Features FeaturesRSS FeedFeeds

Where spin is a sin

West Indies' rich legacy of pace bowling is mostly history, so why are they still not giving spinners a fair go?

Vaneisa Baksh

May 19, 2008

Comments: 17 | Text size: A | A


Cameo appearances: the likes of Dave Mohammed (above, centre), Amit Jaggernauth and Sulieman Benn have made it to the side only sporadically © Stanford 20/20
Enlarge
 

An old sore was scraped open during the recent Sri Lanka tour of the West Indies, once again splitting camps and raising questions over selection policies. The issue that resurfaced was why spin bowlers had not found a space of comfort on West Indian teams. The answers suggest it is an old and bitter debate that circles issues of power, ethnicity and nationalism.

The squad currently in training for Australia's tour includes three specialist fast bowlers: Jerome Taylor, Fidel Edwards and Daren Powell, along with Dwayne Bravo; Amit Jaggernauth (offbreaks), Sewnarine Chattergoon (legbreaks) and Sulieman Benn (left-arm orthodox). Dave Mohammed, who was in fine form during the West Indies Players' Association (WIPA) Twenty20 tournament that ended last Sunday, is not in, and columnist Fazeer Mohammed questioned the omission, as well, of Nikita Miller, who was the leading wicket-taker in the regional first-class series.

There is little to suggest that the final squad will carry more than one bowler outside the fast framework, especially given the venues. The question will indubitably arise again: what does West Indies have against spinners?

Looking through the dispassionate lens of history, it appears a matter of identity and power. West Indies cricket came to glory through its fast bowlers and locked itself into an alignment that equates power with speed. And although the speed is no longer what it was, the power base it constructed will not let it lose its place.

For in the beginning there was pace. Seeking Test status in the 1920s, to make their case West Indies found strength in fast men like Learie Constantine, George Francis, Herman Griffith and George John. This was their bowling armoury (supported by the medium pace of Joe Small and occasional legbreaks from Teddy Hoad, Ernest Rae, Clifford Roach and others). It set up an identity of sorts - nothing sharply defined, but something of a formula upon which team selections could rest. Spin bowlers were not a dominant part of that equation.

Something unusual happened when the team was preparing for the England tour in 1950. Selectors took a chance on two uncapped players who had been frightfully impressive at home, and that was how Alf Valentine and Sonny Ramadhin injected the flavour of spin into the West Indies team.

 
 
Lloyd complained after the loss to India in 1976, when he played three spinners, that there were 'guys who bowled spin, not got people out'
 

They mystified, and more importantly took wickets, to see West Indies to their celebrated victory at Lord's. But they were an aberration on account of their sheer talent. Spin bowlers were confined mainly to practising their craft in rural areas, and it was because Ramadhin had got a job at Trinidad Leaseholds Ltd, and had caught the influential eye of one of the managers, that he appeared on the radar of the selectors.

The squad for the 1950 tour had three quicks and four spinners, but by the end of the decade West Indies were slipping again, despite the presence of the ultimate allrounder, Garry Sobers. By the time Clive Lloyd came, the team was not a winning one. He defined the period from 1969 to 1973, when Sobers and then Rohan Kanhai captained the team, as the "most depressing" for cricket in the region. The team had no Test victories in four consecutive series: against England in 1969 (0-2), then 0-1 to India in 1971 at home, followed by five draws with New Zealand at home in 1972, and then 0-1 against Australia, again at home in 1973. Lloyd complained after the loss to India in Port-of-Spain in 1976, when he played three spinners, that there were "guys who bowled spin, not got people out."

The most dismal loss was when Australia trounced West Indies in the 1975-76 series. The traumatic experience at the hands of the Australian quartet of Dennis Lillee, Jeff Thomson, Max Walker and Gary Gilmour probably settled the matter for Lloyd. He had found Andy Roberts and Michael Holding and they were going to form half of his attack. The rest is history. A steady stream of big, powerful, fast bowlers emerged - Colin Croft, Joel Garner, Malcolm Marshall, Sylvester Clarke, Courtney Walsh, Patrick Patterson, Ian Bishop, Curtly Ambrose, the Benjamins - Winston and Kenny.

The West Indies team became the most dreaded on account of these speed demons, and thus was victory defined. West Indies' identity as world champions was tied to their fast-bowling arsenal, and it has not yet been able to shake that link, despite losing the status. After Ambrose and Walsh retired, the team never mustered a strong bowling attack. A few have come and gone; there are a couple of promising ones now, like Taylor, but nothing like a pack hunting at any one time.


