Netherlands v Sri Lanka, World T20, Group 1 March 23, 2014

Four cracks at immortality

Netherlands face an uncertain future, and their captain Peter Borren has indicated the World T20 might be the last tournament for some of the players. For now, they have four more chances to pull off a major upset

"Having nothing to lose in Twenty20 can make you very dangerous." Peter Borren said it after the incredible victory over Ireland that took Netherlands into the main group stage of the World T20 and the captain said it again ahead of their first Super 10 match against Sri Lanka.

Unfortunately, this Netherlands side really doesn't have a lot to lose. Alongside being the only Associate side left in the competition, they face an uncertain future due to a failure to qualify for the 2015 World Cup and the loss of their ODI status. The level of their continued funding from the ICC is yet to be confirmed and their coach at this tournament, Anton Roux, is still an interim appointment due to the KNCB's financial situation.

Coming into the tournament, two substandard performances in warm-up matches against Afghanistan and Hong Kong had left Borren visibly frustrated at the direction their cricket was going in. Then there was the controversy of Tim Gruijters being replaced in the squad by Tom Cooper, no longer required by his Sheffield Shield side.

Since then Netherlands' fortunes have, at least superficially, been given a lift. Borren and his at-the-double Dutch have returned to Chittagong with the chance to shake up the order and tug at the sleeves of the game's decision-makers once again.

"For us we've had a pretty tough few months," Borren said. "Having failed to qualify in New Zealand we're not quite sure what the ICC are going to do moving forward, with our status, but also with Associate cricket. We're very proud of the fact that we're representing the Associates here now. We hope that we can do them proud. It's an achievement in itself that we're the only Associate to have made it this far. It wasn't easy."

At around 5pm in Sylhet two days ago, the odds of them being that front-running Associate had entered Headingley '81, 500-1 territory. With Netherlands needing to score 190 in 14.2 overs or less, Irish fans would have been heading online to confirm hotel bookings in Chittagong. Borren, however, had not started making other plans.

"We were sort of hoping to be here. I'm glad that that's eventuated," he said. "Otherwise we would have been back home in Holland. I was very much hoping to be here and it took something pretty special in the end. When we went to the ground to play against Ireland it wasn't going to be quite as difficult as it ended up being. Zimbabwe thrashing the UAE as they did made our task quite a lot harder.

"As we were preparing for the last game we did genuinely believe there was a chance of us making it here. By the time the game started the chance had become small, and by half time in that game it had become even smaller. Although we decided that we were going to have a go at getting the runs in 14 overs, perhaps the belief might have been there, but it was definitely in the back of the head that we might be going home. We're excited to be here."

The emotions were more earthy a little more than a week ago, when Borren said he was "p**sed off" at continued batting failures. It did not require much to exceed expectations but Stephan Myburgh, Wesley Barresi, Cooper and Borren himself put on an incandescent display of brilliant orange against Ireland. It was a shot to nothing - that word again - and seemingly nothing could hold Netherlands back.

"When we failed to chase a couple of manageable targets, I wasn't happy," Borren said. "But this last target, I wouldn't have called manageable ... It's a captain's nightmare, inconsistency. It is something we should look at, but it is Twenty20 cricket. You've heard that a million times, that anything can happen if you have a fearless approach. We've got guys who are capable of achieving really good things in the next few games. I'm not p**sed off after the last game."

Netherlands have form for this sort of thing, of course, although Borren said that the memory of their win over England in the opening match of the 2009 World T20 was beginning to fade. Now they have four more cracks at "knocking over a Full Member" and making sure the flame of Dutch cricket has fuel to burn, even as a period of hardship threatens to set in.

"For some of us, this may be the last time at this level, so we'd like to leave this stage with the memory of orange shirts playing some good cricket."

Alan Gardner is an assistant editor at ESPNcricinfo. He tweets here

Comments have now been closed for this article

  • SuperSharky on March 24, 2014, 9:09 GMT

    I love it when the associates beat the bullies once in a while. It gives meaning to the game cricket and that extra spice witch makes the sport more enjoyable viewing. It's really sad that the greed for money is making these associate teams future uncertain. I still remember the good old days when 4 of the associate teams could compete against the full members in ICC events.

  • on March 24, 2014, 5:10 GMT

    Best of luck for the upcoming matches, go a head and proud us Associate countries.

