Pakistan cricket April 23, 2013

Hafeez, a reason to watch Pakistan bat

Osama Baig
After a long time, the country has a batsman who is as captivating and consistent as their bowlers

I pick up a ruined cricket ball that I had rescued from a wet clump of grass the other day. "I am thinking of bowling in the nets today," I say. "Want to join me and bowl?"

My room-mate looks up from his laptop and shakes his head. He isn't a fast-bowling fan. I am.

After bowling my heart out alone in the nets, I walk around the perimeter of it and notice the blade of a broken cricket bat. I pick up the broken blade. I swing it around while mentally picturing Viv Richards slowly windmilling his arms as he walks to his batting crease with his swagger. I walk over towards the open field to the side of the nets with the bat and ball in my hand, windmilling my arms now. I chew on my pretend gum too.

I toss the ball up, but I am too late in trying to get both hands on the broken stick. The ball hits me just below the neck. It's Rodney Hogg who has just bounced Richards. Richards isn't going to take that politely now is he? I toss the ball up, and this time around I hoick Hogg over square leg. I go to collect the ball.

I toss the ball up again, and I'm slightly late this time round too. Just as the ball is about to hit the ground, I swiftly step to the side to give myself room, bend down, connect with the 'yorker', and smack it to extra cover with a flourish of the bat. AB de Villiers, you beauty. How did you ever smoke a Dale Steyn yorker for a six in the IPL?

The furiously belted ball ricochets off a metal beam that supports the nets from the outside, and it rockets straight back to me. My eyes lit up: Shoaib Akhtar. I shift my weight slightly onto the back foot, I keep my bat straight, line it up with the ball, and just prod the ball forward. The backfoot straight push-drive of Sachin Tendulkar makes the ball speed away on the grass. A bird sitting in its path takes flight in alarm, and follows the ball while she is curving up in the air. She's slower than the ball; it's Waqar Younis chasing fruitlessly after the ball as it crosses the boundary.

I toss the ball up once more, but I throw it a little waywardly. The ball is falling to my right, a loosener by Ishant Sharma. I clear my left foot, get down on one knee and hit the ball for a flat six over extra cover. All the while Mohammad Hafeez's picture is crystal clear in my mind, with his bat flourish, face completely focused, mouth tense with the effort of holding in his breath when going through the motion. The piece of wood shatters in my hand on making contact with the ball. I am shaken up by the sharp pain in my hands. I look down surprised, not at my bleeding hands but rather why I had fantasised about Hafeez in a list that otherwise includes Richards, de Villiers and Tendulkar. I quickly blame my Hafeez-crazy friend and pretend to be irritated at her for weaseling Hafeez into my fantasy of batting giants. But I am only pretending, deep down I know the truth.

I usually don't watch Pakistan bat, I have given up on that department for a while now. I only watch them bowl. This way, I get to watch proper bowling versus a batting line-up that is better (aren't the rest of the big Test nations better?). I just get to watch better cricket. Over the past year, however, Hafeez has been the exception to my rule of no-watching-Pakistan-bat. His style immediately catches the eye. The delicate shot where he places the ball to pierce the gap between backward point and short-third man is my favourite shot from a Pakistan batsman. I realise that Hafeez made his way into my mind along with Tendulkar et al because my Pakistani heart yearns for Hafeez. I want to watch him bat, and bat consistently well at that. Caribbean Premier League, I will definitely be following you.

It's getting dark around the empty cricket field. I pick up the broken bat pieces with my throbbing hands, and start walking back to my room. "Where have you been?" my roommate asks, looking at my bloody hand and shooting me a quizzical look. "I have hope in Hafeez," I reply. Shaking his head, he turns back to his laptop; he isn't a Hafeez fan. I am.

If you have a submission for Inbox, send it to us here, with "Inbox" in the subject line

Comments have now been closed for this article

  • hailianpak on April 24, 2013, 5:32 GMT

    He's one of my favorite players in Pak along with Saeed Ajmal. I think he has the potential to be a very competitive allrounder in all forms of cricket. But there's one thing he can't do, no matter how good he plays in the next few years He will never achieve respectable figures to be one of the best allrounders ever. In my opinion he had the talent to be one of the best but what he didnt have, especially at the start of his career, was temprament to support his talent. He's got a pretty solid batting technique.

  • on April 27, 2013, 17:57 GMT

    Naman Gupta, i disagree with you there, we had the likes of inzamam, miandad and yousaf who were fine individual players. I agree that pakistan batting as a unit has always been a weak point but they are not underacheivers! There bowlers were World class and they continue to produce fine bowlers which other countries such as India and Sri Lanka couldnt produce

  • on April 27, 2013, 12:45 GMT

    hafeez is a fine batsman who is lovely to watch when he gets going, he will pull the ball beautifully, play fine cover drives and his timing could be as majestic as sachin. The only problem with him is that he dont often get going. Thats why he would never be even near the batting giants, because every great player best abbiliy is to score consistently, which he lacks, just like other pakistani batsman

  • on April 23, 2013, 11:38 GMT

    I disagree here, Pakistan always had batting talent. The problem was always poor shot selection and lack of application. The most obvious example is Umar Akmal, who is an amazing talent. I remember when Pakistan came to Australia, his batting was superb. But he was too content on 50, and unwilling to bat long, often throwing it away with outrageous strokes. I remember the contraversial Sydney test, known for horrible keeping of Akmal. But people also forget how Pakistan threw away a very good start, by playing lofted square drives to the throat of backward point and Mohammed Yousuf giving his wicket away by targeting third man with a slip in place in first innings, and getting out caught and bowled trying to hammer Nathan Hauritz out of the park. Umar Akmal in second innings also got out playing a miscued attempted lofted drive to hands of extra cover. Also fielders haven't always backed their bowlers, with so many dropped catches. Pakistan will always be known as underachievers.

