The Heavy Ball

BCCI composes FAQ in transparency bid

Indian board attempts to improve its image by becoming more accessible

R Rajkumar
03-Nov-2011
In what appears to be a major public relations coup aimed at addressing recent allegations of a lack of transparency, the Board of Control for Cricket in India has decided to draft an FAQ to help answer queries and improve its image with the public. The FAQ currently contains questions the BCCI says it is most frequently inundated with on its website. The following is a sampling.
What does the "I" in BCCI stand for?
Your guess is as good as ours. It appears to be something left over from generations past, when the organisation stood for something. Something else, we mean, back in the days when it hadn't evolved as yet into the success that we clearly are today. We've chosen to let the mysterious "I" be for the time being, though some say it now stands for "Inconceivable." Others say it stands for "India", which is silly, because that implies our influence is limited to just one country.
Why is India the only team that has the sponsor's name appearing larger than the team's name on the players' jerseys?
Simple. Chances are you already know which nation's team is playing the game when you turn on the TV. Or are you that stupid that you have to see it plastered over the uniform of each player? No, didn't think so. But not too many people know who the sponsor of the team is. Therefore, the sponsors deserve the greater exposure. We are nothing if not equal opportunity here at the BCCI.
Full post
How to gloat with class

Every Indian fan must memorise these tips before approaching any disconsolate England fan

Sidin Vadukut
31-Oct-2011
First of all, dear readers, I would like to wish all of you a happy, if belated, Diwali. Diwali is a time for great joy and sulphurous gases in India. This is the time of the year when we blow up things to celebrate the symbolic victory of good over evil. Indeed, the literal translation of the word Diwali in Sanskrit is "a festival to remind you of fire insurance".
For Indian cricket fans this Diwali was doubly sweetened by the stupendous performance of their ODI team against England. I don't know if you were able to keep track of the results, but the eventual scoreline of the five-match series was 5-0, with India winning all five matches. India won the first, second, third, fourth and fifth matches, while England lost the first, second, third, fourth and... wait... yes, the fifth match as well. For a brief moment during the third match, in Mohali, it looked like England might win. But India won. And England lost.
Basically the point I am trying to make is that India won all their matches, as opposed to England, who did not win any.
Full post
Cricket losing popularity in India

Country's cricket fans endure the absence of live games and the threat from a new sport

R Rajkumar
20-Oct-2011
Renewed efforts are being made to give a much-needed boost to cricket in India after a study commissioned by the ICC recently found the sport was suffering from a lack of exposure, and was, in fact, showing unmistakable signs of marginalisation in the country.
The controversial report threw up many uncomfortable truths for cricket administrators trying their best to raise the profile of the game in countries where cricket continues to struggle to gain a foothold. For example, it was found that in spite of their best efforts, there were still as many as 11 days last year that failed to offer a telecast of some form of live cricket in India. Just as confounding was the discovery that during the 354 days in which live matches were shown, ratings plummeted steadily, in some cases even lagging behind reruns of Masterchef Afghanistan.
The report also highlighted other problem areas. While it would appear that the basic infrastructure for the game in India has, after decades of struggle, just about been put into place, and a national team finally been scratched together from far-flung regions across this vast land, these are but surface details that flatter to deceive.
Full post
If Steve Jobs had run cricket

The sport would have been played in pristine outfits, by beautiful people who'd get all their problems solved by someone smarter than the umps

Many worldly scholars have often wondered what the world would have been like had Steve Jobs been given the chance to run it. Naturally, we went a step further. Where would cricket be had Jobs been at the helm? We suspect it would have ended up a publicly listed entity with insanely priced stock. And that it would have spread like wildfire to all corners of the globe, even enjoying a brief stint as the world's most popular sport. New formats would have been unveiled and discontinued. And the governing body would have become wildly popular (imagine that).
It's all in the "i"
The little "i" has served to add a sense of mystique to all Apple products. So rebranding the ICC as iCC wouldn't really have made a huge difference. After all, what are ICC decisions if not mysterious and confusing enough to alienate half the cricket population? But it would have made cricket cool to the Americans.
All whites
All cricket matches would have been played in whites - with a hint of a silvery glow. Boards would have been expected to pay more if they wanted coloured clothing.
Full post

Showing 241 - 250 of 536