England v Australia, 1st Test, Cardiff

Harmison and Panesar await their fate

Andrew Miller

July 4, 2009

Comments: 32 | Text size: A | A

Who should be in England's squad? Have your say


Steve Harmison picked up Ricky Ponting during an impressive spell, England Lions v Australians, New Road, July 3, 2009
Steve Harmison added the wicket of Ricky Ponting yesterday, along with Phillip Hughes for the second time in the match © Getty Images
Enlarge

The speed with which England vacated the field at Edgbaston on Friday afternoon revealed plenty about their mindset in the lead-in to next week's first Test in Cardiff. The time was 5pm on a perfect summer's afternoon, and the opportunity was there for at least another hour and a half of fine-tuning. However, it was not deemed necessary by England's think tank, who have seen enough already, and just want to get the proper action underway now.

On Sunday, that action will come one step closer to fruition when the national selector, Geoff Miller, unveils England's trimmed-down squad for Wednesday's massively anticipated Ashes opener. That Miller has spent the week in the stands at Worcester, watching the Lions - and more pertinently, Steve Harmison - rather than fussing about the form of, say, Monty Panesar, suggests that 11 of the expected 13 names on his list will be fairly easy to second-guess.

All the permutations, therefore, come down to the selection of two men: the squad's spare batsman, and of course, the extra seamer, a man who remains highly likely to complement the chosen triumvirate of James Anderson, Stuart Broad and Andrew Flintoff, given that Cardiff's reputation as a raging turner has resulted in a mere 17 wickets for spinners, out of a possible 120, in three Championship matches this season. Regardless of his three morale-boosting wickets at Edgbaston on Thursday, Panesar's own figures for Northamptonshire last month were 2 for 149.

The fact that England have yet to finalise their squad was telegraphed by the sight of Miller's fellow selectors, James Whitaker and Ashley Giles, joining him on the balcony at Worcester for the final day of the Lions match. As fate would have it, the England captain, Andrew Strauss, arrived at the ground just as Harmison and Graham Onions were about to take the new ball in Australia's second innings. That pair, plus the injury-prone but highly rated Ryan Sidebottom, are the front-runners for that final berth, and their fates will be revealed in an announcement at Old Trafford at 10am on Sunday.

If the heart says Harmison, after the fury of his performance against the Australians this week, the head suggests that Onions will be permitted to continue in the role in which he excelled, in albeit subdued circumstances, against West Indies earlier in the year. Having claimed five wickets on debut at Lord's, including four in seven balls, Onions impressed with his versatility in the second Test at Chester-le-Street, where at various stages of the match he found swing, bounce and aggression to meet his team's requirements.

Continuity calls for Onions' inclusion, even if Harmison is the last man that the Aussies would wish to line up against right now. Besides, the impression gleaned from the winter campaign in the Caribbean is that Harmison still has a lot of ground to make up with the management - not least the hard-bitten new coach, Andy Flower - after a lacklustre series of performances. His inclusion would be expedient in the circumstances, but having gone to such lengths to arrange that squad bonding exercise in Flanders last week, it would be peculiar if England went fishing outside their initial squad of 16 at this crucial stage of the series.

What is more, it is arguable that Harmison may already have done his job for this summer. In 2005, his furious five-wicket onslaught on the first morning at Lord's was the performance that spelt out to the Aussies the extent of the challenge that awaited them. If truth be told, he was rarely as effective thereafter - he made vital incisions, most notably the dismissals of Michael Clarke and Mike Kasprowicz at Edgbaston, but claimed just nine wickets at 50.22 in the remaining four Tests of the series.

What Harmison has done, however, is put on the sort of welcoming committee that Australian sides have habitually laid on for English touring teams. His unbridled hostility with the ball has been coupled with a selection of choice barbs that reveal an astonishing appetite for a tussle from a man who came across so meekly in Australia three years ago. It hasn't quite been like watching the long-retired Dennis Lillee and Jeff Thomson chopping England down to size in regular tour openers at Lilac Hill, but it's not far removed.

Even Harmison himself does not expect to feature at Cardiff, but the lurking menace of his Worcester performance is quite enough national service for now - in particular, the manner in which he has dissected the technique of Australia's wunderkind opener, Phillip Hughes. "I have put loads of doubt in him [Hughes]," said Harmison. "I imagine I've put doubt in a lot of the batsmen's minds."

As for the 13th man in the squad, Michael Vaughan's retirement has cleared the clutter quite nicely as far as the selectors are concerned. Regardless of his first-ball duck for the Lions, Ian Bell's class is such that he's unlikely to be shunned at this stage of the series, even if his temperament has yet to convince everyone. Including, quite possibly, the man himself.

Possible Test squad Andrew Strauss (capt), Alastair Cook, Ravi Bopara, Kevin Pietersen, Paul Collingwood, Ian Bell, Matt Prior (wk), Andrew Flintoff, Stuart Broad, Graeme Swann, James Anderson, Graham Onions, Monty Panesar.

Andrew Miller is UK editor of Cricinfo

RSS Feeds: Andrew Miller

© ESPN Sports Media Ltd.

Posted by darkness on (July 5, 2009, 10:20 GMT)

1.strauss,2.cook,3.bopara,4.pietersen,5.collingwood,6.flintoff,7.prior,8.broad,9.harmison,10.anderson,11.swann

Posted by popcorn on (July 5, 2009, 9:06 GMT)

The Pommies are desperately trying to forget the humiliation of their 5 nil whipping in The Ashes 2006 -07 - but they cannot. They'll get whipped again, whatever squad they choose.

