Big Bash League 2011-12

Forty-somethings make Twenty20 their own

Two 40-year-olds have been among the key men in the BBL. And they haven't been alone in the tournament

Alex Malcolm

January 28, 2012

Comments: 13 | Text size: A | A

Brad Hogg sets off his celebrations, Perth Scorchers v Adelaide Strikers, BBL, Perth, January 8, 2012
Brad Hogg's success in the BBL even led to a call-up to Australia's T20 side © Getty Images
Enlarge
Related Links

Insert your cliché here. Age is merely a state of mind. You can't buy experience. Forty is the new 30. You never lose it.

All these adages were to be tested in the Big Bash League when so many retirees signed up for the tournament.

Shane Warne was a major coup, but it was not entirely unexpected. Despite being 42, his signing for the Melbourne Stars came on the back of regular appearances in the IPL for the Rajasthan Royals. Likewise, Matthew Hayden had been playing for Chennai Super Kings as recently as the 2010 Champions League, and had long been interested in representing the Brisbane Heat.

But when it was announced that Brad Hogg and Stuart MacGill, both 40, both without any professional cricket at all in over three years, would represent the Perth Scorchers and the Sydney Sixers respectively, the legitimacy of this Big Bash League came under heavy scrutiny. Questions were being raised as to why a highly successful state-based Big Bash had been scrapped for a franchise-based competition that would feature a bunch of "has-beens" looking for a superannuation boost. It was akin to HBO axing Sex and the City at the peak of its popularity for reruns of The Golden Girls.

And yet it is the two 40-year-olds, Hogg and MacGill, who have been the headline acts.

Hogg's tournament has been remarkable, extraordinary in reality. Between March of 2008 and November 2010 the left-arm wristspinner had played no competitive cricket whatsoever until he returned for his club side, Willetton, in the WACA Grade Twenty20 competition. The competitive urges were not satisfied enough after two games, and he returned to play in the two-day competition in February 2011.

Six games later he was back on the WACA ground, playing in the A-grade final, having taken five wickets in the elimination final, and made 144 in the semi. His opponents in the decider, Subiaco-Floreat, had faced the incumbent Test spinner Michael Beer in their semi, and to a man were unanimous in declaring Hogg the far more challenging opponent of the two.

Less than 10 months later Hogg has been picked to play T20 cricket for Australia. His form in the BBL has been phenomenal. Going into the final, his 12 wickets at 13.50 are eye-catching enough, putting him alongside Rana Naved-ul-Hasan, James Faulkner, and Mitchell Starc as the most damaging bowlers in the tournament. But his economy rate has been incredible. No player has come close to Hogg's effectiveness in conceding less than six runs an over.

The figures are astonishing, yet Hogg has never had any physical restrictions. Even at 40, he has been one of the fittest and most agile players in the Scorchers side, his fielding still an outstanding feature of his game.

The MacGill story is a different one, and yet he has been just as successful as Hogg. MacGill retired in May 2008, mid-Test-tour in the Caribbean, mentally and physically finished. His knees had given way. Carpal-tunnel syndrome was affecting his wrist. Touring had taken its toll. Cricket was a past life and MacGill was ready for a new one.

Yet he returned to New South Wales grade cricket in November 2011 for Sydney University. After four T20s and three club matches, his old mate Stuart Clark gave him a job with the Sydney Sixers.

There was trepidation on opening night against the Brisbane Heat. But 2 for 21 alleviated any doubts MacGill, or others, may have had about his place in the Sixers side.

While the figures are not as eye-catching as Hogg's - MacGill's six wickets have cost 24.33 apiece while he operated at 6.95 runs per over - MacGill's fingerprints have been all over the Sixers' key wins, as his mastery, guile, and skill proving too good in the big moments.

He removed Hayden and Brendon McCullum to set the first game up, and his coup de grace was against Hobart in the semi-final. The tournament's leading scorer, Travis Birt, held the key to the match on his broad bat. MacGill unlocked him with the artistry of a safe cracker, removing him with a wrong'un that would have caused even Shane Warne to tip his hat.

MacGill, like Hogg, has had so successful a return that he has nominated and been picked up for the Bangladesh T20 Premier League.

Both men have been stars of tournament, but they have not overshadowed the biggest star of all, Warne. The king was expected to perform. We knew he could write his own scripts; only, this time he got to tell us what would happen before it actually happened.

 
 
With four forty-somethings having dominated the Big Bash, it is worth asking: are we too hasty to cast elder statesmen aside, or is it simply an indictment of the younger players coming through
 

At 42 he is as fit as he has ever been, and not surprisingly is still bowling with tremendous control and confidence. Warne may not have the mystery trickery he once possessed, but his powers of deduction, and his ability to break down a batman's technique or tactics in a short space of time have never been greater.

The special part about this year's BBL is that Warne has taken us through it ball-by-ball with live in-the-run commentary that has been as insightful as brilliant.

Hayden, too, has commentated while playing, giving frank and honest assessments of his opponents and cricket generally. His candour has been refreshing in a world where cricketers must tip-toe diplomatically across every single contentious issue.

Hayden may have a little less hair these days but he is no less intimidating with bat in hand, and while he was not as dominant has his three former Australian team-mates, he was extremely competitive.

Which begs the question, is 40 the new 30?

