World Twenty20 triumph offers a blueprint for success

A brave new India

With proper planning, India can ensure that the momentum gained by winning the World Twenty20 takes them a long way

S Rajesh in Johannesburg

September 25, 2007

Comments: 26 | Text size: A | A



With proper planning, India can ensure that the momentum gained by winning the World Twenty20 takes them a long way. © Getty Images
Enlarge

From no-hopers to world champions - all it took was two weeks for India to traverse the journey. A new captain, a young team, and lack of experience in this format were all touted as reasons why India could not win, but these were weaknesses only on paper; out on the field, each of these turned out to be strengths: Mahendra Singh Dhoni was vibrant and positive in the field, backing his hunches at key moments; the young team added oodles of energy to fielding, while the lack of experience in playing this game freed them of excess baggage and allowed them to learn quickly and formulate customised strategies which they believed would work for them: a prime example was the decision to bat first, even as most experts suggested chasing was the way to go.

Even more than the actual results perhaps, what was so refreshingly different was the manner in which they played the game. There was a fearlessness to their approach which can only come from self-belief; there were clear signs that they were enjoying the game and each other's successes.

That the team was missing at least four first-choice players - the three batting superstars and Zaheer Khan - makes this triumph all the more remarkable. The team has come in for high praise from every quarter, and deserves every bit of it. The question is: what next? Will this remain an isolated, one-off tournament success triggered by a series of inspirational performances, or will it actually cue off a long-term and sustained level of excellence for the team. The cynical view is to go with the former, but given some of the ingredients in the mix, this is an excellent opportunity to take this as the launching pad for something big.

For inspiration, the Indians only need to look back at the World Cup-winning Australian side from 1987. Few gave Allan Border and his team any chance either, but that tournament allowed him to identify a few players who would form the core of the Australian side for the next decade. It also put in place a culture of high performance, where the benchmarks were so difficult, and yet attained so regularly, that excellence became a habit which was then passed on from generation to generation.

With the Indians, that has seldom been the case. Sourav Ganguly's team had an outstanding run between 2002 and 2004, but suddenly it collapsed after the win in Pakistan - with several players losing form or getting overconfident - and several gains from that period were lost.

This time, it needs to be different. With the average age of the squad just 25 - and eight who are less than 24 - it's just the opportune moment to plan a line of succession so that, when the batting superstars aren't around, the transition isn't unnecessarily painful.

One player who now needs to be given as much international exposure as possible is Rohit Sharma. His game is grounded on a good technique, and yet he can shift from defensive to attack in a trice. Add his unflappable temperament, and he looks like a player who can successfully play all types of international matches. He deserves further international exposure during the home season, so that he leads the accession to the batting spots that will, sooner or later - be vacated by Sachin Tendulkar, Sourav Ganguly and Rahul Dravid.

Gautam Gambhir has been a fringe player for a while now, but here he elevated himself to the role of a senior batsman, playing responsibly without losing his flair. Moreover, both Rohit and Gambhir are good in the field - a prerequisite in the modern game.

Irfan Pathan's glorious comeback makes the allrounder's spot a viable option once again, while RP Singh and Sreesanth fill up the fast bowlers' slots well. Add some of the others who have been on the fringes but couldn't make it to this squad, and it's clear that there's a healthy competition for places in the XI, which can only be a good thing. It's probably time to look beyond Ajit Agarkar now, and the excuse can no longer be that the replacements aren't available.

In every sport, consistency is the key - by winning the World Twenty20, the Indians haven't become the best team in the world. Australia still occupy that mantle, and rightly so. What the Indians have shown, though, is that they have the skill and the hunger to mix it with the best. The challenge now is to maintain that hunger and drive season after season. India have got the momentum going their way with this superb title triumph. With proper planning, they can ensure that this momentum takes them a long way.

S Rajesh is stats editor of Cricinfo

RSS Feeds: S Rajesh

© ESPN Sports Media Ltd.

