County news February 25, 2015

Major overhaul afoot in county game

38

Play 03:15
Hopps: England's professional game faces the prospect of a major shake-up

The ECB is actively debating a reduction in the amount of Test cricket in an English summer - down from seven Tests to as low as five - to make room for a more integrated professional structure which could see England players performing in a restyled T20 competition.

In a wide-ranging review, where nothing is seen as sacrosanct, a return to three-day first-class cricket and a single-division County Championship is also on the table for discussion.

That a two-division Championship, which has widely been accepted as responsible for raising standards as well as serving the needs of the England team, is even up for discussion will leave many aghast and is bound to be the subject of fierce debate.

These ideas - termed by the ECB as a "conversation process" - form part of a wide-ranging review into the future of English cricket with the stated aim of providing quality over quantity and championing the cricket that people want to watch. The talking is scheduled to stop by the end of the year with a five-year plan then announced for 2016 to 2020.

The initial ideas are included in a document - Strategy Conversation Summary - seen by ESPNcricinfo which also raises the prospect of four-day Test cricket and a suggestion that the next World Cup - to be played in England in 2019 - could be played over 40 overs.

The debate will be stepped up over the introduction of a Big Bash style T20 league - to be call an England Premier League - almost certainly played by eight or 10 teams, and an FA Cup-style knockout tournament.

And in a move that may shock Sky, the current broadcast partners, the county chairmen have suggested that future TV deals should see coverage shared between free-to-air and subscription providers. The presentation talks of: "A balance between terrestrial and satellite: at least two broadcasters".

Other suggested changes includes a rebranding of the ECB - the current brand is seen as toxic - as Cricket England & Wales.

The discussion document is proof that the new duo at the helm of the ECB - the chairman Colin Graves, whose election was confirmed on Tuesday, and chief executive Tom Harrison - are prepared to countenance what could conceivably become the most widespread overhauling of the professional game in England in modern times.

Behind the open-minded review, with everything on the table, is a sense that they already have a clear idea of the direction they wish to travel - and that they could soon face opposition from county chief executives and county members.

The overall aim is to raise ECB income to £175m a year - a rise of almost £50m - to see the board's reserves lifted to £44m and for England to win the Ashes and the World Cup in 2019.

All the ideas have been discussed by county chairmen and the ECB board in recent days and are included in a document circulated to key decision makers. Some will have a longer shelf life than others.

A series of consultations are due to follow over the next few months, with presentations to county CEOs - a group not obviously included in the discussions, arguably to the detriment of the process - in October and decisions announced in January 2016.

While many of the aims are laudable - seeing the sport regarded as the benchmark for social integration, a fully professional women's game and establishing cricket as the undisputed No. 2 sport in England and Wales - some will cause widespread shock in the game.

The move to two division, four-day cricket was viewed as a key factor in England's resurgence in the early years of this century.

Any decision to move to a three-day format - with teams expected to bowl 110 overs a day - will be seen by many as a retrograde step and the antithesis of the aim of trying to mirror Test cricket within the county game.

The aim of seeing England players regarded as "folk heroes" may also raise some eyebrows.

The document also suggests that some Championship cricket at least could be played as day-night - so with a white ball - and that all county grounds should be equipped with floodlights.

The intention that "the number of counties in financial pain" should be "halved" is one that could be interpreted in different ways and will raise doubts about the survival of the 18-team professional system in its current form.

I don't think Colin Graves will be a particularly despotic leader - he's not been like that at Yorkshire
Martyn Moxon, Yorkshire's director of cricket

Graves is not as autocratic as some paint him. Nevertheless, his business approach at Yorkshire, where he is about to step back as chairman to concentrate on his new ECB role, has been notably straightforward with a preference for decisiveness and unashamed addressing of the problems above conciliation and compromise.

Martyn Moxon, Yorkshire's director of cricket, reflecting on life at Headingley now that Graves' attentions are turning elsewhere, tried to put his reputation into context. "I don't think he'll be a particularly despotic leader - that's not how he's been at Yorkshire," Moxon said. "He's inclusive and discusses things with people. Ultimately he will then make the final decision. He's a top man to work with and for."

One county chief executive told ESPNcricinfo: "T20 and Test attendances might be down in Yorkshire, but actually they are growing elsewhere. These ideas have not been filtered by common sense."

While not detailed in the discussion document, it is understood that the aim for the EPL would be to pay smaller counties not to participate and allow their players to join larger clubs for the duration of the specific competition.

Another senior figure at a non-Test hosting county remarked: "If that happens, our county ground will be a car park within five years."

