Brydon Coverdale
Assistant editor, ESPNcricinfo

Australia news

Arthur's exit highlights deeper problem

Mickey Arthur's sacking, with just two weeks before the Ashes, is indicative of the current plight of the Australian team

Brydon Coverdale

June 24, 2013

Comments: 30 | Text size: A | A

Darren Lehmann sits in front of a statue of himself which was unveiled before the second day's play, Australia v India, 4th Test, Adelaide, 2nd day, January 25, 2012
Darren Lehmann won't have much time with the squad as the Ashes begin on July 10 © Getty Images
Enlarge

"What are we doing ????? Cricket ???? Adults we are , not schoolboys!"

Those words were tweeted by Darren Lehmann back in March after news emerged that four players on Australia's tour of India had been suspended for a Test over the so-called homework saga. It was an understandable sentiment from 10,000 kilometres away. The nine question-marks from the Twitter comment above accurately expressed the prevailing disbelief of cricket fans and former players alike. Now we're about to find out whether Lehmann has the answers.

Australia's coach Mickey Arthur admitted at the time that in taking such a harsh stance on the homework issue, he was putting his neck on the line. James Sutherland, Pat Howard and the Cricket Australia board have now lopped it off. That is not in itself remarkable, for few occupations have poorer job security than sports coaching. But the timing was jaw-dropping, much more so than the homework crisis, or the news that David Warner had punched an opponent.

Arthur had been coach of Australia for 578 days, yet 16 days before the first Ashes Test, Cricket Australia decided he was no longer the man for the job. It was a decisive move, but one that smacked of panic. In the past few months, Arthur has presided over a 4-0 thrashing in India and an early exit from the Champions Trophy, but this was a call made less on the basis of on-field results than of off-field direction. Or rather lack of it.

First there was the homework issue. Cricket Australia supported the stance taken by Arthur, Michael Clarke and team manager Gavin Dovey at the time, but also wondered how the so-called misdemeanours from the wider playing group had been allowed to build to such a degree. In banning Shane Watson, James Pattinson, Usman Khawaja and Mitchell Johnson from the Mohali Test, Arthur said Australia were drawing a line in the sand. Nobody seemed to recall where that line was when Warner punched Joe Root in a Birmingham pub this month.

Cricket Australia's displeasure at the handling of that incident was evident when the chief executive James Sutherland spoke about the whole squad and team management being responsible. Why were the players out drinking at 2.30am in the middle of a Champions Trophy campaign, he wondered. And why had it taken so long for word of the incident to filter back to CA headquarters?

The coach is responsible for what happens on a tour, but he is not the only one. Team culture is also directed by the captain, team manager, assistant coaches and senior players. Not to mention that in the aftermath of the Argus Report, Cricket Australia appointed a general manager of team performance, Pat Howard. The idea was that the buck would stop with him, yet he'll be there on Monday in Bristol to announce the sacking of the coach. A coach he played a key role in appointing.

Over the past few weeks, Arthur has had plenty on his plate, devising game plans and tactics for the Champions Trophy and the upcoming Ashes. That is not to say he is blameless for the direction this squad has taken; far from it. But it's hard not to see him as a scapegoat. All smiles in public, Arthur could deliver a spray when required, but there comes a time when the players must also be held accountable.

If Arthur did not gain respect from the players, that says as much about their attitudes as it does about the coach himself. When Arthur led South Africa he was in charge of a group full of hardened professionals who did not require serious disciplining. By contrast, this current crop has lacked leadership and self-governance. It will be fascinating, therefore, to see if Lehmann has any more success than Arthur.

Certainly he will have the respect of the players, as a former Test batsman, prolific first-class run scorer, successful coach and stereotypical Aussie bloke. But this job will be much, much harder than it might appear from the sidelines. It's all well and good to tweet about the players not being schoolboys, but Lehmann might discover they're acting like them.

Getting the players to take responsibility for themselves will be his biggest task. But on his side will be the fact that when he talks about what it means to play for Australia, when he delivers an impassioned statement about the responsibilities incumbent on those who wear the baggy green, they will listen.

He may be the right man for the job, but how Cricket Australia has let it come to this, two weeks from an Ashes series, is astounding. Australia's 1948 Ashes touring party went down in history as The Invincibles. It's up to Lehmann to ensure the 2013 squad is not remembered as The Uncoachables.

Brydon Coverdale is an assistant editor at ESPNcricinfo. He tweets here

RSS Feeds: Brydon Coverdale

© ESPN Sports Media Ltd.

Posted by BillyCC on (June 26, 2013, 2:18 GMT)

Warne was right in the period of Australian dominance that they didn't need a coach. The players were good enough. Darren Lehmann would have been a candidate then. But what if all your players are lacking quality (except for Clarke and maybe a couple of bowlers)? That's when you might actually need some real help. Sacking Arthur is not the answer. A lot of the current crop don't know how to play Test cricket. That was all on show in India. Of course, they don't get found out in this environment when there are only a few good teams (SA, England, and then India at home and that's about it). The Australians have had only two good results in the last three years and that was a Sri Lanka away series victory and a drawn series in South Africa. Everything else has been a non-challenge or a very poor result.