Posted by Chirag_Mehra on (September 29, 2007, 21:04 GMT)

Many congratulations to Team India, We all hope that, they will be doing this on regular basis, but one thing i want to tell all you guys that why we have Ajit Agarkar out of the team, the series just gone by wasn't very good for him but nobody in this world can deny that he still is the strike bowler for india, he still has got much cricket left in him and he'll prove himself again, everyone(sre, rp ,pathan, munaf, zaheer) is good but no one of the caliber of ajit.. Media hasn't been doing justice with him till now, perhaps he deserves a lot more that such low level critisicm, he has served the country a lot and he has worked upon his game even harder and don't forget he is the fittest player around.. Even if we can't praise him we must not utter any rubbish for one of the finest and most humble servent of the country......

Posted by kirangurujane on (September 26, 2007, 17:18 GMT)

You have hit the nail on the head. It all started from the series in England. India had a bit of luck to evade the initial setback in the first test. Then India cameback strongly to win the second test. India had a chance to make it 2-0 but I feel Dravid was too concerned about making history by winning it 1-0 and didnt really go full throttle for a 2-0. India was down 3-1 in the ODI series but fought extremely hard to come back and loose the series 4-3. During this period the young India was learning from her mistakes and none of them were repeated in ICC T20 world cup. India outbatted/outfielded/outbowled all the teams we faced in the last 4 matches. Most importantly MS Dhoni "outcaptained" all his couterparts. Many thought that India will fall short of experience of some big names but Dhonis crew was out there with a mission to prove everyone wrong. India will have to use this momentum and inject this positivity to other more challenging forms of cricket

Posted by gvk2710 on (September 26, 2007, 14:16 GMT)

The senior trio have done a lot for Indian Cricket. No one can question their self-less commitment to Cricket and the country. Having seen the high performance of these youngsters, I am sure that, on their own, they will stand down from the forthcoming series rather than deny three young batsmen their opportunity to play and improve

Posted by satyasainvs on (September 26, 2007, 13:57 GMT)

cheers Team India for Grand success.. Definitely the spirit of Team India went up very high at this moment, really we seen great Aggression each individual players eyes to beat any country in the world.. they never loose their temperment, keep up the cool phase at all the time during 20-20.. But only now BCCI and selectors has to take bold decision to choose young and energetic indian team for upcoming series.. now they should believe that Team India need young blood rather than experience for getting success.. request them not to keep these players for the reserve bench.. otherwise they may loose their rythm.. hoping that upcoming Australian series prove that 20-20 never come fluke and Luck.. All the Best Team India..

Posted by judson_jd on (September 26, 2007, 13:19 GMT)

Do not take the name of Agarkar in vain.... It's silly to say that it's time to look beyond Agarkar now... Mark my words, Irfan and Sreesanth will again go back to their original form and India would have no other option but return to the services of Agarkar. By this article, you have degraged Agarkar to a large extent. He had 2 bad overs in 20-20 and had 6 very good overs.. No one will ever talk about that. Mark my words, He'll return and return strongly.

Posted by PatsFan on (September 26, 2007, 12:49 GMT)

Congrats to India on this remarkable triumph. I hope the board does some long term planning and begins to groom players for the future to replace the Fab Four when they do retire. I also see that Badrinath is getting a raw deal from the board and media since his name never comes in discussions. He has been scoring runs at every given stage and yet he is not in the reckoning for a spot in the team!!

Posted by amit2007 on (September 26, 2007, 12:07 GMT)

I totally agree with author, More chances needs to give the youngster like R sharma, Manoj tiwari and Suresh Raina. These three are here to replace the biggies of cricket. On the Australia tour, i think they should be pick in the team.

