| Series | Countries | Live Scores | Fixtures | Results | News |
Features
|
Photos | Video & Audio | Blogs | Statistics | Archive | Games | Mobile | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
Dale Steyn's stats in Test wins are second to none; for West Indies, wins in Australia have completely dried up since 2000
February 8, 2013
![]()
|
|||
|
Related Links
Numbers Game : Last week's column: When the going gets tough...
Players/Officials:
Dale Steyn
Series/Tournaments:
Pakistan tour of South Africa
Teams:
South Africa
| West Indies
|
|||
In the Johannesburg Test against Pakistan, Dale Steyn bagged the most inexpensive ten-for ever by a South African bowler in Tests: he gave away only 60 for his 11 wickets, which, in terms of runs conceded, was 31% lower than the next best, Peter Pollock's 10 for 87 against England in 1965. The win was the 33rd in Steyn's Test career, which is exactly as many as Allan Donald achieved in his career, but Steyn has 38 more wickets from those matches. That match-winning act was also a quick reminder that, after a slightly below-par 2012 - he took 39 wickets in ten Tests at 29.71 - he is back at his best in 2013.
South Africa's bowling attack has several go-to options, especially since the meteoric rise of Vernon Philander over the last year, but Steyn still remains the main act. When he bowls well and is among the wickets, the match result is seldom anything other than a South African win. Steyn's bowling average in the 33 Test wins that he has been a part of is a stunning 15.79; in the 30 Tests that South Africa have either drawn or lost, Steyn has only managed 98 wickets at 38.48.
As a match-winner, Steyn is quickly climbing the rungs among the best there have ever been. Only eight bowlers have taken more wickets in Test wins, but among those with 150 wickets in wins, just two have a better average, while none have a strike rate as good as Steyn's 29.9 balls per wicket. Among South Africans, only Makhaya Ntini has taken more Test wickets in wins, but his tally of 233 is one that Steyn can overtake if he has another Test like the one at the Wanderers. As it stands, Ntini has featured in 17 more wins than Steyn, but he has only eight more wickets.
Despite being a part of a side that has had other top-class bowlers, Steyn has still taken a high percentage of wickets in wins. His tally of 225 in 33 wins means he averages 6.82 wickets per Test, which is next only to Muttiah Muralitharan (8.11 wickets per Test in wins) and Richard Hadlee (7.86). Murali took a whopping 438 wickets in 54 Test victories at 16.18, and while 21 of those wins were against Bangladesh and Zimbabwe, even excluding those games, he finished with 269 wickets from 33, at an average of 17.89 runs per wicket, and 8.15 wickets per Test. Hadlee had the best average and the second-best wickets-per-Test ratio among the bowlers who took 150 wickets in wins, but even he once went wicketless in victory: against England at Headingley in 1983, he bowled 47 overs without striking once, even as Lance Cairns, Ewen Chatfield and Jeremy Coney shared the spoils in a five-wicket win. Steyn's poorest match haul in a win is one wicket, against Bangladesh in Centurion in 2008 - the only batsman he dismissed was the No. 10, Shahadat Hossain.
