Guest Column Guest ColumnRSS FeedFeeds  | Archives

Bowling in India? Don't get bored

The former Australia quick on what a fast bowler needs to do to succeed in hostile Indian conditions

Jason Gillespie

November 22, 2012

Comments: 21 | Text size: A | A

Jason Gillespie sticks it out, New Zealand v Australia, 3rd Test, Auckland, 1st day
Jason Gillespie played in the last touring team to win a Test series in India Hamish Blair / © Getty Images
Related Links

Patience is a just reward that comes after an Indian tour.

As a fast bowler, you know you have to work incredibly hard for your wickets in tough conditions there. The pitches do not offer a lot of assistance; the ball is not doing a lot through the air and off the pitch. Batsmen can hit through the line, safe in the knowledge that the ball is not going to do too much. And you are bowling against some of the best batsmen in the world. So your margin for error is minimal.

In 2001, during that great Test series involving India and Australia, our plans were to go about things like we did in Australia: bowl in the channel outside the off stump, bowl with extra men on the off side, build pressure and stay patient. That method is popularly known as bowling dry. Now that plan works really well in rest of the world, where there is a little bit of movement on and off the pitch and there is also a little bit of bounce and carry. In India that will not work, and during the memorable Kolkata Test we learned a valuable lesson.

We had done very well in Mumbai in the first Test, winning it inside three days. At Eden Gardens, though we made India follow-on, our plan to bowl in the channel did not work because the ball was not carrying to the wicketkeeper or slips and there was no sideways movement or swing through the air. So it was more difficult to create an opportunity. As for the batsman, he could just hit it at the top of the bounce, pierce a gap, and with the pace of the outfields in India, it would get to the boundary easily, even if you had a deep-point fielder. Also, by sticking to the off-side line, you take out the opportunities to get lbws and bowleds.

So, on our next visit in 2004-05, our plans changed. We decided to essentially bowl to the Indian batsmen's strengths. They like to whip the ball through the leg side. We felt that if we bowled straighter, the old you-miss-we-hit theory could be more effective. Having to hit every single ball that they faced meant we were in the game and we had success.

Another important part of our plan was making use of the knowledge that the Indian batsmen are more worried about their own personal contribution to our advantage. They are traditionally very good at running when they hit the ball, but not when running for their partner. The non-striker, having to work harder for his team-mate, was a little bit more tired and therefore more likely to make a mistake. So we made sure we were physically more agile in the field.

Shane Warne recently wrote about our primary plan on that tour (which he had devised): attacking bowling with defensive fields, and defensive bowling with attacking fields. As fast bowlers we thought that if we attacked by bowling straight at the stumps, maybe we could defend with our fields. So we had two midwickets in catching positions to snare anything in the air if the batsman went for the flick. And as defensive fielders, we pushed the mid-on a little bit deeper, equivalent to standing on the edge of the 30-metre circle as in a one-dayer, and then we had square leg and fine leg out. We were trying to dry up the boundaries with those fields.

But before deploying any strategy, what fast bowlers need to understand quickly is, the SG ball, which is used in India, does not swing for long. If you took an SG ball to England, it would swing for a lot longer, but in the subcontinent even a Kookaburra or Dukes ball will not swing for long. This certainly has to do with the conditions, but the key is still to move the ball.

We did not use conventional swing and relied more on using the cross-seam a lot. We were looking to scuff it up a lot quicker, in order to get reverse swing. Zaheer Khan does that. And it worked quite well.

Once it starts to reverse, you can then start attacking the stumps by bowling from both over and around the wicket; you can vary your length (as Aakash Chopra mentions in a recent piece) and make use of the angles at the crease when you deliver the ball.

If it is not really doing anything, then you just need to settle in, bash the pitch hard, be patient and continue to strive to bowl as many dot balls as you can

Sometimes when the pitch is not doing anything and the ball takes two bounces to reach the wicketkeeper, it can be quite de-motivating. So holding back your pace can potentially be a better option rather than trying to bang the ball into the pitch only for it to just sit up and be hit. If you are going to bowl fast on such pitches, you need to bowl a lot fuller, giving the ball a chance to move through the air, especially if it is reversing. But if it is not really doing anything, then on any pitch around the world, you just need to settle in, bash the pitch hard, be patient and continue to strive to bowl as many dot balls as you can.