Posted by Azfar on (September 26, 2007, 11:56 GMT)

This team is like a breath of fresh air to Indian Cricket.Their performance in T20 has been stunning to say the least.But Australia still remains the best team in the World.Dhoni's leadership has been a revelation. I see shades of Imran Khan in his leadership.Hope he can keep his head and take India to greater heights. The way Sharad Pawar and other BCCI officials are trying to take the credit and the limelight away from the players is absolutely disgusting. The truth is that India won the T20 WC in spite of BCCI's lackadaisical approach to this form of the game. BCCI threatened not to participate in this WC and later on sent a team which was obviously not the first choice one. It is another matter that this young brigade has won us the prize the 'Holy Trinity' never could.Now the BCCI officials are jumping over each other trying to take the credit for this triumph. When will Indian Cricket get rid of people like Niranjan Shah, Sharad Pawar and company.

Posted by rejikorah on (September 26, 2007, 11:50 GMT)

Brave new India? Some guys don't think so. One Indian thinks we just opened up a long lost cricket entertainment industry - this time full circle. Million dollar deals, TV Ratings.. the whole nine yards. Read this: http://digg.com/other_sports/T20_ICCI_Cricket_Champions_Why_India_made_it

Posted by kunuko on (September 26, 2007, 11:15 GMT)

I agree that the youngsters did a marvellous job but I still think Joginder Sharma would defintely not find a place in any team atleast for his bowling. Inspite of his supposedly good bowling in the last over in the semis and the finals, where all he had to do was bowl a stump to stump line as the pressure was on the opposition in both matches. Cant say much about his batting as not many of us have seen any. For all we know, he might just go JP Yadav's way. And definitely, the newer youngsters can only improve in the guidance of the BIG 3. Uthappa needs to learn being patient as time and again he has squandered away a well begun innings. And Rohit Sharma's career can only go upwards by playing in the company of the BIG 3 atleast until they are playing. I dont see much reason for the seniors to just retire until they are playing well. Sachin-Sourav opening the one dayers in England brought back old memories. RESTING the seniors in inconsequential/early matches in a series is an option.

Posted by 12kris on (September 26, 2007, 10:55 GMT)

I wouldn't call it a flash in the pan. It was indeed a creditable show, winning the 20-20 world cup, beating all except New Zealand in the league. But what kind of celebration is this, with politicians vying with each other to be in reflected glory. If we are going to mature as a nation, we should stop wearing our hearts on our sleeves. Learn from the mistakes, (we made plenty of them- we might have had to pay for them on a less fortunate day) even after winning. And to see the officials of the BCCI jumping around the stadium, when they were the ones who voted against 20/20 in the ICC meetings.

Posted by guljar on (September 26, 2007, 10:50 GMT)

It's not very long that India was doing very bad and you have to return Sourav Ganguly and who had a great comeback. Rahul and Sachin are players whom any country will have luck to have them once in it's history. And all are them are still doing excellent. So we should not comment to disrespect them. And in rare case people will give room for young as Naser hossain did. We all know it's not the individual, rather it's all about how they perform as a team. And most of the time the reason of doing bad for India or Pakistan is division inside team.

Posted by Twenty_20 on (September 26, 2007, 10:45 GMT)

Interesting comments by all - I agree with most. I would however urge the selectors to look at one big aspect among others when selecting - Form. If Jaysuria can do well for Sri Lanka - based on form (he was dropped remember?) why is age an issue? I am not favouring the big three at all here - I want the best 11 to play for India - I dont care how many are over 35 or how many are under 22! Yes you need to groom some players but it cant be that you groom 6 out of 11! Lets have the balance, whoever does well is in, whoever does not waits.

Posted by Harish_KG on (September 26, 2007, 10:38 GMT)

The raw talents like Rohit, Yusuf , Robin etc has a lot to learn from the big 3. So if the selectors maintain a pool of youngsters and give them chances in a rotation policy, I think we have a good chance to become strong like Austrlia atleast in the one day cricket format. Selectors should discuss the perfomance of every players after a series and should give advise like players like Sreesanth as he is sometime found too arrogant than aggressive.

