England: 'Militant' players in favour of two division system (12 May 1998)
THE first signs of a new militancy on the part of the Professional Cricketers' Association emerged yesterday from a special meeting at Edgbaston attended by 210 of the 400 current players
12-May-1998
12 May 1998
'Militant' players in favour of two division system
Christopher Martin-Jenkins
THE first signs of a new militancy on the part of the
Professional Cricketers' Association emerged yesterday from a
special meeting at Edgbaston attended by 210 of the 400 current
players.
A combined postal and on-the-spot vote representing 62 per cent
of all players expressed strong opposition to the England and
Wales Cricket Board on the structure of county cricket, the
restrictions on the free movement of players between clubs and
the lack of financial support by the board for the PCA itself.
There was a unanimous vote for the PCA to be treated as "the 19th
county" when the board distribute their annual profits,
increasing their grant from the present £120,000 to something in
excess of £1 million a year. As many as 93 per cent of players
expressing their opinion also wanted a change in the system of
registering county players, calling for the end of lists one and
two by which counties keep the lid on 'transfers' from one club
to another.
The most contentious issue remains the balance of the county
programme. Eighty-four per cent answered "no" to the question
"Are you happy with the current system?" but David Graveney, the
chief executive of the PCA, explained that this did not
necessarily mean that the vast majority wanted two divisions.
"When we began debating it was clear that there are various
possible permutations," Graveney said. "Whether there should be
eight championship games in two divisions with play-offs, or 12
or 16 games, and how these would fit in with one-day matches,
still has to be clarified. We accept that the present structure
is in place but the officers of the PCA needed to know how
players are thinking. It's clear they would like to consider a
two-division system."
That is still some way for calling unequivocally for promotion
and relegation, with all the possible commercial advantages for
the top clubs and disadvantages for the small ones. The players'
chairman, Matthew Fleming of Kent, was in no doubt, however, that
the executives of the PCA had been given a mandate to push the
board for a two-divisional structure in the championship. It has
already been agreed for the one-day league from next season, with
the top nine counties in this year's AXA League forming the top
division.
Fleming said: "We didn't really go into details but the bottom
line is that we don't want our views to be ignored again. The
players have given us a mandate and we will now do something with
it."
A two-thirds majority of players expressed support for two
divisions when the new structure was under debate last season but
the First Class Forum subsequently rejected the idea and voted by
12 to seven for a Super Cup one-day competition to reward the top
eight teams in the championship. That is the proposed structure
for the next three years.
If the association were to get a much larger slice of the board's
television income it would make all former professional
cricketers associate members so that their interests could be
better represented when they retired. "This is a matter very
close to out hearts after what happened to David Bairstow in the
winter," said Graveney. "We found ourselves in a position where
we were helpless. We want increased revenue so we can plough it
back into those who play and those who are now retired."
Other examples of players whom the association would like to help
are the former Northants and West Indian fast bowler, Winston
Davis, who is paralysed after an accident, and the young county
cricketer, Jamie Hood, badly injured in a car accident.
Fleming added: "We have not been independent and we think that is
a realistic goal. The board have been helpful with our ideas in
the past and they continue to be helpful but we want to get away
from the scenario that every time we have a new idea we have to
go to the board."
These are major issues and the board reacted with understandable
caution last night while making the general point that the
players have a perfect right to express their views. A spokesman
said that they would be happy to discuss the structure again with
the players and that discussions were already going on about the
question of registration and the PCA grant.
Player power has been dormant in English professional cricket for
many years, mainly because the game has been run from the centre
by former players. The prospect of a serious clash of wills
between administrators and practitioners cannot now be ruled out
but it is much more likely that a consensus will emerge, between
the centre and the PCA, if not necessarily between the players
and a majority of county committees, whose constant struggle to
survive financially often leads them to see the professional game
through different eyes.
Source :: Electronic Telegraph (https://www.telegraph.co.uk)