March 24, 2014

The Shoaib Malik question

No one can give a satisfactory answer about why he's in the side and what has happened to his supposed utility. Maybe the answer has to do with his captaincy stint

Shoaib Malik is a battle-scarred fixture in the Pakistan side, but who knows why? © AFP

What has happened to Shoaib Malik? The world has more pressing mysteries to resolve but if a couple of idling hours present themselves, here is a lighter excursion to consider.

Let's qualify that question a little. It's not that I think Malik would have ended up as one of Pakistan's greatest players, but neither did I ever think he would end up as he is right now. And what he is right now, well, I have no idea: even in a career stretched to its very limits by the idea of his elastic utility, it's difficult to know what he is doing in the side now and why he's there.

Nobody seems to have a real answer to why. I'm not sure whether Mohammad Hafeez has been specifically asked the question, but I'm certain he'd say something unprofessorial about Malik bringing a lot of experience. To which would be asked, of what? Five Champions Trophies, one World Cup and four World T20s of not really doing much?

Ordinarily the selectors should be the best people to ask, except, for about a year now, Pakistan have operated without a selection committee. Okay, so there has been one but rubber stamps have had more traction, and if Azhar Khan claims to head it, in terms of power wielded he is somewhere below what Viktor Yanukovych now claims over Ukraine and Ban Ki-Moon does over our united nations. (One of the good things about the incoming selection chief, Rashid Latif, and Moin Khan as coach - if he is kept on - is that Pakistan's captains will be challenged a little more about their selections; the flipside is, hello, how long do those arrangements last?)

If asked they might point to numbers Malik has accrued in domestic T20 tournaments and leagues as reasons. In which case they would only be pointing out their own incompetence, or dereliction of duties. In the last two T20 tournaments in Pakistan, Malik has masked mostly ordinary work with a couple of decent scores across 11 matches. Sandwiched in between was what should have been the clincher in any discussion about his prospects: a truly abysmal Big Bash League for Hobart Hurricanes. If that is the crutch Pakistan fall back on in picking him, it's a truly splintered one.

There's no doubt that Malik has always carried the unmistakable air of a man who isn't what he is on the outside. But how much during his captaincy was it him and how much was he made to be like that, encircled as he was by older vultures like Mohammad Yousuf?

What else could it be? Every recent selection of his has been accompanied by talk of the political sway he harnesses, as if it were black magic or voodoo shrouding the team. Could it be for his reputation as a feared India-slayer, which, come to think of it, is a similar kind of hokum? Personally I like to think that behind his recent selections, something more prosaic has been at work. Each time the captain has seen an opportunity to forge a weird, anticipatory unity, not in strength but in mediocrity: "I'll pick you despite you not deserving it, if you pick me later when you're me and I'm you." It could be any of these or none, or all.

But if we'll never get to the bottom of why, we should ask again what: what has happened to him so that he is now merely flotsam in Pakistan's big-tournament squads? And the thing that keeps coming to mind over and over again is his 21-month captaincy between 2007 and 2009. He hasn't been the same since he was removed in January 2009, after an ODI series loss to Sri Lanka, but really because he was said, by his own manager and coach, to be a "loner" and "aloof" (no prizes for knowing that the omnipotent Buddha, Intikhab Alam, was involved in this).

I always wondered about that description. Bob Woolmer wasn't a bad judge of a cricketer. Was he that wrong about Malik, whom he always identified as a potential captain? There's no doubt that Malik has always carried the unmistakable air of a man who isn't what he is on the outside. He clutches on to whatever may be inside him so staunchly, there is no hope in knowing what or who he really is. But how much during his captaincy was it him and how much was he made to be like that, encircled as he was by older vultures like Mohammad Yousuf, who could never digest having been overlooked for the captaincy? The one time Malik unloaded on Shoaib Akhtar's fitness and commitment on the field, he was forced to u-turn two days later. A few days after that he was removed. He has rarely spoken about that time, which is strange given that, at 27, it effectively killed his career.

Meanwhile, away from the limelight, in the smaller, fairly stable pond of Sialkot, Malik has continued to lead. That experience is like an alternate reality, of what is happening in a world where Malik is still captain, where his position in the batting order is secure and fixed. He is the big fish here, a leader of men around him. The level, of course, is much lower, but it is telling that he looks like a different man when leading Sialkot. In that light, the mind sometimes wanders down a road where Malik wasn't removed as captain and imagines what it might have done to him as player.

