S Rajesh
Numbers Game Numbers GameRSS FeedFeeds  | Archives
ESPNcricinfo's stats editor S Rajesh looks at the stories behind the stats

Dot balls, singles, twos and boundaries

We analyse teams, batsmen and bowlers on these parameters in the 2011 World Cup

S Rajesh

April 8, 2011

Comments: 11 | Text size: A | A

AB de Villiers and Hashim Amla run a leisurely single, Netherlands v South Africa, World Cup 2011, Mohali, March 3, 2011
AB de Villiers and Hashim Amla were among the batsmen who played the lowest percentage of dot balls © AFP
Enlarge

Almost a week after a heady tournament came to its culmination, it's time to look back at some of the vital stats that defined the performances of the teams. Three of the key measures for batsmen and bowlers are the dot balls bowled and faced (they indicate the amount of pressure a team put themselves under or exerted on the opposition), the singles and twos taken and conceded, which are a measure or urgency in the batting and in the field; and the boundaries scored and given away, which indicate a batting line-up's explosive ability and a bowling unit's ability to contain it.

Overall in the 2011 World Cup, the number of dot balls bowled was about three percentage points less than in the previous World Cup, the number of singles and twos increased by a similar number of percentage points, while the percentage of runs scored in boundaries increased a bit too. The overall numbers were obviously affected by the fact that the 2011 World Cup was held in three countries and the conditions were different in each - India was much more batting-friendly compared to Sri Lanka and Bangladesh.

The overall stats also show how the top eight teams fared on these parameters. India's batting strength clearly shows through in these numbers: historically their batsmen have been known to rely more on boundaries than singles and twos, which also generally translates into a relatively high dot-ball percentage. However, the presence of Gautam Gambhir, Virat Kohli, Yuvraj Singh, MS Dhoni and Suresh Raina in the current line-up means they are now among the best at running singles and twos, and at minimising dot balls. That's clear from the table below, where India's dot percentage of 47.99 is only marginally poorer than England's, who were the best team in this aspect in the tournament, and better than South Africa. These were also the only teams with a sub-50% dot-ball rate.

The other aspect that stands out about India's batting is that their batsmen were explosive enough to find the boundaries fairly often - 45% of their runs were scored in fours and sixes, which is a healthy percentage. England's dot-ball percent was low, but then so was their boundary ratio, which meant they couldn't always get the sort of scores they needed to, despite playing relatively few dot balls.

West Indies, on the other hand, were a side that believed in fours, sixes, and little else. They struck 33 sixes, which was the second-highest after New Zealand's 36, but they also played out the highest percentage of dots among the top eight teams, and had the smallest percentage of singles and twos. Theirs was clearly a high-risk strategy, and it didn't quite pay off.

Dots, ones, twos and boundaries for batting teams in the World Cup
Batting team Total runs Total balls Dot-ball % 1s and 2s % as % of balls faced 4s and 6s as % of runs scored
India 2471 2557 47.99 41.30 45.08
Sri Lanka 2207 2333 50.19 38.62 46.04
Pakistan 1656 1983 55.82 34.80 40.70
New Zealand 1695 1923 54.60 35.41 46.02
South Africa 1767 2001 48.28 42.88 39.05
Australia 1441 1593 50.85 39.55 42.33
England 1829 2056 47.47 44.41 35.10
West Indies 1411 1746 58.36 32.76 47.48
All teams 21,333 25,423 54.86 36.01 42.97
All teams - 2007 World Cup 21,333 25,851 57.92 33.01 44.47

The bowling presents a slightly different picture. India weren't as dominant with ball as they were with bat, but in the knockout games they rose to the occasion spectacularly. Their dot-ball percentage was the lowest among the top eight teams, and though they conceded a higher percentage of singles and twos than any other side, they didn't give away as many runs in fours and sixes on average as some of the other sides did. India conceded 183 fours, which was the highest in the tournament, but they also bowled 487 deliveries - that's 81.1 overs - more than any other side.

