| Series | Countries | Live Scores | Fixtures | Results | News |
Features
|
Photos | Video & Audio | Blogs | Statistics | Archive | Games | Mobile | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
February 11, 2013
![]()
|
|||
|
Related Links
Players/Officials:
Mitchell Johnson
Series/Tournaments:
Australia tour of India
|
|||
For his durability, experience and current run of strong form, Mitchell Johnson is looming as a central player in Australia's plans for the Test matches against India.
There is something else that will also enhance Johnson's chances of taking on a major role for the tourists, an attitude more so than an attribute. Johnson enjoys bowling in India, loves the feel provided by the SG ball, and has no qualms whatsoever about the adversity destined to be faced by all fast men on the subcontinent.
Across six Test matches in India, Johnson's returns have been serviceable rather than spectacular - 21 wickets at 37.23 - but he has developed an affinity for the region and its conditions. The captain Michael Clarke and the coach Mickey Arthur value his ability to deliver long spells and summon the occasional burst of reverse swing, despite conditions that could not be more different from Johnson's happiest hunting ground at the WACA.
If Johnson is yet to play in a winning Test match in India, on at least one occasion he should have. The 2010 Mohali Test ended in a one-wicket victory for the hosts, yet with a few runs still required Johnson pinned Pragyan Ojha for the plumbest of LBW shouts, only to have the umpire Billy Bowden deny the appeal. That day, the SG ball sat comfortably in Johnson's left hand, and it did again recently when he began training with it again in preparation for the tour.
"I love bowling with the SG ball. It's a nice feel in the hands, it's a bit thin at the seam but it stands up taller," Johnson said. "In their conditions over there what I've learned is the ball really doesn't swing. The last couple of times I've been there, watching the Indians they bowl a lot across the seam for 10-12 overs, and then they seem to really get into the rough side, getting a bit of sweat into it and shine the other side, and getting reverse swing. That's something I've picked up over there.
"Reverse swing is a very hard thing to face, so that'll be something we'll be trying our best to do … I'm sure the guys are already practising it over there. I've had SG balls at training sessions. I actually went back to club training while we were in Perth and bowled with an SG ball over there and it started to do a few things early on. All us fast bowlers have been given an SG ball to play with and we've been working on that. I'm looking forward to getting into that practice game [in Chennai] and seeing if it all works."
Australian knowledge of how to bowl fast in India reached a peak in 2004 when the visitors won the series 2-1, breaking a drought that stretched back to 1969-70. However those lessons had been all but lost by the time Ricky Ponting's team returned in 2008, when none of the bowlers seemed to have any clue about how to get the ball moving.
Their coach Troy Cooley appeared even less an authority on the topic, and the vistors' eyes widened at how often India's bowlers ignored the conventional seam-up approach and had the ball reverse swinging inside a handful of overs. Since then a little more know-how has been gained, and Johnson said he had taken time to watch footage of Zaheer Khan by way of refreshing his memory.
"It does go [reverse] early, and with a hard reverse swinging ball it does make it even harder to face I think," Johnson said. "I've been watching Zaheer Khan bowl, he's an unbelievable left-arm bowler, and just watching the way he bowled over in their conditions. When the ball's reverse swinging when it's hard and then bouncing through a bit more it's very difficult, and he's had a lot of success over there.
"Hopefully a few other guys like Peter Siddle have learned from that and are going to take that into the tour. We've got a few fast bowlers over there but I'll be pushing as hard as I can to get into that first XI. It's a great thing to have for Australian cricket in a Test series over in India, very difficult conditions to bowl in as a fast bowler. I love the challenge of bowling over there in those conditions, against a great side. There'll be some fiery net sessions I'm sure."
| "Our quicks have put us where we are. In these conditions, we shouldn't ignore that. Just because you're playing in different conditions, your strength is still your strength." Australia's assistant coach Steve Rixon | |||
While Australia's selection of a 17-man squad has provided the team with a wide array of options, there is a view within the team that to load up with spin in deference to the slow, low surfaces likely to be on offer would detract from the great strength of pace bowling that has helped lift the team to third in the ICC's Test rankings since Clarke became captain.
