December 26, 2012

Shortfall

14


© Satish Acharya

Satish Acharya is a cartoonist in Mumbai

Comments have now been closed for this article

  • cricketlover550 on December 29, 2012, 10:21 GMT

    excellent 1 .. where u get these ideas from?

  • on December 28, 2012, 8:02 GMT

    Hehe lol and dhoni's expression xcellent satish

  • vijaysrivatsan on December 27, 2012, 5:03 GMT

    Reason# 483 by dhoni.sure he has 484 ready for next match

  • saro_cric on December 27, 2012, 4:17 GMT

    Playing a T20 match with just 3 regular bowlers is horrible! I don't understand why dhoni trusts jadeja too much!!!

  • asiacricket1234 on December 26, 2012, 20:39 GMT

    Well I think India have done well as a Bowling unit. They only had 133 run and Pakistan has a aggressive batting line up. I didnt expect them to get that many wicket or to get that match down to last over. What shocked me is the way they lost their wickets.

  • on December 26, 2012, 13:09 GMT

    gud 1 !!!!!! ya it is ryt tht they r shot with 2-3 bolwers

  • nideesh on December 26, 2012, 10:35 GMT

    short of ideas and bowling changes

  • hachan on December 26, 2012, 9:18 GMT

    but i think a "short ball" by I Sharma was the reason for Indian defeat...agree?

  • on December 26, 2012, 8:53 GMT

    India were 2 bowlers short but because yuvi bowled well in last few games against England Dhoni thought he is as good as especialist but he proved to be wrong at the end of the day. We(Pakistan) used 6 bowlers and all of them were especialist bowlers, that is our strength and good to see our batters doing well after Inzi's consultancy.

  • indiasupbangalore on December 26, 2012, 8:03 GMT

    I think we were definitely a bowler short, oh well I am tired of listening to dhoni's excuses he needs a break, can we please pass on captainy of t20s to virat, and have a better a wicketkeeper bastsman in place.

  • cricketlover550 on December 29, 2012, 10:21 GMT

    excellent 1 .. where u get these ideas from?

  • on December 28, 2012, 8:02 GMT

    Hehe lol and dhoni's expression xcellent satish

  • vijaysrivatsan on December 27, 2012, 5:03 GMT

    Reason# 483 by dhoni.sure he has 484 ready for next match

  • saro_cric on December 27, 2012, 4:17 GMT

    Playing a T20 match with just 3 regular bowlers is horrible! I don't understand why dhoni trusts jadeja too much!!!

  • asiacricket1234 on December 26, 2012, 20:39 GMT

    Well I think India have done well as a Bowling unit. They only had 133 run and Pakistan has a aggressive batting line up. I didnt expect them to get that many wicket or to get that match down to last over. What shocked me is the way they lost their wickets.

  • on December 26, 2012, 13:09 GMT

    gud 1 !!!!!! ya it is ryt tht they r shot with 2-3 bolwers

  • nideesh on December 26, 2012, 10:35 GMT

    short of ideas and bowling changes

  • hachan on December 26, 2012, 9:18 GMT

    but i think a "short ball" by I Sharma was the reason for Indian defeat...agree?

  • on December 26, 2012, 8:53 GMT

    India were 2 bowlers short but because yuvi bowled well in last few games against England Dhoni thought he is as good as especialist but he proved to be wrong at the end of the day. We(Pakistan) used 6 bowlers and all of them were especialist bowlers, that is our strength and good to see our batters doing well after Inzi's consultancy.

  • indiasupbangalore on December 26, 2012, 8:03 GMT

    I think we were definitely a bowler short, oh well I am tired of listening to dhoni's excuses he needs a break, can we please pass on captainy of t20s to virat, and have a better a wicketkeeper bastsman in place.

  • ramli on December 26, 2012, 7:58 GMT

    good one ... the famed batting collapsed ... why rue only lack of bowlers ... just say ... we lacked everything to WIN ...

  • naansari on December 26, 2012, 7:12 GMT

    Once again India's strong batting line up collapsed and the bowlers almost tried to pull a thrilling win...but bad luck they lost the match in the last over.

  • S.Alis on December 26, 2012, 6:21 GMT

    Poor Dhoni. Always short on something after losing.

  • Player_007 on December 26, 2012, 5:35 GMT

    Good one Satish!! but that's always the case with India...

  • No featured comments at the moment.

  • Player_007 on December 26, 2012, 5:35 GMT

    Good one Satish!! but that's always the case with India...

  • S.Alis on December 26, 2012, 6:21 GMT

    Poor Dhoni. Always short on something after losing.

  • naansari on December 26, 2012, 7:12 GMT

    Once again India's strong batting line up collapsed and the bowlers almost tried to pull a thrilling win...but bad luck they lost the match in the last over.

  • ramli on December 26, 2012, 7:58 GMT

    good one ... the famed batting collapsed ... why rue only lack of bowlers ... just say ... we lacked everything to WIN ...

  • indiasupbangalore on December 26, 2012, 8:03 GMT

    I think we were definitely a bowler short, oh well I am tired of listening to dhoni's excuses he needs a break, can we please pass on captainy of t20s to virat, and have a better a wicketkeeper bastsman in place.

  • on December 26, 2012, 8:53 GMT

    India were 2 bowlers short but because yuvi bowled well in last few games against England Dhoni thought he is as good as especialist but he proved to be wrong at the end of the day. We(Pakistan) used 6 bowlers and all of them were especialist bowlers, that is our strength and good to see our batters doing well after Inzi's consultancy.

  • hachan on December 26, 2012, 9:18 GMT

    but i think a "short ball" by I Sharma was the reason for Indian defeat...agree?

  • nideesh on December 26, 2012, 10:35 GMT

    short of ideas and bowling changes

  • on December 26, 2012, 13:09 GMT

    gud 1 !!!!!! ya it is ryt tht they r shot with 2-3 bolwers

  • asiacricket1234 on December 26, 2012, 20:39 GMT

    Well I think India have done well as a Bowling unit. They only had 133 run and Pakistan has a aggressive batting line up. I didnt expect them to get that many wicket or to get that match down to last over. What shocked me is the way they lost their wickets.