Posted by sujay77 on (September 26, 2007, 10:33 GMT)

It was fantastic to see India win this 20/20 World cup when least expected. I really don't agree that the Dravid, Sourav & Tendulkar should leave the one day scene just yet, they still have the class to shine India through. I like the selection policy of picking a lot of youngsters who are the future, but there should be a blend of the experience & youth. It'll be great to see that so many people are fighting for a place in the Indian team, much like a football team, you have to have a good squad of players to give consistent results. Lastly want to mention on Dhoni's captaincy hats off to him, brave decisions, masterclass.

Posted by RaghavanK on (September 26, 2007, 10:26 GMT)

I wish, not every good performance was met with cynicism by the media .I think this team has in it to consistently perform and the recent performances against England and South Africa only highlight this. It is also high time that the selectors enforced their faith in the yonger generation and gave them an extended run in the 50 over version and the "seniors" make a graceful exit through the 5 day version

Posted by Gabri on (September 26, 2007, 10:19 GMT)

I agree with Rajesh on most of the things except Agarkar. That he had one off tournament does not mean he should be discarded. The best option would be to treat him like our "treasured" senior trio and play him in rotation. Having played nearly 200 LOIs and taken close to 300 ODI wickets is no small matter. His experience would be very valuable to upcoming (???) youngsters like RP, Sree etc. As for the series against Australia, it would be always be better to have one of the senior playing in all matches and the rest of the team comprising of the youngsters. That way when tomorrow they decide to step down, we have the best backup available to go ahead. Just to tell you, one worldcup win is not what made Australia the team that everyone's looking upto. Let this team show that kind of consistency; I am sure they will for there are signs of it. Congrats to Dhoni and his team anyway, you did us all proud....

Posted by Anubanks on (September 26, 2007, 9:58 GMT)

I really suprised at the comments about the trio to be dropped just after a successful T20 WC. I feel they are the nuclues of the team in one-day and test. Though I feel the selectors should start using the home series against Aus/Pak to try out few youngsters and try and identify a fit replacement for the superstars...I feel Rohit is an ideal replacement for Dravid, he has the potential to be a class player in all forms !!

Posted by YeshuBN on (September 26, 2007, 9:23 GMT)

I don't think Ajit can make his place in the team with that poor kind of bowling action. Only thing is to go back and play some domestic cricket get the feel back and compete again. I agree he Was(not 'is') a wicket taking bowler but he didn't maintain consistency....

Posted by VINEEP on (September 26, 2007, 9:08 GMT)

At last after 24 years we did it ,our boys made our dream come true.We should be proud of our Players and INDIA

Posted by mirchi on (September 26, 2007, 8:56 GMT)

To most it will have become obvious that the tempo of ODIs will change rapidly - and rightly so too. Whereas Sachin and Rahul might still make it for a year or so in this format, Ganguly should now take his hat and if he doesn't, he should be dropped. If nothing else, the 20/20 WC has clearly outlined India's way forward - youth!

Besides, the question now arises as to who you drop to make room for Sachin and/or Dravid. Sachin for Sehwag, yes. But from there on, it's anybody's guess. Both Uthappa and Rohit Sharma are live wires, especially the latter. They have the potential to carry India forward to the next stage. Yuvraj and Dhoni select themselves and so too Gambhir - at least for the moment. I sincerely believe India should stick with the four bowlers one allrounder formula. It is a proven winner. Zaheer (in place of Joginder) along with RP and Irfan will give India the edge against Australia at home, where the SG ball at the start and 2 spinners will do the rest.

Posted by YeshuBN on (September 26, 2007, 8:43 GMT)

I really don't agree with the comment from Mr.Krishna. Its true that we have to give chance to youth but bigger truth is our youth has plenty of things that they have to learn from our big Three!!! The T20 game doesn't exactly reflect the cricketing skills of a player. Till they become much more perfect let them be playing with seniors and let them learn the things. Of course its better if seniors play games on rotational basis. We have plenty of cricket left in them, we sure have to enjoy this.

