Michael Jeh January 30, 2011

Cricket will need to adapt to cultural shift in Australia

At a time when Australian cricket is going through a bit of a soul-searching period, it is a good time to ask some questions about the long-term health (viability) of a sport like cricket in a country that, unlike the subcontinent, has many
19

At a time when Australian cricket is going through a bit of a soul-searching period, it is a good time to ask some questions about the long-term health (viability) of a sport like cricket in a country that, unlike the subcontinent, has many competitors for hearts and minds. The Australian Sports Commission have commissioned a report into sport that was highlighted in the Weekend Australian yesterday. Revealingly, the headline is entitled "Ugly truth of Australian sport" and the synopsis paints an interesting, perhaps even disturbing, picture of the landscape of sport in this country, especially in relation to the juniors who are at the at the very heart of our long-term future.

Specifically in relation to cricket, the report suggests that 97% of cricketers have experienced sledging at some point in their careers. Whilst past generations of Australian cricketers, even at club level, have shown a cultural tendency to view sledging as an entirely normal part of the cricketing experience, I am not so sure that this indifference will continue into the next generation with the same casual shrug of the shoulders and the promise of a beer afterwards in the change rooms.

Well, to begin with, it is now increasingly the case (in the cities anyway) that cricketers rarely tend to sit in the dressing room for hours afterwards, sipping a beer or three in their jocks and swapping tall stories, jokes and local cricketing folklore. The young lads that I play with (and against) tend to switch on their mobile phones as soon as they enter the change rooms after play and make immediate plans to meet friends at another location. I cannot think of the last occasion when they even stayed long enough to have a shower after the game. It's the modern style of social interaction and I have no issue with it but it is a significant shift away from the 'dressing room culture' that has long been a part of club cricket in Australia (perhaps elsewhere too). Perhaps bush/country/regional cricket still enjoys that sort of old-fashioned camaraderie where it becomes slightly easier to embrace the notion of "what happens on the field stays on the field". That philosophy has long been at the cornerstone of the Australian defence of sledging and until recently, that has generally been a system that has worked.

I have an inkling that this culture is about to change sometime soon and I suspect Cricket Australia will need to have their finger on the pulse to monitor this changing heartbeat and design a system that can cope with this cultural shift. To be fair, most of the cricketing authorities are already aware of the need to create a slightly less hostile environment for cricket, as evidenced by numerous 'spirit of cricket' type programs being implemented at the grass roots level. One local competition near Brisbane even has a 'red card, yellow card' type system to deal with verbal abuse and other unpleasantries. In its infancy, these programs are still more symbolic than anything else - I haven't seen anything (yet) to suggest that the umpires or administrators are enforcing these rules to any great extent but at least they are aware of the need to move with the times and have started moving in the right direction. Major cultural shifts like this take time and cannot be expected to happen overnight.

Anyone who has followed my blogs will know that I have always argued a consistent position against sledging, verbal abuse, mental disintegration etc so there's nothing new in my opinion on this issue. Previously, I have copped a lot of flak for being out of touch with the generation of cricketers I played with and to be fair, I have to concede that generally speaking, I was in the minority. I was often out of step with the general consensus that sledging was simply part of the game and that it was merely another tactic to get the better of your opposition with no malice intended. I'll stick to my guns and state my view that I think it's unnecessary and in poor taste but prepared to accept that I was outvoted in my era.

But the times they-are-a-changin' and I predict that Australian cricket will no longer be able to tolerate those frontier-style views of manhood in the politically correct, harassment-free, litigious and 'mum-power' driven junior sport culture that will soon graduate to men's cricket. For one thing, there are a lot more young cricketers from Asian families who are coming through the system. You've only got to read the cricket scores in the Sunday newspapers to see that trend emerging and generally speaking (and I am generalising here), those families are less accustomed to the traditions of "whatever happens on the field, stays on the field". As we saw when Brad Hogg referred to an Indian cricketer as a "bastard" and caused some offence, what is generally a low-level insult to some people can be escalated to a much higher plane to another person. We can beat about the bush all we like but that is the new reality of cricket in Australia, perhaps also in England, New Zealand and South Africa.