Those two little friends of mine: Sonny Ramadhin and Alf Valentine have been two of all too few Test-winning spinners from the islands © The Cricketer International
Enlarge
 

Worldwide, flat wickets have become the trend, some say to ensure five days of cricket, others to give fast bowlers a harder time. In the West Indies, the pitches at Bourda and Queen's Park Oval have been traditionally flat, but Sabina Park and the Kensington Oval were known to have been fast, but now there are complaints that even those have flattened considerably.

Spinners are more prevalent in world cricket, and there have been some outstanding ones who really take wickets. Shane Warne and Muttiah Muralitharan come easily to mind, but there have been so many - Bishan Bedi, Abdul Qadir, Jim Laker, Erapalli Prasanna, Bhagwat Chandrasekhar, Monty Panesar, Richie Benaud, Maninder Singh, Mushtaq Ahmed, Anil Kumble, Daniel Vettori - one wonders why spin has remained so low on the West Indies list despite its own high-quality players like Lance Gibbs, Ramadhin, Valentine and Sobers.

The answer has to do with power bases. Pace was the seed of West Indies' power. And as in situations where a power base feels threatened, the instinct is to defend it. The power of pace has largely been epitomised in players of African descent, and according to one observer, in this West Indian culture, spin bowling has not been seen as "manly", which may be a factor in why it has not been absorbed across the board.

The spinners who have emerged have mainly come from Trinidad and Guyana, and are of Indian descent. The list includes Inshan Ali, Raphick Jumadeen, Rangy Nanan, Dinanath Ramnarine, Mohammed, Jaggernauth and Mahendra Nagamootoo. (This may also account for the fact that the best players of spin have been Brian Lara of Trinidad, and Carl Hooper and Robert Christiani of Guyana.)

Although there are a few exceptions (Valentine, Gibbs, Hooper, Roger Harper, Albert Padmore) spin has traditionally been the forte of players of Indian descent, and Indian players, it must be remembered, were invisible on the West Indies Test team for nearly a quarter of a century before Ramadhin appeared, and thus would hardly have made their impact within the power base.

While it would be fair to say that no spinners have in the recent past shown any more outstanding ability than fast bowlers have, it is also reasonably apparent that more fast bowlers with promise have been given more chances than their spinner counterparts.

Ramnarine, the WIPA president, and probably the best spinner of recent times, says: "Spinners have to work doubly hard to justify their selection. They play one match in, one match out. There is no way you can develop as a Test cricketer like that. You ought to play 25 matches to have a real appreciation for Test cricket. When he got 300 wickets, Shane Warne said that he was now learning how to get people out. It is a serious statement.

 
 
The power of pace has largely been epitomised in players of African descent, and according to one observer, in this West Indian culture, spin bowling has not been seen as 'manly' and this may be a factor in why it has not been absorbed across the board
 

"I think spinners should be a critical part of any West Indies team now. Wickets are not conducive to fast bowling, we need to find the balance for the attack. A lot needs to be done for spinners. The art ought to be encouraged. There should be specialised training for them."

Nanan, a leading spinner during the days of the pace quartet, agrees that spinners have not had a fair chance on West Indies teams, and that it is primarily because selectors and captains are too impatient. He cites a string of one-shot spinners - Inshan, Jumadeen, Derick Parry. "Nobody got a long run, to play Test after Test," he says. Also, "captains of West Indies teams didn't really know how to set fields for spinners.

"Cricket is a game of angles," and you had to think differently for spinners. The best captain for spinners was Lara, he says, because Lara grew up among spinners (like Rajindra Dhanraj). "If Shane Warne was living in the West Indies nobody would have heard of him. It took 15 Tests before he made any breakthrough.

"Now we don't have quality fast bowlers, but fast bowlers still get in the side. The spinners today are not of outstanding quality, but you have to motivate yourself to train hard, and how much can you do without a chance?"

Ramnarine thinks the whole attitude towards spinners has been wrong, but can't say why. "I can't answer that. I have been trying to work it out, when you consider that at the regional level it is the spinners who do well. Something, to me, is not quite clear."

It might become clearer if one considers that just as cricket power lay in the hands of the white elite until it was wrested away after 50 years of struggle, so too the resistance to spin is caught up in the issue of control. Lloyd, for example, the man at the helm of the fast-bowling dominance, and head of the WICB's Cricket Committee, was recently quoted as saying that his formula for returning West Indies cricket to glory was to open a school for fast bowlers.