Steve Rixon, the assistant coach, is adamant that high quality pace bowling will be as difficult for India's batsmen to face as wily spin will be vexing for Australia. Though not a selector, he counselled those choosing the team for the first Test in Chennai not to sap an area Australia is strong simply because it is the done thing in India.
"That's one thing we keep forgetting about," Rixon said. "We talk about swinging the ball up front and reverse-swing during the game is very important. But having tall bowlers hitting the deck hard at 145 (km/h) is equally as hard for any Asian player to combat as it would be for our guys to combat their spin bowling.
"We're going to have a distinct advantage with our quick bowlers. Our quick bowlers will play a part and it will be the fact that they hit the deck hard - whether [selectors] have a leaning towards your spinners, which I'm thinking is going away from our strength. But I don't make that decision. Our quicks have put us where we are. In these conditions, we shouldn't ignore that. Just because you're playing in different conditions, your strength is still your strength."
Daniel Brettig is an assistant editor at ESPNcricinfo. He tweets here
© ESPN EMEA Ltd.
| ||||||
| Comments have now been closed for this article |
||||||
Assistant editor Daniel Brettig had been a journalist for eight years when he joined ESPNcricinfo, but his fascination with cricket dates back to the early 1990s, when his dad helped him sneak into the family lounge room to watch the end of day-night World Series matches well past bedtime. Unapologetically passionate about indie music and the South Australian Redbacks, Daniel's chief cricketing achievement was to dismiss Wisden Almanack editor Lawrence Booth in the 2010 Ashes press match in Perth - a rare Australian victory that summer.
ICICI Bank M2I. Register Now and Get A Gift Offer.
Safe & simple online money transfer. Apply Now!
Buy Wisden 2013 & get a FREE Playfair
Available now at Cricshop
What the article doesn't say is, that MJ has taken the most wickets of any non-Indian bowler in India in ODIs since 2007 (with better S/R & E/R than almost everyone). Relevance to Tests? IMO it indicates that MJ has the ability to rattle India, & with a good captain behind him (Clarke), MJ COULD do very well. The other thing is, India is not as strong in batting as they were in previous tours, so there is enuff to suggest he would improve on his Indian stats. Leaning towards picking Starc over MJ, & I don't particularly want TWO left hand pacers in the side. That said, since MOST of India's frontline batsmen are Right handed, - two lefties could really make some great roughage outside off for Lyon. On paper Siddle, Starc & Bird would be the best combo, but I am not sure that Bird has any "reverse swing" skills? (He does a lot of new-ball damage in fairly good bowling conditions).
Only a few years ago, Mitchell Johnson was the best bowler in the world. He lost form, had injury, and lost confidence, but he is back to his best now. So long as he maintains this form, he should be a walk up starter. For me, the scary bowling of Mitchell Starc, the unbelievable accuracy of Pattinson and the new boy with the magic arm Jackson Bird should be the 4 bowlers to pick - provided that they are all fit and in form. Siddle is a more than useful backup bowler but I wouldn't have him in my starting XI unless one of the others breaks down or loses form. Our top 4 quicks are 4 of the scariest in the world, and this new look Indian batting line up are going to have nightmares over them. Indians are unlikely to be particularly scared of Lyon - though he is a consistent bowler who provides good back up - but the prodigous spin from Doherty could do a Panesar-like job, if we do use a spinner.
I've got to admit that Johnson has surprised and impressed me since his recall to the team. When he was dropped I thought he was a complete goner. His confidence looked way down and his bowling was bloody awful to be frank. .. when they brought him back I thought Oh oh, this is a mistake. He'll just spray it around for a few games and then get dropped again. Instead he bowled fast, accurately and with plenty of venom. How many Sri Lankan fingers did he break? 2 or 3 wasn't it? ... I don't know if this is going to last but I'm happy enough to just enjoy it while it's here. .. However, having said all that my bowling line-up would be: 1 Siddle. A very skilfull & dogged bowler who inspires everyone around him. Sids is essential imo 2. Starc. .. IF he can Indian conditions he has the potential to destroy them. Does control the white ball better than the red but has time to work on that. 3 Bird. A walking metronome. Can hold line and length for long, long periods at surprising pace.