Family values too are now much changed from the culture that cricket flourished throughout the Ian Chappell, Allan Border, Steve Waugh and Ricky Ponting eras. Mothers are now playing much more prominent roles in deciding what sports their sons play, and this will have an impact on what behaviours they are prepared to tolerate from/to their boys. I can only speak from my experience as a parent/coach/manager in junior sport (cricket and rugby union) and from the many interactions I have with other parents, there is a definite paradigm shift in the powerful and influential roles that mothers play. The mothers I speak to simply don't understand the macho posturing that tends to excuse verbal abuse as a tactical ploy. Not used to the 'what happens on the field stays on the field' sort of excuses that men tend to hide behind, women (and an increasing number of men in the circles I move in) are questioning whether they want their sons growing up in an environment that condones this naked verbal aggression.

Again, I can only speak for myself and for the groups that I am involved in but we've had many conversations about what defines the new style of manhood that we want for our sons. We spend all week trying to get our young boys to behave in certain ways, use their manners, respect women/authority, not say anything that is unkind/cruel/hurtful and it would be utterly counter-productive for us to then encourage them to play a sport that promotes this as an essential ingredient to success.

As a group of parents, we are concerned about a society that has an increasing drug, alcohol and associated violence problem. We want our children, especially male children, to grow up in a world that is a bit more genteel and less prone to aggression and domestic violence. It's not necessarily a moral position - we just want them to be safe. The following excerpt from the aforementioned newspaper article summarises the issue:

"Verbal abuse -- mostly by players, spectators and parents -- was dissuading volunteers, and seen to be reflective both of the individuals themselves and of society generally. Sledging by players, and even spectators, was taking the fun out of sport, and was attributed to the culture of sport in Australia as well as the individuals themselves. Almost every cricketer surveyed -- 97 per cent -- had experienced sledging."

So why would we allow our sons to play a sport that runs counter to every other message every other minute of the day? I never want to hear my son swearing at an umpire or opposition player, I never want to hear him telling the opening batsmen that he's going to "knock his head off" and I never want to hear him laugh about the fact that he got the better of someone because he needled him about his weight, colour, sister's virginity etc. If that happens in my family, I will remove him from that sport and find some other activity to engage him in. And that's the new environment that I think Australian cricket administrators are going to have to contend with when designing long-term plans for the future of cricket for a generation of cricketers, some of whom haven't even been born yet!

Talent cycles come and go. It has been ever thus. We've lost the Ashes in 2011 but we'll get it back again sometime soon. The more salient issue will focus on whether cricket (and sport in general) can re-invent itself to appeal to a new world that still wants to win at all costs but somehow wants to do it without the aggro. I love the fact that more women now control that family dynamic because my wife (and the other significant females in my life) has already changed me for the better. When I come home and recount tales of sledging from the cricket field, my wife gives me sort of quizzical look that shrivels me and makes me feel like a little boy again. It's a silent look of scorn and pity that reminds me that my behaviour a few hours ago would not be out of place in a kindergarten.

With more single mums and females making decisions around sport, cricket will need to appeal to that market if it wants to retain a mass audience of young boys who will need mum's permission to keep playing the game. Otherwise, as the numbers filter through junior sport and the pyramid effect continues to narrow the funnel, through sheer weight of numbers, we'll never keep pace with the juggernaut that is already India, Sri Lanka, Pakistan and Bangladesh.

This report by the Sports Commission indicates that these issues are indeed a real concern for sport administrators in Australia. The Minister for Sport was even moved to comment that "we need to urge the general community to take a tougher standard against inappropriate behaviour". Be the change that you want to be Minister - perhaps you can convince your fellow politicians to show us the way forward with their daily behaviour in Parliament!

Michael Jeh is an Oxford Blue who played first-class cricket, and a Playing Member of the MCC. He lives in Brisbane

Comments have now been closed for this article

  • Ammit on February 9, 2011, 16:29 GMT

    Hah! You touched the right and wrong chords at the same time. Someone for whom the sport is not only passion but a career, is out there to secure his future and will do whatever it takes to be successful. This is what happens in the world outside of Sports too. But things get personal pretty soon no matter how hard you try. Only GOD like SACHIN can stand rude sledging and reply with his bat [over years] but there is only one GOD and the rest are human. Sledging is good as long as you do not get personal. Someone's mother,sister,color,race or religion is not playing and they should be kept aside. You can bully someone with a bat in hand for the reason he is on the field only. The bigger thing is Sportsman spirit. Leaving crease without waiting for umpire to raise finger and not shamelessly showing your finger [Punter].Healthy rivalry is good for game that's what sell. That's what get people emotionally glued to game. Men are hard and they play rough but don't be a abuse or cheat

  • Jim c on January 31, 2011, 14:57 GMT

    If you can't deal with sledging you shouldn't be playing the game...as a batsman the best way to deal with a bowler telling you that you can't bat is to hit the next ball for runs, as a bowler, to take a wicket...sledging, mental disintergation, whatever you call it, has and will be a part of the game.

