Matches (15)
IPL (2)
PSL (3)
Women's Tri-Series (SL) (1)
Women's One-Day Cup (1)
County DIV1 (3)
County DIV2 (4)
USA-W vs ZIM-W (1)

Different Strokes (old)

'I wasn’t there'

It could have been one of the greatest days of my life and I went AWOL

It could have been one of the greatest days of my life and I went AWOL. At the precise moment (16:44:19, as has been meticulously noted by some newspapers) that Sachin was deftly playing Chaminda Vaas to the onside for his hundredth run, I was driving around central Delhi, just 6 km from the Kotla Stadium, listening to radio commentary - instead of being at the ground - and muttering “YOU IDIOT, YOU IDIOT, YOU IDIOT!” to myself.
But on this admittedly minor scale, it was quite an experience being in Delhi traffic at this momentous hour and noting that other people in other cars were listening to their radios as intently as I was: fiddling with knobs, pulling at antennae, the passengers at the back leaning forward.
Sachin hit the four that took him from 93 to 97; six people sitting in a large Sumo next to my car exchanged high-fives. Ganguly failed to take a single; another driver muttered a curse and shared conspiracy theories with the lady sitting next to him. The radio commentator got excited, shouted “Is he OUT??!” when Sachin nicked a ball short of second slip; in numerous vehicles, hands abandoned steering wheels and flew to heads. It was high drama on the streets.
The radio channel didn’t have advanced sound filters to muffle the crowd noise, which meant that from around the point SRT got to 98 it was almost impossible to hear the commentators over the screams of tens of thousands of spectators. In that last over, when Ganguly hit a four, the crowd roared a standard roar (whether they were applauding the boundary or shouting at Dada to get off the striker’s end is another question). But when he took a single off the next ball, the noise made my car shake (shaken myself, I jumped a red light, that too in the high-security India Gate vicinity). From that point on till well after Sachin had reached the 100, I couldn’t hear a thing the commentators were saying – but then, I didn’t need to.
Full post
The nightmare called Television Commentary

It’s the mid innings break in the first One-Day International, – I think these should be renamed Damage Limitation Internationals or DLIs given the state of most one-day pitches now-a-days

It’s the mid innings break in the first One-Day International, – I think these should be renamed Damage Limitation Internationals or DLIs given the state of most one-day pitches now-a-days. Anyway, it’s Pakistan and England against each other, and I’m lurking around in my Inbox. We had conceded something of a mountain to chase, but I knew from before hand that we’ll lose, some times you just know.
Not a matter of not having enough faith in the team, but sometimes you just know, probably something in the stars (when half of the team is having a bad hair week (month?), something has got to give at some point!). So I thought I might as well use this time to indulge in some good old fashioned commentary nit-picking.
Enter Anu Garg, the author of the brilliant AWAD – A Word A Day – books and newsletter. I’m subscribed to the newsletter. It’s a brilliant kick-up read, especially if you read it after watching a live cricket broadcast.
For a self confessed pedant like my self listening to some of these modern day commentators is a demanding task, made mildly Herculean when some of them insist on breaking the world record for longest duration in between positive thought occurred or hair cuts taken or sentence said where they haven’t brutally executed the grammar, pronunciation, and subject verb agreement of the language they claim to be speaking in!
Full post
Self belief, sledging, and the art of the possible

New Zealand have defeated Australia in the third ODI by chasing down Australia's score of 331, setting a new world record in the process

New Zealand have defeated Australia in the third ODI by chasing down Australia's score of 331, setting a new world record in the process. This comes hot on the heels of the second ODI where New Zealand only just failed to reel in Australia's score of 322.
And the New Zealanders are not the only side doing some impressive chases. Since 2000, there have been ten instances of sides successfully chasing scores of 300 or over, which had only happened six times before 2000. A couple of years ago, Pakistan were set 350 to win and nearly did it. What is going on?
Excellent batting conditions certainly have something to do with it. The popular taste for one-day internationals is for high scoring matches, and in response to this taste, groundsmen the world over are preparing surfaces devoid of grass, and with consistent bounce and pace. Rule changes like the 'powerplay' also aid batsmen and hinder bowlers.
Declining standards of bowling attacks may also play a role. New Zealand conducted both of their runchases against an Australian attack without Glenn McGrath, and the Australian attack in the third ODI was one of the most inexperienced Australian bowling lineups seen in more then a decade.
Full post
The man who rolled Tendulkar over

Some questions in cricket are subjective, allowing for perfectly good arguments both sides, such as whether Bradman’s Invincibles were a greater team than Steve Waugh's side, or whether Sunil Gavaskar possessed a better defensive technique than