The crop of fast bowlers over the past decade or so belies the claim that fast bowling is still a prowess worthy of boast for West Indies. They simply have not produced enough of the right calibre to merit that claim. In the face of the shifting conditions of cricket pitches, of the developed capacity for spin worldwide, of the need to produce a balanced attack, the attention to spin has been peremptory.


Carl Hooper was a good batsman against spin, and a decent spinner himself - which may owe to his Guyanese origins © AFP
Enlarge
 

A small group of spinners worthy of attention currently exists in the region but selectors continue to baffle by selecting those considered to be the lesser talents. It is almost as if they are doing it to reinforce a case against spinners, said one disgusted supporter. He, like many others in Trinidad, chose to boycott the recent Tests against Sri Lanka to protest the exclusion of Jaggernauth of Trinidad in favour of Benn of Barbados. The selectors, it was claimed, were being insular again.

It is one of the troubles plaguing West Indies cricket. Understandably so, given the nature of the union that created West Indies cricket out of a series of independently run Caribbean nations. The rejection of spin is just one element of a difficult bundle that cannot be unravelled without fully confronting its racial, ethnic and nationalistic components.

It seems more of a struggle to let go of the element that once instilled fear in opponents, more of an inability to accept that fast bowlers of current times do not invoke dread; as also a reluctance to enter a world that will require a redefinition of what constitutes a powerful team.

Vaneisa Baksh is a freelance journalist based in Port-of-Spain, Trinidad

RSS Feeds: Vaneisa Baksh

© ESPN Sports Media Ltd.

Posted by world_champion on (May 21, 2008, 20:41 GMT)

I think that the WICB should just pick a 20 year old spinner and keep him in the team for at least 8-9 years and after that everybody would see the potential in them so they would automaticly come in without problems

Posted by Yawd_Man on (May 21, 2008, 13:03 GMT)

Vaneisa,

Decent article but I don't think race, ethnicity or nationality has anything to do with the failure to include spinners in the starting 11. The fact that spinners get invited to camp shows that some consideration has been given to include them. Personally I beleive that our batting line up isn't as strong as the Aussies, the Indias, etc... so we cant afford to include a full time spinner who will contribute nothing to the batting. I dont believe we are confident enough to make that gamble, and the safest bet is to go with a pacer. I believe it is as simple as that..nothing to do with race or any of the other things you mentioned...Regionally Jamaica has a very strong team with batting all the way to 8 so they can use the a specialist spinner, Nikita Miller and two specialist pacer, Taylor and Powell and some mediums....think about it Jamaica can easliy add two more quickies in Jermaine Lawson and Andrew Richardson, but because the batting is deap we use a specialist spinner

Posted by azaro on (May 20, 2008, 15:03 GMT)

Adding some strength to the spinning department would clearly improve the West Indies test side and provide a more competitive dimension. It also ensures longer rest periods for the quicks given the side is not packed with four anymore.

However, the need is to help the spinners develop and it would seem some coaching emphasis is in order both for the spinners and their use by captains. The current crop neither have the variety in their armoury nor the ability to rip the ball, both required in a modern-day test spinner. The regional games hide these shortcomings in that (1) pitches are not always as flat as they are for test matches and (2) the batting abilty of many of the players falls way short and the result is cheap wickets for spinners. Add to that the tendency for West Indian captains to inhibit spinners in doing anything other than bowling negatively (remember poor Nagamootoo!) and certainly not allowing them to 'give it air'!

Posted by michaus55 on (May 20, 2008, 13:45 GMT)

Clive LLoyd gave the spinners a game to win vs India, they literally dropped the ball. The success of the West Indies has always been based on good fast bowling. Except for Ram and Val and Gibbsy, we never had threatening spin bowlers. Dave Mohamed and co. aren't good enough to worry international batsmen. Haven't seen much of benn except for T20 games, nor have I seen the youngster fron T/dad. However, I say use what works.

Posted by robbiegy2k on (May 20, 2008, 12:56 GMT)

Sorry duoaudshah but I must disagree with you, could you please name these pace bowlers that have been given a test here and there? Recent WI fast bowling attacks that spring to mind consist of such players as: Taylor/Powell/Edwards (all 20+ tests) then going back a bit you have the likes of Corey Collymore (30 tests) Pedro Collins (29 tests) Mervyn Dillon (38 tests) Nixon McLean played 19 tests and averaged 42!