  • Murtaza on January 31, 2011, 9:35 GMT

    I think sledging will continue and it should be because it just creates a spice...

  • Crickeyt on January 31, 2011, 8:39 GMT

    Come on, it is not such a big deal, the whole sledging thing. It used to be in the early 90s when Aussies were the only ones doing it and the other teams were still in the "gentleman's game" mode. But now all teams have some quiet players and some chatty ones, so it is a level field for all. Other games like football also have rules against blatant abuse, but no one besides cricket suggests a blanket ban on all chatter. It is an intrinsic part of cricket at all levels. In the sub-continent, we do not have parents accompanying their kids to games, so most of your arguments are not valid there. All kids sledge in cricket and no, they do not learn it from TV, since it happened even before there was cricket on TV.

  • brenno_23 on January 31, 2011, 7:01 GMT

    well, wasn't this a very interesting article, i totally agree that personal abuse is innapropriate but i disagree on the rest of this piece. i don't think that there is anything wrong with trying to put your opponent off his/her game by mentioning something about the way which they are playing, after all if they are thinking about what's coming out of your mouth rather than the next ball, you've almost won the battle. as a local cricketer at u16's level i have experienced plenty of sledges before and dealt out my fair share as well. i think that it show's character and mental toughness to ignore the chatter and concentrate on the game. as such i think that there is a place for sledging as long as it doesnt descend to personal abuse, thanks

  • Joe Drake-Brockman on January 31, 2011, 2:12 GMT

    When I played junior cricket in the 1960's the worse you heard was "come on we'll get this kid out easily or something similar". Unfortunately my generation as adults decided the "old rules" for blokes not swearing in front of kids or women were somehow reducing our"macho manhood" and we threw the rules out. No now we have a free for all where swearing and personal denigration is the norm (go to a pub or wet mess). So "rough" sledging is to be expected. Good to see that maybe after 40 yrs maybe we'll move back to the "old standards".

  • cricket lover on January 31, 2011, 2:01 GMT

    i agree completely. i've never understood why a player of calibre of warne, mcgrath, steve waugh etc needed to sledget to gain an advantage! was it to instill fear in opposition because they weren't confident of their own abilities?! and for all those who say sledging is part of sport, well its not. you only have to look at bradman's last innings and how eng players applauded him when he came to the crease. how can you abuse someone then shake hands and say lets leave it on the field? to me the real person was that on the field who was abusing me. the one off the field is the fake who wants now to be seen as a gentleman!

    mcgrath vs sarwan in W.I all those years ago, perfect example how things go wrong. mcgrath deserved what he got there in reply to his pathetic sledge to sarwan. sledging has no place in any sport let alone in cricket which is know for "gentlemen's sport". slegding will always lead to bad blood between team & i've seen it plenty of times!

  • Milind Jadhav on January 31, 2011, 1:46 GMT

    Wonderfully written. Brings back nostalgic memories of playing cricket in India. I think it was pretty much the same the world over. Everything and everybody was game. Poeple thought you were queer if you did not pass around a few cuss words and indluge in some banter! Agressive Mum's apart, I think this generation of kids are being turned by the society into a bunch of politically correct sissy's. Double standards galore and hypocrisy rules but one has to be politically correct...speaking your mind can get a person into a lot of trouble! People dont have the time to bond with their team mates nor is there any inclination to get to know each other. Guess, we can only watch the world go by...thank you once again...

  • Aaron on January 30, 2011, 20:59 GMT

    I don't know about kids sport in Australia but in New Zealand the problem isn't the kids so much as the parents on the sideline. I'm shocked at how seriously some parents take a game between 8 year olds. Certainly the 8-year olds have it in perspective, they enjoy themselves but don't get too upset when they lose. In the meantime though many of the parents are on the sideline going beserk, shouting at the referee and even their own child when things don't go well. Young kids start off with a mature attitude to sport but with examples like this on the sideline they either stop playing because they find their parent's really embarassing or they start to behave the same way themselves. I don't have a solution for this unless referees are given the power to red card people on the sideline.