I wasn't in favor of bringing Johnson in, but he has been bowling well since his recall to the national set up. Johnson is no longer tearing though batting lineups but instead of bowling tripe while waiting for that magic spell he is bowling good deliveries.He appears to have more control than Starc. It is almost as if Starc is where Johnson used to be - capable of destroying lineups but also bowling a lot of loose stuff.Given that when you look at our bowlers they are light on test experience Bird (2), Pattinson (7), Starc (7) it seems likely that Johnson (50) will play at least a couple of tests in India. The first couple of tour games will be a play-off between Maxwell and Henriques. I don't think Smith's int he mix for that no.7 spot because he's not bowling enough.To a lesser extent, it'll also be a playoff between Cowan and Khawaja, and also between a few of the quicks. My prediction is that our starting X1 will be Watson, Warner, Hughes, Khawaja,Clarke, Wade, Doh,Lyo, Sids, Pats
Siddle and Starc are certain to be the top two pacers in the XI. It will be a very interesting choice for the third seamer. Every one has his case. Pattinson(If he is 100% is too talented to miss out), Bird(His McGrath like accuracy will be invaluable), Mitchell Johnson(His tireless energy and ability to bowl long spells will be precious in hot conditions), Moises Henriques(if the pitches are minefields, then playing three pacemen will be a luxury and Henriques' fast cutters will add value along with his batting).
@laxmanrules - you haven't been paying much attention, Watson is not bowling. He has given up bowling until he gets his body and batting sorted, but given how well Henriques bowled in the first tour match, he could be a very valuable addition to the team. Unfortunately, in Indian conditions, I don't think most matches will see 3 specialist fast bowlers. 2 quicks, 2 spinners and Henriques as an allrounder, I don't think they will go with Maxwell as an allrounder, they will want variety in the spin attack. Smith is a maybe, but I don't think they have taken him as an allrounder, I believe he is there as a batsman as he has hardly bowled this summer.
If they only go with 1 specialist spinner, I expect to see Clarke and Warner bowling rather than Maxwell.
Posted by popcorn on (February 13, 2013, 14:40 GMT)The Indians won't know what hit them when Mitch hustles them.
Posted by laxmanrules on (February 12, 2013, 21:21 GMT)Looking forward to see what the Australian pace attack does. With Siddle, Bird, Starc, Johnson and Watson (yes!) this is among the best fast bowling attacks to have come to India in the past 10 years. I am afraid we might lose this one at home too. This will be another trial by fire for Indian opening batsmen and I pray at least one of them go on to get big scores. Cannot wait to see the youngsters on both sides make a name for themselves here. It's India Vs Australia and reputations will be made!
Posted by ozziespirit on (February 12, 2013, 15:39 GMT)Pick Johnson for India, that's fine, but not for the Ashes. Too many painful memories for him and aussie fans like myself would overshadow it and built unneccesary pressure on him. England tore him apart then, and if they do it again which they may well, it could be the end for him. Bird/Starc/Siddle for the Ashes.
Posted by Meety on (February 12, 2013, 6:04 GMT)@dunger.bob on (February 11, 2013, 23:51 GMT) - I think Finn is a very good talent (a bloke I didn't rate during the Ashes), & I think fully fit, Bresnan & Tremlett are quality. The advantage England has, is that most of their frontline pace attack have more experience so you sort of know what level of skill they'll deliver. With Oz, most of our pace talent is raw (MJ & Siddle excepted) & there will be variable performances. I believe that IF you assume both sides pacers play to their best ability (Eng - Anderson, Finn & Broad) v (Oz Siddle + anyone of about 5 or 6 others), Oz pacers are better - they do what Eng do but faster & we have genuine left hand options - Eng don't. Unfortunately in 2009, Oz had the 3 best pacers over the course of the Ashes (Hilfy, Siddle & MJ). So it will really need to be a team effort to get across the line - no drop catches!