I fully agree with Vaneisa's article and I think the majority of cricket fans (WI or not) would point out the stubborn and tunnel vision views of the selectors/WICB on this subject is non-rewarding and has a slight whiff of nostalgia about it! Considering that all of the test playing countries now 9 times out of 10 play a frontline spinner (sometimes more for balance than playing conditions) would indicate that either the WICB know something the other boards don't or as is more likely they are just biased against giving spin bowlers a good run in the team.

Posted by Dave10 on (May 20, 2008, 8:05 GMT)

This is not true .....

....."If Shane Warne was living in the West Indies nobody would have heard of him. It took 15 Tests before he made any breakthrough."...............

Warne took 7/52 in his fifth test

Posted by ozcomment on (May 20, 2008, 3:22 GMT)

dear vaneisa,

forgive me, i am technologically challenged, and have only just worked out how to reply to your articles. thank you for your fair comment, and highlighting such important issues. michael manley seems a long way away when one looks at the current state of west indies cricket. the team is important, as you imply, for all that can be done for developing a regional identity. let's hope that not just spinners of indian extraction, but all other of the carribean's many races and ethnic groupings develop and turn the west indies into a force again

Posted by duoaudshah on (May 20, 2008, 2:27 GMT)

Find another argument and another solution...that one was a bit weak there in my view. I personally won't venture to suggest a solution, but I will keep thinking...and for now, lets see what the spinners offer and how we progress with this.

Posted by duoaudshah on (May 20, 2008, 2:26 GMT)

Great article, but I believe the writer should also look at the other side of the coin and make a more fair comparison. In the past decade and a half, the same thing that has been done to spinners (one test here, another there), has been done to fast bowlers. For almost every spinner named that was barely given a chance, a fast bowler can also be named who was just given a short run. Admittedly, it takes time for the spinner to develop, but the same argument goes for fast bowlers, and batsmen. So...what exactly is the biased then? Its strange to me too that spinners perform so well in regionals, and just dont live up to that in the Test arena, while many pacers who were merely 'ok' in regionals, are now our leading bowlers (Taylor and Edwards)...it has to do with grabbing the opportunity with both hands and making the best of it. So many spinners have been tried, and even on flat pitches they have failed to impress...Lewis, Perry, Mohammed, Benn...and the list will keep on going.

Posted by Jublees on (May 20, 2008, 1:15 GMT)

Every test side needs a quality spinner. Bowling on a 5th day wicket with rough emerging outside the batsman off stump. West Indies have a very poor side at the moment have done nothing since the 80's when they had the great pace attack. That kind of attack only comes around once in a lifetime. There was no need for a spinner back then as the pace guys were doing the job. Its now time West Indies cricket started encouraging spin bowling and look to produce a world class spinner. Without one they will continue to be a poor test side.

Posted by Lipak on (May 20, 2008, 0:58 GMT)

The stigma especially here in trinidad is that not only spinners are not given a fair enough chance but also spinners and players on the whole of east indian decent are not treated equally. Take the recent first test against Sri Lanka where Benn was selected over Jaggernath on merit Amit had taken well over 100 wickets over the past three seasons and at that time had ten wickets over Benn's tally at that point in the Carib Beer Cup. So based on merit Amit would have been the one to play but the excuse given by captain Chris Gayle was that they had to pick the spinner who could bat and Amit is certainly no mug .With this point who would you rather pick, a spinner who is more capable of taking five wickets or one who can give you 20 runs at #10? Also take Dave Mohammed who has played 4 test on 4 continents who have not done badly and who has a test batting average of over 40.He too has taken a bag of wickets in Carib Beer and is a spinner who can bat but was dropped for Benn and Lewis

Posted by fuzziduck23 on (May 19, 2008, 19:42 GMT)

Might I also add, Jerome Taylor has been a breath of fresh air, and I hope he continues to focus and get better. Powell has been decent at times as well, and Bravo also offers good support. There is room for another bowler....why not a specialist spinner? Dave can also bat a bit!

Posted by fuzziduck23 on (May 19, 2008, 19:38 GMT)

Great Article, as a Trinbagonian and West Indian, it pains me to see our best spinners not being given an opportunity to show their stuff. Jaggernauth and Mohammed have proven season after season, that they are the best in the Caribbean (which has coincided with the high levels of success for T&T regionally), but one of our coaches once said that Chris Gayle was the best in the caribbean. As Dinas said, "something to me is not quite clear."