The teams with the best bowling stats were Pakistan and South Africa: both had dot-ball percentages of around 60, which means they were able to consistently exert pressure on the opposition batsmen. They also didn't concede too many singles and twos, thus forcing batsmen to take more risks. The team that conceded the smallest percentage of runs in boundaries, though, were Sri Lanka - they conceded only nine sixes, which was the second-lowest in the tournament, despite bowling in eight innings.

Dots, ones, twos, and boundaries for bowling teams in the World Cup
Bowling team Total runs conceded Ball bowled Dot-ball % 1s and 2s as % of balls bowled 4s and 6s as % of runs conceded
India 2270 2622 50.34 41.30 39.91
Sri Lanka 1605 2110 55.88 36.87 35.02
Pakistan 1517 2135 61.97 30.82 39.68
New Zealand 1548 2022 59.25 32.34 43.80
South Africa 1249 1728 60.30 32.18 40.83
Australia 1437 1852 59.13 32.40 43.15
England 1807 1979 55.48 33.65 47.81
West Indies 1251 1565 54.89 36.55 41.57

Among the batsmen who played at least 300 balls in the World Cup, AB de Villiers played the lowest percentage of dot balls. In the 326 balls he faced, there were only 122 off which de Villiers didn't score a run, which converts into an exceptionally low percentage of 37.42. The break-up of the balls he faced reads thus: 146 singles, 19 twos, one three, 31 fours and seven sixes. No other batsman comes close to de Villiers' dot percentage: the next best is Mahela Jayawardene with 40.46. Virender Sehwag's low percent is especially noteworthy since he opens the innings and bats during a period when batsmen are more likely to play dots due to the field restrictions.

Among the nine batsmen who have a dot percent of less than 50, the one with the lowest run-rate is Ian Bell, who didn't score off only 136 out of 307 balls, but also didn't strike too many boundaries. His break-up reads thus: 137 singles, 16 twos, 16 fours and two sixes. From the nine top teams, the batsmen who played the most dots were Brad Haddin (58.67) and Graeme Smith (58.33), two naturally aggressive players who changed their gameplan - with varying degrees of success - to suit the slow pitches of the subcontinent.

Batsmen with lowest dot-ball percentage in the World Cup (Qual: 300 balls)
Batsman Runs Balls Run rate Dot ball%
AB de Villiers 353 326 6.49 37.42
Mahela Jayawardene 304 304 6.00 40.46
Virender Sehwag 380 310 7.35 42.90
Ian Bell 245 307 4.78 44.30
Jonathan Trott 422 522 4.85 44.44
Hashim Amla 306 349 5.26 44.70
Gautam Gambhir 393 462 5.10 45.24
Virat Kohli 282 343 4.93 46.94
Andrew Strauss 334 357 5.61 47.06

Among the bowlers, two Australians head the list for the highest percentage of dot balls bowled. Most players on the list are those who bowled with the new ball during the fielding restrictions, but Mitchell Johnson, who usually bowled first-change, leads with a dot-ball percentage of more than 68. The impressive Tim Southee comes in third, while the only two spinners with a percent of more than 60 are Mohammad Hafeez and Graeme Swann.

Bowlers with highest dot-ball percentage in the World Cup (Qual: 300 balls)
Bowler Balls Runs Econ rate Dot %
Mitchell Johnson 345 231 4.01 68.41
Brett Lee 326 235 4.32 66.56
Tim Southee 434 312 4.31 64.98
Umar Gul 363 272 4.49 64.74
Shaun Tait 312 264 5.07 63.14
Mohammad Hafeez 330 193 3.50 62.12
Graeme Swann 408 309 4.54 61.27

S Rajesh is stats editor of Cricinfo

RSS Feeds: S Rajesh

© ESPN Sports Media Ltd.

