Ian Chappell
Ian Chappell Ian ChappellRSS FeedFeeds  | Archives
Former Australia captain, now a cricket commentator and columnist

Bowlers are becoming an endangered species in limited overs

Heavier bats, shorter boundaries, and the two new balls are killing the contest

Ian Chappell

October 20, 2013

Comments: 141 | Text size: A | A

Rohit Sharma and Virat Kohli celebrate India's win, India v Australia, 2nd ODI, Jaipur, October 16, 2013
Setting batting records at the cost of bowling doesn't help the game © BCCI

John Lennon's song "Give Peace a Chance" became the rally cry for anti-war protesters. Soon the refrain at cricket grounds could be: "Give bowlers a chance."

In the short forms of the game there's a chance bowlers will become an endangered species if the trend of heavier and better bats and shorter boundaries continues. This tendency has led to a surge in boundaries in general and sixes in particular. While this may sound like a favourable result in a game competing for the entertainment dollar, the long-term consequences may not be so desirable.

In the second ODI between India and Australia, 64% of the runs scored off the bat were accumulated in boundaries. Singles accounted for around 28% of the scoring - the majority of which would have been at the easier end of the scale, with the infielders back on the 30-yard circle - and about 43% of the deliveries were dot balls.

This means a reduced reliance on fielding and running between wickets - two of the more exciting skills in the game.

As the boundaries have been shortened and the bats have improved, the preference for power over artistry in batting has increased. Throw in abundant protective equipment, the prevalence of flat pitches, and the restrictions on bowlers and their field placings, and suddenly being a leather flinger is becoming about as attractive as eating a cold curry.

Even the new ball at each end isn't the advantage it first appears to be, as it reduces the chances of the old ball swinging, and the increased hardness means the batsmen can hit them further. Add a bit of outfield dew in the evening and that curry's looking really unpalatable.

However, administrators still aren't satisfied with their efforts to punish bowlers. The improvement in bats means the ball, once hit, travels faster. Hence there's a greater likelihood bowlers will be sconed by a straight drive. Additionally, the unfortunate fielders placed in a catching position 15 metres from the bat are more prone to hand injuries.

You can't blame the bowlers for thinking they are being served up as cannon fodder for the pampered batsmen.

More and more we're hearing commentators say: "The batsman is not frightened to take on the outfielders." That's because the odds favour them. But if sixes become even more prevalent, there's a danger the spectacle will become monotonous.

If batting skill is reduced to power-hitting, the bowlers will be less inclined to rely on guile for their wickets. There's no incentive for the faster bowlers to seek a length where the ball might swing, if sixes are constantly being crashed down the ground. Spinners too will be less inclined to employ flight to deceive batsmen.

We're already seeing the slower-ball bouncer and the wide yorker being regularly used to contain the hitting. Eventually bowlers will rely heavily on batsmen getting themselves out rather than on ambushing them.

The short-form games are designed for exciting close finishes. If huge first-innings totals become the norm, close finishes will become less prevalent, as the chasing team implodes, seeking an impossibly high run rate. Instead of fans who enjoy a contest, the game will attract spectators who would have revelled in the Lions-versus-Christians debacles.

Bowlers need to be offered a crumb in the shorter forms of the game otherwise they'll revolt, as they have done in the past, using extreme methods like Bodyline and chucking.

The problem is, bats can be further improved but little can be done to the ball to improve the bowler's lot. There must be consideration given to curbing the influence of the bat and placing more emphasis on the skill of the user. Making the boundaries fairer would be a good start.

Another move would be to redress the imbalance in the rewards system. Batsmen are being conditioned to believe rapid-fire boundaries bring bigger paydays than a well-constructed longer innings. Consequently they seek increased hitting power. If these trends continue, sooner or later the bowlers are going to declare war.

Former Australia captain Ian Chappell is now a cricket commentator for Channel 9, and a columnist

RSS Feeds: Ian Chappell

© ESPN Sports Media Ltd.

Posted by flickspin on (October 25, 2013, 16:30 GMT)

i love the modern game, its far more exciting than cricket 15 years ago.

i love the amount of sixes and fours. i like teams scoring 300 runs.

i reckon modern bats,smaller grounds and field restictions make the modern game exciting.

cricket should reward skill, i love the ramp shot, i love the switch hit and the bowlers being put under pressure.

i reckon in 10 years most batsmen will be able to switch hit.

i have no problem with using carbon fibre tape on the back of the bat, which the icc banned.

the icc should investigate ball science instead of 6 stitches(have 8 stitches) have a higher thicker seam(have a seam 5mm thick) or drill holes in the cork of the ball and fill with heavy and light substances( the ball still weighs 156g) but has weights in it so it dips,drifts and swings more.

having 2 new balls takes reverse swing out of the game but bowlers should able to get double the amount of conventional swing

i agree that 4 bowlers should to bowl 12 overs get rid of part timers

Posted by madvjs on (October 25, 2013, 13:11 GMT)

Mr rookie4u, I dont understand where does the BCCI come into the discussion here. This article is to highlight the massacre of bowlers by the ICC Technical team. 100% agree with Chapple here, the bowlers are being killed by constant change of rules. I am really struggling to understand why does cricketing rules need to be changed almost every year. What is ICC trying to achieve? A good game of cricket is about the equal contest between bat and ball and current rules are heavily stacked against bowlers. Few rules I never understood (after playing and following cricket for 25 odd years now) Legside wide in ODI: Ball misses legstump by a centimeter, its a wide, Why?? LBW: Ball pitches outside legstump, batsman is not out, even if the ball is hitting the stumps, Why? These are few rules that need to be reconsidered to make the contest even. There could be a minimum boundary rule of 75m but you can see the batsmen these days are hitting close to 90m consistently

Posted by   on (October 24, 2013, 18:52 GMT)

If bowlers are not allowed to bowl more than 20% of the max balls their side bowls, there is no reason why a batsman should be allowed to bat more than 20% of the balls his side faces. May come back in case all the batsmen who followed him get out.