  • A.Kessell on March 24, 2014, 3:47 GMT

    The main problem is that the larger boards would rather organise meaningless, but profitable bi-latteral series during the period that would be used for the olympic games and potential qualifiers. Therefore they oppose any form of cricket being part of the olympic games, and that in turn causes small boards massive headaches as they struggle to get funding from their goverments that are more inclined to support global/olympic sports. This makes for example the Dutch board more reliant on the ICC and that in turn makes the ICC less inclined to increase funding. Holland will never be a large cricket market, it can't be, it's tiny. But if t20 went olympic the interest of goverments around the world would increase and Holland does have a large repatriation base and healthy sports infrastructure which could see the team steadily improve. Nevermind the other countries who's interest would be peeked enough to increase the funding of their own boards, taking strain of the ICC

  • Cricarf on March 23, 2014, 22:17 GMT

    I think the main issue here is theres no love or following for the game in Holland as there is in countries such as Nepal and as long as thats the problem they will have to rely on expats to make up the team which is sad

  • on March 23, 2014, 16:27 GMT

    Brilliant piece. Hope the ICC does not reduce funding to countries such as Holland and PNG who failed to qualify for the WC. In fact what the ICC could do is increase the countries getting ODI and T20 status!

  • SuperSharky on March 24, 2014, 9:09 GMT

    I love it when the associates beat the bullies once in a while. It gives meaning to the game cricket and that extra spice witch makes the sport more enjoyable viewing. It's really sad that the greed for money is making these associate teams future uncertain. I still remember the good old days when 4 of the associate teams could compete against the full members in ICC events.

  • on March 24, 2014, 5:10 GMT

    Best of luck for the upcoming matches, go a head and proud us Associate countries.

  • A.Kessell on March 24, 2014, 3:47 GMT

    The main problem is that the larger boards would rather organise meaningless, but profitable bi-latteral series during the period that would be used for the olympic games and potential qualifiers. Therefore they oppose any form of cricket being part of the olympic games, and that in turn causes small boards massive headaches as they struggle to get funding from their goverments that are more inclined to support global/olympic sports. This makes for example the Dutch board more reliant on the ICC and that in turn makes the ICC less inclined to increase funding. Holland will never be a large cricket market, it can't be, it's tiny. But if t20 went olympic the interest of goverments around the world would increase and Holland does have a large repatriation base and healthy sports infrastructure which could see the team steadily improve. Nevermind the other countries who's interest would be peeked enough to increase the funding of their own boards, taking strain of the ICC

  • Cricarf on March 23, 2014, 22:17 GMT

    I think the main issue here is theres no love or following for the game in Holland as there is in countries such as Nepal and as long as thats the problem they will have to rely on expats to make up the team which is sad

  • on March 23, 2014, 16:27 GMT

    Brilliant piece. Hope the ICC does not reduce funding to countries such as Holland and PNG who failed to qualify for the WC. In fact what the ICC could do is increase the countries getting ODI and T20 status!

  • No featured comments at the moment.

  • on March 23, 2014, 16:27 GMT

    Brilliant piece. Hope the ICC does not reduce funding to countries such as Holland and PNG who failed to qualify for the WC. In fact what the ICC could do is increase the countries getting ODI and T20 status!

  • Cricarf on March 23, 2014, 22:17 GMT

    I think the main issue here is theres no love or following for the game in Holland as there is in countries such as Nepal and as long as thats the problem they will have to rely on expats to make up the team which is sad

  • A.Kessell on March 24, 2014, 3:47 GMT

    The main problem is that the larger boards would rather organise meaningless, but profitable bi-latteral series during the period that would be used for the olympic games and potential qualifiers. Therefore they oppose any form of cricket being part of the olympic games, and that in turn causes small boards massive headaches as they struggle to get funding from their goverments that are more inclined to support global/olympic sports. This makes for example the Dutch board more reliant on the ICC and that in turn makes the ICC less inclined to increase funding. Holland will never be a large cricket market, it can't be, it's tiny. But if t20 went olympic the interest of goverments around the world would increase and Holland does have a large repatriation base and healthy sports infrastructure which could see the team steadily improve. Nevermind the other countries who's interest would be peeked enough to increase the funding of their own boards, taking strain of the ICC

  • on March 24, 2014, 5:10 GMT

    Best of luck for the upcoming matches, go a head and proud us Associate countries.

  • SuperSharky on March 24, 2014, 9:09 GMT

    I love it when the associates beat the bullies once in a while. It gives meaning to the game cricket and that extra spice witch makes the sport more enjoyable viewing. It's really sad that the greed for money is making these associate teams future uncertain. I still remember the good old days when 4 of the associate teams could compete against the full members in ICC events.