David Hopps
David Hopps David HoppsRSS FeedFeeds  | Archives
UK editor, ESPNcricinfo

England v India, Champions Trophy, final, Edgbaston

ICC must never betray fans again

The lack of a reserve day for the Champions Trophy final was a huge let-down by the ICC

David Hopps

June 23, 2013

Comments: 100 | Text size: A | A

The crowd waited patiently for the rain to relent, England v India, Champions Trophy final, Edgbaston, June 23, 2013
The loyal supporters deserve better from the ICC © PA Photos
Enlarge

So the ICC just got away with it. The rain relented, we had a final to remember, and the fans went home happy. That will be the official view. There may even be some pats on administrators' backs. But it only tells half the story.

Yes, the rain relented, yes, we had a 20-over final to savour, and yes, India, the best team in the tournament, won and their supporters celebrated long into the night.

But the administrators should not get away with it. By staging a final without a reserve day, they messed with the fans and got lucky. They should never be allowed to do so again.

The official explanation is that there were only 17 days to stage the tournament, that there was "no wriggle room", and that bilateral tours take precedence. Are fans really expected to take such an explanation seriously?

You can praise the players for contesting a fluctuating final in difficult conditions. You can listen to people intellectualising about the amount of cricket played, and how difficult it is to cram spare days into the schedule.

You can retreat into comforting jokes about the essential awfulness of the English summer and even speculate that global warming could make it more unbearable than ever. You can listen to thousands of explanations about logistics, about what is possible and what is not.

None of that matters. Do not accept any explanation that you hear. The administrators need to understand that to stage the final of a major one-day tournament without a reserve day is as purblind as it gets.

If you do something, you have to do it properly. If you tell spectators that a tournament is important, and sell TV rights and tickets on that basis, there are basic standards you have to meet to try to bring it to a satisfactory conclusion.

We can all argue incessantly about the details: about how many sides should take part, how the groups should be drawn up, whether to pre-determine semi-final venues for the countries that qualify, how to choose between sides that finish on equal points.

We can argue about one white ball or two, about numbers in circles, whether to allow runners, whether balls can be bounced in to the stumps, how many bouncers in an over.

We can philosophise about whether the Champions Trophy really matters and whether essentially we would be better without it. But not to have a reserve day in a final is nonsense.

A final is what everyone has built up to for weeks. It justifies everything that has gone before. It justifies the efforts of the players and the dreams of the fans. Not to deliver this climax turns the entire tournament into a failure.

Shakespeare did not stop writing Hamlet after four acts because he had run out of time and he had to get on with The Merry Wives of Windsor. The football World Cup in Brazil will not end at the semi-final stage if the final is suspended because of a sudden cloudburst.

Even without an official reserve day, the authorities could have cobbled one together, as the rain fell, in case it was needed, with enough will and imagination.

Only five players in England's ODI squad are in the T20 squad to face New Zealand on Tuesday at The Oval. They have already ripped out virtually the entire Ashes squad. They could have removed a few more.

If India were about to catch a flight on the 24th to the Caribbean, for a triangular tournament against Sri Lanka and West Indies, they could have changed the flight. The first game is not until the 28th.

If there were not enough stewards, employ some. If they had no bar staff, close the bars. If the ICC officials had to get back to London for a meeting, then play the game without them. Tell them the result later.

If it rains for a week then you cannot do much about it. But by not including a reserve day, the administrators lost touch with the millions of fans who keep the game alive. They must never do so again.

David Hopps is the UK editor of ESPNcricinfo

RSS Feeds: David Hopps

© ESPN Sports Media Ltd.

Posted by TheOnlyEmperor on (June 26, 2013, 6:27 GMT)

It's in the news that England is planning to levy 3000 pound sterling for every visa application from India, Pakistan, Sri Lanka and Bangladesh... because these are apparently "high risk" countries. Clearly, this is one more reason why international cricket tournaments should not be held in England. No South Asian cricket fan would want to pay a deposit of 3000 pound sterling to enter England with awful weather and watch a cricket match that invariable struggles to go its entire course!