Posted by YeshuBN on (September 26, 2007, 8:31 GMT)

Rajesh, I feel its a good analysis of future Indian cricket. The victory in the T20 world cup doesn't prove that We(India) are world's best, but it certainly says that we have youth in our team who can make India world champion in all sorts of game in future. What should happen is we need to keep the momentum going with the guidance of senior legends of Indian cricket. Board should not neglect the players and also there should be healthy competition. Future Indian cricket is depending on gentle performance from key players like, Dhoni, Gambhir, Yuvraj, Pathan, R.Sharma, RP, Shree... Good Luck INDIA!!!

Posted by jyotsna on (September 26, 2007, 8:05 GMT)

i think the author must wait before comming to conclusions. it was 20-20. these very juniors like dhoni and uttappa were among those because of whom we lost the world cup. and as for as ajit goes i suppose he has 3-4 years till left . till recently it was he who played wonderfully against S.Africa in future cup finals. even the england series he had his share of glory .and as for economy goes fielders were also responsible. i agree that he was'nt up to the par but cricket doesn'nt mean a world cup nor a series. so keep ur valuable comments for the right time as form doesnt stay for long but class does.

Posted by pammy on (September 26, 2007, 7:58 GMT)

Indian team has enough takent to win matches against any time of the world. But need to improve the system of selection. We should think afresh about the senior players. We should try to build a team of younger members. I dont think there is a space for Sachin, sourav and dravid, specially in one day and 22-20 matches.

Posted by Krishna2007 on (September 26, 2007, 5:46 GMT)

Is it not time for the big three to take a hint and leave ODIs for good? Even if they are performing, they are preventing young talent from coming up. Our performance in T20 would surely have been worse if they had played. Now the 50 over format will change to a faster version post T20. The triumvirate will be out of sorts in it. They should stick to Test matches and make a dignified exit in the next two years. Expect that Dravid will do so but the other two may have to be dragged out kicking and screaming.

Can India keep up the winning momentum post-World Twenty20?
Comments have now been closed for this article

FeedbackTop
Email Feedback Print
Share
E-mail
Feedback
Print
S RajeshClose
S Rajesh Stats editor Every week the Numbers Game takes a look at the story behind the stats, with an original slant on facts and figures. The column is edited by S Rajesh, ESPNcricinfo's stats editor in Bangalore. He did an MBA in marketing, and then worked for a year in advertising, before deciding to chuck it in favour of a job which would combine the pleasures of watching cricket and writing about it. The intense office cricket matches were an added bonus.
Related Links
Series/Tournaments: ICC World Twenty20
Teams: India

    Big-hearted, broad-shouldered Davo

Alan Davidson was a fine allrounder, who has spent his life serving Australian sport in various capacities. By Ashley Mallett

    Dubai-Dhabi-Doo

Rob Steen: Who knew the Middle East would one day become the centre of a cricket-lover's universe?

    Dhawan's bouncer problem

Aakash Chopra: Why the Indian opener would be well advised to shelve the hook and pull in Australia

    The last cricket bookseller

The home of Australia's first, and possibly last, full-time dealer of his kind is a treasure trove of cricket literature amassed over 45 years. By Russell Jackson

England's problem with attacking batsmanship

Jon Hotten: It has taken the country ages to get over its obsession with defensive batting

News | Features Last 7 days

Pakistan should not welcome Amir back

The serene team culture cultivated by Misbah and his men shouldn't be allowed to be disrupted by a player with a tainted past

November games need November prices

An early start to the international season, coupled with costly tickets, have kept the Australian public away from the cricket

'I'm a bit disappointed not to get that Test average up to 50'

Mahela Jayawardene reflects on his Test career, and the need to bridge the gap between international and club cricket in Sri Lanka

A two-decade long dream

In 2011, MS Dhoni helped end a 28-year wait for India and gifted Sachin Tendulkar something he had craved throughout his career - to be called a World Cup champion

The wow and the sheesh

Coloured clothes, black sightscreens, two white balls: the game of cricket looked so different in 1992. But writing about it now seems more fun than watching it then

News | Features Last 7 days