Posted by MitchellYoung on (July 5, 2009, 8:15 GMT)

Why would you not put Harmison in your team? If you want players to win you matches then he is an obvios chioce. He is experienced having been through three ashes series hes got to be selected. he has genuine pace and will scare batsman like Hughes and North who havnt seen alot of him. I would also give bell a run ahead of Bopara for the first test atleast again for the experience factor. if he dosnt prefeorm then Bopara comes in at Lords. Australian batsman have a weaknes with the ball moving around just outside off so get the four strong pace attack and have them bowl on that line the should all move it. This also creates rough outside the left handers off stump for Swann and a little bit of Pietersen to aim at later on. Team for first test: 1. Strauss (c) 2. Cook 3. Bell 4. Pietersen 5. Collingwood 6. Flintoff 7. Prior 8. Broad 9. Swann 10. Harmison 11. Anderson

Posted by spicypotnoodle on (July 5, 2009, 8:09 GMT)

The whole will-he-or-won't-he debate over Harmison has been nothing more than pointless distraction - or at least I hope that proves to be the case and he doesn't make the squad. Harmison's fragile state of mind is the last thing England need if they've any chance of regaining the Ashes. He may have roughed up Phil Hughes (due to fail) and snared Ponting (saves his runs for the big occasion) but I still think that the Aussies would secretly be much happier facing Harmison than Onions or even Rashid. Harmison is a known quantity to them and, apart from the first day of the 2005 Ashes when they were caught cold, the Aussies have always played him with ease. I assume the final place in the XI will be see a shootout between Onions, Monty and Rashid. Play your five best bowlers, I say. We know Anderson, Broad, Freddie and Swann are four of them. I'd make Onions the fifth - although Rashid's batting would be handy.

Posted by rustom_deboo on (July 5, 2009, 7:34 GMT)

my xi.. strauss, cook, bopara, pietersen, collingwood, flintoff, prior, broad, anderson, harmison, panesar.

Posted by cricketmad1234 on (July 5, 2009, 7:03 GMT)

Doesnt really matter who England select. Wont change the outcome . Australia 5-0 Harmison, Onions or Panesar wont be any threat to the Austraian batting line up.England should worry about their batting line up not their bowling attack. The england batting line up wont be able to handle Johnson,Lee, Siddle and Clark. England wont make over 300 runs in an innings for the entire series. Aussie Aussie Aussie 5-0

Posted by vishwastar on (July 5, 2009, 5:31 GMT)

Strauss; Cook; Bopara; Pietersen; Collingwood; Prior; Flintoff; Broad; Swann; Anderson;onions; i think harmison needs to be there in squad.

Posted by Ilin on (July 5, 2009, 5:21 GMT)

panesar is best option,as kangaroos always struggles against a quality spinner like kumble,bhajji,murlitharan.england is lucky to have a good spinner like panesar.he should be in.

Posted by desoler on (July 5, 2009, 5:17 GMT)

harmison can be droppeed if broad makes his role as the strike bowler who emphasizes more on bounce not on swing at initial stage.bcoz anderson has the swing and broad is not extraordinary wit his swing espesially to left handers.australians have 5 left handers in top 8.broad bounces well so he would be like of harmison and his battin gets more point than harmison.

in spin swann n panesar should play, bcoz they r not extraordinary spinners like mendis n murli or bhajji n mishra but both together will be very effective on current english wickets n weather.if condition is seamer friendly then ryan shpuld replace monty. but still question about anderson bcoz his natural bowling is suited for right handers so it's so important to get initial australian wickets by broad

strauuss, cook, bopara, pietersen, collingwood, flintoff, prior, broad, swann, anderson, panesar(sidebottom) england should not consider only their inform bowlers but bowlers who has ability to get 20 wickets

Posted by Serenity on (July 5, 2009, 4:19 GMT)

I expect the thirteen to be: Strauss; Cook; Bopara; Pietersen; Collingwood; Prior (though it should be Foster keeping); Flintoff; Broad; Swann; Anderson; Panesar; Bell and Onions. With Bell and Onions missing out on the day, unless the Cardiff pitch is more seamer friendly than expected in which case, Onions will play instead of Panesar.

(I suspect Australia's XI to be Hughes, Katich, Ponting, Hussey, Clarke, North, Haddin, Johnson, Lee, Siddle and Clark.)

Who should be in England's squad for the first Test?
Comments have now been closed for this article

TopTop
Email Feedback Print
Share
E-mail
Feedback
Print
Andrew MillerClose
Andrew Miller Andrew Miller was saved from a life of drudgery in the City when his car caught fire on the way to an interview. He took this as a sign and fled to Pakistan where he witnessed England's historic victory in the twilight at Karachi (or thought he did, at any rate - it was too dark to tell). He then joined Wisden Online in 2001, and soon graduated from put-upon photocopier to a writer with a penchant for comment and cricket on the subcontinent. In addition to Pakistan, he has covered England tours in Sri Lanka, Bangladesh, South Africa, Australia and New Zealand, as well as the World Cup in the Caribbean in 2007
Tour Results
England v Australia at Chester-le-Street - Sep 20, 2009
England won by 4 wickets (with 60 balls remaining)
England v Australia at Nottingham - Sep 17, 2009
Australia won by 111 runs
England v Australia at Nottingham - Sep 15, 2009
Australia won by 4 wickets (with 10 balls remaining)
England v Australia at Lord's - Sep 12, 2009
Australia won by 7 wickets (with 38 balls remaining)
England v Australia at Southampton - Sep 9, 2009
Australia won by 6 wickets (with 9 balls remaining)
More results »
News | Features Last 3 days
News | Features Last 3 days