ECB elections January 20, 2009

Marland ready for ECB challenge

Cricinfo staff

Giles Clarke has indeed found a challenger © Getty Images
The former treasurer of the Conservative party, Lord Marland of Odstock, has been unveiled as Giles Clarke's only challenger for the post of ECB chairman.

Clarke was proposed by Nottinghamshire and seconded by Northamptonshire and Middlesex, Marland by Lancashire and seconded by Hampshire and Leicestershire. The ballot will close on February 9.

Marland, 52, was initially understood to have been assured of seven of the 19 votes in the ballot, with 10 required for a clear majority. Lancashire, Derbyshire and Leicestershire have pledged their support, along with Surrey, Warwickshire and Hampshire, although Charles Fry, the chairman of MCC, has since cast doubt on the solidity of Marland's support by suggesting that the club will favour the incumbent Clarke.

Should that be the case, then the election battle could be as good as over before it has begun. According to The Guardian, Clarke, who saw off Surrey's Mike Soper in last year's ballot, already has at least nine counties on his side, with Yorkshire, Worcestershire and Gloucestershire still to decide on their allegiance.

A millionaire financier who was made a life peer in 2006, Marland has said he will stand because he has become frustrated at Clarke's governance, and cited the Stanford Series as evidence that the ECB had lost its way. "I believe it is vital for English cricket in its current situation to have a contest for the chairmanship of the ECB," said Marland. "There are deep schisms within the game which need to be healed, and I believe I can be a unifying candidate.

"The image of our game has been very badly damaged during Giles Clarke's time at the helm and the Stanford and Moores/Pietersen affairs of recent months have highlighted both errors of judgement and management failures. An uncontested election would imply endorsement of these errors and failures, and that would be wrong.

"There has been non-stop fire-fighting in the ECB," said Marland. "They've had firefighting after their failure to get on with India, Australia and South Africa in the IPL, the disastrous Stanford cricket match and their failure to deliver the Middle East tournament as an alternative to the IPL. There needs to be much more harmony in Test match cricket and in cricket in this country. There is clearly a big divide among the counties as to how it is run and things are not harmonious - my approach would be more conciliatory."

Marland was also critical of the ECB's handling of the recent leadership crisis, telling BBC Radio Five Live that Kevin Pietersen had been badly treated by his employers. "I thought Pietersen showed great leadership taking the team out to India," said Marland. "I thought that was a brave thing to do and a good thing to do and I don't think he was treated very well when he returned.

"There was then a continual barrage from various camps in the press about his role and that of Moores and I think it's terribly unseemly. I don't believe in this airing of one's laundry in the press. Any well-run operation sorts itself behind closed doors and that is what the ECB needs to do."

Marland held the post of Tory party treasurer from 2003 to 2007, and was a key figure in the successful candidature of Boris Johnson in last year's London mayoral elections. His sporting credentials are enhanced by his involvement with the independent body, Sports Nexus, which specialises in the structure, governance and accountability of sports.

In 2004, pre-empting the controversial Bradshaw-Stewart plan that was squashed by the ECB Board last summer, he co-authored a report which proposed an IPL-style domestic competition, among whose critics was the then-Somerset chairman, Clarke. In 2007, he came close to becoming the first independent chairman of the Football Association, and in 2008, he was appointed president of Salisbury FC.

Marland's nomination came on the day the ECB held a conference at Leicester to discuss the future of Test cricket. That meeting instead became a de facto election campaign, with Neil Davidson, the Leicestershire chairman, outspoken in his desire for change. "It is not healthy for the ECB to be chaired by someone who is basically unacceptable to a significant number of chairmen and their clubs," he told The Guardian.

Comments have now been closed for this article

  • E on January 20, 2009, 20:58 GMT

    Giles Clarke has done little for English cricket than strut around and look a complete idiot while trying to crawl to the likes of Allen Stanford. He boasts about the TV deal but if he was honest he might care to admit than anyone with half a brain could have carried that off. He's had his chance and looks like a relic from the Tory party in the John Major era.

  • Brishni on January 20, 2009, 15:26 GMT

    Giles Clarke apparently Refused the BCCI, when it offered support and money for the EPL, citing it waited for Arab money, which never turned up. If that were not enough to highlight Clarke's incompetence at managing affairs and negotiating deals, he apparently rebuffed Lalit Modi and the BCCI when it propsed the IPL. With Cricket Australia and the South African Cricket Board keen to participate for the greater good of cricket, it serves to show the myopic stance of Giles Clarke. And the final nail in the coffin was of course the Stanford fiasco. If flying onto hallowed turf of Lords with a cart of money smacked of an absolute dearth of character of the main financer and his backer, Giles Clarke, the series itself showed just how uncomfortable the English lads were playing on the field (and watching the WAGs play off it). Cricket needs a mediator and one who understands how to unite, and not be a disruptive force like Giles Clarke. Time to pack up Mr Clarke.

  • No featured comments at the moment.