August 24, 2012

South Africa's overseas advantage

Unlike the two previous top-ranked Test teams, South Africa have risen to the top on the basis of consistently excellent away results

After hanging on to the No. 1 spot for a year, England have relinquished it to South Africa, and Andrew Strauss, their captain, was quick to acknowledge that Graeme Smith's team thoroughly deserved the honour, given their recent form. England had an extremely dominant spell when they won eight out of nine series, but since then, they've lost two out of four, and both by convincing margins - 3-0 to Pakistan and 2-0 to South Africa.

South Africa's strong run, on the other hand, has been going on for much longer: since December 2006, in 20 series, they've won 13, drawn six, and lost only one - to Australia at home in 2009, immediately after beating them in Australia earlier in the season. During this period they've won two series in England, and one each in Pakistan, Australia, New Zealand and West Indies. They haven't won a series in India in two attempts, but each time they've won a Test and drawn the series. The only country in which South Africa didn't win or draw their last series is Sri Lanka - they lost 2-0 in July-August 2006.

The big difference between the recent records for England and South Africa has been the teams' overseas performance. During England's powerful run between 2009 and 2011, most of their emphatic wins were achieved in England: Australia was the only major opposition they beat in an away series - their other overseas win was in Bangladesh, while they drew in South Africa. On the other hand, they beat West Indies, Australia, Pakistan, Sri Lanka and India at home.

India's ascent to the top spot in December 2009 was also largely based on home wins, though they also had two creditable series wins in England (in 2007) and New Zealand (2009), But out of seven series wins between 2007 and 2009, four were achieved at home - against Pakistan, Australia, England and Sri Lanka - and one in Bangladesh. On the other hand, they lost series in Australia, South Africa and Sri Lanka during this period.

South Africa's move up the table, though, has been based on wins both home and away. In 27 away Tests since December 2009, they have a 14-4 win-loss record, with no series losses. That record dips slightly in home Tests, to 16-9 in 28 matches, with one series defeat in ten.

The table below compares the records for all teams since December 2006, excluding Tests against Zimbabwe and Bangladesh. Though Australia have a marginally better overall win-loss record during this period, South Africa have been the overwhelming champions in away Tests: they have a win-loss ratio of 3, while none of the other teams has managed even half that. England, on the other hand, have a ratio of 0.5, exactly the same as India.

Teams in Test cricket since December 2006 (excl. Tests v B'desh and Zim)
Team Tests W/L Ratio Away Tests W/L Ratio
South Africa 51 26/ 13 2.00 25 12/ 4 3.00
Australia 61 34/ 16 2.12 29 12/ 9 1.33
Pakistan 40 10/ 16 0.62 36 10/ 15 0.66
England 69 27/ 21 1.28 31 7/ 14 0.50
India 59 21/ 18 1.16 33 8/ 16 0.50
Sri Lanka 45 13/ 14 0.92 20 3/ 10 0.30
New Zealand 37 4/ 21 0.19 17 1/ 12 0.08
West Indies 46 6/ 22 0.27 23 1/ 13 0.07

A closer look at the overseas stats indicates the major differentiator between South Africa and the other teams: it's the ability of their batsmen to retain the ability to make huge scores even when playing in unfamiliar conditions. Several teams have better batting averages in home Tests than South Africa: India average 47.82, Australia 40.96, England 40.29, and Sri Lanka 39.94, while South Africa are fifth, on 35.62. (All stats exclude Tests against Zimbabwe and Bangladesh).

However, in away games, South Africa's batting is a long way better than other teams: they average 44.93, and the next best are Australia on 35.51. Even allowing for the fact that away Tests for other teams include matches in South Africa, where conditions are toughest for batting these days, the difference is huge. India's batting average overseas falls to 31, while England are slightly better at 33.48.

One of the key stats here is the number of hundreds scored by South African batsmen: in 25 overseas Tests, they've scored 41 hundreds and 55 fifties. That works out to an average of 1.64 hundreds per Test, and a fifties-to-hundreds ratio of 1.34. Both are significantly better than those of other teams. India, for example, average 0.70 hundreds per Test, and have a fifties-to-hundreds ratio of 4.26. That South African ability to convert starts into big scores was evident in the series in England too, when they turned five out of ten 50-plus scores into hundreds, including three scores of more than 180.