  • venkat on January 30, 2011, 18:33 GMT

    If anyone thinks that the game has to be played in peace and quiet he is entirely mistaken. The guys who say "sledging must be banned" are typically people who have never played the game. The fact is whenever there is a game of cricket, there is at the very least friendly banter. In the local leagues in India, it takes two blocks before someone reminds the batsmen that this isn't a two day game and he better get on with it. There are lots of other things that are said and sometimes there is abuse. I think abuse is pathetic and in general it should be avoided. But I dont think it is entirely avoidable. And for those who say abuse must be banned, I want to ask a simple question. How many grown men don't cuss? I cant think of any. Yes, kids should learn to respect the game, respect the opponents etc, but we cant entirely do away with words on the field. And if you ask me, I personally believe that cricketers are far better behaved than most other sportsmen.

  • Ammit on February 9, 2011, 16:29 GMT

    Hah! You touched the right and wrong chords at the same time. Someone for whom the sport is not only passion but a career, is out there to secure his future and will do whatever it takes to be successful. This is what happens in the world outside of Sports too. But things get personal pretty soon no matter how hard you try. Only GOD like SACHIN can stand rude sledging and reply with his bat [over years] but there is only one GOD and the rest are human. Sledging is good as long as you do not get personal. Someone's mother,sister,color,race or religion is not playing and they should be kept aside. You can bully someone with a bat in hand for the reason he is on the field only. The bigger thing is Sportsman spirit. Leaving crease without waiting for umpire to raise finger and not shamelessly showing your finger [Punter].Healthy rivalry is good for game that's what sell. That's what get people emotionally glued to game. Men are hard and they play rough but don't be a abuse or cheat

  • Jim c on January 31, 2011, 14:57 GMT

    If you can't deal with sledging you shouldn't be playing the game...as a batsman the best way to deal with a bowler telling you that you can't bat is to hit the next ball for runs, as a bowler, to take a wicket...sledging, mental disintergation, whatever you call it, has and will be a part of the game.

  • Murtaza on January 31, 2011, 9:35 GMT

    I think sledging will continue and it should be because it just creates a spice...

  • Crickeyt on January 31, 2011, 8:39 GMT

    Come on, it is not such a big deal, the whole sledging thing. It used to be in the early 90s when Aussies were the only ones doing it and the other teams were still in the "gentleman's game" mode. But now all teams have some quiet players and some chatty ones, so it is a level field for all. Other games like football also have rules against blatant abuse, but no one besides cricket suggests a blanket ban on all chatter. It is an intrinsic part of cricket at all levels. In the sub-continent, we do not have parents accompanying their kids to games, so most of your arguments are not valid there. All kids sledge in cricket and no, they do not learn it from TV, since it happened even before there was cricket on TV.

  • brenno_23 on January 31, 2011, 7:01 GMT

    well, wasn't this a very interesting article, i totally agree that personal abuse is innapropriate but i disagree on the rest of this piece. i don't think that there is anything wrong with trying to put your opponent off his/her game by mentioning something about the way which they are playing, after all if they are thinking about what's coming out of your mouth rather than the next ball, you've almost won the battle. as a local cricketer at u16's level i have experienced plenty of sledges before and dealt out my fair share as well. i think that it show's character and mental toughness to ignore the chatter and concentrate on the game. as such i think that there is a place for sledging as long as it doesnt descend to personal abuse, thanks

  • Joe Drake-Brockman on January 31, 2011, 2:12 GMT

    When I played junior cricket in the 1960's the worse you heard was "come on we'll get this kid out easily or something similar". Unfortunately my generation as adults decided the "old rules" for blokes not swearing in front of kids or women were somehow reducing our"macho manhood" and we threw the rules out. No now we have a free for all where swearing and personal denigration is the norm (go to a pub or wet mess). So "rough" sledging is to be expected. Good to see that maybe after 40 yrs maybe we'll move back to the "old standards".

