INBOX

From our readers

West Indies cricket

July 15, 2013

The folly of omitting Shivnarine Chanderpaul

Roger Sawh, Canada


Shivnarine Chanderpaul shapes to play the pull, West Indies v South Africa, 4th ODI, Dominica, May 30, 2010
The argument against Shivnarine Chanderpaul's exclusion from the ODI side doesn't hold up against the gaping weakness that has plagued West Indies © Associated Press
Enlarge
Related Links

"Chanderpaul in one-day cricket? He's too old, man! Brethren, he doesn't score fast enough, he needs 150 overs! He's been in so many losses man! Brotha, we've got to move on from him!"

In the above few lines lies a modern-day cricket mystery that I struggle to comprehend.

The West Indies' one-day international cricket team of 2013 is the personification of the phrase 'all flash and little substance'. Blessed with a galaxy of stars of the Twenty20 arena, it's a group that would command an IPL owner's highest bids with ease and, given 20 overs of operation, would most likely deliver breathtaking results. Sadly for them, T20s and ODIs are entirely different endeavours.

On the spectrum of cricket formats, ODIs are thought to be in the middle while T20s and Tests lie at their respective extremes. A closer consideration, though, gives a better idea of things as ODI cricket is closer to Test cricket in nature than T20. Batsmen are required to build innings in ODIs, hence the format necessitates patience, soundness of technique, deep consideration, concentration, and conditional awareness. In T20s, a 'wham-bam-thank-you-ma'am' fifty in no time at all is a game-changer, but in ODIs, its effect is not quite as prolific - a steady and calculated approach bears greater fruit in a 50-over war of attrition, as the value of an innings lies not just in the shots and runs, but also in the negotiation of bowlers, spells, fielding restrictions and playing conditions.

In the West Indies' set-up, the vast majority of batsmen either completely lack or inexplicably suppress the rare talent of building an innings. It is a talent that Shivnarine Chanderpaul, an evergreen batsman of close to 300 ODIs who has been producing runs across formats despite approaching the age of 40, has bursting forth from his anti-glare eye patches. It is a gift that the powers that be in West Indies team selection are willfully blind to and, as collapses continue to litter modern-day West Indies cricket history, it is a boon that has been simply deserted.

Recent history bears testament to the need for a Chanderpaul-like presence. Throughout the course of the Champions Trophy, when Chris Gayle or Marlon Samuels failed to provide a platform for an innings, the team's batting would generally be lost at sea. In the just concluded tri-series with India and Sri Lanka, fireworks in Jamaica only temporarily hid the batting unit's frailties, as the team eventually failed to make their own home series final. Fast forward to Sunday, when Pakistan surgically dismantled the West Indies batting approach on a minefield in Providence, Guyana, and you could see the tumour just grow.

After pinpointing the ineptitude of the West Indies batsmen against pressure, and recognising the gaping need for an anchor man, Pakistan simply did what their team has the ability to do - they bowled a consistent and threatening line and length to allow the mentally fragile batsmen to whither in the South American heat. If only there were a stabilizer, a thorn in opposition's side, a Trott-like gnat to hover annoyingly despite the predator's fiercest swipes. If only substance had not been jettisoned for style and if only conditional awareness had come into play when the squad was being picked to select a player, any player, who could dig deep and tackle the demons of the pitch and the opposition. Chanderpaul is renowned for prizing his wicket like no other - more often than not, he would have found a way to tough things out.

Those who support Chanderpaul completely understand the argument against his inclusion. Quite frankly, though, it doesn't hold when compared with the need that exists. Across the cricketing world, ODI nations have their best Test batsmen in their line-ups because they recognise that the format requires a chutzpah that great Test batsmen possess. From Amla to Trott to Misbah, there is the knowledge that you need a backbone in an ODI batting line-up, regardless of the lack of glamour. Unless another batsman in the current line-up steps up to do the dirty work, the selectors have to plug the enormous hole in their order.