| Bowler | Tests | Wickets | Average | Strike rate | 5WI/ 10WM | Wkts per Test |
| Richard Hadlee | 22 | 173 | 13.06 | 33.5 | 17/ 8 | 7.86 |
| Imran Khan | 26 | 155 | 14.50 | 38.3 | 11/ 6 | 5.96 |
| Dale Steyn | 33 | 225 | 15.79 | 29.9 | 17/ 5 | 6.82 |
| Muttiah Muralitharan | 54 | 438 | 16.18 | 42.7 | 41/ 18 | 8.11 |
| Malcolm Marshall | 43 | 254 | 16.78 | 38.1 | 17/ 4 | 5.91 |
| Allan Donald | 33 | 187 | 16.79 | 35.5 | 14/ 3 | 5.67 |
| Curtly Ambrose | 44 | 229 | 16.86 | 44.4 | 13/ 3 | 5.20 |
| Fred Trueman | 34 | 177 | 17.30 | 40.8 | 11/ 2 | 5.21 |
| Waqar Younis | 39 | 222 | 18.20 | 35.0 | 14/ 4 | 5.69 |
| Dennis Lillee | 31 | 203 | 18.27 | 39.0 | 17/ 6 | 6.55 |
| Shaun Pollock | 49 | 223 | 18.30 | 47.5 | 9/ 1 | 4.55 |
| Michael Holding | 31 | 152 | 18.36 | 40.1 | 6/ 1 | 4.90 |
| Wasim Akram | 41 | 211 | 18.48 | 42.3 | 13/ 2 | 5.15 |
| Anil Kumble | 43 | 288 | 18.75 | 44.4 | 20/ 5 | 6.70 |
| Lance Gibbs | 30 | 154 | 19.16 | 60.4 | 14/ 2 | 5.13 |
| Glenn McGrath | 84 | 414 | 19.19 | 47.7 | 18/ 3 | 4.93 |
| Courtney Walsh | 52 | 239 | 19.72 | 46.2 | 10/ 2 | 4.60 |
A big improvement in Steyn's stats over the last three years has been his distribution of wickets, more specifically his results against left-hand batsmen. Till around 2009, he clearly preferred bowling to right-handers: his average against them was almost twice as good as his average against left-hand batsmen.
While there isn't a huge improvement in his overall average since 2010 (21.20 compared to 23.97 till 2009), the stats against left-handers have improved significantly, from 35.98 to 23.14. Among the left-handers he has had success against recently are Narsingh Deonarine (four dismissals conceding 20 runs), Michael Hussey (three dismissals for 44), Alastair Cook (three for 94) and Chris Gayle (two dismissals for 50). Steyn's improved stats against left-handers have made him a more well-rounded bowler, and a bigger threat for opposition batsmen. That can only be good news for South African fans.
| Batsman type | Wickets | Average | Strike rate | Econ rate |
| Right-hand batsmen | 119 | 18.62 | 32.07 | 3.48 |
| Left-hand batsmen | 53 | 35.98 | 57.81 | 3.73 |
| Total | 172 | 23.97 | 40.0 | 3.59 |
| Batsman type | Wickets | Average | Strike rate | Econ rate |
| Right-hand batsmen | 109 | 20.45 | 40.51 | 3.02 |
| Left-hand batsmen | 42 | 23.14 | 45.21 | 3.07 |
| Total | 151 | 21.20 | 41.8 | 3.04 |
Winless in Australia
On November 23, 2000, West Indies were thumped by an innings and 126 runs at the Gabba in the first Test of the five-Test series in Australia. They lost all the Tests in that series, and the six ODIs that followed, and since then it has been one long losing spree for them in Australia. Since the beginning of 2000, and against all opposition excluding Zimbabwe and Bangladesh, West Indies have a 1-29 win-loss record in all international matches in Australia, their solitary victory coming against Pakistan in a VB Series match in 2005. Against Australia, West Indies have been winless in 30 international matches, losing 27, with one draw and two no-results.
West Indies' win-loss ratio of 0.03 in international matches in Australia is the poorest by a team in a particular country (excluding all matches involving Bangladesh and Zimbabwe). As the table below shows, not only do West Indies have the worst win-loss ratio in a country, they also have the second- and third-worst, in New Zealand and South Africa. That's a pretty telling comment on how badly West Indies have fallen away, especially when playing away from home.
| Team | Host | Matches | Win-loss | Ratio |
| West Indies | Australia | 33 | 1-29 | 0.03 |
| West Indies | New Zealand | 23 | 2-14 | 0.14 |
| West Indies | South Africa | 26 | 4-20 | 0.20 |
| New Zealand | India | 25 | 4-16 | 0.25 |
| South Africa | Sri Lanka | 23 | 5-16 | 0.31 |
| West Indies | Sri Lanka | 25 | 5-15 | 0.33 |
| Sri Lanka | India | 30 | 7-19 | 0.36 |
| Sri Lanka | South Africa | 36 | 9-25 | 0.36 |
| Pakistan | Australia | 33 | 9-24 | 0.37 |
| New Zealand | South Africa | 47 | 12-31 | 0.38 |
The table below shows the decline - first gradual, then steep - in West Indies' results in Australia, over five 33-match periods. In the period between 1980 and 1984, they won more than three times as many matches as they lost; between 1985 and 1988, they won twice as many as they lost. Those were the days when West Indies were clearly the dominant side in world cricket. Then followed a period of parity in the 1990s, when West Indies won about as many matches as they lost. Since 2000, though, the results have turned downright embarrassing.