  • cricket lover on January 31, 2011, 2:01 GMT

    i agree completely. i've never understood why a player of calibre of warne, mcgrath, steve waugh etc needed to sledget to gain an advantage! was it to instill fear in opposition because they weren't confident of their own abilities?! and for all those who say sledging is part of sport, well its not. you only have to look at bradman's last innings and how eng players applauded him when he came to the crease. how can you abuse someone then shake hands and say lets leave it on the field? to me the real person was that on the field who was abusing me. the one off the field is the fake who wants now to be seen as a gentleman!

    mcgrath vs sarwan in W.I all those years ago, perfect example how things go wrong. mcgrath deserved what he got there in reply to his pathetic sledge to sarwan. sledging has no place in any sport let alone in cricket which is know for "gentlemen's sport". slegding will always lead to bad blood between team & i've seen it plenty of times!

  • Milind Jadhav on January 31, 2011, 1:46 GMT

    Wonderfully written. Brings back nostalgic memories of playing cricket in India. I think it was pretty much the same the world over. Everything and everybody was game. Poeple thought you were queer if you did not pass around a few cuss words and indluge in some banter! Agressive Mum's apart, I think this generation of kids are being turned by the society into a bunch of politically correct sissy's. Double standards galore and hypocrisy rules but one has to be politically correct...speaking your mind can get a person into a lot of trouble! People dont have the time to bond with their team mates nor is there any inclination to get to know each other. Guess, we can only watch the world go by...thank you once again...

  • Aaron on January 30, 2011, 20:59 GMT

    I don't know about kids sport in Australia but in New Zealand the problem isn't the kids so much as the parents on the sideline. I'm shocked at how seriously some parents take a game between 8 year olds. Certainly the 8-year olds have it in perspective, they enjoy themselves but don't get too upset when they lose. In the meantime though many of the parents are on the sideline going beserk, shouting at the referee and even their own child when things don't go well. Young kids start off with a mature attitude to sport but with examples like this on the sideline they either stop playing because they find their parent's really embarassing or they start to behave the same way themselves. I don't have a solution for this unless referees are given the power to red card people on the sideline.

  • venkat on January 30, 2011, 18:33 GMT

    If anyone thinks that the game has to be played in peace and quiet he is entirely mistaken. The guys who say "sledging must be banned" are typically people who have never played the game. The fact is whenever there is a game of cricket, there is at the very least friendly banter. In the local leagues in India, it takes two blocks before someone reminds the batsmen that this isn't a two day game and he better get on with it. There are lots of other things that are said and sometimes there is abuse. I think abuse is pathetic and in general it should be avoided. But I dont think it is entirely avoidable. And for those who say abuse must be banned, I want to ask a simple question. How many grown men don't cuss? I cant think of any. Yes, kids should learn to respect the game, respect the opponents etc, but we cant entirely do away with words on the field. And if you ask me, I personally believe that cricketers are far better behaved than most other sportsmen.

  • Aadil on January 30, 2011, 14:18 GMT

    As some comments before me have rightly pointed out sledging will always be part of all sports not only cricket but "what happens on the field stays on the field" way of thinking is hypocritical. If you call someone a so and so on the field obviously they're not going to have a beer after with you. Thats where the difference lies between the australian team and others (especially asian teams). Rightfully so, as a sledge may be offensive or not depending on the individual. And there is no moral arbiter determining offensiveness as much as Paul Harris or others have acted as at times (and no im not condoning racism or other personal sledges). Just saying that if you are going to sledge and demean the opposition you will have to live with consequences without complaining, which are being hated by opposition players and fans and maybe getting even more back. If winning that game is worth that then good luck to you (Symonds, Hayden and McGrath should take note).

  • Michael Jeh on January 30, 2011, 11:35 GMT

    Steve Gwynne, to answer your question, I've played grade cricket since 1986 and my point is that the post-match social scene is a lot different now than it was when I first played. It's just a different type of social interaction now, much less about both teams sitting in the dressing room and talking till late into the evening. When it happens, it's mainly the older guys. And regardless of what you think, the Aust Sports Commission report clearly highlights some issues that you can't ignore. Those are not my words, they're from parents, coaches and volunteers. Only time will tell whether that will change or not.

  • Borogove on January 30, 2011, 11:33 GMT

    (Contd.)

    If a ruling is ever to be made, two problems need to be solved - 1) any ruling may be attacked as being racist/culturally-biased by the 'losing' party; 2) deciding whether the spirit of cricket should be tweaked periodically, based on the values of the society of that day. Re. #2, if so, we will see this problem and others like it raised - again ad infinitum, ad nauseum - perhaps even going back in the direction of sledging, someday!