Posted by siddhartha87 on (October 24, 2013, 9:41 GMT)

agreed.These 65-70 m boundaries are absolute joke. The boundaries should be minimum 80-85 m.Also 5 players outside the circle should be allowed.Sir vIv averaged 47 and had strike rate 90 back in 80's.With these current settings he would have averaged 70 and Strike rate 120 for sure.

Posted by rookie4u on (October 23, 2013, 3:03 GMT)

This is how the beauty of the game has spoiled. Cricket administrators here have worked around the strength of home side. Preparing utterly rubbish flat pitches with shorter boundaries. Poor bowlers are mere spectators with ordinary batsmen toring them apart. That is why we haven't seen too many class bowlers to join the likes of Kapil and Zaheer.. Extremely ordinary set-up for bowlers. And hence you see Indian side struggling massively when they go to England, Australia, New Zealand. Not to forget the next world cup being down under, I'm sure BCCI will try their best to bully and get placid pitches there as well. I fail to understand why cricket is slowing getting to a point where it will be viewed only as a batsman's game.

Posted by jever03 on (October 22, 2013, 19:43 GMT)

I think Chappell is right. If hitting sixes becomes the norm, as is already starting to be the case, then it's going to become boring. The thrill in cricket lies in the contest between bat and ball. Insure this thru these measures: 1. Why have the ten over restriction for bowlers? Allow 15 for one and 12 for two more. That brings a strategical dimnension to the game. 2. Keep the boundaries were they used to be: at the adversitising board and if it's stopped before and the fielder touches it in the process so be it - no boundary. 3. Keep the powerplays (another slightly strategic dimension) but allow more fielders outside the circle. 4. Go back to one ball. The two-ball-experiment didn't work out. 5. Allow two bouncers per over. 6. Get rid of overthrows. After those changes 250 is again an almighty total and a six is hit as often as a wicket is lost, which is how it should be.

Posted by towf on (October 22, 2013, 9:31 GMT)

Personally I think limited overs cricket despite its success is flawed. Look at first class cricket and Test cricket, teams win by bowling out other sides as well as scoring the runs. Limiting overs and asking bowlers to get them all out within that time is probably going to result in high scoring draws, but what if the wickets become the target for the team bowling second and runs become the target for the team batting first? At least then bowlers, captains and of course batsmen will think about their wicket before becoming adventurous.

Also please get more bowler friendly cricket balls, watching a new ball bowler in limited overs cricket mostly dull because almost nothing happens with the ball, rather batsmen get to set a foundation rather than trying to survive which is much more exciting to watch.

Comments have now been closed for this article

Email Feedback Print
Ian ChappellClose
Ian Chappell Widely regarded as the best Australian captain of the last 50 years, Ian Chappell moulded a team in his image: tough, positive, and fearless. Even though Chappell sometimes risked defeat playing for a win, Australia did not lose a Test series under him between 1971 and 1975. He was an aggressive batsman himself, always ready to hook a bouncer and unafraid to use his feet against the spinners. In 1977 he played a lead role in the defection of a number of Australian players to Kerry Packer's World Series Cricket, which did not endear him to the administrators, who he regarded with contempt in any case. After retirement, he made an easy switch to television, where he has come to be known as a trenchant and fiercely independent voice.

Hangovers and headaches

2014 in review: Embarrassing defeats, a beleaguered captain, a bitter former star, alienating administrators - England's year was gloomy. By George Dobell

Ten years later

Gallery: Efforts by Surrey have helped transform a coastal village in Sri Lanka devastated by the December 26 tsunami

    'We did not drop a single catch in 1971'

Couch Talk: Former India captain Ajit Wadekar recalls the dream tours of West Indies and England, and coaching India

Sachin to bat for life, Lara for the joy of batting

Modern Masters: Rahul Dravid and Sanjay Manjrekar discuss the impact of Lara's batting

I bowled to them, look where they are now

Roger Sawh: Ever get the feeling you're sharing in the success of a top-level cricketer you may have played with growing up?

News | Features Last 7 days

Watson's merry-go-round decade

In January 2005, Shane Watson made his Test debut. What does he have to show for a decade in the game?

Why punish the West Indies players when the administration is to blame?

As ever, the West Indies board has taken the short-term view and removed supposedly troublesome players instead of recognising its own incompetence

Power to Smithy, trouble for Dhoni

Australia's new captain admirably turned things around for his side in Brisbane, leading in more departments than one

India's attack: rare intensity before regular inanity

For the first hour on day three, despite the heat and the largely unhelpful pitch, India's fast bowlers showed a level of intensity and penetration rarely seen from them; in the second hour, things mostly reverted to type

Bowlers in waiting

Bowlers who have been around for plenty of time but haven't played in cricket's biggest show

News | Features Last 7 days