Matches (21)
IPL (3)
Pakistan vs New Zealand (1)
NEP vs WI [A-Team] (1)
County DIV1 (4)
County DIV2 (3)
WT20 Qualifier (4)
RHF Trophy (4)
PAK v WI [W] (1)
News

'I have nothing to worry' - Srinivasan

N Srinivasan, the ICC chairman and sidelined BCCI president, is confident that the Mudgal report on the IPL 2013 spot-fixing saga has nothing incriminating against him

N Srinivasan: 'Even if there was 10% of evidence against me, the court would have pointed that out'  •  AFP

N Srinivasan: 'Even if there was 10% of evidence against me, the court would have pointed that out'  •  AFP

N Srinivasan, the ICC chairman and sidelined BCCI president, is confident that the Mudgal report on the IPL 2013 spot-fixing saga has nothing incriminating against him. The Supreme Court of India had named Srinivasan and three others on Friday in connection with the report, which, the court observed, had suggested several "misdemeanours".
Srinivasan - along with IPL COO Sundar Raman, Chennai Super Kings official Gurunath Meiyappan and Rajasthan Royals co-owner Raj Kundra - was given four days to raise objections with any of the findings of the report pertaining to him, as he thought necessary.
"The honourable Supreme Court has not said anything against me. I also do not think there is any evidence against me. If there was anything against my report, the order would have been different," Srinivasan told the Mumbai Mirror. "You may see the report. Prima facie, there is not stricture or observation against me. I've nothing to worry."
When asked by the BCCI lawyer about whether Srinivasan could contest the BCCI election scheduled for November 20, one of the presiding judges, TS Thakur had said, "We cannot give clarity on whether you can contest or not until this matter is disposed of."
Srinivasan said if the Mudgal report had "found evidence" against him, the court would have reacted differently. "Even if there was 10% of evidence against me, the court would have pointed that out," he said. "I am sure the investigators have not found anything against me."
He also reiterated that he cannot be blamed for what Gurunath - who is also his son-in-law - may or may not have done. "I am not responsible for anything that others do. If Gurunath has done something, you investigate and take action against him. I can't be held responsible for others' acts."