  • on April 23, 2013, 11:32 GMT

    @ Author

    Please toss the ball one more time and imagine dale steyn holding his hands above, counting Hafeez's dismissals, 7 times I guess!

  • hailianpak on April 24, 2013, 5:32 GMT

    He's one of my favorite players in Pak along with Saeed Ajmal. I think he has the potential to be a very competitive allrounder in all forms of cricket. But there's one thing he can't do, no matter how good he plays in the next few years He will never achieve respectable figures to be one of the best allrounders ever. In my opinion he had the talent to be one of the best but what he didnt have, especially at the start of his career, was temprament to support his talent. He's got a pretty solid batting technique.

  • on April 27, 2013, 17:57 GMT

    Naman Gupta, i disagree with you there, we had the likes of inzamam, miandad and yousaf who were fine individual players. I agree that pakistan batting as a unit has always been a weak point but they are not underacheivers! There bowlers were World class and they continue to produce fine bowlers which other countries such as India and Sri Lanka couldnt produce

  • on April 27, 2013, 12:45 GMT

    hafeez is a fine batsman who is lovely to watch when he gets going, he will pull the ball beautifully, play fine cover drives and his timing could be as majestic as sachin. The only problem with him is that he dont often get going. Thats why he would never be even near the batting giants, because every great player best abbiliy is to score consistently, which he lacks, just like other pakistani batsman

  • on April 23, 2013, 11:38 GMT

    I disagree here, Pakistan always had batting talent. The problem was always poor shot selection and lack of application. The most obvious example is Umar Akmal, who is an amazing talent. I remember when Pakistan came to Australia, his batting was superb. But he was too content on 50, and unwilling to bat long, often throwing it away with outrageous strokes. I remember the contraversial Sydney test, known for horrible keeping of Akmal. But people also forget how Pakistan threw away a very good start, by playing lofted square drives to the throat of backward point and Mohammed Yousuf giving his wicket away by targeting third man with a slip in place in first innings, and getting out caught and bowled trying to hammer Nathan Hauritz out of the park. Umar Akmal in second innings also got out playing a miscued attempted lofted drive to hands of extra cover. Also fielders haven't always backed their bowlers, with so many dropped catches. Pakistan will always be known as underachievers.

  • on April 23, 2013, 11:32 GMT

    @ Author

    Please toss the ball one more time and imagine dale steyn holding his hands above, counting Hafeez's dismissals, 7 times I guess!

  • on April 23, 2013, 11:32 GMT

    @ Author

    Please toss the ball one more time and imagine dale steyn holding his hands above, counting Hafeez's dismissals, 7 times I guess!

  • on April 23, 2013, 11:38 GMT

    I disagree here, Pakistan always had batting talent. The problem was always poor shot selection and lack of application. The most obvious example is Umar Akmal, who is an amazing talent. I remember when Pakistan came to Australia, his batting was superb. But he was too content on 50, and unwilling to bat long, often throwing it away with outrageous strokes. I remember the contraversial Sydney test, known for horrible keeping of Akmal. But people also forget how Pakistan threw away a very good start, by playing lofted square drives to the throat of backward point and Mohammed Yousuf giving his wicket away by targeting third man with a slip in place in first innings, and getting out caught and bowled trying to hammer Nathan Hauritz out of the park. Umar Akmal in second innings also got out playing a miscued attempted lofted drive to hands of extra cover. Also fielders haven't always backed their bowlers, with so many dropped catches. Pakistan will always be known as underachievers.

  • on April 27, 2013, 12:45 GMT

    hafeez is a fine batsman who is lovely to watch when he gets going, he will pull the ball beautifully, play fine cover drives and his timing could be as majestic as sachin. The only problem with him is that he dont often get going. Thats why he would never be even near the batting giants, because every great player best abbiliy is to score consistently, which he lacks, just like other pakistani batsman

  • on April 27, 2013, 17:57 GMT

    Naman Gupta, i disagree with you there, we had the likes of inzamam, miandad and yousaf who were fine individual players. I agree that pakistan batting as a unit has always been a weak point but they are not underacheivers! There bowlers were World class and they continue to produce fine bowlers which other countries such as India and Sri Lanka couldnt produce

  • hailianpak on April 24, 2013, 5:32 GMT

    He's one of my favorite players in Pak along with Saeed Ajmal. I think he has the potential to be a very competitive allrounder in all forms of cricket. But there's one thing he can't do, no matter how good he plays in the next few years He will never achieve respectable figures to be one of the best allrounders ever. In my opinion he had the talent to be one of the best but what he didnt have, especially at the start of his career, was temprament to support his talent. He's got a pretty solid batting technique.