Posted by   on (April 10, 2011, 6:49 GMT)

Where is Misbah? He should probably top the dot ball list!Wait.. is he not still not out on 23 off 1917272 balls?

Posted by turabjohnson on (April 9, 2011, 20:21 GMT)

i agree these stats are useless. batting conditions were tougher in srilanka and bangladesh.

Posted by   on (April 9, 2011, 8:13 GMT)

pointless stats... as you stated in the beginning batting conditions were different through the different venues

Posted by   on (April 9, 2011, 0:11 GMT)

AMAZING STATS! AS I analyzed the stats, I can only lament the WI batting performance.OUR bowling was competitive, for a matter of fact it was very good, as the stats show.BUT THE batting, we need to take more singles. OUR batters are not very patient. LOOK at it,we had the highest boundaries % of runs scored. WE had the highest dot ball%. WE were only looking for the big shots. WI batters need to score off more balls. THE INDIANS had a good balance in the three categories.

Posted by slowerball on (April 8, 2011, 18:12 GMT)

umm... so what? only squareone has an nice statistic.

Posted by   on (April 8, 2011, 16:05 GMT)

@squareone... ya, that's incredible... i can't believe that the author didn't mention that... weird... 2007: 21,333 runs scored 2011: 21,333 runs scored

Posted by   on (April 8, 2011, 13:40 GMT)

So, this goes to show how much England miss having an explosive, boundary hitting batsman.

Bring on Peter Trego of Somerset. A million miles better than Luke Wright.

Posted by jonesy2 on (April 8, 2011, 13:10 GMT)

haa cop this everyone who says johnson is expensive. eat your words haters

Posted by squareone on (April 8, 2011, 12:21 GMT)

Another important fact is that 2007 and 2011 WC had the same amount of runs scored - 21,333 !!! Isnt that amazing ??

Posted by   on (April 8, 2011, 9:49 GMT)

380 310 7.35 can any one beat this? #viru

Comments have now been closed for this article

FeedbackTop
Email Feedback Print
Share
E-mail
Feedback
Print
S RajeshClose
S Rajesh Stats editor Every week the Numbers Game takes a look at the story behind the stats, with an original slant on facts and figures. The column is edited by S Rajesh, ESPNcricinfo's stats editor in Bangalore. He did an MBA in marketing, and then worked for a year in advertising, before deciding to chuck it in favour of a job which would combine the pleasures of watching cricket and writing about it. The intense office cricket matches were an added bonus.

    We need sophisticated technology to deal with chucking

Darren Berry: Still images and slow-motion replays are more effective than lab testing

    India's Constant problem

Rewind: How a row over the appointment of an umpire in 1982 led to the Shakoor Rana-Mike Gatting stand-off

Aftab's unfulfilled talent

Mohammad Isam: Aftab Ahmed could have been a superstar for Bangladesh, but he didn't have the desire and work ethic to follow through

    Test cricket's young Fab Four

Martin Crowe: Kohli, Root, Smith and Williamson will take turns as the No. 1 Test batsman. So far each has shown only one technical weakness

Analysing the unexplainable

Anantha Narayanan: Sequences as bad as, or worse than, India's five-innings streak of sub-200 scores

News | Features Last 7 days

India disgraced themselves by not competing

MS Dhoni and the BCCI are to blame for a touring party that became too comfortable and compliant

'I couldn't bring myself to set a batsman up by giving him runs'

Glenn McGrath talks about the method behind his metronomic consistency, visualisation, and why aggression isn't about sledging

Dhoni doesn't heed his own warning

Plays of the Day from the second ODI between England and India, in Cardiff

Test cricket's young Fab Four

Kohli, Root, Smith and Williamson will take turns as the No. 1 Test batsman. So far each has shown only one technical weakness

Starting and ending with half-centuries, and 99 on debut

Also, Tamim's share of Bangladesh's runs, run out for a duck on debut, most Test wickets against Pakistan, and 40-year-old captains

News | Features Last 7 days