Matches (13)
IPL (2)
WT20 Qualifier (4)
County DIV1 (4)
County DIV2 (3)
Feature

India's No.4 conundrum, the Siraj question, and more

With both KL Rahul and Ravindra Jadeja ruled out of the second Test, the hosts have to make some big selection decisions

Alagappan Muthu
Alagappan Muthu
29-Jan-2024
On the back of a loss to start the series, India have lost their best batter from the Hyderabad Test and one of their biggest match-winners at home to injury. KL Rahul and Ravindra Jadeja have been ruled out of the second Test in Visakhapatnam which starts on Friday and India face a bit of a challenge in balancing their XI, starting with...

Who is the new No. 4?

Shreyas Iyer, probably. He did not cover himself in glory in the second innings - but then again none of the Indian batters did. When the loss became a possibility, the pressure seemed to get to them and the aggression that they showed that threw England spinners off their lengths in the first innings vanished. India will need someone in the top four who can do that and Iyer is as good an option as they've got right now. Because all of a sudden, after Rohit Sharma at the top, the experience that India can call on in their batting line-up has fallen into a crater.
Who should bat at No.4?
23.0K votes
Shreyas Iyer
Rajat Patidar
Sarfaraz Khan

Who replaces Jadeja

Kuldeep Yadav is the frontrunner. He has three five-fors in eight Tests. He has been in fine form in limited-overs cricket, displaying the very trait that is essential in the longer format - accuracy. That along with the X-factor of his wristspin made him a tempting option even in Hyderabad but India went with Axar Patel because they wanted the batting depth. Now with Jadeja out, their hand has been forced.
India have called up two other spinners to the squad as well - Saurabh Kumar, a veteran from domestic cricket and an ever-present in the India A squad, and Washington Sundar, a decent left-hand batter which helps when you're playing an opposition with two left-arm spinners, one of whom has just made history.
The trouble with replacing Jadeja is that he is among their best bowlers and their best batters in the recent past. Kuldeep and Saurabh will give India reliability in one discipline - at least in terms of trusting them to bowl a ton of overs - but not in the other. Washington is the other way around. He has almost as many fifties as he has wickets in Tests.
Who replaces Jadeja?
18.7K votes
Kuldeep Yadav
Saurabh Kumar
Washington Sundar
Patidar would be the front-runner considering he was already in the squad as Virat Kohli's replacement, but is there place for Sarfaraz as well in the XI? India need batting depth and those two have been on the fringes of selection for a while.
Patidar is known for his big-match temperament. And Sarfaraz, who was due in Bengal to play for Mumbai in the ongoing Ranji Trophy but is now another step closer to making his long-awaited international debut, tends to score lots of runs quickly. One of them is almost certain to make it to the XI in Visakhapatnam, but if India choose to replace Jadeja with Kuldeep then they might consider picking both Patidar and Sarfaraz to shore up the batting.
Playing both of them, though, will mean India have to drop the fifth bowler and go with a four-man attack. Mohammed Siraj bowled only four of the 64.3 overs in the first innings and seven of 102.1 in the second, so will India borrow from England's playbook and pick just the one fast bowler?
Should Siraj play the second Test?
18.8K votes
No, pick an extra batter
Yes, four bowlers is too few

Alagappan Muthu is a sub-editor at ESPNcricinfo