Posted by ultimatewarrior on (June 25, 2013, 7:26 GMT)

this is one of the best articles on problem a rain can cause and the possible solutions, also i will congratulate all players to give 100% without affecting from rain.....everybody was waiting for a good entertainment of 50-50 between two best teams of best structured tournament but even after giving 10 hrs we got a start stop T20 game....so why not we should try for some BEST solution like permanent roof top like Wimbledon for atleast places for tournament finals and semifinals.....I know it may cost very heavy (640Million Pound for Wimbledon)...but it will be less than what the cricket world had paid today.....

Posted by   on (June 25, 2013, 0:47 GMT)

No wonder ICC coffers are poorer than the top 3 major boards. As an avid cricket fan, i'm tired of bilateral series, they number in the hundreds these days and we are tired of watching them. India taking on Srilanka again!!! Please have TEST matches of WI VS INDIA , SL VS INDIA , SL VS WI .

Now thats a bilateral series!

Posted by Lermy on (June 25, 2013, 0:30 GMT)

Cricketers need to harden up. Give them football boots and raincoats and tell them to get on with it. I remember looking at a pitch under 2 inches of water and people seriously suggesting we give it half an hour before making a decision. Now that's the sort of attitude that built the British empire. If there's less than half an inch of surface water, play on sir!

Posted by JG2704 on (June 24, 2013, 22:38 GMT)

I've since heard that with the help of Courage/John Smiths/Kronenberg/Fosters and many others that ECB/ICC tried to organise an aftershow event. Unfortunately they failed and obviously it was not rescheduled

Please publish this time - too many ill comms , not enough light humour

Posted by alesana85 on (June 24, 2013, 22:07 GMT)

Totally agree with this article. This is what happens when TV money is put ahead of cricketing prestige. I don't take the 20/20 world cup seriously because of the farcical situation of having a 7 over innings per side match in the T20 world cup in Sri Lanka 2011 due to TV rights. Two years later the icc has stuck with the status quo & have almost shot themselves in the foot again! Despite this well written article, the fact that the icc has almost let this happen again does not give me confidence in future icc tournaments.

Comments have now been closed for this article

FeedbackTop
Email Feedback Print
Share
E-mail
Feedback
Print
David HoppsClose
David Hopps David Hopps joined ESPNcricinfo as UK editor early in 2012. For the previous 20 years he was a senior cricket writer for the Guardian and covered England extensively during that time in all Test-playing nations. He also covered four Olympic Games and has written several cricket books, including collections of cricket quotations. He has been an avid amateur cricketer since he was 12, and so knows the pain of repeated failure only too well. The pile of untouched novels he plans to read, but rarely gets around to, is now almost touching the ceiling. He divides his time between the ESPNcricinfo office in Hammersmith and his beloved Yorkshire.

    What is Rohit Sharma's role?

Should India have practised slip catching in the nets? Who will play at the G?

    'I'd like to have faced the West Indies quicks'

Northamptonshire's David Willey picks his ideal partner for a jungle expedition, and talks about his famous dad

    Benn shows up in body and spirit

Tony Cozier: The spinner has brought in a sense of discipline into his bowling and behaviour on the field since his Test comeback

    The return of Bob Simpson

Rewind: When the 41-year-old former captain came out of retirement to lead Australia against India

Why Steven Smith's here to stay

Russell Jackson: He has experienced captaincy at every level. Most admirably, he has managed to reinvent his game to succeed at the highest level

News | Features Last 7 days

What ails Rohit and Watson?

Both batsmen seemingly have buckets of talent at their disposal and the backing of their captains, but soft dismissals relentlessly follow both around the Test arena

The perfect Test

After the tragedy of Phillip Hughes' death, this match showed that cricket and life will continue to go on. This time Test cricket dug in and got through to tea.

Hazlewood completes quartet of promise

Josh Hazlewood has been on Australian cricket's radar since he was a teenager. The player that made a Test debut at the Gabba was a much-improved version of the tearaway from 2010

Australia in good hands under proactive Smith

The new stand-in captain has the makings of a long-term leader, given his ability to stay ahead of the game

Karn struggles to stay afloat

The failed gamble of handing Karn Sharma a Test debut despite him having a moderate first-class record means India have to rethink who their spinner will be

News | Features Last 7 days