    Still, it's worrying how far all of this is going in the direction of political correctness - but in the absence of a set of absolute morals/values and strict adherence to the same, this was always on the cards.

    Sadly, this trend Jeh mentions (if indeed, it is true) sounds like it will essentially emasculate or feminize the next generation of males.

  • Borogove on January 30, 2011, 11:29 GMT

    Agreed, some of the confusion on this matter is because one man's banter is another man's sledge (especially when comparing Asians and Australians). Coming from SL, it seems our boys have now learned how to both take it AND dish it out.

    The question is - if sledging is intrinsic to cricket (and not a cultural-biased version of it), all those aspiring to play had better learn to do so. If not - and if sledging needs to be curbed, since the gray area of banter vs. sledge cannot be neutrally identified, the ICC might as well rule that the 2 teams need not talk to each other at all on the field, during passages of play. Stay in the gray area and we will continue to have this discussion ad infinitum, ad nauseum.

    Yes - it may make matches less interesting, but if sledging is wrong, that's the price to be paid. Since this depends heavily on whose word or view is to be considered right/wrong, I doubt we will see this happening any time soon.

  • Gautam Banerjee on January 30, 2011, 11:23 GMT

    Very nice article.I don't know if people will read through all of it. "Machoness" will remain! The way one demonstrates it may change. But it will remain! After all every male(I am restricting my comments to men's game) wants to be the alpha male. So whatever one does, the agression will remain. In fact every one comments on how this team or that team does not have the aggresion.So every body wants aggression. Bowlers when they show agression with a short ball to the head are chastised. Why a batsman not be penalised for hitting the ball out of the ground or hitting successive 6s? these are all forms of agression and ultimately it comes out verbally if one can't demonstrate it on the ball!

  • Brad on January 30, 2011, 9:50 GMT

    Sportsmen in all codes have a go at the opposition and always will. Sledging is not just an entrenched part of cricket but an entrenched part of sport. Hell, I've got several books on classic sledges and it is a two way street, not one side ganging up on the other. There is no place for racism in sport and displaying good sportsmanship is crucial, but anything else to gain an advantage is okay, as long as you shake hands with your opponent and look him in the eye after the game. Kids sport is different, with the emphasis on participation - not winning the contest - and should be looked at separately to adult sport.

  • les on January 30, 2011, 9:29 GMT

    Steve Gwynne; but this doesn't happen in any other part of the world. Oh and don't come off telling me that thats why we are different. That train has already left long long long ago.

  • Seether1 on January 30, 2011, 8:33 GMT

    I for one would find cricket a whole lot less interesting if sledging was banned, especially at Test level. Cricket is a tough sport unlike the thrill-a-minute American sports. To be successful one has to be mentally tough.

  • Steve Gwynne on January 30, 2011, 7:43 GMT

    Sledging has been around for over 100 years and will always be a part of the game. Its not the sledging that is inappropriate but the manner of the sledge. I do not know at what grade Michael the author of the story plays or at what level but he needs to find a new team if his current one has no history of social mixing at the end of a fixture. Cricket has a social history as well as a sporting history and in my 40 years experience will never change.

  • No featured comments at the moment.

  • Steve Gwynne on January 30, 2011, 7:43 GMT

    Sledging has been around for over 100 years and will always be a part of the game. Its not the sledging that is inappropriate but the manner of the sledge. I do not know at what grade Michael the author of the story plays or at what level but he needs to find a new team if his current one has no history of social mixing at the end of a fixture. Cricket has a social history as well as a sporting history and in my 40 years experience will never change.

  • Seether1 on January 30, 2011, 8:33 GMT

    I for one would find cricket a whole lot less interesting if sledging was banned, especially at Test level. Cricket is a tough sport unlike the thrill-a-minute American sports. To be successful one has to be mentally tough.

  • les on January 30, 2011, 9:29 GMT

    Steve Gwynne; but this doesn't happen in any other part of the world. Oh and don't come off telling me that thats why we are different. That train has already left long long long ago.

  • Brad on January 30, 2011, 9:50 GMT

    Sportsmen in all codes have a go at the opposition and always will. Sledging is not just an entrenched part of cricket but an entrenched part of sport. Hell, I've got several books on classic sledges and it is a two way street, not one side ganging up on the other. There is no place for racism in sport and displaying good sportsmanship is crucial, but anything else to gain an advantage is okay, as long as you shake hands with your opponent and look him in the eye after the game. Kids sport is different, with the emphasis on participation - not winning the contest - and should be looked at separately to adult sport.