George Dobell is a senior correspondent at ESPNcricinfo

Comments have now been closed for this article

  • Android on February 27, 2015, 16:03 GMT

    increase the popularity of 20/20 get it on free to air like bigbash. no need for franchises allow county's to have more overseas signings for the comp and preserve our traditions

  • Adam on February 26, 2015, 21:52 GMT

    I know, what a ridiculous suggestion. Leicester and Essex have consistently been two of the best T20 teams.

    Now if you suggested they be allowed to drop professional county games played in front of empty stands and focused on continuing to play T20 in front of packed houses all summer, that would seem more reasonable.

  • Steve on February 26, 2015, 19:15 GMT

    get rid of teams such as leicester and essex that have recently produced Cook, Bopara, Broad and Taylor?

  • Steve on February 26, 2015, 19:13 GMT

    More could be made of the county premier leagues. perhaps these could be regionalised so that young talent is not missed. Why get rid of te?#

  • Dave on February 26, 2015, 16:07 GMT

    County cricket is weak. Glos, Northants, Leicestershire, Derbyshire, Essex are all basically playing 2nd xi standard. So get rid of them as pro teams. Make them minor counties and have a promotion/relegation to give minor counties a chance to go pro.

    Participation is the key. 100 peopel gives you 10 good players... 1000 players gives you 100 decent players.. etc etc. Participation will breed more talent. Got to think long term and you HAVE to concentrate on amateur cricket.

  • Jez on February 26, 2015, 14:29 GMT

    so in effect they want to reduce the amount of men's professional teams yet they want to introduce a women's professional league - that makes sense, that will be a real money spinner. The problem with county cricket now is that it cant be taken seriously - I quite regularly go and watch lancs, 20 years ago there'd be 6 or 7 full internationals playing for Lancs with 2 top quality internationals per side, now I'm lucky to see James Anderson once a season and I can probably forget about seeing Jos Buttler. If that's not bad enough counties lose players for England B fixtures and the farcical situation where Anderson was not allowed to play for Lancs in relegation decider 4 months before he was due to play again for England. Subsequently England are missing out as the likes of Joe Root don't play any county cricket to correct any faults they may have

  • Barry on February 26, 2015, 12:52 GMT

    Dear Colin, just remember the country gets the tennis buzz (and importantly kids get first introduced to the game) big time for a fortnight a year - what you are dreaming of for a month a year. Why? Because as chewton mendip points out below ITS ON FREE TO AIR. If you can't achieve that, then leave Friday nights for four whole months for kids and their dads alone: it's harder to put down your bat and completely forget about the game after that (in spite of Wimbledon how many Englishmen are in top 100?). You're Chairman, you owe the kids not the cash now Colin marketing department.

  • Barry on February 26, 2015, 11:55 GMT

    4 days Tests fine (going on into a Monday is wrong - I had to throw sickies for our greatest triumphs of the decade when the 'folkhero' climax should be on a Sunday, like a Wimbledon Final). 40 overs fine for working age adults, still remains a serious test and Indians should see symmetry with 20 overs for facebook U20s. Early evening highlights of ALL forms of cricket like Channel 4s excellent for all at work or unable to get to games. Rest rubbish, the game might be in decline in big Yorks but not at overacheivers small Sussex or Somerset, where Fridays are fantastic.

  • Martin on February 26, 2015, 11:45 GMT

    Regarding aim number one, what the "customer"(yuck - the use of that word says it all really) wants ECB, is to be able to see cricket on tv. As long as cricket hides behind the pay wall and makes itself invisible to the vast majority of the country, it will never, ever, become the no. 2 sport in this country (as it was surprise, surprise before cricket was hidden behind the pay wall in 2006).

    As for the aims regarding the county championship they beggar belief. How exactly would playing less first-class cricket lead to England being a better test match team? They only play 16 matches a year now. We spent so many years getting to the excellent county championship we have now and they want us take us back 25 years in one fell swoop.

  • Steve on February 26, 2015, 6:48 GMT

    Even the dismantling of English cricket is half-hearted. Let's scrap county cricket and test matches. Create 6 T20 franchises and base them all in London. Fill 90% of the sides with foreign stars who everyone wants to see. Play the whole series in three weeks and the rest of us in the provinces can go cycling. I've had enough George, I really have. 4 day tests in rainy old England with 100 or 120 over day? They can't even get through 90 in 6.5 hours. We'd all be there until midnight.

    You could shorten championship by reducing D1 to 8 teams. SplitD2 into 2 groups of 6, include two Irish sides to help them progress to Test cricket. Top of each D2 to replace bottom two in D1. Reduce international summer to 5 or 6 tests, 3-5 odis ond 2 T20. 2 T20 comps, 1 for counties thru whole season, then T20 BigShakedown can combime sides in season middle.

    Get th. Big Shakedown on terrestial Tv.

  • No featured comments at the moment.