Australia v India, CB Series, Sydney

Dhoni hits out at controversial decisions

Sidharth Monga at the SCG

February 26, 2012

Comments: 528 | Text size: A | A


David Warner runs out Sachin Tendulkar, Australia v India, CB Series, Sydney, February 26, 2012
MS Dhoni on Tendulkar's run-out: "I don't think we can justify the fact that [Brett] Lee was going towards the point fielder. I don't think he had any business there." © Getty Images
Enlarge

MS Dhoni has said that India were at the receiving end of both the controversial decisions today in their big loss to Australia, which has left them only a small window in the back door if they are to make it to the finals. David Hussey was ruled not-out in an appeal for handling the ball under Law 33 as it was deemed he stuck his hand out to avoid an injury. Sachin Tendulkar was trying to complete a tight run when he found the bowler Brett Lee in the way near the striker's end. In going around Lee, he lost on valuable time and was caught short by a direct hit.

For Dhoni, Hussey was out "plain and simple" despite the explanation given by umpire Billy Bowden. Dhoni's argument was that Hussey's hand was stuck out far enough in front of his body to make self-preservation a dubious argument. "Like you said, protecting yourself [holding his hand close to the body] I was also happy, but if you are protecting yourself [stretching his hand further] it is not good."

Dhoni reasoned with the example of the dismissal of Inzamam-ul-Haq in Peshawar in 2006 when he blocked a throw with his bat. "I was involved in another run-out in Pakistan, where Inzi bhai defended something that was right at his face, and he was given out," Dhoni said. "In this case David was really lucky. I think he should have been given out, but it is not in my hand."

However, Dhoni forgot a technicality in Inzamam's case because he was given out for obstructing the field. Hussey couldn't have been ruled out for obstructing the field because he touched the ball with the hand not holding the ball. Hussey's case falls under the handling-the-ball law, and that law has provision for self-preservation.

Dhoni equated Hussey's outstretched hand to a handball in football. "In his judgement he was protecting himself, but his hand was too far ahead," Dhoni said. "Just like an example, a soccer incident where your hands are popping out and it hits your hand, you get a penalty irrespective of what's happening. So that's why I said, plain and simple, it is out."

About Tendulkar's run-out, Dhoni complained of different yardsticks on different days. "I need to give an example of what happened in the Brisbane game that I was playing in [on February 19]," Dhoni said. "Vinay [Kumar] was bowling, we had a slip, and we didn't have a midwicket. And the ball went to the point fielder, Vinay crossed the wicket and he was coming towards midwicket [to back up the throw].

"The umpire came up to him and said, 'You are not allowed to do that.' But he was doing something that was well within the laws of the game. I don't think we can justify the fact that Lee was going towards the point fielder. I don't think he had any business there. Then he stopped right in front of Sachin, which means you have to take a longer way, across him. That's my reading of that particular run-out."

In the game Dhoni spoke out, Bowden and Steve Davis were the umpires, but Dhoni doesn't remember who out of the two warned Vinay. Dhoni felt that tonight Bowden - the umpire at the non-striker's end when Tendulkar was run out - should have intervened.

"It was a bit unjustified," Dhoni said. "He [Tendulkar] had to take those extra yards. As the incident I spoke about, which happened a few games ago, I think Billy should have said something, because he was in a better position to see where exactly the bowler was and where he stopped. It was very difficult for Simon [Taufel, the leg umpire] to take a call because he had no clue as to which angle the batsman was running, and where Lee actually stopped."

 
 
"You have these umpires coming in for two or three games, and we keep on shuffling them. I may have a view in a particular game, but I may not be there in another game and the new man coming in has a different view and by that time it is our batsman who is standing there. So we will be on the receiving end from both the umpires." MS Dhoni
 

Dhoni wasn't in the middle to remind the umpires of the Brisbane incident, but he felt it wouldn't have made any difference. "Once the decision is given, you can only sit there and cry and cry and it still goes in the opposition's favour."

Dhoni did call for clearer laws, though. "As I said, you look at it [the Hussey incident] and it seems out," Dhoni said. "I don't know why it was given not out. But what also can be done is to have hard lines as to this is what it is. What happens is, you have different umpires in different games, and like the umpire said [even] if it was an Indian batsman he would have given not out, but it's not there at that point of time. Things like this happen once in a while. It should be like, 'This is what happened, okay we should give him out.'

"Because if there are a lot of ifs and buts, you have these umpires coming in for two or three games, and we keep on shuffling them. I may have a view in a particular game, but I may not be there in another game and the new man coming in has a different view and by that time it is our batsman who is standing there. So we will be on the receiving end from both the umpires."

Dhoni said India could have done better to come back from those decisions. "The umpires took the decision so no real point blaming the decision because at the end of the day that will stay," Dhoni said. "What can be done is, in case of the Sachin run-out, the next batsman going in can try to stabilise the innings. In case of the David Hussey run-out, the next bowler can put pressure and try and get the batsman out. This is how it goes. Once the umpire has taken the decision, it stays."