In those conditions, your best ball is the length ball, and what you need to do as a bowler is be prepared to bowl that as many times as you can throughout the course of the day and not get bored doing it. That is the key because the batsman is waiting for you to get bored, waiting for you to do something different so he can score some runs. The batsmen will be willing to just block, block, block, if you are bowling that good-length ball. So you need to be really disciplined, really patient and build that pressure and get the batsman to do something he really does not want to do.

As for bashing the pitch, the speed really varies. Zaheer bowls at 130kph, while Umesh Yadav runs in hits the deck hard, nudging 140kph, as does Ishant Sharma. But the speed is not the whole factor. It is actually having the discipline to bowl the ball in the right spot on the pitch over and over again that is more important.

A lot of pundits have suggested bowling the cutter is a very good ploy on the flat tracks of India. I did try it myself but I realised my pace varied a lot when I ran my fingers across the seam. It was my slower ball, the cutter, and I didn't bowl it a lot. If anything, I changed the seam position - holding the seam pointing towards fine leg or gully, just to try something different. That is what I mean by variation. Not by bowling at a different spot on a pitch.

From what I saw, the England fast bowlers were never consistent with their lines and lengths in the first Test. That is all it was. Obviously the Indian batsmen played the England seamers really well. The England fast bowlers got bored quickly and tried a lot of different things rather than just settling in and bowling disciplined lines and lengths.

You always have to have a mindset of how you are going to take a wicket. The first and only question a captain needs to ask his fast bowler when he hands him the ball: how are you trying to get the batsman out? That is how you win matches: always keep thinking "wickets".

Jason Gillespie, currently the first-team coach at Yorkshire, played seven Tests in India, taking 33 wickets at 21.72. Among fast bowlers who've played at least 5 Tests in India since 2000, only Glenn McGrath (19.90) and Dale Steyn (20.23) have a better average

RSS Feeds: Jason Gillespie

© ESPN Sports Media Ltd.

Posted by kaidranzer on (November 24, 2012, 19:31 GMT)

If the plan works, it's a masterstroke. If it doesn't, never mention it again, eh? The australians did not win because of their "plan". They won because the Indians were pathetic. So Jason Gillespie, please don't try to say you figured things out. You were an average bowler in the company of great bowlers.

Posted by paraloid on (November 24, 2012, 9:25 GMT)

Fantastic piece. Even as a non player but devoted follower I found it immensely interesting. Please more commentary like this instead of the typical meaningless waffle as cited by @Dark_Harlequin.

Posted by Sanawana on (November 23, 2012, 13:59 GMT)

Jason's a great coach and he was a great bowler. It's good to read the champions of Australian dominance and the way they used to think, gives you a better perspective.

Posted by Harlequin. on (November 23, 2012, 12:47 GMT)

Fantastic article, very rare do you read detailed insights like this. Most of the time you just hear things like 'if you bowl to your field and hit the right lengths then you will get wickets', which are so vague that you wonder if the person saying it actually understands! It can be used as further evidence that broad should not be in the current England side; patience takes maturity, and maturity is something that Broad don't got!

Posted by ab_cricket on (November 23, 2012, 11:38 GMT)

Excellent read! Don't know how much the English bowlers will learn from this.

Posted by ooper_cut on (November 23, 2012, 11:13 GMT)

The only man to have been dropped from a test side after getting a double hundred in his last game.

Posted by popcorn on (November 23, 2012, 11:02 GMT)

If India makes pitches ike they made at Mumbai 2004,and the ICC honours them fot it, bowlerts will never get bored in India. Especially Michael Clarke who got 6 for 9. By the way, that match got over in 2 and a half days.

Posted by bighit14 on (November 23, 2012, 10:46 GMT)

A good strategy makes a good bowler and this is a perfect example

Posted by azzaman333 on (November 23, 2012, 9:41 GMT)

As always, Warne is shown to be 2 steps ahead of everyone else on the cricket field. And Gillespie and McGrath were the perfect partnership, with the capable support of Kasprowicz, to execute those plans.

Posted by   on (November 23, 2012, 9:09 GMT)

I used to be his big fan. A legend from the Aussie dominance era! It also gives an insight how mentally strong the Aussies were on the top, no matter what the conditions they stuck to their plans and remained hungry for wickets and runs.

