10 December 1996
Walsh out to woo Symonds
By Charles Randall
GLOUCESTERSHIRE are hoping Courtney Walsh, their captain, can
persuade Andrew Symonds this week that his future lies in England
and not Australia.
Symonds, 21, the dual-qualified batsman currently playing for
Queensland in the Sheffield Shield, is due to represent Australia
A in a limited-overs game against Walsh`s West Indies team at
Melbourne on Friday.
If he does, he will effectively disqualify himself from playing
for Gloucestershire and his decision would ease the resentment
around the county circuit caused by his rejection of an England A
tour opportunity last year.
According to international regulations any appearance at national
level, from under-17 upwards, would render a player ineligible
for any other Test country for four years, which would change
Symonds`s status to an overseas registration at Gloucestershire.
With Walsh as the county`s overseas man for at least the next two
years, Gloucestershire would be unable to retain Symonds. Philip August, club chief executive, telephoned Walsh in Australia
yes- terday. He said: "I explained the situation to him vis-`-
vis Andrew, and Courtney will be putting the Gloucestershire
viewpoint.
"I would like to think he sees he has a future in English cricket
and I`d be personally disappointed - and the club would be disappointed - if he turns his back on us, having given us those assurances, as he did do, that he regarded himself as English."
Symonds, who was born in Birmingham but was taken to Australia by
his parents at the age of 18 months, signed a three-year contract
with Gloucestershire early this year, but that depended on his
eligibility for England.
Unsettled Derbyshire batsman Chris Adams has threatened to invoke the Treaty of Rome to buy himself out of the remaining two
years of his five-year contract after the club`s refusal of his
offer of #50,000 - equivalent of two years` pay - for his
release.
However, Adams may be frustrated in his freedom bid. A European
law expert said yesterday that an employee had no legal right to
buy himself out of a reasonable contract without the employers`
consent.
Source :: Electronic Telegraph (https://www.telegraph.co.uk)