Some questions in cricket are subjective, allowing for perfectly good arguments both sides, such as whether Bradman’s Invincibles were a greater team than Steve Waugh's side, or whether Sunil Gavaskar possessed a better defensive technique than Geoffrey Boycott. In such cases the pleasure lies in the give-and-take of conversation, in the marshalling of evidence and the subtlety of the details one summons – it’s a way of keeping one’s cricket brain in good nick.
And even when some perfectly absurd point of view turns up, such as the recent case made by least three wise men of Indian cricket that Sourav Ganguly was not just a batsman but a batting allrounder and would add balance to the Test side with his seamers, the good cricket fan mops up the coffee he has spilt in surprise at the breakfast table, and, swallowing his initial derision, begins to think how one might best argue this case. (eg. Not only did our good Dada take a number of wickets in this year’s Duleep Trophy, but he also topped the bowling averages for India in his debut series in 1996; bowled a corker of an opening spell when given the new ball against Australia at Kolkata in 1998, not so long ago; and only last year beat and bowled the tiresomely immovable Jacques Kallis in a Test match, again in Kolkata.)
So here’s another question for you to mull over: of the hundreds of bowlers to have dismissed Sachin Tendulkar in his sixteen seasons of international cricket, who can have been the least distinguished? To my mind the answer is Ujesh Ranchod, a bowler of Indian origin who came with the touring Zimbabwean party of 1993. One doesn’t know on what basis Ranchod was selected, but when he was named in the eleven for the only Test of the series it turned out he was making not only his Test but apparently also his first-class debut.
Ranchod was a purveyor of the most gentle, benevolent offspin; what shape and curve he possessed had less to do with his bowling than his frame (although only 23, he was rather portly). He made a charming contrast bowling in tandem with Zimbabwe’s senior spinner, the gaunt, shrewd veteran John Traicos, all of 45 - no older man has played Test cricket since, or probably ever will. While Traicos looked every bit as capable as when he made his debut for South Africa in 1970, Ranchod’s was the sort of bowling that made even the viewer want to charge down the pitch and hit him for six. Yet some lucky star stone over his head that day, and Tendulkar, perhaps overly respectful given that it was the first day of the Test, chipped him in the air and was caught by Traicos.
Full post
On the (alcohol fuelled) Madness of Crowds.

After the first one-day international between New Zealand and Australia, Ricky Ponting once again complained about the poor crowd behaviour that saw several of his team-mates have fruit and bottles thrown at them

After the first one-day international between New Zealand and Australia, Ricky Ponting once again complained about the poor crowd behaviour that saw several of his team-mates have fruit and bottles thrown at them. This is not the first time that Australian teams in New Zealand have had to deal with this; poor crowd behaviour was a feature of Australia's one-day games when they toured New Zealand earlier this year.
There's no doubt in my mind that the demon drink is almost entirely responsible for the missile throwing and pitch invasions that occur in New Zealand and were formerly a frequent event in Australian one-day games as well. I was 'lucky' enough to experience one of these disturbances up close and personal in this fixture in Australia's tour of 2000, and I saw first hand the way in which the ground authorities were eager to maximise sales of the full strength local beverage- they were selling it by the six-pack.
Most of New Zealand's cricket fixtures are played on rugby grounds, and New Zealand Cricket do not control most of the venues. Eden Park, for example, is controlled by the Eden Park Trust Board. So there are limits to what New Zealand Cricket can do to limit the sale of alcohol. Ground authorities are keen to maximise their revenue, and there is little that can be done to restrict them.
In Australia, the cricket authorities are in a much stronger position. Cricket Australia affiliate bodies directly control four of Australia’s six main venues. These authorities were (and are) as keen as anyone else to maximise their revenue from the game, but are also mindful of the need to maintain order to attract patrons. I suspect that the insurance companies that protect them have played a role in insisting on stronger crowd control measures.
Full post
Does Glenn McGrath get his due?

Even at the age of 35, no one doubts that Glenn McGrath is one of the world's leading fast bowlers, even if it is an age since he pushed the speedometer past 140 kmph

Even at the age of 35, no one doubts that Glenn McGrath is one of the world's leading fast bowlers, even if it is an age since he pushed the speedometer past 140 kmph. He may not be the fastest bowler but he is still one of the best, spearheading the Australian attack for a decade now.
Sometimes though, I feel that for all of his wonderful achievements, Glenn McGrath might be somewhat under appreciated, at least in Australia. To understand how much he's done, the joy of StatsGuru comes to our aid. If you look at the career summary for Glenn McGrath, it is pretty obvious- he has done everything that a bowler could do, and he's done it year in, year out, against all comers, in every part of the world. And he's still doing it. So far this summer, close to his 36th birthday, he's taken 16 wickets at 20.43
So why do I feel that Glenn McGrath might be under apprieciated? Well, for a start, Shane Warne has overshadowed his entire career. To the Australian cricket public, bowlers are the people's heroes, not the batsman, and Warne's dazzling persona, deeds and controversy have kept the spotlight firmly on him. Aesthetically, to watch Warne in operation is a visual feast for the spectator or the television viewer, his wiles, legbreaks, and cunning provide far more drama then McGrath's robotic accuracy.
Not that Glenn McGrath begrudges Warne his fame. It is impossible to tell looking in from the outside, but McGrath seems to be the ideal team man, rejoicing in the success of his collegues as much as his own. Despite the Golden Boots that McGrath sported to celebrate his 500th Test wicket, McGrath is at heart a modest man, not given to blowing his own trumpet. When talking to the media, although he is open about his bowling goals when asked, he seems more animated talking about his ever-improving batting feats.
Full post

Showing 131 - 140 of 153