Chanderpaul never retired from ODI cricket - he was a victim of a post-World Cup 2011 purge that placed the blame at his feet for the team's unsuccessful campaign. He was a scapegoat, and he was thrown away in ODIs for the wrong reasons.

Chanderpaul is often described as a 'crab' at the crease. Crabs don't make great entertainers. They don't drive with elegance or pull with panache. They claw. They scratch. They exist in perpetual commotion with themselves, lacking suave but forever battling against all challenges. For the West Indies, there needs to be a survivor among the showmen; not only to see out the difficulties, but to help them develop strong shells of their own.

If you have a submission for Inbox, send it to us here, with "Inbox" in the subject line

© ESPN Sports Media Ltd.

TopTop
Email Feedback Print
Posted by adyall on (July 19, 2013, 2:46 GMT)

I thought that we tried to use Sarwan in this role, but he failed. There are enough senior players in the team who can/should perform that role...e.g. Gayle, Samuels. Shiv is great, no doubt...but we should be looking to build for the future rather than trying to win games

Posted by gtman on (July 18, 2013, 9:43 GMT)

Playing Shiv might not solve the problem, but at least it would have brought a bit of stability to the batting, especially in the home series. I agree that Devon should not be in the squad. Darren Bravo and Sarwan both failed in England, however Bravo can still be given another chance or two. Sarwan had so many chances and he rarely fulfill the task as a reliable batsman. Im sure there are a few other batmen who the Windies can give that opportunity to e.g. Powell and Narsingh etc. Don't forget that the Tiger is doing well at Derbyshire in all forms of the game.

Posted by   on (July 18, 2013, 1:14 GMT)

Shiv Chanderpaul and Brendan Nash need to be reintroduced into West Indies cricket

Posted by   on (July 17, 2013, 23:43 GMT)

@rohit Ramesh and ray24 West Indies need chanderpaul to play for them badly until he retires. He can replace a lot of players in this side but I will only name a few . Devon smith , pollard and Tino best although he is a bowler he serves no purpose , and he nor Devon smith should never be recall to play for WI . They have fail , fail , and fail . Chanders will help West Indies and their is no young player who has his temperament and so can play instead of him , other guys are Sarwan and narsingh they can help wi .

Posted by Reuelsean on (July 17, 2013, 21:53 GMT)

Bringing back Chanderpaul on the ODI team is not the answer, forget about statistics and averages, Wi need to be focused on the future and Chanderpaul doesn't factor into those plans. Bravo has been in the job for a short time and already ppl are calling for his head, his captaincy has been good so far, give him a chance to do his job. I'm glad the selectors don't listen to you guys, otherwise we would be changing players every game. Darren bravo is the player who needs to play the anchor role and bat through the inns, a job that he is very capable off doing, he just needs time.

Posted by Ray24 on (July 17, 2013, 14:52 GMT)

Excellent player, but 39. WI for your own good move on.

Posted by DanD-Dan on (July 17, 2013, 7:58 GMT)

In addition to his ability to scratch and grind, let's not forget that Tiger has one of the fastest 100's in ODI history. He can turn it on when he wants to.

Posted by   on (July 17, 2013, 5:38 GMT)

guys like shiv and sarwan are badly needed. They have tonnes of massive hitters at the top in gayle, samuels, pollard, bravo, but they can't rotate the strike. They play about 5-6 dot balls and go for the big one. Guys like sarwan and shiv can score 3 runs every 4 balls taking minimum risk. I reckon drop pollard and dwayne bravo and pick sarwan and shiv instead getting sarwan to bat at 3, and shiv at 5.

Comments have now been closed for this article

Think the world needs to read your opinions on cricket? Here's your chance to be published on ESPNcricinfo.

FAQ ►

MORE IN INBOX

Anderson or Trueman?

Who is England's best bowler? The debate rages on

For the love of the game

Stories of Arjuna, of Sanath, and of a third-world country recovering from wa...

Me, my Bapi and Bangladesh cricket

A son recalls the highs that Bangladesh cricket gave him and his father

DOPPELGANGERS

GAMES

  • CROSSWORD
    crossword