladesh(1947-1972) for a short-time was in Pakistan. As an independent country Bangladesh has granted test status in 2000. Where is the logic to exit West Indies as a combined Caribbean islands cricket team? If so, then European Union have more judicial right to form a combined strong European Union cricket team.

  • Michael on September 3, 2009, 18:49 GMT

    Something will have to give.The Champions Trophy is a showcase tournament.Everyone will be watching and there are only a couple of weeks left. Whatever the reasons and continuing arguments someone HAS to get Gayle and team out into the field for that tournament. So get on with it whoeverNOW!! Or get Holding and Viv out of retirement.

  • Ricky on September 3, 2009, 17:58 GMT

    It is clear to me that the WICB does not have the future of WI cricket or the its followers on there mind. How in the world can we ever think about sending this bunch ti the Champion Trophy. Reifer is a "has been", and most of the other on the troop are "may have never been". It hurts as a WI supporter to have to endure and follow this. Chris Gayle in my opinion has never been commited to test cricket. However after seeing what is happening now, I fully support WI most talanted cricketers "Chris / Sarwan / Shiv / Dwayne / Danesh / Jerome / Fidel and the rest to see occuption otherwise. It is clear your employees does not appreciate you. WICB / Riefer and the rest, feel free to continue to embarass us.........

  • Vlad on September 3, 2009, 16:53 GMT

    The only reason why, in my view, the WICB can maintain its status quo [see recent reelection of incompetent leaders] is because the regional boards can't see eye to eye on a number of, probably, key issues. It has to be, because they're the ones who lend authority to the WICB and how could one explain their passive attitude otherwise while all this nonsense is taking place. No matter how you turn it at the end of the day WI aren't united and to the man it comes down to whether we own similar passports. Ironically enough however, they all realize that standing alone won't work but I suppose all this supposedly passive behavior covers a more active jockeying for power and control.

  • No featured comments at the moment.