Posted by kivmohd on (May 19, 2008, 14:14 GMT)

I'm from Trinidad and thoroughly agree with the article. I was, however, pleasantly surprised that Benn actually made it into the final 11. This feeling was suppressed by the thought that he beat Jaggernauth purely on his race, but what other reason is there if Jaggernauth outshone him in the recent regional competition. Because I'm a die-hard cricket fan and ridiculous patriot, i would never stop supporting the West Indies, but the selectors are doing everything in their power to break me... and the many other West Indian supporters who think!

Posted by RameshP on (May 19, 2008, 13:29 GMT)

Fantastic stuff. On the money, a courageous piece of writing. They are literally tons of such cases dating back to Alvin Kalicharan ommission from the WI squad when the WI Kerry Packer players returned from their honeymoons in the late 70s/80s to the current discriminatory measures against players from Trinidad & Guyana.

ramesh

Posted by Aditya_mookerjee on (May 19, 2008, 9:47 GMT)

I agree with Vanessa entirely, that spin bowling, both off break and leg break should be encouraged. For a right handed bowler, off break and leg break bowling are contradictory to each other. A leg break bowler has relatively more turn but less control. An off break bowler has more control, and less turn, than a leg break bowler. I remember Larry Gomes playing in the 80's. He was a stylish batsman, and good off break bowler. I assume he was in the team as an all rounder. Perhaps, Ramadin, and Valentine, were not very orthodox, or if they were, they must have been coached. It is as natural for the West Indies isles to produce spin bowlers, as it is for the Indian Subcontinent. But the intent is not visible, at present, to others outside the isles.

Posted by redneck on (May 19, 2008, 5:37 GMT)

Of course there are going to be more opportunities for pace bowlers over spin bowlers. traditionaly most sides pick 3 quicks and a spinner with India being the exception. even Sri Lanka with their low, slow decks only have Murali taking up the spin attack. As a australian watching the West Indies in South Africa earlier in the year and giving the West Indies very little hope in challenging the South Africans, the like of Edwards and Taylor stood up tremendously well and look every part like a formidable attack! Add a Sewnarine Chattergoon (who can bat as well) and with the all-round abilities of Chris Gayle and that should provide the West Indies with all the spinning options they should need to compete with any test side!

Have your say
Comments have now been closed for this article

FeedbackTop
Email Feedback Print
Share
E-mail
Feedback
Print
Vaneisa BakshClose
Vaneisa Baksh Vaneisa Baksh has been studying West Indies cricket's history for ages, and has been writing on the game for even longer. She has been admitted as a member of the Queen's Park Cricket Club in Port-of-Spain, Trinidad, which recently opened its doors to females. She hasn't become one of the boys yet, though.

    'Like a ballet dancer'

My XI: Martin Crowe on Mark Waugh's lazy elegance and batsmanship that was easy on eye

    Sea, sun, scandal

Diary: Our correspondent takes in the sights and sounds of Galle and Colombo, and reports on a tampering controversy

    Worst keepers, and honours at Lord's

Ask Steven: Also, most keeping dismissals on debut, seven-for at HQ, and youngest ODI centurions

    From swinging London to Maco country

Diary: Our correspondent walks and buses the streets of the English capital, and then heads for the coast

Cook's Brearley lesson

Jon Hotten: Mike Brearley was an outstanding captain despite his repeated failures with the bat

News | Features Last 7 days

Vijay rediscovers the old Monk

The leave outside off stump has been critical to M Vijay's success since his India comeback last year. Contrary to popular opinion, such patience and self-denial comes naturally to him

Bhuvneshwar on course for super series

Only 15 times in Test history has a player achieved the double of 300 runs and 20 wickets in a Test series. Going on current form, Bhuvneshwar could well be the 16th

Ugly runs but still they swoon

Alastair Cook did not bat like a leading man but the crowd applauded him for simply not failing

India come full circle

India's wretched run away from home began at Lord's in 2011. A young team full of self-belief may have brought it to an end with their victory at the same venue three years later

Ishant's fourth-innings heroics in rare company

In India's win at Lord's, Ishant Sharma took the best bowling figures by an Indian in the fourth innings of a Test outside Asia. Here are five other best bowling efforts by Indians in the fourth innings of Tests outside Asia

News | Features Last 7 days
Sponsored Links

Why not you? Read and learn how!