England Lions v Australians, Tour Match, 2nd day August 17, 2013

Watson hopeful for Oval bowling role

Shane Watson hopes to bowl in the nets on Monday as he aims to prove his fitness for an all-round role in the final Investec Ashes Test at The Oval, which starts on Wednesday. Watson did not bowl during Australia's two-day tour match against England Lions in Northampton, which finished in a rain and bad light-affected draw on Saturday, after he suffered an injury to his right groin halfway through his 19th over in the Test loss at Chester-le-Street.

However, Watson was able to bat and run between the wickets unimpeded in the second innings of that Test and again during Australia's disappointing effort in Northampton, where he top scored with 45 from 44 deliveries. After the match, Watson said working with the team doctor Peter Brukner had given him confidence that he would be able to continue with the heavy bowling workload that has led to him sending down 80.3 overs in the series so far.

"The injury I got during the Test match is something that just occasionally pops up in my groin," Watson said. "It's something that does settle down pretty quickly, so hopefully I'll be bowling and building it up to be able to make sure I can do a job in the Test match. I think the plan is at the moment to be able to bowl on Monday and make sure I'm confident to be able to do a job in the Test match.

"The great thing here is the doctor we've got here is someone who has made a significant difference to my body. The techniques he's using to be able to release the tension that builds up in muscles has made a huge difference throughout this whole series so far, with what he's been doing with this groin injury that does flare up occasionally but does settle down quicker than my calf or hamstring issues."

If Watson was unable to bowl at The Oval it would place his position in the team in doubt, given his lack of big scores in Test cricket over the past two years and the selectors' desire to have a fifth bowling option. Watson looked good in scoring his 45 against England Lions, mostly against the spin of Simon Kerrigan, but like the rest of the batsmen he failed to go on after making a start.

The match was particularly important for Usman Khawaja, the incumbent Test No.3, and for Phillip Hughes, the man who could replace him at The Oval. Khawaja edged behind for 4 and Hughes made a scratchy 30, and while it was notable that Hughes came in at first drop and Khawaja down at No.6, Watson, the stand-in captain, said that was a decision that had come down from the team management.

"I'm a ring-in captain so I have no idea, absolutely none," he said of the batting order. "I'm told where we're all to bat and we moved on. I know not to interpret things. It might get me into trouble."

That no player managed a half-century was far from the result the Australians wanted after their capitulation at Chester-le-Street. Nathan Lyon bowled impressively on the first day in Northampton and Mitchell Starc was reasonable enough, but Watson said apart from the fact that most batsmen had at least got starts, there was little to take out of the batting display.

"The wicket with the new ball provided a few challenges," he said. "It wasn't a Test match wicket, that's for sure, so it's hard to get a gauge of exactly where guys are at. In the end I think it was just more a case of getting out there and trying to put in a decent performance. In the end we probably haven't got a hell of a lot out of this game from the batting side of things.

"From the bowling side of things I thought Nathan Lyon bowled extremely well, especially in the first part of his spell. Mitchell Starc bowled really well with the new ball so there are some very positive signs out of this as well."

Brydon Coverdale is an assistant editor at ESPNcricinfo. He tweets here

Comments have now been closed for this article

  • Chris_P on August 20, 2013, 7:53 GMT

    @ Sam Matthews On par keeper? Did you not see any of the India series? Or the Sri Lankan seriesfor that matter, or the South African as well. Wade was abysmal! Conservatively speaking, about 4 levels below Haddin, at best.

  • on August 19, 2013, 8:45 GMT

    @Paul_JT - I agree with all of your selections except one. Brad Haddin should be banished to the nether realms of retirement and not allowed anywhere near the side. Wade is a better batsman and on-par keeper.

  • Paul_JT on August 18, 2013, 9:42 GMT

    Looking towards the next series, perhaps it would is worth "resting" Watson and Harris to look at Faulkner and Starc. Hughes should be given the reassurance of the next series at number 3. Smith is in the cliched last chance saloon. Team for 1st Test in Brisbane: Rogers, Warner, Hughes, Clarke, Bailey, Watson, Haddin, Pattinson, Siddle, Harris, Lyon.

  • jmcilhinney on August 18, 2013, 3:40 GMT

    I think Watson will play regardless of whether he can bowl because, while he hasn't made big scores this series, at least he's made some runs. Whether he could keep his place as a batsman alone for the return series in Australia would be a different question though.

  • hhillbumper on August 17, 2013, 22:02 GMT

    This man must play in the fifth test.just to watch that look on his face when he misses a straight ball.Just that look has made this summer for me.The utter arrogance and contempt this man feels for his time plastered all over his face is priceless and explains why Aus cricket has fallen into such a factional low. KP might be divisive but at least he has some talent.

  • disco_bob on August 17, 2013, 21:24 GMT

    Does anyone else find Watson being captain and making pronouncements on the team as well as hoping to have a bowling role, a bit er... dysfunctional given his history? Watson is a liability for this team in every possible way. You have to feel sorry for Khawaja, he must feel like he's batting for his future every single time he comes to the middle.