Shane Watson, Australia's captain, said that Bowden and Taufel were two of the most respected umpires, and he was sure they had made the right call in interpreting the law. When asked about the Tendulkar decision, Watson cheekily said that he thought Tendulkar was upset with Gautam Gambhir's call.

Edited by Abhishek Purohit

Sidharth Monga is an assistant editor at ESPNcricinfo

RSS Feeds: Sidharth Monga

© ESPN Sports Media Ltd.

Posted by frozeninusa on (February 29, 2012, 16:02 GMT)

Out of all cricket playing countries, the Aussies care the least about sportsmanship although they are the first to complain when the trick is played on them. It is not just this incident, we have seen this film played out in Australia many times. The real fault lies with the umpires who don't apply the rules consistently. I also have the feeling that Australia will make sure they lose the last league match to Sri Lanka to make sure they don't have to play India again.

Posted by soumyas on (February 29, 2012, 5:57 GMT)

to everyone, i suggest to watch the video before commenting, LEE who was on left side of pitch, ST started running on right side of pitch, obviously LEE was further the pitch after the follow through, LEE saw ST running on other side so he crossed the pitch and started running in front of ST, then ST tried to change the direction and started to go around LEE, ST thought LEE will run little further so he can avoid collision and reach crease with minimal distance/time, so ST took lesser angle deviation, BUT was deceived by LEE as LEE he stopped suddenly which almost blocked his way, ST had no other way than to collide, so he had to slowdown to avoid collision and major injury. this fraction of sec delay was enough for him to fall short.

Posted by   on (February 28, 2012, 13:58 GMT)

@slgamaya- i think u havnt watched d match and u jz saw the clippings in news channel.. nobody who had watched d game would say that sachin wont reach d crease eventhough lee havnt obstructed him... then there s no need to turn around dhoni.. he havnt done anything wrong as he knws d laws & so he appealed for that.... wen things go wrong its obvious that people start to comment against them whom they have praised ones..... then its surprising to hear watson's comment that he thought sachin was reacting for gambhir's call..... bcz its clear in the field that sachin was the one who called for the single....strange but we know thats the nature of australians.....

Posted by   on (February 28, 2012, 12:32 GMT)

I think its the ICC's plot to make umpires make bad calls so that India would be forced to take up DRS

Posted by Shiju2011 on (February 28, 2012, 7:05 GMT)

When I read some of these comments, some people are ridiculing india's appeal for D.H run out. Why? He was unfair to stop the ball with hands and thus handling the ball. Today one of the commentators also suggested it as not a handling the ball case. This kinds of justifications are only for ausies. And again, as Dhoni claimed, Vinay Kumar was told by the umpire that he was not suppose to come into the way of batsman the other day. I also saw it in the tv, but of course, do not hear what he said. The same umpire did not consider the block by Lee when Sachin was given out. This is partiality and Billy Bouden is becoming a burden to the game. If not to block sachin, why was lee there in his way? If it was to enjoy the stumping, he had many other options. He clearly took a full turn to come to sachin's way just to stand in front of Sachin. That is how it should be judged. Not that he was not aware of the batsman, but he should be aware that he is in the line of the non-striker.

Posted by mahesh8811 on (February 27, 2012, 23:44 GMT)

dhoni just say we didn't bat and lost the game. if u still going to make silly excuse get ready to loose today game with bonus point.

Posted by drinks.break on (February 27, 2012, 23:25 GMT)

If Hussey hadn't handled the ball, it would clearly have hit him, and there would have been no run out. India can't get the opposition out by normal means, so they sulk when their attempt to manipulate difficult, fringe laws doesn't result in sending the batsmen to the pavilion on a technicality. A clear sign of a team that doesn't know how to win.

Posted by vj3478 on (February 27, 2012, 23:05 GMT)

@jude28:Even if you beat us Sri Lankans with a bonus point you will never match the NRR - simply explains lots of people bashing india/dhoni here are not aware of the rules :)

Posted by _Oracle_ on (February 27, 2012, 22:14 GMT)

@Nrayc: Bitter about losing in WC mate?? @David: Are you serious? Sachin had just changed the direction and you if you have ever played any sports, you would know diving after changing direction is not only hard but can invite to injuries..

Posted by SLMaster on (February 27, 2012, 22:05 GMT)

Also, why shouldn't Hussey block the ball. Indian are sloppy throwers. In the next over after the incident a throw from the field hit Hussey when standing next to umpire at non-strikers end.

Comments have now been closed for this article

TopTop
Email Feedback Print
Share
E-mail
Feedback
Print
Sidharth MongaClose
Tournament Results
Australia v Sri Lanka at Adelaide - Mar 8, 2012
Australia won by 16 runs
Australia v Sri Lanka at Adelaide - Mar 6, 2012
Sri Lanka won by 8 wickets (with 34 balls remaining)
Australia v Sri Lanka at Brisbane - Mar 4, 2012
Australia won by 15 runs
Australia v Sri Lanka at Melbourne - Mar 2, 2012
Sri Lanka won by 9 runs
India v Sri Lanka at Hobart - Feb 28, 2012
India won by 7 wickets (with 80 balls remaining)
More results »
News | Features Last 3 days
News | Features Last 3 days
Sponsored Links

Why not you? Read and learn how!