Posted by Alexk400 on (November 23, 2012, 8:32 GMT)

Excellant insight into bowling plans.

Posted by   on (November 23, 2012, 7:14 GMT)

Some insights from Imran, Wasim and Waqar would be nice. After all, theres no fast bowlers who've bowled better in Subcontinent conditions.

Posted by himohan007 on (November 23, 2012, 6:02 GMT)

Well written article miles better than Akash Chopra's. He is also the one of the successful pace bowler in India along his team mate McGrath.

Posted by   on (November 23, 2012, 5:30 GMT)

I love you Man!! You were the best bowler of recent time. Better than McGrath and Lee. Glad you took up the coach job as you would be able to give cricket something to look up for. You always made my day watching you bowling with those BIG mullets, I even kept them :) so you can imagine how big a fan I am. I even played with you twice, You hit me on chin while bowling :P but I LOVE THAT as I am the luckiest :)

Posted by unregisteredalien on (November 23, 2012, 5:04 GMT)

Sooooo, why wasn't Dizzy in the frame to replace McDermott as Australia's bowling coach? Does DeWinter really have better insights than these?

Posted by Bigizzy on (November 22, 2012, 23:43 GMT)

Best analysis I have read of how to bowl to Indian batsmen in India. Also I think big credit to Warne for coming up with the innovative strategy.

Posted by InsideHedge on (November 22, 2012, 22:48 GMT)

A world class bowler, so you read what he writes. Simples.

Posted by   on (November 22, 2012, 21:42 GMT)

Awesome Article..loved the detailed explanation by one of the greats of the game..The aussies understand what they are trying to do and learn from their mistakes..The kolkata test was not a failure for Jason..rather a learning for the Whole team..They did lose the test..but came back stronger and with a different set of plans...which worked for them..May be thats why they are one of the greatest sides in the world...i am saying this inspite of being a hardcore indian fan..because i love the sport and i like the intelligence put into the use before execution.

Posted by the_blue_android on (November 22, 2012, 21:11 GMT)

what a bowler! he would have been one of the greats if not for his fragile body!

Posted by   on (November 22, 2012, 20:26 GMT)

fantastic article from a fantastic bowler..

Posted by   on (November 22, 2012, 20:24 GMT)

Dizzy's right, dot after dot after dot, the less you have to chase the greater the control on the game.

Comments have now been closed for this article

Email Feedback Print
Jason GillespieClose

    Ronchi's blitz, and remarkable ODI recoveries

Ask Steven: Also, the fastest ODI 150s, and the highest Test totals without a half-century

    Penalty runs the best punishment for slow over rates

Ashley Mallett: Fines and suspensions have had no effect. Awarding the opposition runs for every over a team falls short in a Test innings will definitely bite harder

    Pietersen stars in his own muppet show

David Hopps: KP's rubbishing of many aspiring English county professionals brings to mind the belief of Miss Piggy that "there is no one in the world to compare with moi"

    How to construct an ODI chase

Michael Bevan: Focus on targets smaller than winning the match, and back your tailenders to deliver for you

The many crickets of an Indian boyhood

Sankaran Krishna: Growing up in India, you play a number of varieties of the game, each developing a certain skill

News | Features Last 7 days

Kohli at No. 4 - defensive or practical?

It seems Virat Kohli is to not bat before the 12th or 13th over to strengthen the middle and the lower middle order. It suggests a lack of confidence in what was supposed to be India's strength in their title defence: their batting

Open with Rohit and Binny, with Kohli at No. 3

India's batting is going the way of their bowling in Australia, and they need get their order sorted before the World Cup

Off-stump blues leave Dhawan flailing

The out-of-form Shikhar Dhawan still has the backing of his captain, but there's no denying his slump has arrived at an inconvenient time for India and his technical issues have to be sorted out before they attempt to defend the World Cup

On TV it looks uglier than it actually is

Often reasonable arguments on the field look nasty beyond the boundary and on camera

'Teams can't have set formula' - Dravid

In the first episode of Contenders, a special ten-part buildup to the 2015 World Cup, Rahul Dravid and Graeme Smith discuss the impact of local conditions on team compositions and the issues surrounding the format of the tournament

News | Features Last 7 days