Dalmiya blames Zee and ESS in telecast row

Jagmohan Dalmiya, the president of the Indian cricket board, has blamed Zee Telefilms and ESPN-Star Sports, the opposing parties in the telecast-rights issue, for putting the Australian series in jeopardy. Dalmiya felt that the TV channels had placed their commercial interests ahead of the public interest for the game.

Dalmiya's comments came in the wake of the battle for TV rights to telecast international matches in India for the next four years. Addressing a press conference in Kolkata, Dalmiya revealed that the BCCI had been "pushed back to the wall" and had "no elbow-room" to arrive at a solution.

"We need TV channels for the telecasting of the matches. But they are not ready to come to an agreement so that we can ensure the live coverage of the matches. We require TV channels, but cricket is supreme."

Dalmiya reiterated that the board was trying its best to ensure that the series was telecast live, and said that they had proposed four options to Zee and ESS. "We are making necessary arrangements. We will make an announcement within the next few days."

The first option was to submit fresh bids before the Mumbai High Court whereby rights could be awarded to the highest bidder. The second option was the division of the four-year telecast period into two parts. That would mean that the upcoming three cricket series will be segregated from the total period under consideration. Dalmiya added: "The four-year TV rights contract would then have commenced from May 2005."

As a third option, the TV companies were asked to submit tenders for the coverage of only these three cricket series. The final option was for the BCCI to produce the television coverage of these matches on its own.

Dalmiya also said that the board had tried to convince the ICC about holding the series without TV coverage. "In a letter to the BCCI, the Australian Cricket Board even threatened not to come and play in India," Dalmiya said. "If there was no television coverage. So, we had no option before us other than cancelling the whole tender process."