Guest Column Guest ColumnRSS FeedFeeds  | Archives

Bowling in India? Don't get bored

The former Australia quick on what a fast bowler needs to do to succeed in hostile Indian conditions

Jason Gillespie

November 22, 2012

Comments: 21 | Text size: A | A

Jason Gillespie sticks it out, New Zealand v Australia, 3rd Test, Auckland, 1st day
Jason Gillespie played in the last touring team to win a Test series in India Hamish Blair / © Getty Images
Enlarge
Related Links

Patience is a just reward that comes after an Indian tour.

As a fast bowler, you know you have to work incredibly hard for your wickets in tough conditions there. The pitches do not offer a lot of assistance; the ball is not doing a lot through the air and off the pitch. Batsmen can hit through the line, safe in the knowledge that the ball is not going to do too much. And you are bowling against some of the best batsmen in the world. So your margin for error is minimal.

In 2001, during that great Test series involving India and Australia, our plans were to go about things like we did in Australia: bowl in the channel outside the off stump, bowl with extra men on the off side, build pressure and stay patient. That method is popularly known as bowling dry. Now that plan works really well in rest of the world, where there is a little bit of movement on and off the pitch and there is also a little bit of bounce and carry. In India that will not work, and during the memorable Kolkata Test we learned a valuable lesson.

We had done very well in Mumbai in the first Test, winning it inside three days. At Eden Gardens, though we made India follow-on, our plan to bowl in the channel did not work because the ball was not carrying to the wicketkeeper or slips and there was no sideways movement or swing through the air. So it was more difficult to create an opportunity. As for the batsman, he could just hit it at the top of the bounce, pierce a gap, and with the pace of the outfields in India, it would get to the boundary easily, even if you had a deep-point fielder. Also, by sticking to the off-side line, you take out the opportunities to get lbws and bowleds.

So, on our next visit in 2004-05, our plans changed. We decided to essentially bowl to the Indian batsmen's strengths. They like to whip the ball through the leg side. We felt that if we bowled straighter, the old you-miss-we-hit theory could be more effective. Having to hit every single ball that they faced meant we were in the game and we had success.

Another important part of our plan was making use of the knowledge that the Indian batsmen are more worried about their own personal contribution to our advantage. They are traditionally very good at running when they hit the ball, but not when running for their partner. The non-striker, having to work harder for his team-mate, was a little bit more tired and therefore more likely to make a mistake. So we made sure we were physically more agile in the field.

Shane Warne recently wrote about our primary plan on that tour (which he had devised): attacking bowling with defensive fields, and defensive bowling with attacking fields. As fast bowlers we thought that if we attacked by bowling straight at the stumps, maybe we could defend with our fields. So we had two midwickets in catching positions to snare anything in the air if the batsman went for the flick. And as defensive fielders, we pushed the mid-on a little bit deeper, equivalent to standing on the edge of the 30-metre circle as in a one-dayer, and then we had square leg and fine leg out. We were trying to dry up the boundaries with those fields.

But before deploying any strategy, what fast bowlers need to understand quickly is, the SG ball, which is used in India, does not swing for long. If you took an SG ball to England, it would swing for a lot longer, but in the subcontinent even a Kookaburra or Dukes ball will not swing for long. This certainly has to do with the conditions, but the key is still to move the ball.

We did not use conventional swing and relied more on using the cross-seam a lot. We were looking to scuff it up a lot quicker, in order to get reverse swing. Zaheer Khan does that. And it worked quite well.

Once it starts to reverse, you can then start attacking the stumps by bowling from both over and around the wicket; you can vary your length (as Aakash Chopra mentions in a recent piece) and make use of the angles at the crease when you deliver the ball.

 
 
If it is not really doing anything, then you just need to settle in, bash the pitch hard, be patient and continue to strive to bowl as many dot balls as you can
 

Sometimes when the pitch is not doing anything and the ball takes two bounces to reach the wicketkeeper, it can be quite de-motivating. So holding back your pace can potentially be a better option rather than trying to bang the ball into the pitch only for it to just sit up and be hit. If you are going to bowl fast on such pitches, you need to bowl a lot fuller, giving the ball a chance to move through the air, especially if it is reversing. But if it is not really doing anything, then on any pitch around the world, you just need to settle in, bash the pitch hard, be patient and continue to strive to bowl as many dot balls as you can.

In those conditions, your best ball is the length ball, and what you need to do as a bowler is be prepared to bowl that as many times as you can throughout the course of the day and not get bored doing it. That is the key because the batsman is waiting for you to get bored, waiting for you to do something different so he can score some runs. The batsmen will be willing to just block, block, block, if you are bowling that good-length ball. So you need to be really disciplined, really patient and build that pressure and get the batsman to do something he really does not want to do.

As for bashing the pitch, the speed really varies. Zaheer bowls at 130kph, while Umesh Yadav runs in hits the deck hard, nudging 140kph, as does Ishant Sharma. But the speed is not the whole factor. It is actually having the discipline to bowl the ball in the right spot on the pitch over and over again that is more important.

A lot of pundits have suggested bowling the cutter is a very good ploy on the flat tracks of India. I did try it myself but I realised my pace varied a lot when I ran my fingers across the seam. It was my slower ball, the cutter, and I didn't bowl it a lot. If anything, I changed the seam position - holding the seam pointing towards fine leg or gully, just to try something different. That is what I mean by variation. Not by bowling at a different spot on a pitch.

From what I saw, the England fast bowlers were never consistent with their lines and lengths in the first Test. That is all it was. Obviously the Indian batsmen played the England seamers really well. The England fast bowlers got bored quickly and tried a lot of different things rather than just settling in and bowling disciplined lines and lengths.