| Period | Matches | Win-loss | Ratio |
| Jan 2000 onwards | 33 | 1-29 | 0.03 |
| 15 Dec 1992 - 31 Dec 1999 | 33 | 17-15 | 1.13 |
| 18 Nov 1988 - 14 Dec 1992 | 33 | 16-13 | 1.23 |
| 9 Nov 1984 - 17 Nov 1988 | 33 | 21-10 | 2.10 |
| 20 Jan 1980 - 8 Nov 1984 | 33 | 24-7 | 3.42 |
| ||||||
| Comments have now been closed for this article |
||||||
Stats editor Every week the Numbers Game takes a look at the story behind the stats, with an original slant on facts and figures. The column is edited by S Rajesh, ESPNcricinfo's stats editor in Bangalore. He did an MBA in marketing, and then worked for a year in advertising, before deciding to chuck it in favour of a job which would combine the pleasures of watching cricket and writing about it. The intense office cricket matches were an added bonus.

Aakash Chopra: Apart from luck, you need to pick your team wisely, get to bat at the top, and have your captain's support
Fixing? It's people like us doing it
Ed Hawkins: It's convenient to blame the underworld for every instance of fixing, but it's ordinary punters behind many of them
The perils of scoffing at failure
Rob Steen: Excessive success can destroy inhibition, and hence the capacity for shame
New Zealand shaken and stirred
Andrew Alderson: The second-innings collapse at Lord's has revived concerns about New Zealand's top order
'Being an NZ fan is like being in an abusive relationship'
Beige Brigade: Taylor Swift's songs would speak to any Kiwi cricket fan right now
A talent that didn't know its own worth
Sreesanth wasn't the most likeable team-mate or opponent, but he had skill beyond doubt, which we might have seen the last of
Even at the height of his success with the national side, Sreesanth was a lonely cricketer who felt hard done by
Pollard sledges Watson, Dravid is angry
Plays of the day from the IPL match between Mumbai Indians and Rajasthan Royals in Mumbai
A time for anger, a time for action
Out of the shattered lives of three young men caught up in allegations of fraud, newer and stronger players must emerge
Mumbai Indians still have a better head-to-head record against Chennai Super Kings, but once again on the big occasion, they came second
Mumbai Indians still have a better head-to-head record against Chennai Super Kings, but once again on the big occasion, they came second
Even at the height of his success with the national side, Sreesanth was a lonely cricketer who felt hard done by
Spirited Sunrisers exceed expectations (53)
Sunrisers began this tournament as one of the underdogs, but fought impressively to reach as far as the Eliminator
Anderson's magic not to be missed (50)
None of the other three England bowlers with 300 Test wickets - or many other of the game's finest swing merchants - could have bowled better than James Anderson at Lord's
A case of peaking too early (41)
Royal Challengers began the season in full steam, but failed to replicate their consistency away from home
ICICI Bank M2I. Register Now and Get A Gift Offer.
Safe & simple online money transfer. Apply Now!
Buy Wisden 2013 & get a FREE Playfair
Available now at Cricshop
Beside the Clive LLoyd era,WI has not been an impressive side.Today more than ever they are exposing their inability to compete in world criket.I think the public especially west indians are concerned about the state of their cricket.As soon as LLoyd departed the scene WI cricket started to slide.Carl Hooper tried,but unfortunately he had to go.Under the present administration and coach things don't seem promising.
