Most Impactful Batters of the Series (Only T20s)The Batting/Bowling Impact is a factor not only of the runs scored/wickets taken/economy rate, but also of the pressure under which these performances happened.
Player | Team | Batting Impact | BI/inn | Inns | Runs | Impact Runs |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TSK | 585.2 | 73.1 | 8 | 420 | 479.8 | |
SF | 436.3 | 48.4 | 9 | 306 | 351.4 | |
WSF | 432.9 | 48.1 | 9 | 336 | 370.9 | |
WSF | 372.9 | 41.4 | 9 | 336 | 355.9 | |
SEO | 295.7 | 49.2 | 6 | 225 | 256.6 | |
TSK | 269.7 | 33.7 | 8 | 293 | 289.7 | |
SF | 264.2 | 33 | 8 | 204 | 233 | |
SF | 227.4 | 45.4 | 5 | 170 | 193.7 | |
MI NY | 218.8 | 36.4 | 6 | 162 | 187.7 | |
LAKR | 186.6 | 31.1 | 6 | 129 | 152.6 | |
SEO | 172.8 | 24.6 | 7 | 170 | 178.7 | |
LAKR | 172.4 | 28.7 | 6 | 158 | 159.1 | |
MI NY | 169.8 | 24.2 | 7 | 180 | 180.6 | |
WSF | 161.4 | 32.2 | 5 | 153 | 153.2 | |
SF | 160.3 | 20 | 8 | 169 | 167.9 | |
SF | 146.8 | 16.3 | 9 | 157 | 155 | |
TSK | 145.6 | 29.1 | 5 | 120 | 132.6 | |
LAKR | 142.6 | 23.7 | 6 | 163 | 161.5 | |
SF | 126.9 | 15.8 | 8 | 111 | 118.5 | |
WSF | 110.7 | 15.8 | 7 | 99 | 103.6 | |
TSK | 106 | 15.1 | 7 | 147 | 132.5 | |
WSF | 105.7 | 15.1 | 7 | 153 | 127.6 | |
SEO | 104.3 | 17.3 | 6 | 97 | 105.9 | |
MI NY | 94.9 | 23.7 | 4 | 85 | 91.2 | |
MI NY | 75.9 | 10.8 | 7 | 133 | 117.4 | |
SF | 67.1 | 9.5 | 7 | 81 | 75 | |
LAKR | 66.7 | 16.6 | 4 | 64 | 67.7 | |
SEO | 64.6 | 16.1 | 4 | 111 | 93.9 | |
WSF | 61 | 15.2 | 4 | 78 | 72 | |
LAKR | 60.5 | 15.1 | 4 | 60 | 62.8 | |
LAKR | 60.2 | 12 | 5 | 84 | 75.9 | |
LAKR | 59.1 | 9.8 | 6 | 81 | 74.3 | |
SEO | 57.4 | 14.3 | 4 | 89 | 81.2 | |
LAKR | 55.3 | 27.6 | 2 | 26 | 40 | |
TSK | 47.5 | 7.9 | 6 | 94 | 77.1 | |
WSF | 45.2 | 11.3 | 4 | 42 | 42.4 | |
MI NY | 42.2 | 14 | 3 | 35 | 39.1 | |
TSK | 33.1 | 5.5 | 6 | 83 | 59.7 | |
WSF | 32.6 | 32.6 | 1 | 33 | 34.3 | |
MI NY | 28.9 | 5.7 | 5 | 49 | 44.6 | |
SEO | 27.7 | 6.9 | 4 | 28 | 28.3 | |
LAKR | 26.6 | 8.8 | 3 | 13 | 16.2 | |
TSK | 24.2 | 24.2 | 1 | 17 | 19.1 | |
SEO | 23.3 | 4.6 | 5 | 44 | 33.8 | |
MI NY | 22.4 | 3.2 | 7 | 63 | 47.1 | |
MI NY | 20.8 | 20.8 | 1 | 14 | 16.1 | |
MI NY | 19.9 | 4.9 | 4 | 40 | 32.3 | |
TSK | 19.3 | 9.6 | 2 | 24 | 22.7 | |
MI NY | 15.9 | 7.9 | 2 | 14 | 16.4 | |
MI NY | 15 | 7.5 | 2 | 18 | 17.9 | |
LAKR | 14.9 | 2.4 | 6 | 27 | 22 | |
SEO | 14.5 | 4.8 | 3 | 29 | 24.3 | |
MI NY | 14.5 | 3.6 | 4 | 26 | 21.8 | |
SEO | 14.1 | 7 | 2 | 9 | 11.4 | |
LAKR | 13.3 | 6.6 | 2 | 11 | 12.6 | |
TSK | 12.7 | 6.3 | 2 | 7 | 9 | |
SEO | 12.5 | 12.5 | 1 | 15 | 15 | |
TSK | 12.2 | 4 | 3 | 13 | 12.3 | |
SF | 11.8 | 2.3 | 5 | 33 | 20.8 | |
SF | 10.6 | 5.3 | 2 | 20 | 17.3 | |
TSK | 10.2 | 5.1 | 2 | 12 | 12.4 | |
SF | 8.4 | 2.1 | 4 | 23 | 17.3 | |
LAKR | 6.1 | 6.1 | 1 | 12 | 10.3 | |
TSK | 4.3 | 0.6 | 7 | 50 | 32.5 | |
SEO | 4 | 1.3 | 3 | 24 | 15.8 | |
TSK | 3.7 | 3.7 | 1 | 6 | 5.6 | |
SF | 3.4 | 0.5 | 6 | 42 | 26.5 | |
SF | 3.4 | 3.4 | 1 | 6 | 5.1 | |
SEO | 3.3 | 3.3 | 1 | 5 | 5 | |
MI NY | 2.6 | 0.6 | 4 | 38 | 26.1 | |
LAKR | 2.6 | 1.3 | 2 | 15 | 6.4 | |
SEO | 2.3 | 1.1 | 2 | 20 | 13 | |
MI NY | 2.2 | 0.7 | 3 | 27 | 21.1 | |
SEO | 1.9 | 0.4 | 4 | 27 | 16.3 | |
SF | 1.2 | 0.6 | 2 | 6 | 1.8 | |
SEO | 0.8 | 0.2 | 3 | 10 | 3 | |
TSK | 0.6 | 0.6 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |
MI NY | 0.5 | 0.5 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |
LAKR | 0.5 | 0.5 | 1 | 4 | 0.8 | |
MI NY | 0.5 | 0.2 | 2 | 1 | 0.7 | |
TSK | 0.2 | 0.2 | 1 | 4 | 1.9 | |
TSK | 0.1 | 0.1 | 1 | 2 | 0.8 | |
SF | -0.9 | -0.9 | 1 | 0 | -0.6 | |
SF | -3.5 | -3.5 | 1 | 5 | -2.8 | |
SEO | -5.5 | -1.9 | 3 | 12 | 4.3 | |
SEO | -5.7 | -1.9 | 3 | 14 | 4.9 |
Developed in partnership with IITM CESSA
Top Wicket Takers
15
Innings: 7Average: 13.46
12
Innings: 6Average: 6.08
11
Innings: 7Average: 19.27
Top Run Scorers
420
Innings: 8Average: 52.50
336
Innings: 9Average: 48.00
336
Innings: 9Average: 56.00
Tournament Fan Ratings
Instant answers to T20 questions