Mediocrity On Centre-Stage (1 November 1998)
One does not quite attribute the virtues of drab, dull professionalism to the men from the Caribbean
01-Nov-1998
1 November 1998
Mediocrity On Centre-Stage
By Shakil Kasem
Beyond the boundary
One does not quite attribute the virtues of drab, dull
professionalism to the men from the Caribbean. Instinct an intuition
are more their line of business. Yesterday Brian Lara and his team
turned on a highly clinical and business like performance that
stopped the high-flying Indians in heir tracks.
The bowlers, particularly the new ball trundlers, planned their
attack with particular emphasis on line and length. Once the law of
averages caught up with Sachin Tendulkar, the West Indian quickies
moved in quickly for the kill. After Tendulkar fell to a brilliant
effort, courtesy of Carl Hooper in the slips, Azharuddin plunged
India into gloom by putting his pads in the way of one that had pace
and did not look like doing anything but going straight.
Sourav Ganguly came good with a workman like 83, but it was Robin
Singh who really spared India the blushes with an unbeaten 73. This
knock helped India stay afloat and looked like keeping the West
Indies on the field for a duration which would be an embarrassment
for a semi-final. The West Indian openers, particularly Philo
Wallace, then proceeded to shrug Indian bowling pretensions aside
with disdain and utter contempt.
When their main strike bowler is shown the door in the very first
over (a la Wasim Akram), the bowling side is immediately on the
defensive, looking for shadows in every nook and cranny. Bringing on
a spinner in the 4th over to stop the bleeding was an indication that
Azhar was driven to desperate measures, because the runs still kept
on flowing from all directions. Chanderpaul was a different
personality, harsh and rude to every bowler who turned his arm over.
Even Wallace took a backseat.
Remind me to ask Tendulkar when he gets the time to practice his
bowling. He bowls three different kinds, depending on who and what he
faces. To Philo Wallace it was a slow one that wobbled in the air,
and by the time Wallace's bat responded to his mind, the catch was
there for the taking. Unlikely breakthrough, from an unlikely source.
Or was it? India could not have been proud of what they offered on
the day. Without Tendulkar on the scoresheet, the rest of the batting
was more preoccupied with staying alive than taking the fight to the
West Indian bowlers. While trying to consolidate they used up
precious overs, and in the end, to one's surprise, India folded up at
least 40 runs short of what was needed to make a tight match. To have
expected Tendulkar to make the breakthroughs while bowling was asking
for the improbable. Tendulkar obliged for a while, but there is a
point when even genius must bow down to the mediocre.
Kumble was a disappointment and, along with his skipper, would not
want to remember this tournament with much affection. For Brian Lara,
on the other hand, life is beginning to treat him well as captain,
and he seems to bring the best out of his charges.
Chanderpaul has developed from a push-and-prod player to one of
sheer class, capable of holding his own with the best.
Dhaka's interest in keeping the subcontinent alive took an upturn
when Chanderpaul enhanced Tendulkar's reputation as a bowler and Carl
Hooper's brain died on him. India's mindset was difficult to
comprehend, and their body language seemed to suggest that they were
for some inexplicable reason apologetic for being in the semis. The
fielding left gaping holes, and the bowling lacked the penetration
and commitment that the Windies quickies made common place. But both
sides left vast room for improvement. Because you can bet the South
Africans won't be shaking in their boots after watching this
particular match.
Source :: The Bangladesh Daily Star (https://www.dailystarnews.com)