Meanwhile South Africa have always been blessed with high-quality bowlers, which means the efforts of their batsmen haven't gone waste. However, three other teams - Australia, Pakistan and England - have bowling averages that are similar to those of South Africa. The key difference has been the ability of the batsmen to rack up huge scores, no matter what the conditions.

Overseas stats for all teams since Dec 2006 (excl. Tests in B'desh and Zim)
Team Tests Bat ave 100s/ 50s Wkts taken Bowl ave
South Africa 25 44.93 41/ 55 395 34.16
Australia 29 35.51 34/ 79 484 33.37
Pakistan 36 29.05 22/ 90 593 32.66
England 31 33.48 34/ 72 471 35.85
India 33 31.00 23/ 98 487 40.12
Sri Lanka 20 33.45 27/ 37 216 50.09
New Zealand 17 24.87 7/ 30 214 39.93
West Indies 23 29.63 19/ 53 269 45.17

Among batsmen who have scored 1500-plus overseas runs since December 2006 (excluding matches in Bangladesh and Zimbabwe), four of the top eight averages belong to South Africans. Hashim Amla and AB de Villiers have 65-plus averages, while Jacques Kallis and Graeme Smith average more than 54.

Some of the top batsmen from other teams have struggled overseas during this period. Rahul Dravid averaged only 35.10 in 33 Tests, Ricky Ponting 36.82, Virender Sehwag 36.97, and Michael Hussey 37.34. VVS Laxman averaged 70.45 in home Tests during this period, but in overseas games his average dropped to 41.35. (Click here for the full list of batsmen in overseas games, with a 1500-run cut-off.)

Best overseas batsmen since Dec 2006 (Qual: 1500 runs, excl Tests in B'desh and Zim)
Batsman Tests Runs Average 100s/ 50s
Hashim Amla 25 2486 65.42 8/ 11
AB de Villiers 25 2147 65.06 5/ 9
Shivnarine Chanderpaul 19 1607 61.80 5/ 10
Kumar Sangakkara 19 1972 58.00 9/ 6
Jacques Kallis 24 2082 57.83 10/ 6
Chris Gayle 16 1517 56.18 4/ 4
Misbah-ul-Haq 24 1867 54.91 3/ 15
Graeme Smith 25 2286 54.42 8/ 10

A further break-up for these four South African batsmen shows how adept they have been against both pace and spin in overseas Tests. Amla and de Villiers average more than 70 against pace, and more than 60 against spin. Kallis' average against pace, and Smith's against spin, drop below 50, but they're still pretty impressive numbers.

On the other hand, some of the other top batsmen from other sides have struggled against either pace or spin, or in some cases both, in overseas matches. For the Indians, pace has been the problem: Dravid averaged 34.67 against fast bowling, Laxman 35.50, Sehwag 37.93 and Tendulkar 43.40; against spin Tendulkar and Laxman average more than 60, and Dravid 46.42. For England, Pietersen and Cook average marginally more than 40 against pace in overseas matches, but Ian Bell's average drops to 37.68; against spin, Cook averages 73.46, and Pietersen 48.15. Ponting averages 35 against pace and Hussey 30; against spin their averages are 61 and 52. Kumar Sangakkara, Sri Lanka's best batsman, averages 54 against pace and 64 against spin, but Jayawardene's average against pace is only 29.29.

South Africa thus have a core group of batsmen who've proved themselves to be top-class against both pace and spin in overseas Tests. There was a time when India's top four were similarly capable as well, but they didn't always have the bowling support to convert their batting class into victories. Dale Steyn and Co have ensured that South Africa don't face that problem, and the result is a well-deserved top spot in Test cricket. The challenge now will be to ensure they don't slip up like India and England did.

South Africa's top batsmen v pace and spin in overseas Tests (excl. B'desh and Zim)
Batsman Pace-runs Dismissals Average Spin-runs Dismissals Average
Hashim Amla 1457 20 72.85 1029 16 64.31
AB de Villiers 1176 15 78.40 963 15 64.20
Jacques Kallis 950 20 47.50 1107 16 69.18
Graeme Smith 1431 24 59.62 817 18 45.38

S Rajesh is stats editor of ESPNcricinfo. Follow him on Twitter

Comments have now been closed for this article

  • Rahul on August 25, 2012, 19:49 GMT

    Can anybody tel me if any team from subcontinent other than India has ever reache to number 1ranking in test

  • Dummy4 on August 25, 2012, 6:54 GMT

    Can someone show this to David Kendi and ask him why SA are not WAY ahead of the rest on the rankings table? Why do teams like England and India, that play many more tests at home than away, get such a huge advantage in the rankings?