  • Gautam Banerjee on January 30, 2011, 11:23 GMT

    Very nice article.I don't know if people will read through all of it. "Machoness" will remain! The way one demonstrates it may change. But it will remain! After all every male(I am restricting my comments to men's game) wants to be the alpha male. So whatever one does, the agression will remain. In fact every one comments on how this team or that team does not have the aggresion.So every body wants aggression. Bowlers when they show agression with a short ball to the head are chastised. Why a batsman not be penalised for hitting the ball out of the ground or hitting successive 6s? these are all forms of agression and ultimately it comes out verbally if one can't demonstrate it on the ball!

  • Borogove on January 30, 2011, 11:29 GMT

    Agreed, some of the confusion on this matter is because one man's banter is another man's sledge (especially when comparing Asians and Australians). Coming from SL, it seems our boys have now learned how to both take it AND dish it out.

    The question is - if sledging is intrinsic to cricket (and not a cultural-biased version of it), all those aspiring to play had better learn to do so. If not - and if sledging needs to be curbed, since the gray area of banter vs. sledge cannot be neutrally identified, the ICC might as well rule that the 2 teams need not talk to each other at all on the field, during passages of play. Stay in the gray area and we will continue to have this discussion ad infinitum, ad nauseum.

    Yes - it may make matches less interesting, but if sledging is wrong, that's the price to be paid. Since this depends heavily on whose word or view is to be considered right/wrong, I doubt we will see this happening any time soon.

  • Borogove on January 30, 2011, 11:33 GMT

    (Contd.)

    If a ruling is ever to be made, two problems need to be solved - 1) any ruling may be attacked as being racist/culturally-biased by the 'losing' party; 2) deciding whether the spirit of cricket should be tweaked periodically, based on the values of the society of that day. Re. #2, if so, we will see this problem and others like it raised - again ad infinitum, ad nauseum - perhaps even going back in the direction of sledging, someday!

    Still, it's worrying how far all of this is going in the direction of political correctness - but in the absence of a set of absolute morals/values and strict adherence to the same, this was always on the cards.

    Sadly, this trend Jeh mentions (if indeed, it is true) sounds like it will essentially emasculate or feminize the next generation of males.

  • Michael Jeh on January 30, 2011, 11:35 GMT

    Steve Gwynne, to answer your question, I've played grade cricket since 1986 and my point is that the post-match social scene is a lot different now than it was when I first played. It's just a different type of social interaction now, much less about both teams sitting in the dressing room and talking till late into the evening. When it happens, it's mainly the older guys. And regardless of what you think, the Aust Sports Commission report clearly highlights some issues that you can't ignore. Those are not my words, they're from parents, coaches and volunteers. Only time will tell whether that will change or not.

  • Aadil on January 30, 2011, 14:18 GMT

    As some comments before me have rightly pointed out sledging will always be part of all sports not only cricket but "what happens on the field stays on the field" way of thinking is hypocritical. If you call someone a so and so on the field obviously they're not going to have a beer after with you. Thats where the difference lies between the australian team and others (especially asian teams). Rightfully so, as a sledge may be offensive or not depending on the individual. And there is no moral arbiter determining offensiveness as much as Paul Harris or others have acted as at times (and no im not condoning racism or other personal sledges). Just saying that if you are going to sledge and demean the opposition you will have to live with consequences without complaining, which are being hated by opposition players and fans and maybe getting even more back. If winning that game is worth that then good luck to you (Symonds, Hayden and McGrath should take note).

  • venkat on January 30, 2011, 18:33 GMT

    If anyone thinks that the game has to be played in peace and quiet he is entirely mistaken. The guys who say "sledging must be banned" are typically people who have never played the game. The fact is whenever there is a game of cricket, there is at the very least friendly banter. In the local leagues in India, it takes two blocks before someone reminds the batsmen that this isn't a two day game and he better get on with it. There are lots of other things that are said and sometimes there is abuse. I think abuse is pathetic and in general it should be avoided. But I dont think it is entirely avoidable. And for those who say abuse must be banned, I want to ask a simple question. How many grown men don't cuss? I cant think of any. Yes, kids should learn to respect the game, respect the opponents etc, but we cant entirely do away with words on the field. And if you ask me, I personally believe that cricketers are far better behaved than most other sportsmen.