Soon after he was removed as captain he was called to a senate committee hearing in Islamabad, where the team management's assessment of him were first made public. He sat impassively through the day as his coach and manager said their pieces and senators grilled him. He explained why Pakistan had lost the ODI series to Sri Lanka with clear-headedness, before adding that he had jumped before he was pushed. "I am one of the most flexible players in the Pakistan side and have batted everywhere. I want to get better as a player now." Irony doesn't begin to get that.

But it was as he hung around before the meeting started, with a group of journalists, that he uttered the most revealing truth. We asked him generally how he was now that he was no longer captain.

"Ab sukoon hai," he smiled back, as if emerging from a coma. He is at peace now, he meant.

That left unsaid what sometimes needs to be spelt out: that taking up the Pakistan captaincy is essentially going to war. It scrambles the minds of most men, to say nothing of what it does to their games. Maybe what he has been suffering from since then is some strain of a post-traumatic affliction.

Osman Samiuddin is a sportswriter at the National

Comments have now been closed for this article

  • irfan on March 29, 2014, 5:48 GMT

    I alway believe that Malik was one of the best talent Pakistan has pruduced.He still by far the best player in current pakistan team .Malik is a prime example of that how pcb waste the player talent not utilising them right .Malik is a match winner ,pcb and capton should use him right. and if they dont know how to use him right ask MS Dhoni .Best of luck malik ,I know you will come back strongly.

  • Dummy4 on March 29, 2014, 3:36 GMT

    Malik deserve 3 or 4 more years in Pakistan cricket he is very nice player that he already proved many times in the past. In other words for some reason Pakistani Captains not using him properly. In last 3 years he is most affect player he always playing in too much tension whether in next match he will be in the side or not and check out almost he is coming to bat in a situation where he can do much only to play some slog shots to increase the run rate.

    We should have mix of players 6 new + 5 seniors and he should be part of seniors along with Afridi, Hafeez, Kamran, Gul and Malik and bring 6 new players.

  • kamil on March 27, 2014, 18:30 GMT

    To me Malik is still capable of batting at number 3 in ODIs and T20s. He desperately needs to get his right position to bat on. Don't forget that he used to be a match winner for Pakistan during Inzi's captaincy.

  • shafiq on March 27, 2014, 13:17 GMT

    Can't bat can't bowl as one commentator said in the last tournament he played, he's our 'specialist fielder'. If he had a shred of shame he would retire from international cricket, anybody else in the current squad batter or bowler would add to the team, he's useless. We've gotten rid of Farhat but still can't shake the cancer that is Malik and Akmal Sr; until these 2 are removed they will constantly bring us down.

  • Dummy4 on March 27, 2014, 4:54 GMT

    its pretty simple.. Pakistan lacks an experienced player ( Indian for e.g. has Dhoni) who can come in late in the innings to guide a chase. It is unfortunate that we have vested so much time with Malik that we now feel obliged to ' make use of his experience ' and force his selection. Fact of the matter is Pakistan lacks options. Kamran Akmal is the player who fits this requirement, who can come down the order and we can use another opener like Sharjeel or Nasir jamshed ... clearly this is not a great option either.

  • Dummy4 on March 27, 2014, 0:24 GMT

    To be honest ,Muhammad Hafeez should also be dropped.What has he done ?His average is like 20.And for SM he should totally be dropped.

    Imran nazir deserves a chance again..

  • Dummy4 on March 26, 2014, 12:46 GMT

    why isn't raza hassan in he squad?

  • Dummy4 on March 26, 2014, 12:00 GMT

    except the similarity with Mohammad Yousuf all is true..... Management should add Sharjeel Khan to strengthen the batting or add any bowler to strengthen bowling.... he is totally misfit in the squad...

  • Android on March 26, 2014, 5:12 GMT

    all of you sporting malik you don't know pakistan have lots of player better than him can you see he play 22 matches last 4 world cup make only 416 average 19 please bring some good for pakistan future

  • Dummy4 on March 25, 2014, 23:32 GMT

    I truly agree Sharjeel does not deserve a spot. He played at the most flat pitches and yet to give performance. He needs to be dropped. Nasir Jamshed needs to be given regular spot. The guy single handedly won the series against india. Yes he didn't perform on difficult tracks but look at india persisting with Shikar Dhawan

  • No featured comments at the moment.