Posted by diri on (February 10, 2013, 10:21 GMT)@fastbowling and all the other people commenting saying that steyns average and strike rate is good because he plays most of his games in SA conditions...well in the same light we can say that if Jaques Kallis played most of his cricket in india he would have an avearge of over 65 with more hundreds and runs than Sachin Tendulkar...Kallis would be the god of cricket and not Tendulkar??? am I right?? anyway I still think Kallis is the MVP in world cricket and the greatest cricketer of all time. its only in 20 years time when you look back you will realize I am right....KING KALLIS is the best.
Posted bySteyn is a great and has a couple more ears to become greater. Just love watching him bowl.
Posted by mcsdl on (February 9, 2013, 18:31 GMT)Greatest test bowlers in this order: Murali, Mcgrath, Ambrose, Marshall, Akram, Warne, Steyn, Hadlee, Waqar, Lilee, Donald, Pollock, Imran, Garner... Saying that Steyn has the potential the climb up the list. Downfall for Steyn will be other great bowlers were brilliant in both Tests and ODIs but Steyn is ordirany in ODIs...!
Posted by Soso_killer on (February 9, 2013, 12:56 GMT)I should add Steyn has a good average in ASIA, and does have an inswinger in his armour. Like SurlyCynic just said his outswinger is to deadly to an extent that he could not be bothered with anything else. If all these muppets you hail as greats because they had "more variation", why does a "limited" Steyn have a far superior strike rate to any bowler that has 200+ wickets?
Also keep in mind that this is a batsmen era, no uncovered pitches, a limited amount of short balls etc. Get a clue you guys!!
Posted by SurlyCynic on (February 9, 2013, 10:06 GMT)getsetgopk: If you think Steyn can't bowl reverse swing or inswing you obviously didn't see his 7-fer in Nagpur. Have a look online. His inswinger featured against NZ this year too, but obviously his outswinger is so effective he uses that most of the time. If you think he's still 'poor' against lefthanders you obviously didn't read the article above.
Posted by SamRoy on (February 9, 2013, 7:54 GMT)@GrindAR Sorry mate, the worst test cricket years were between 2002-2006 when apart from Australia (and for a brief period of one year 2004/05 England) nobody else had a good bowling attack. Pitches were flat (except in SA and sometimes in England and NZ) and everyone was having outrageously inflated batting averages.
Posted by aa61761 on (February 9, 2013, 5:16 GMT)@All Stern Fans - Stern has taken only one 5 for against Pakistan in Asia and only one 5 for against Sri Lanka in asia - and these were not any sizzling performances. Most of his Asian wickets are against India and in only two matches one 10 wicket haul. If you go test by test against India most of his wickets are Tail Enders, example,
Test # 1870 MS Dhoni† c †Boucher b Steyn A Kumble* b Steyn Harbhajan Singh b Steyn RP Singh b Steyn
Test # 1871 V Sehwag b Steyn R Dravid b Steyn Harbhajan Singh lbw b Steyn RP Singh c Smith b Steyn S Sreesanth b Steyn
Test # 1873 V Sehwag lbw b Steyn SC Ganguly c Amla b Steyn Harbhajan Singh lbw b Steyn
Do not count any wickets against Bangladesh. In his most recent tour of Asia he was a total flop.
Getting RP SINGH or S Sreesanth does not make for very good reading, you need to get Sehwag, Dravid, Tandulkar, etc. as bulk of your wickets to impress on Asian wickets.
Posted by getsetgopk on (February 9, 2013, 3:15 GMT)LIke I said before, the best chance to neutralize the Steyn threat is to pack the side with lefties. His stats against lefties is very very average if not down right poor. Proves one or two things, first, he swings the ball one way and thats all he can do. He doesn't have the inswinger or the off cutter and doesn't get any seam movement even on wickets helping seam bowling. He doesn't have the reverse swing so he's basically an average bowler once you play out the initial 20 overs as was shown by Pakistan in the 2nd innings at wonderers. But, since both the potential lefties, TAufeeq and Haris Sohail are injured there is not much hope other than to promote batsmen with sound technique to open the innings which is Jamshed with Azhar Ali.
Posted byI think if you put any of the modern greats on the pitches Lohman and Barnes bowled on, then you would find some seriously skewed stats emerging. Batting in those days was a nightmare. That is why they are not included.