You always have to have a mindset of how you are going to take a wicket. The first and only question a captain needs to ask his fast bowler when he hands him the ball: how are you trying to get the batsman out? That is how you win matches: always keep thinking "wickets".

Jason Gillespie, currently the first-team coach at Yorkshire, played seven Tests in India, taking 33 wickets at 21.72. Among fast bowlers who've played at least 5 Tests in India since 2000, only Glenn McGrath (19.90) and Dale Steyn (20.23) have a better average

RSS Feeds: Jason Gillespie

© ESPN Sports Media Ltd.

Posted by kaidranzer on (November 24, 2012, 19:31 GMT)

If the plan works, it's a masterstroke. If it doesn't, never mention it again, eh? The australians did not win because of their "plan". They won because the Indians were pathetic. So Jason Gillespie, please don't try to say you figured things out. You were an average bowler in the company of great bowlers.

Posted by paraloid on (November 24, 2012, 9:25 GMT)

Fantastic piece. Even as a non player but devoted follower I found it immensely interesting. Please more commentary like this instead of the typical meaningless waffle as cited by @Dark_Harlequin.

Posted by Sanawana on (November 23, 2012, 13:59 GMT)

Jason's a great coach and he was a great bowler. It's good to read the champions of Australian dominance and the way they used to think, gives you a better perspective.

Posted by Harlequin. on (November 23, 2012, 12:47 GMT)

Fantastic article, very rare do you read detailed insights like this. Most of the time you just hear things like 'if you bowl to your field and hit the right lengths then you will get wickets', which are so vague that you wonder if the person saying it actually understands! It can be used as further evidence that broad should not be in the current England side; patience takes maturity, and maturity is something that Broad don't got!

Posted by ab_cricket on (November 23, 2012, 11:38 GMT)

Excellent read! Don't know how much the English bowlers will learn from this.

Posted by ooper_cut on (November 23, 2012, 11:13 GMT)

The only man to have been dropped from a test side after getting a double hundred in his last game.

Posted by popcorn on (November 23, 2012, 11:02 GMT)

If India makes pitches ike they made at Mumbai 2004,and the ICC honours them fot it, bowlerts will never get bored in India. Especially Michael Clarke who got 6 for 9. By the way, that match got over in 2 and a half days.

Posted by bighit14 on (November 23, 2012, 10:46 GMT)

A good strategy makes a good bowler and this is a perfect example

Posted by azzaman333 on (November 23, 2012, 9:41 GMT)

As always, Warne is shown to be 2 steps ahead of everyone else on the cricket field. And Gillespie and McGrath were the perfect partnership, with the capable support of Kasprowicz, to execute those plans.

Posted by   on (November 23, 2012, 9:09 GMT)

I used to be his big fan. A legend from the Aussie dominance era! It also gives an insight how mentally strong the Aussies were on the top, no matter what the conditions they stuck to their plans and remained hungry for wickets and runs.

Comments have now been closed for this article

FeedbackTop
Email Feedback Print
Share
E-mail
Feedback
Print
Jason GillespieClose

    'Haven't seen anyone play as straight as Sachin'

My XI: Martin Crowe on Tendulkar's finely calibrated footwork

    The importance of being insatiable

Rob Steen: Careers tend to blossom or fizzle out depending on a sportsman's craving for success

    In the ring with Adam Hollioake

On the Road: Arya Yuyutsu picks a fight with the former England cricket captain turned pro-boxer. Because he's that daft

    The two faces of James Anderson

Sidharth Monga: Why does the man who is possibly England's greatest fast bowler occasionally turn into Mr Hyde on the field?

Younis Khan: unsung and endearing

Hassan Cheema: Despite being part of a dysfunctional set-up, he has managed to get the best out of himself and his partners

News | Features Last 7 days

How bad must a defeat be to be unacceptable?

A gutting loss to England, after leading the series 1-0, has thrown up some glaring inadequacies in the Indian team but there is little being said or done in terms of improvement

Role model Moeen setting high standard

His rapid improvement with the ball has been integral to England coming from behind to lead the series - but that is just one area where Moeen Ali continues to impress

'We watched cricket, we talked cricket'

On the eve of Mahela Jayawardene's final Test, his team-mate, best friend and fellow batting superstar Kumar Sangakkara speaks about what made him, and them, tick

Time to liberate MS Dhoni

After 8-0, MS Dhoni could look forward to building a team from scratch; now, there is nothing left for him to contribute. Free him from the Test captaincy and he could yet give back in other ways

Dhoni's control test

For all MS Dhoni's many trophies and accomplishments, Test cricket continues to resist his magic and indefinitely postpone his motorbike ride into the sunset

News | Features Last 7 days

    How bad must a defeat be to be unacceptable? (127)

    A gutting loss to England, after leading the series 1-0, has thrown up some glaring inadequacies in the Indian team but there is little being said or done in terms of improvement

    Time to liberate MS Dhoni (109)

    After 8-0, MS Dhoni could look forward to building a team from scratch; now, there is nothing left for him to contribute. Free him from the Test captaincy and he could yet give back in other ways

    Should Dhoni focus on one-day cricket? (78)

    His decisions in the England series have seemed to confirm that he does not care too much for the Test game. Maybe he should be concentrating on the World Cup

    Dhoni's control test (71)

    For all MS Dhoni's many trophies and accomplishments, Test cricket continues to resist his magic and indefinitely postpone his motorbike ride into the sunset

    One-day barrier to Indian Test progress (56)

    With too great an emphasis on limited-overs cricket, MS Dhoni's side have a set of skills and a level of concentration that are not commensurate with the necessities of Tests