Thirty has been a taboo age for cricketers in recent times and yet as these four greats will attest, age is no barrier to success. Michael Hussey's entire Test career has been played out after his 30th birthday. Ricky Ponting has more Test centuries and fifties after 30 than he did before, at a better strike rate, while averaging barely half a run less. Both are getting ever closer to the big four-zero mark, and though they have been doubted through periods of poor form, they have proved beyond doubt they are still currently irreplaceable in the Australian Test line-up.

With four forty-somethings having dominated the Big Bash, it is worth asking: are we too hasty to cast elder statesmen aside, or is it simply an indictment of the younger players coming through?

Whichever way you look at it, the competition has been far better for the presence of the senior statesmen. You can't buy experience, but you can buy experienced players, and in this instance they have been worth every cent.

Alex Malcolm is a freelance writer based in Perth

RSS Feeds: Alex Malcolm

© ESPN Sports Media Ltd.

Posted by BellCurve on (January 30, 2012, 8:20 GMT)

Between the age of 40 and 47, Jack Hobbs scored 2139 Test runs at an average of 64.82, including 8 centuries and a highest score of 211. 6 out of the 8 centuries were scored against Australia, against legendary bowlers such as Jack Gregory, Authur Mailey and Clarrie Grimmett. Donald Bradman retired a few days before his 40th birthday. In his last year of Test cricket, when he was 39 years old, he scored 1223 runs at an astonishing average of 111.18. Dravid is currently 39, Tendulkar 38, Ponting 37 and Kallis 36. Provided they look after themselves and retain the fire in their bellies, there is no reason why they cannot continue playing for a few more years. Laxman on the other hand should go; he was never that good; it's time for him to make way for a younger player.

Posted by   on (January 30, 2012, 7:26 GMT)

Age is a just a number. I believe there are two kinds of age: one, biological age ( calculated from the time we born) and the other, the actual age ( based on how you maintain your fitness, athleticism through a disciplinary life style). Some time a biologically 40 plus' actual age can be less than that of biologically 20 plus'!!

Posted by   on (January 30, 2012, 2:06 GMT)

It's more an indictment on the younger spin bowlers of this country that they are not good enough to out bowl a 40YO who's been out of the game for some time.

Posted by   on (January 30, 2012, 1:42 GMT)

Bert Ironmonger made his test debut at 46. These guys have got heaps of cricket left in them.

Posted by SRT_GENIUS on (January 30, 2012, 0:51 GMT)

It probably shows that spinners can play longer than we think they should. And also that Australia's previous generation had more to offer than the current one.

Posted by MENDIS_Forever on (January 29, 2012, 13:05 GMT)

You have missed the grand father of them all. Sanath Jayasuriya.a surprise selection indeed.

Posted by   on (January 29, 2012, 12:42 GMT)

Dsig3 your actually quite wrong, nowadays more and more batsmen around the world are reaching the 40yr old mark,e.g. Dravid who's 39, tendulkar whis 38 , lax man whis 38, Michael hussey who's 38 , pointing at 37 all still playing now , as no.1 choices for their country.

Posted by trepuR on (January 29, 2012, 9:45 GMT)

has no-one else thought of the fact that these players were not good enough (with the exception of Warne) to play test cricket for australia when they played their last games. It has been astounding how well they have all competed but for me, the success of over 40s at the big bash is more proof of the more challenging nature of test cricket as opposed to evidence of a need for some complete rethink of our attitudes towards age in the world of cricket. 20/20 is simply less difficult to play well than other forms of cricket, it simply requires less skill and less endurance (mental and physical). And as usual when I make comments like this on this website I must offer my disclaimer that I am not the archetypal 'old englishman' sitting at his computer struggling with the keyboard in attempt to voice his opinions about what it was like 'back in my day', I am in fact a 16 year old Australian.

Posted by KarachiKid on (January 29, 2012, 7:54 GMT)

I think 40 is the new 30, only in T20's. In the future I see many more 35+ guys playing T20's in league as well as international matches. I think Misbah would be there for Pakistan. Tendulkar can keep playing from Indian side. Aussies would be served well to draft in Warne, Hayden, Gilly, Bracken and Stuart Clark in their T20 side and they will surely win the next T20 world cup. I think there is no harm in giving it a go, as Aussies like to project outside that they dont take T20 as seriously. So give these blokes a go and you will see the result.

Posted by perkin-aus on (January 28, 2012, 13:16 GMT)

No, 40 is not the new 30. 50 is the new 30, 40 is the new 20

Comments have now been closed for this article

TopTop
Email Feedback Print
Share
E-mail
Feedback
Print
Alex MalcolmClose
Tournament Results
Scorchers v Syd Sixers at Perth - Jan 28, 2012
Syd Sixers won by 7 wickets (with 7 balls remaining)
Hurricanes v Syd Sixers at Hobart - Jan 22, 2012
Syd Sixers won by 7 runs
Scorchers v Melb Stars at Perth - Jan 21, 2012
Scorchers won by 11 runs
Melb Stars v Strikers at Melbourne - Jan 19, 2012
Melb Stars won by 6 wickets (with 7 balls remaining)
Syd Sixers v Scorchers at Sydney - Jan 18, 2012
Syd Sixers won by 1 run
Hurricanes v Melb Reneg at Hobart - Jan 18, 2012
Hurricanes won by 7 wickets (with 1 ball remaining)
More results »
News | Features Last 3 days
News | Features Last 3 days