  • Premanand on August 25, 2012, 5:34 GMT

    SA are by far the consistent team in the last 6 years and the above stats are no surprise to all of us. They should have been No.1 in 2010 itself but for the loss in Kolkatta in the penultimate over of the match (to draw the series 1-1) and beacuse of which India barely managed to nose ahead of SA in the rankings. If SA had drawn that series they would have been No.1 in 2010 itself and would have remained No.1 till now and Eng would have not have even reached the No.1 rankings. It was merely bad luck coupled with some strange approach by SAF that delayed their march towards No.1 ranking. However, they will find stiff challenge from AUS, ENG and may be India in the next 2 to 3 years. Well done SAF & SMITH & GARY KIRSTEN

  • Babaji on August 25, 2012, 4:27 GMT

    I believe South Africans are true No. 1 after 2 years of non-deserving teams at the helm. India and England's record speak for itself. They have not managed to convincingly win any away series with credible opposition. I truly hope that South Africa manage to remain on top, they have a tendency to lose in Asia regardless of how good they are performing elsewhere. Good luck!!

  • Dummy4 on August 25, 2012, 3:57 GMT

    South africa wont be the number 1 after their sl tour next year

  • Dummy4 on August 25, 2012, 2:56 GMT

    @cenitin, India did well btw 2003 and 2008 in overseas, bcos there were Ganguly, Kumble in the team. Also Except Pakistan tour in 2004 where Shewag scored triple century and dravid a double century; Aussie tour in 2003-04 where Dravid, Laxman scored lot of runs while Ganguly, Sachin has scored centuries, in most of series Indian batsmen never scored "BIG Daddy Hundreds" in Overseas.

    India never looked team to win any series even btw 2003-2008 and they relied heavily on magical innings from batsmen to score Match winning knocks. Compare this to SA from 2006; Amla, AB, Smith were exceptionally gud batters while Steyn, Philander (for one year or so), Pollock were great bowlers..

    So, Overseas records of India doesn't tell true story; We lack bowling unit to take 20 wickets in overseas. And in future, Indian Pacers wont pick 5 wickets/inn or 10 wickets/match on regular basis.

  • Rex on August 25, 2012, 1:20 GMT

    test_cricket_is_real_cricke Wrong! India was only ranked No.1 from December 09 until July 11, a mere 20 months.

  • Gez on August 24, 2012, 23:20 GMT

    Thanks for this article. I think far too much focus in recent times has been placed on short-term results and meaningless rankings. In the history of cricket, everyone knew who the best team was, simply by virtue of good performances over a 4 or 5 year period. Everyone knew the West Indies were the best from 1977-93, while Australia was the best team in the world from 1994-2007. Since the retirements of McGrath and Warne in early '07, South Africa have risen to become the No.1 team. England and India may have been top of the rankings, but IMO were never the 'true' No.1 as this article tends to support. Sure, these two teams might have performed exceptionally well over shorter time frames at various points (over 2 years), but South Africa have proven excellence over a longer period IMO, and are a much more adaptable team in all conditions.

  • Prashan on August 24, 2012, 19:02 GMT

    South Africans are no doubt the best test team in the world today. Yes their last overseas test series loss was in Sri Lanka in 2006. Saffers have actually lost 3 out of their last 4 tests in Sri Lanka as they lost the test series in SL 1-0 in 2004 (2 test match series). They are due to visit SL in July next year and I know it will be tough for us but still we Lankans hopefully can trouble them with spin. Our test record against SA is far better than our woeful test record against Aussies.

  • kanishka on August 24, 2012, 19:00 GMT

    India's devastating losses in England and Australia have distorted what used to be a fairly respectable record. However, there is no denying that India has trouble winning series overseas. That is where the lack of technique and skill become obvious. The Rainas and Yuvraj's of the world have to prove themselves in Perth and Headingley before we can be world class contenders, and our bowlers like Kumble and Zaheer have to be able to take wickets everywhere.

  • No featured comments at the moment.