Posted by PutMarshyOn on (June 25, 2013, 15:07 GMT)

There would be scant talk of culture, leadership, and responsibilities if the team was any good. Painful as it is to admit it the current mob just aren't good enough to win the Ashes. It won't matter who is coach - Lehmann won't have to combat Anderson on a humid Nottingham morning or try to keep Pietersen quiet on an Oval shirt-front. 4-0 England, and that hurts, but that's what we get for prioritising fast-food cricket.

Posted by Un_Citoyen_Indien on (June 25, 2013, 14:32 GMT)

A bit of advice to the Aussies: Don't make the mistake of hiring a non-Australian as your coach again. It just won't work in the long run, especially keeping in mind the Aussie psyche that involves strong feelings of individualism, liberty and of course national pride. Australian cricketers probably find it a bit tedious to deal with non-Australian coaches.

Give your players plenty of rope (within reasonable curfews) and watch as they start to enjoy their cricket again. Cricket is more art than science, so do away with unimportant issues like 'skin fold tests', especially in test matches where they have reduced significance. A little bit of body fat shouldn't be a problem and in fact the odd pizza/ pastry can be incorporated into a positive and relaxing shared activity for the team, so encourage it by all means.

Why, if skin folds really were such an issue, you'd never have had fine cricketers like Lehmann, Boon, M. Hughes, 'Tubby' Taylor, Border, S. Waugh and of course, Warne.

Posted by Hammond on (June 25, 2013, 11:26 GMT)

Re-arranging the deck chairs on the Titanic!

Posted by CricketMaan on (June 25, 2013, 8:20 GMT)

Forget Boof, that lineup for 1st test Warner/Rogers, Cowan, Hughes, Clarke (injury prone), Watson, Smith, Haddin, Siddle, Starc, Pattinson, Lyon won't send shivers to England. Unless thier bowlers set it up for Aus, its not going to be easy for that line up to put a 400+ everytime they bat first to setup the game! I see 3-0 England with 2 washed out.

Posted by   on (June 25, 2013, 7:42 GMT)

in case of aussie current crisis.................. it's all about talent. in present team composition they haven't any class players like mark Waugh, Damien martyn, ponting, Andrew Simonds, McGrath and all. current AUS bunch is young of course but they haven't special edge that require to maintain the Australian dominance in world cricket. at the same time other cricketing nations also have the talents to challenge Australia in all formats of the game. it's easy to coach to handle the game if they have class and talent in their ranks. it is very unfair to compare between present team performance and past performance of mark taylor, ricky ponting era. coaches have nothing to do about execution of the game plan in the middle after all.

Posted by SamRoy on (June 25, 2013, 3:48 GMT)

@Edwards_Anderson You can have the best coach in the world, but if you do not have the talent, you will not be successful in the long term. Current Australian batting is quite bad and no really talented batsman is visible on the horizon (If Jordan Silk or Nic Maddinson were so good they would directly been in the team). Coaching is important but secondary. The players are primary.

Posted by Cricket_theBestGame on (June 25, 2013, 2:18 GMT)

arthur wasn't the right coach for aust. period. the problem is with cheif selector, pat howard and clarke himself. the argus review was supposed fix issues yet it has lead to more!

to discipline players, simple, one warning and then pack your bag and go home! there are plenty more players wanting to have a go.

who could forget alan border discplinig billy macdormat in Eng in a side match!

Comments have now been closed for this article

FeedbackTop
Email Feedback Print
Share
E-mail
Feedback
Print
Brydon CoverdaleClose
Brydon Coverdale Assistant Editor Possibly the only person to win a headline-writing award for a title with the word "heifers" in it, Brydon decided agricultural journalism wasn't for him when he took up his position with ESPNcricinfo in Melbourne. His cricketing career peaked with an unbeaten 85 in the seconds for a small team in rural Victoria on a day when they could not scrounge up 11 players and Brydon, tragically, ran out of partners to help him reach his century. He is also a compulsive TV game-show contestant and has appeared on half a dozen shows in Australia.

    It's not the plan, stupid

Ed Smith: Good performances make all plans look good. The better team on the day always wins, irrespective of what was strategised in the dressing room

    Original hits

ESPNcricinfo XI: A look at some of cricket's most memorable strokes - and their makers

    What is Rohit Sharma's role?

Should India have practised slip catching in the nets? Who will play at the G?

    'I'd like to have faced the West Indies quicks'

Northamptonshire's David Willey picks his ideal partner for a jungle expedition, and talks about his famous dad

The charm of the Boxing Day Test

Jonathan Wilson: It's special not just for the cricket, but also because it satisfies one of the tenets of Christmas - bringing people together

News | Features Last 7 days

What ails Rohit and Watson?

Both batsmen seemingly have buckets of talent at their disposal and the backing of their captains, but soft dismissals relentlessly follow both around the Test arena

Hazlewood completes quartet of promise

Josh Hazlewood has been on Australian cricket's radar since he was a teenager. The player that made a Test debut at the Gabba was a much-improved version of the tearaway from 2010

Australia in good hands under proactive Smith

The new stand-in captain has the makings of a long-term leader, given his ability to stay ahead of the game

Karn struggles to stay afloat

The failed gamble of handing Karn Sharma a Test debut despite him having a moderate first-class record means India have to rethink who their spinner will be

Vijay 144, Ganguly 144

Stats highlights from the first day of the second Test between Australia and India in Brisbane

News | Features Last 7 days