  • OhhhhhMattyMatty on August 17, 2013, 19:21 GMT

    Australia are taking positives from being outclassed and outplayed by a rushed together, underprepared England 4th XI?!!! How the mighty have fallen......

  • landl47 on August 17, 2013, 18:46 GMT

    There was one player who looked to be in prime form. Unfortunately for the Australians, his name was Gary Ballance.

  • Chris_P on August 20, 2013, 7:53 GMT

    @ Sam Matthews On par keeper? Did you not see any of the India series? Or the Sri Lankan seriesfor that matter, or the South African as well. Wade was abysmal! Conservatively speaking, about 4 levels below Haddin, at best.

  • on August 19, 2013, 8:45 GMT

    @Paul_JT - I agree with all of your selections except one. Brad Haddin should be banished to the nether realms of retirement and not allowed anywhere near the side. Wade is a better batsman and on-par keeper.

  • Paul_JT on August 18, 2013, 9:42 GMT

    Looking towards the next series, perhaps it would is worth "resting" Watson and Harris to look at Faulkner and Starc. Hughes should be given the reassurance of the next series at number 3. Smith is in the cliched last chance saloon. Team for 1st Test in Brisbane: Rogers, Warner, Hughes, Clarke, Bailey, Watson, Haddin, Pattinson, Siddle, Harris, Lyon.

  • jmcilhinney on August 18, 2013, 3:40 GMT

    I think Watson will play regardless of whether he can bowl because, while he hasn't made big scores this series, at least he's made some runs. Whether he could keep his place as a batsman alone for the return series in Australia would be a different question though.

  • hhillbumper on August 17, 2013, 22:02 GMT

    This man must play in the fifth test.just to watch that look on his face when he misses a straight ball.Just that look has made this summer for me.The utter arrogance and contempt this man feels for his time plastered all over his face is priceless and explains why Aus cricket has fallen into such a factional low. KP might be divisive but at least he has some talent.

  • disco_bob on August 17, 2013, 21:24 GMT

    Does anyone else find Watson being captain and making pronouncements on the team as well as hoping to have a bowling role, a bit er... dysfunctional given his history? Watson is a liability for this team in every possible way. You have to feel sorry for Khawaja, he must feel like he's batting for his future every single time he comes to the middle.

  • OhhhhhMattyMatty on August 17, 2013, 19:21 GMT

    Australia are taking positives from being outclassed and outplayed by a rushed together, underprepared England 4th XI?!!! How the mighty have fallen......

  • landl47 on August 17, 2013, 18:46 GMT

    There was one player who looked to be in prime form. Unfortunately for the Australians, his name was Gary Ballance.

  • No featured comments at the moment.

  • landl47 on August 17, 2013, 18:46 GMT

    There was one player who looked to be in prime form. Unfortunately for the Australians, his name was Gary Ballance.

  • OhhhhhMattyMatty on August 17, 2013, 19:21 GMT

    Australia are taking positives from being outclassed and outplayed by a rushed together, underprepared England 4th XI?!!! How the mighty have fallen......

  • disco_bob on August 17, 2013, 21:24 GMT

    Does anyone else find Watson being captain and making pronouncements on the team as well as hoping to have a bowling role, a bit er... dysfunctional given his history? Watson is a liability for this team in every possible way. You have to feel sorry for Khawaja, he must feel like he's batting for his future every single time he comes to the middle.

  • hhillbumper on August 17, 2013, 22:02 GMT

    This man must play in the fifth test.just to watch that look on his face when he misses a straight ball.Just that look has made this summer for me.The utter arrogance and contempt this man feels for his time plastered all over his face is priceless and explains why Aus cricket has fallen into such a factional low. KP might be divisive but at least he has some talent.

  • jmcilhinney on August 18, 2013, 3:40 GMT

    I think Watson will play regardless of whether he can bowl because, while he hasn't made big scores this series, at least he's made some runs. Whether he could keep his place as a batsman alone for the return series in Australia would be a different question though.

  • Paul_JT on August 18, 2013, 9:42 GMT

    Looking towards the next series, perhaps it would is worth "resting" Watson and Harris to look at Faulkner and Starc. Hughes should be given the reassurance of the next series at number 3. Smith is in the cliched last chance saloon. Team for 1st Test in Brisbane: Rogers, Warner, Hughes, Clarke, Bailey, Watson, Haddin, Pattinson, Siddle, Harris, Lyon.

  • on August 19, 2013, 8:45 GMT

    @Paul_JT - I agree with all of your selections except one. Brad Haddin should be banished to the nether realms of retirement and not allowed anywhere near the side. Wade is a better batsman and on-par keeper.

  • Chris_P on August 20, 2013, 7:53 GMT

    @ Sam Matthews On par keeper? Did you not see any of the India series? Or the Sri Lankan seriesfor that matter, or the South African as well. Wade was abysmal! Conservatively speaking, about 4 levels below Haddin, at best.